
- 99 installs
- 80 repo stars
- Updated May 18, 2026
- manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
linkedin is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Linkedin by the numbers
- 99 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #4,392 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill linkedinAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 99 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 80 |
| Last updated | May 18, 2026 |
| Repository | manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
Workspace Context
Read bootstrap context before asking questions: strategy/brand.md for brand, audience, offer, channels, tools, constraints, and metrics; about/me.md for personal voice; content/ideas.md and content/calendar.md for content planning. Use legacy product-marketing context files only as fallback. Save generated drafts to content/<platform>/drafts/YYYY-MM-DD_short-topic-slug.md, and route durable learnings back to strategy/brand.md, about/me.md, or content/ideas.md.
Operating Contract
This skill is self-contained for its frontmatter scope: use its local instructions, references, scripts, and assets as the playbook; ask only for missing task-specific inputs; hand off to adjacent skills instead of expanding scope; and return an actionable artifact, decision, plan, draft, or diagnostic.
Two modes — often used together:
1. Profile Audit — analyze and optimize your LinkedIn profile (photo, headline, About, experience, skills, SSI, engagement rate) 2. Content Creation — write high-engagement posts, build thought leadership, grow your audience
Check for strategy/brand.md and about/me.md before starting. If they exist, use them to calibrate voice, audience, and positioning.
---
Mode 1: Profile Audit
Analysis Types
- Full Profile Audit — all elements, complete report with scores
- Quick Profile Review — priority action items and quick wins only
- Visibility Optimization — keyword/SEO discoverability
- Content Strategy Analysis — posting frequency, engagement performance
Accessing LinkedIn via Chrome DevTools
Requires LinkedIn profile open in Chrome, user logged in.
| Tool | MCP Name | Use For |
|---|---|---|
| List Pages | mcp__chrome-devtools__list_pages | Find LinkedIn tab |
| Select Page | mcp__chrome-devtools__select_page | Focus tab |
| Snapshot | mcp__chrome-devtools__take_snapshot | Accessibility tree with UIDs |
| Screenshot | mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot | Photo and banner analysis |
| Navigate | mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page | Go to URLs |
| Click/Hover | mcp__chrome-devtools__click / hover | Interact with elements |
Workflow: list_pages → find linkedin.com/in/ → select_page → take_snapshot → take_screenshot → hover lazy-loaded sections → re-snapshot.
Playwright fallback: If Chrome DevTools unavailable, use mcp__playwright__browser_* equivalents.
Sections to analyze: photo, banner, headline, About, custom URL, experience, education, skills/endorsements, recommendations, featured section, activity/posts, followers/connections, groups.
Common errors:
| Error | Recovery |
|---|---|
| LinkedIn tab not found | Ask user to open LinkedIn in Chrome |
| Content not loading | Scroll, increase timeout, refresh |
| Rate limited/CAPTCHA | Pause 30+ seconds, proceed slowly |
| SSI requires Sales Navigator | Note unavailable, provide estimation |
Profile Scoring
| Category | Weight | Key Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Identity | 15% | Photo quality, banner, consistency |
| Headline | 15% | Value proposition, keywords, memorability |
| About Section | 15% | Story, keywords, CTA |
| Experience | 20% | Completeness, achievements, metrics |
| Skills & Endorsements | 10% | Relevance, count, endorsements |
| Recommendations | 10% | Quality, diversity, recency |
| Activity & Content | 15% | Posting frequency, engagement rate |
Score guide: 90–100 Elite · 80–89 Excellent · 70–79 Good · 60–69 Average · <60 Needs Work
Mandatory Metrics
Engagement Rate:
(Reactions + Comments + Shares) / Impressions × 100Target: 3%+. Example: (15+1+0)/1,376×100 = 1.16% → below target.
SSI Score (target: 70+/100):
- User visits
linkedin.com/sales/ssito share actual score, OR - Estimate: All-Star + active + engaged network → 70–85; complete + regular posting → 55–70; basic + occasional → 40–55
Profile Element Best Practices
Photo: 400×400px min, professional attire, approachable expression, face 60–70% of frame, clean background.
Banner (1584×396px): Branded, value proposition text, no small text or clutter.
Headline (220 chars): [Who you are] | [Problems you solve] | [Benefit/result] | [Keywords]
- ❌ "Marketing Manager"
- ✅ "Marketing Manager | Helping B2B Companies Grow Through Data-Driven Strategies | 45% Revenue Increase Specialist"
About (2,600 chars): Hook → story → what you do/who you help → achievements with metrics → skills → CTA. First person, short paragraphs, relevant keywords.
Experience: Quantified achievements (%, $, #), scope, key projects demonstrated.
Featured: 3–6 curated items — portfolio, case studies, articles, lead magnets.
Audit Report Structure
1. Executive Summary 2. Classification (Industry, Profile Type, Target Audience) 3. Profile Scorecard 4. Calculated Metrics (Engagement Rate, SSI) 5. Element-by-Element Analysis 6. Quick Wins (high impact, low effort) 7. Strategic Recommendations 8. 30-60-90 Day Action Plan
See references/scoring_framework.md, references/metrics_benchmarks.md, and assets/profile_audit_template.md for detailed criteria, industry benchmarks, and report templates.
Industry tone calibration: Conservative industries (Legal, Finance, Healthcare) → formal tone, 2–3x/week, minimal emojis. Progressive industries (Tech, Marketing, Startups) → casual/personal, 4–5x/week, emojis acceptable.
---
Mode 2: Content Creation
Core Principles
Authenticity over performance. LinkedIn readers instantly spot manufactured vulnerability and engagement bait. What resonates is genuinely useful or genuinely human.
- Real experiences with honest reflection
- Specific insights from your actual work
- Admitting what you don't know
- ❌ Performed vulnerability for engagement
- ❌ Stories that feel too perfectly structured
One idea per post. If you have five points, that's five posts.
Value without strings. Ask: "Would I find this valuable if a stranger posted it?"
Post Anatomy
[HOOK — first 1-2 lines] ← Visible before "...see more" (~210 chars)
...see more
[BODY — story or value]
- Short paragraphs (1-2 sentences)
- Line breaks for readability
[CTA — last 1-2 lines]
#hashtags (3-5, at the end)Character limits:
| Element | Limit |
|---|---|
| Post text | 3,000 chars |
| Visible before "see more" | ~210 chars |
| Comment | 1,250 chars |
| Headline | 220 chars |
| About section | 2,600 chars |
Hook Formulas
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Honest admission | "I've been wrong about remote work." |
| Specific observation | "I've noticed something in every founder who scaled past $10M." |
| Direct challenge | "Most career advice optimizes for the wrong thing." |
| Unexpected angle | "The best hire I made had the worst resume." |
| Contrarian opinion | "Unpopular opinion: code reviews are a waste of time." |
| Personal story | "I got fired on a Tuesday. Best thing that ever happened." |
| List promise | "I've hired 200+ engineers. Here are 5 red flags I look for." |
Hooks to retire:
❌ "This one thing made me $X"
❌ "The CEO pulled me aside and said..."
❌ "I'm excited to announce..."
❌ "In today's rapidly evolving landscape..."
❌ Starting with a hashtag or emojiSee references/hooks.md for comprehensive examples.
Formatting
❌ Dense paragraph: "I learned something about leadership last week. My team was
struggling and instead of pushing harder, I removed scope. The result was incredible."
✅ LinkedIn formatted:
"I learned something about leadership last week.
My team was struggling with a deadline.
Instead of pushing harder, I removed scope.
The result?
We shipped faster.
And the quality was BETTER."Rules: one sentence per line, blank lines between paragraphs, numbered lists for tips, 3–5 hashtags at the very end (never inline), one emoji max.
Post Formats
Story Post (personal experiences, lessons):
[Honest admission or surprising outcome]
[One sentence of context]
[What happened — the tension]
[The turning point]
[What you learned]
[Question for reader]List Post (frameworks, actionable advice):
[Hook — clear value promise]
[Why this matters — one sentence]
1. [Point with brief context]
2. [Point with brief context]
3. [Point with brief context] (3-7 items max)
[Closing insight or question]Contrarian Post (challenging conventional wisdom):
[Your position, stated directly]
[The common belief you're challenging]
[Your reasoning — why you see it differently]
[Evidence or experience]
[Nuanced conclusion — acknowledge complexity]
[Invite discussion]Guardrails: Have genuine expertise, argue against ideas not people, offer an alternative, be open to being wrong.
Observation Post (industry insights, trends):
[What you've observed]
[Specific evidence or examples]
[Why it matters]
[Your interpretation]
[Question to test if others see it too]Content Pillars
Rotate through 3–5 pillars:
| Pillar | Example |
|---|---|
| Expertise | "5 database patterns every engineer should know" |
| Stories | "The hardest feedback I ever received" |
| Opinions | "AI won't replace engineers. Bad managers will." |
| Behind the scenes | "Here's our actual sprint retrospective format" |
| Curated insights | "I analyzed 500 job postings. Here's what changed." |
Algorithm Signals
| Signal | Impact |
|---|---|
| Dwell time | Very High — write posts people read fully |
| Comments | Very High — ask questions, create discussion |
| Saves | High — actionable, reference-worthy content |
| "See more" clicks | High — strong hook |
| External links in post | Negative — put links in comments instead |
| Editing within first hour | Negative |
| Posting >1x/day | Negative |
Link post workaround: Post without link → add link as first comment → edit post to say "Link in comments."
Vulnerability Guidelines
Share when: The experience taught something others can learn, you've processed it enough to offer perspective, it serves the reader.
Don't share when: The wound is still fresh, you're seeking sympathy not providing value.
Test before posting: Am I sharing to help others or to process my own feelings? Would I be comfortable if this went viral?
CTAs
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Genuine question | "What's the worst career advice you've received?" |
| Agreement check | "Agree or disagree?" |
| Experience ask | "Has this happened to you?" |
| Bookmark prompt | "Save this for your next [situation]" |
Avoid: "Comment YES if...", "Share this with 3 people", "Follow me for more" — engagement bait destroys trust.
Engagement Strategy
- First hour: Respond to every comment, ask follow-up questions to extend conversations
- Daily comments on others: Add insight, not just agreement — "Great post!" without substance builds nothing
- Posting schedule: Tue–Thu 7–8 AM, 12 PM, or 5–6 PM; avoid posting >1x/day
Anti-Patterns
- "I'm excited to announce..." (corporate speak)
- Humblebrags disguised as lessons
- Recycled viral formats (the Uber driver wisdom, the airport conversation)
- Every. Sentence. As. Its. Own. Line. (when overused)
- Hashtag stuffing (>5)
- Engagement pods (LinkedIn detects and penalizes)
Pre-Posting Checklist
- [ ] Hook: Would this stop MY scroll?
- [ ] Focus: Is there ONE clear idea?
- [ ] Value: Would I find this useful if someone else posted it?
- [ ] Authenticity: Does this sound like me, not "LinkedIn me"?
- [ ] Format: Short paragraphs, scannable with line breaks?
- [ ] CTA: Genuine engagement question (not bait)?
- [ ] Links: External links in comments, not the main post?
---
References
references/hooks.md— Complete hook patterns with examplesreferences/scoring_framework.md— Detailed profile scoring criteriareferences/metrics_benchmarks.md— Industry benchmarks for SSI, engagement, growthassets/profile_audit_template.md— Complete audit report templateassets/quick_review_template.md— Rapid assessment checklistassets/action_plan_template.md— 30-60-90 day roadmap template
LinkedIn Personal Branding Action Plan
Name: [NAME] Start Date: [DATE] Goal: [PRIMARY GOAL - e.g., "Establish thought leadership", "Attract job opportunities", "Generate leads"]
---
Current State Baseline
| Metric | Current | 30-Day Target | 90-Day Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profile Score | /100 | /100 | /100 |
| SSI Score | /100 | /100 | /100 |
| Connections | |||
| Followers | |||
| Weekly Profile Views | |||
| Weekly Impressions | |||
| Engagement Rate | % | % | % |
---
Phase 1: Foundation (Days 1-30)
Week 1: Profile Optimization
Goal: Complete profile overhaul
| Day | Task | Time | Done |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Update profile photo | 15 min | ☐ |
| 1 | Create/update banner image | 30 min | ☐ |
| 2 | Rewrite headline | 20 min | ☐ |
| 2 | Optimize About section | 45 min | ☐ |
| 3 | Update experience descriptions | 60 min | ☐ |
| 4 | Reorganize skills, pin top 3 | 15 min | ☐ |
| 4 | Request endorsements (5 people) | 15 min | ☐ |
| 5 | Set up Featured section | 30 min | ☐ |
| 5 | Request recommendations (3 people) | 20 min | ☐ |
Week 2: Content Foundation
Goal: Establish content pillars and schedule
| Day | Task | Time | Done |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Define 3-5 content pillars | 30 min | ☐ |
| 8 | Brainstorm 20 content ideas | 45 min | ☐ |
| 9 | Create first carousel post | 60 min | ☐ |
| 9 | Draft 3 text posts | 45 min | ☐ |
| 10 | Set up content calendar | 30 min | ☐ |
| 10 | Identify 50 key accounts to engage | 30 min | ☐ |
| 11 | Publish first post | 15 min | ☐ |
| 12 | Comment on 15 posts | 30 min | ☐ |
Week 3-4: Engagement Momentum
Goal: Build engagement habits
Daily Tasks:
- [ ] Comment on 10-15 posts (30 min)
- [ ] Respond to all comments on your posts (15 min)
- [ ] Send 5 connection requests (10 min)
Weekly Tasks:
- [ ] Publish 3 posts
- [ ] Send 1 recommendation request
- [ ] Join/engage in 1 relevant group
---
Phase 2: Growth (Days 31-60)
Week 5-6: Content Expansion
Goal: Increase posting frequency and variety
| Task | Frequency | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Publish posts | 5x/week | ☐ |
| Create carousel | 1x/week | ☐ |
| Record video | 1x/week | ☐ |
| Run poll | 1x/week | ☐ |
| Write article | 1x/2 weeks | ☐ |
Week 7-8: Network Growth
Goal: Expand reach and influence
| Task | Target | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Send strategic connection requests | 50/week | ☐ |
| Comment on influencer posts | 5/day | ☐ |
| Engage in LinkedIn groups | 3 groups | ☐ |
| Collaborate with peer (co-post/tag) | 2 collaborations | ☐ |
| Consider Creator Mode | Yes/No | ☐ |
---
Phase 3: Scale (Days 61-90)
Week 9-10: Thought Leadership
Goal: Establish authority
| Task | Deliverable | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Publish long-form article | 1 article | ☐ |
| Create signature content series | Series name + 3 posts | ☐ |
| Guest post or collaborate | 1 collaboration | ☐ |
| Consider newsletter launch | Yes/No | ☐ |
Week 11-12: Optimization & Systems
Goal: Sustainable growth system
| Task | Deliverable | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Analyze top-performing content | Report | ☐ |
| Refine content strategy | Updated plan | ☐ |
| Build content templates | 3 templates | ☐ |
| Create content batch process | Documented process | ☐ |
| Schedule next quarter planning | Calendar invite | ☐ |
---
Content Pillars & Topics
Pillar 1: [NAME]
Topic Ideas: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Pillar 2: [NAME]
Topic Ideas: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Pillar 3: [NAME]
Topic Ideas: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
---
Weekly Tracking Log
Week 1
| Metric | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Posts Published | ||||||
| Comments Made | ||||||
| New Connections | ||||||
| Profile Views |
What Worked:
What to Improve:
---
Monthly Review Questions
1. What content performed best? Why? 2. Which engagement tactics drove results? 3. What should I do more of? 4. What should I stop doing? 5. Am I on track for my goals? 6. What's my focus for next month?
---
Resources
Tools to Use:
- LinkedIn Analytics (native)
- SSI Dashboard (linkedin.com/sales/ssi)
- Canva (graphics)
- [Content scheduling tool]
Accounts to Follow: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Content Inspiration Sources: 1. 2. 3.
---
Success Criteria
30-Day Milestone
- [ ] Profile score: [X]+ /100
- [ ] Published: 12+ posts
- [ ] Engagement rate: [X]%+
- [ ] New connections: [X]+
60-Day Milestone
- [ ] SSI Score: [X]+
- [ ] Followers: [X]+
- [ ] Weekly impressions: [X]+
- [ ] Inbound messages: [X]+
90-Day Milestone
- [ ] Overall profile score: [X]+/100
- [ ] Consistent posting system
- [ ] Measurable brand presence
- [ ] [Goal-specific metric]
---
Review progress weekly. Adjust strategy based on results.
LinkedIn Profile Audit Report
Profile Information
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Profile Name | [NAME] |
| LinkedIn URL | [URL] |
| Audit Date | [DATE] |
| Profile Language | [PRIMARY] (Secondary: [SECONDARY if applicable]) |
⚠️ MANDATORY Classification
| Field | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Industry/Sector | [INDUSTRY] | Required - determines benchmarks |
| Profile Type | [Employee / Consultant / Freelancer / Entrepreneur / Job Seeker] | Required - affects recommendations |
| Target Audience | [Recruiters / Clients / Peers / Investors / Partners] | Required - shapes strategy |
| Geographic Focus | [Local / Regional / Global] | Affects language and content approach |
Auditor: Claude AI
---
Executive Summary
Overall Score: [X]/100 | Rating: [RATING]
[2-3 sentence summary of profile strengths and key areas for improvement]
Quick Stats
| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connections | [X] | 500+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Followers | [X] | Growing | ✅/⚠️ |
| Profile Views (weekly) | [X] | 50-100+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Post Impressions (7d) | [X] | 1,000+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Search Appearances | [X] | 30-50+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Recommendations | [X] | 5+ | ✅/⚠️ |
⚠️ MANDATORY: Calculated Metrics
Engagement Rate Calculation:
Raw Data: [X] reactions + [X] comments + [X] shares = [TOTAL] interactions
Impressions: [X]
Engagement Rate = [TOTAL] / [IMPRESSIONS] × 100 = [X.XX]%| Metric | Calculation | Result | Benchmark | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engagement Rate | ([R]+[C]+[S])/[I]×100 | [X.XX]% | 3%+ (industry: [INDUSTRY]) | ✅/🟡/🔴 |
Engagement Rate Interpretation:
- 🟢 5%+: Excellent - highly resonant content
- ✅ 3-5%: Good - meeting B2B benchmarks
- 🟡 1-3%: Average - room for improvement
- 🔴 <1%: Low - content strategy review needed
SSI Score:
| Component | Score | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Establish professional brand | [X]/25 | 20+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Find the right people | [X]/25 | 15+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Engage with insights | [X]/25 | 18+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Build relationships | [X]/25 | 18+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| TOTAL SSI | [X]/100 | 70+ | ✅/⚠️ |
If SSI not available: "SSI Score: Not provided - user should visit linkedin.com/sales/ssi" Estimated SSI: [X-Y] based on profile analysis
---
Profile Score Card
| Category | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Identity | /10 | 15% | |
| Headline | /10 | 15% | |
| About Section | /10 | 15% | |
| Experience | /10 | 20% | |
| Skills & Endorsements | /10 | 10% | |
| Recommendations | /10 | 10% | |
| Activity & Content | /10 | 15% | |
| TOTAL | 100% | /100 |
Score Interpretation:
- 90-100: 🟢 Elite (Top 1%)
- 80-89: 🟢 Excellent (Strong brand)
- 70-79: 🟡 Good (Room for improvement)
- 60-69: 🟡 Average (Missing optimizations)
- Below 60: 🔴 Needs Work
---
Profile Completeness Check
| Element | Status | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Profile Photo | ✅/❌ | High |
| Custom Banner | ✅/❌ | Medium |
| Custom Headline | ✅/❌ | High |
| About Section (500+ chars) | ✅/❌ | High |
| Current Position + Description | ✅/❌ | High |
| 2+ Past Positions | ✅/❌ | Medium |
| Education | ✅/❌ | Low |
| 5+ Skills | ✅/❌ | Medium |
| Location Set | ✅/❌ | Low |
| Custom URL | ✅/❌ | Low |
LinkedIn Status: [All-Star / Not All-Star]
---
Element-by-Element Analysis
1. Visual Identity | Score: /10
Profile Photo:
- Current: [Description]
- Score: [X]/10
- ✅ Strengths: [List]
- ⚠️ Issues: [List any issues]
- 💡 Recommendations: [Specific improvements]
Banner Image:
- Current: [Description]
- Score: [X]/10
- Dimensions: 1584x396px recommended
- ✅ Strengths: [List]
- ⚠️ Issues: [List any issues]
- 💡 Recommendations: [Specific improvements]
---
2. Headline | Score: /10
Current Headline:
[Copy exact headline]
Character Usage: [X]/220 ([Y]% utilized)
Formula Check:
| Element | Present | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Who you are | ✅/❌ | |
| What problems you solve | ✅/❌ | |
| Who you help (target audience) | ✅/❌ | |
| Key differentiator/result | ✅/❌ | |
| Relevant keywords | ✅/❌ |
Keyword Analysis:
- Target keywords for role: [List]
- Keywords present: [List]
- Missing keywords: [List]
Recommended Headlines:
Option 1 - Value-Focused:
[Full headline - 220 chars max]
Option 2 - Expertise-Focused:
[Full headline - 220 chars max]
Option 3 - Results-Focused:
[Full headline - 220 chars max]
---
3. About Section | Score: /10
Current About Section:
[Summary or key excerpts]
Character Usage: [X]/2,600 ([Y]% utilized)
Structure Analysis:
| Element | Present | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Compelling hook (first 3 lines) | ✅/❌ | |
| Personal story/journey | ✅/❌ | |
| What you do + who you help | ✅/❌ | |
| Quantified achievements | ✅/❌ | |
| Keywords integrated | ✅/❌ | |
| Call-to-action | ✅/❌ | |
| Contact information | ✅/❌ | |
| Proper formatting | ✅/❌ |
Recommended About Section:
[Full rewritten About section with all elements]---
4. Experience Section | Score: /10
Completeness Score: [X]/5 Quality Score: [X]/5 Total Positions: [X]
Current Roles:
| Role | Company | Duration | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Title] | [Company] | [X years] | ✅/❌ | /10 |
| [Title] | [Company] | [X years] | ✅/❌ | /10 |
Achievement Metrics Check:
| Position | Has Metrics | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| [Current role] | ✅/❌ | [List any metrics found] |
| [Previous role] | ✅/❌ | [List any metrics found] |
High-Priority Fixes: 1. [Position needing description] 2. [Position needing metrics] 3. [Media to add]
Recommended Experience Bullets: For [Role Title]:
- [Achievement-focused bullet with metric]
- [Achievement-focused bullet with metric]
- [Achievement-focused bullet with metric]
---
5. Skills & Endorsements | Score: /10
Total Skills: [X] (Target: 50+) Top 3 Pinned: [Skill 1] | [Skill 2] | [Skill 3]
Skills Gap Analysis:
| Category | Current Skills | Missing Skills |
|---|---|---|
| Core Role | [List] | [List] |
| Technical | [List] | [List] |
| Industry | [List] | [List] |
| Soft Skills | [List] | [List] |
Recommended Skills to Add: 1. [Skill] - [Reason] 2. [Skill] - [Reason] 3. [Skill] - [Reason] [Continue for 10-15 skills]
---
6. Recommendations | Score: /10
Received: [X] | Given: [X]
| Recommender | Role | Relationship | Date | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Name] | [Title] | [Relationship type] | [Date] | Brief/Detailed |
Gap Analysis:
- ✅/❌ Recent recommendations (within 2 years)
- ✅/❌ Diverse sources (managers, peers, clients, reports)
- ✅/❌ Specific achievements mentioned
- ✅/❌ Relevant to current goals
Recommendation Request Strategy: 1. [Person to ask] - [Why] - [Talking points to suggest] 2. [Person to ask] - [Why] - [Talking points to suggest] 3. [Person to ask] - [Why] - [Talking points to suggest]
---
7. Activity & Content | Score: /10
Posting Frequency: [X] posts/week Followers: [X] Engagement Rate: [X]% (Calculated: reactions+comments+shares / impressions × 100)
Content Analysis:
| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Posts/week | [X] | 3+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Avg Reactions | [X] | Varies | |
| Avg Comments | [X] | 5+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Engagement Rate | [X]% | 2-5% | ✅/⚠️ |
Content Format Performance:
| Format | Posts | Avg Engagement | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text | [X] | [X] | |
| Carousel | [X] | [X] | |
| Video | [X] | [X] | |
| Poll | [X] | [X] | |
| Link | [X] | [X] |
Best-Performing Topics: 1. [Topic] - [Why it works] 2. [Topic] - [Why it works]
Content Recommendations:
- Posting frequency: [Recommendation]
- Content pillars: [3-5 suggested pillars]
- Best posting times: [Recommendation based on audience]
- Format focus: [Which formats to prioritize]
---
8. Additional Sections
Featured Section:
- Items: [X]
- Quality: [Assessment]
- Missing: [Suggestions]
Services Section: (if applicable)
- Services listed: [X]
- Alignment with headline: ✅/❌
- Keyword optimization: ✅/❌
Certifications:
- Count: [X]
- Relevance: [Assessment]
- Suggestions: [List]
Publications:
- Count: [X]
- Recency: [Assessment]
Languages:
- Listed: [List]
- Recommendation: [If multilingual profile needed]
LinkedIn Features Status:
| Feature | Current | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Creator Mode | On/Off | [Recommendation] |
| Open to Work | On/Off | [Recommendation] |
| Providing Services | On/Off | [Recommendation] |
| Newsletter | On/Off | [Recommendation] |
| Verified Badge | Yes/No | [Recommendation] |
---
Keyword/SEO Analysis
Target Role Keywords: [List 5-10 keywords user should rank for]
Keyword Presence:
| Keyword | Headline | About | Experience | Skills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Keyword 1] | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ |
| [Keyword 2] | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ |
| [Keyword 3] | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ |
SEO Recommendations: 1. [Specific keyword to add where] 2. [Specific keyword to add where]
---
Quick Wins (Do This Week)
| # | Action | Time | Impact | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Action] | [X min] | High | 🔴 |
| 2 | [Action] | [X min] | High | 🔴 |
| 3 | [Action] | [X min] | High | 🔴 |
| 4 | [Action] | [X min] | Medium | 🟡 |
| 5 | [Action] | [X min] | Medium | 🟡 |
Total Time for Quick Wins: ~[X] minutes
---
Strategic Recommendations
Profile Optimization
| Recommendation | Priority | Effort | Impact | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Rec 1] | 🔴 High | Low | High | This week |
| [Rec 2] | 🔴 High | Medium | High | This week |
| [Rec 3] | 🟡 Medium | Low | Medium | This month |
Content Strategy
| Recommendation | Priority | Effort | Impact | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Rec 1] | 🔴 High | Medium | High | Ongoing |
| [Rec 2] | 🟡 Medium | Low | Medium | This month |
Engagement & Network
| Recommendation | Priority | Effort | Impact | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Rec 1] | 🔴 High | Low | High | Daily |
| [Rec 2] | 🟡 Medium | Medium | Medium | Weekly |
---
30-60-90 Day Action Plan
Days 1-30: Foundation
Week 1 (Quick Wins):
- [ ] [Action item with specific detail]
- [ ] [Action item with specific detail]
- [ ] [Action item with specific detail]
Week 2:
- [ ] [Action item]
- [ ] [Action item]
Week 3-4:
- [ ] [Action item]
- [ ] [Action item]
Month 1 Success Metrics:
| Metric | Current | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Profile views | [X] | [Target] |
| Engagement rate | [X]% | [Target]% |
---
Days 31-60: Growth
Focus Areas:
- [ ] [Focus 1]
- [ ] [Focus 2]
Key Actions:
- [ ] [Action item]
- [ ] [Action item]
Month 2 Success Metrics:
| Metric | Current | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Followers | [X] | [Target] |
| SSI Score | [X] | [Target] |
---
Days 61-90: Scale
Focus Areas:
- [ ] [Focus 1]
- [ ] [Focus 2]
Key Actions:
- [ ] [Action item]
- [ ] [Action item]
Month 3 Success Metrics:
| Metric | Current | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | [X]/100 | [Target]/100 |
| Inbound opportunities | [X] | [Target] |
---
Expected Results After Implementation
| Metric | Current | Expected (90 days) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profile Views | [X]/week | [X]/week | +[X]% |
| Search Appearances | [X]/week | [X]/week | +[X]% |
| Engagement Rate | [X]% | [X]% | +[X]% |
| SSI Score | [X] | [X] | +[X] |
| Inbound Messages | [X]/month | [X]/month | +[X]% |
---
Appendix: Optimized Content Examples
Rewritten Headline Options
1. [Full headline - characters: X/220] 2. [Full headline - characters: X/220] 3. [Full headline - characters: X/220]
Rewritten About Section
[Full optimized About section]Sample Experience Bullets
[Role Title] at [Company]:
- [Achievement bullet with metric]
- [Achievement bullet with metric]
- [Achievement bullet with metric]
---
Report generated by LinkedIn Personal Branding Skill For implementation support, request a follow-up session.
LinkedIn Quick Profile Review
Profile: [NAME] Date: [DATE] LinkedIn URL: [URL]
⚠️ MANDATORY Classification
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Industry/Sector | [INDUSTRY] |
| Profile Type | [Employee / Consultant / Freelancer / Entrepreneur / Job Seeker] |
| Target Audience | [Recruiters / Clients / Peers / Investors / Partners] |
---
Snapshot Score: [X]/100
| Element | Status | Priority Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Photo | ✅/🟡/🔴 | |
| Banner | ✅/🟡/🔴 | |
| Headline | ✅/🟡/🔴 | |
| About | ✅/🟡/🔴 | |
| Experience | ✅/🟡/🔴 | |
| Skills | ✅/🟡/🔴 | |
| Recommendations | ✅/🟡/🔴 | |
| Activity | ✅/🟡/🔴 | |
| Featured | ✅/🟡/🔴 |
Legend: ✅ Good | 🟡 Needs Work | 🔴 Critical
---
Key Metrics (MANDATORY)
| Metric | Value | Benchmark ([INDUSTRY]) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Followers | [X] | [Industry target] | ✅/⚠️ |
| Profile Views/week | [X] | [Industry target] | ✅/⚠️ |
| Post Impressions (7d) | [X] | 1,000+ | ✅/⚠️ |
| Engagement Rate | [X.XX]% | [Industry target]% | ✅/🟡/🔴 |
Engagement Rate Calculation: ([R] + [C] + [S]) / [I] × 100 = [X.XX]%
SSI Score: [X]/100 or "Not available - check linkedin.com/sales/ssi"
---
Quick Checklist
Profile Basics
- [ ] Professional headshot uploaded
- [ ] Custom banner image
- [ ] Custom URL set
- [ ] Contact info complete
- [ ] 500+ connections
Content Quality
- [ ] Headline has value proposition
- [ ] About section has hook + CTA
- [ ] Experience has achievements with metrics
- [ ] 5+ skills listed and endorsed
- [ ] At least 3 recommendations
Engagement
- [ ] Posted in last 7 days
- [ ] Featured section populated
- [ ] Active in comments
- [ ] Following relevant people/companies
---
Top 5 Quick Wins
1. [Win 1] - [Time estimate: X min] 2. [Win 2] - [Time estimate: X min] 3. [Win 3] - [Time estimate: X min] 4. [Win 4] - [Time estimate: X min] 5. [Win 5] - [Time estimate: X min]
Total estimated time: [X minutes]
---
Key Strengths
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]
- [Strength 3]
Priority Improvements
| Issue | Fix | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| [Issue 1] | [Solution] | High |
| [Issue 2] | [Solution] | High |
| [Issue 3] | [Solution] | Medium |
---
Recommended Next Steps
This Week: 1. [Action] 2. [Action] 3. [Action]
This Month: 1. [Action] 2. [Action]
---
For full analysis, request a Complete Profile Audit
LinkedIn Metrics Benchmarks
Table of Contents
1. Social Selling Index (SSI) 2. Profile Visibility Metrics 3. Content & Engagement Metrics 4. Network Growth Metrics 5. Content Performance by Format 6. Industry Benchmarks
---
Social Selling Index (SSI)
The SSI is LinkedIn's proprietary score (0-100) measuring social selling effectiveness over the last 90 days.
SSI Components (25 points each)
| Pillar | Description | How to Improve |
|---|---|---|
| Establish Professional Brand | Profile completeness, content sharing, follower engagement | Complete profile, share valuable content, grow followers |
| Find the Right People | Using search effectively, identifying prospects | Use advanced search, save leads, view relevant profiles |
| Engage with Insights | Sharing/engaging with relevant content | Comment thoughtfully, share industry news, publish content |
| Build Relationships | Connecting and nurturing relationships | Send personalized invites, respond to messages, engage regularly |
SSI Score Benchmarks
| Score Range | Level | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Elite | Top 10% |
| 70-79 | Strong | Top 25% |
| 60-69 | Good | Top 40% |
| 40-59 | Average | Typical LinkedIn user |
| Below 40 | Low | Underutilizing platform |
Target: Aim for 70+ SSI score minimum
How to Check SSI: Visit linkedin.com/sales/ssi
SSI Impact Statistics
- Users with high SSI generate 45% more opportunities
- 51% more likely to hit sales targets
- 78% outsell peers who don't use social selling
---
Profile Visibility Metrics
Profile Views
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly views | 50+ | Varies significantly by industry and activity |
| Monthly growth | 10%+ | Week-over-week improvement |
| Post-optimization spike | 2-3x | Expected after major profile updates |
Benchmark by Activity Level:
- Passive users: 10-30 views/week
- Active posters: 50-150 views/week
- Thought leaders: 200+ views/week
Search Appearances
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly appearances | 30+ | Depends on keyword optimization |
| Keyword ranking | Top 10 | For target role/industry keywords |
Factors Affecting Search Appearances:
- Keyword density in headline, About, and skills
- Profile completeness
- Engagement activity
- Connection network size
Post Impressions
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly impressions | 1,000+ | Varies by follower count and posting frequency |
| Per-post impressions | 200-500 | For accounts with <1K followers |
| Per-post impressions | 500-2K | For accounts with 1K-10K followers |
| Per-post impressions | 2K-10K+ | For accounts with 10K+ followers |
---
Content & Engagement Metrics
Engagement Rate Formula
Engagement Rate = (Reactions + Comments + Shares) / Impressions × 100Engagement Rate Benchmarks
| Rate | Level | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 8%+ | Excellent | Highly resonant content |
| 5-8% | Very Good | Above average engagement |
| 2-5% | Good | Healthy engagement (B2B target) |
| 1-2% | Average | Room for improvement |
| <1% | Low | Content not resonating |
Comment Benchmarks
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Comments per post | 5+ | Aim for meaningful discussions |
| Comment-to-reaction ratio | 1:10 | Higher ratio indicates stronger engagement |
| Response rate | 100% | Reply to all comments within 24 hours |
Share Metrics
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Share rate | 1%+ | Indicates highly valuable/shareable content |
| Saves | Track | LinkedIn doesn't show saves publicly |
---
Network Growth Metrics
Connection Metrics
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Connection count | 500+ | "500+" badge for credibility |
| Connection acceptance rate | 40%+ | Indicates profile appeal |
| Optimal acceptance rate | 60-80% | With personalized invites |
Follower Metrics
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Follower count | Growing | Quality over quantity |
| Monthly follower growth | 5-10% | Sustainable growth target |
| Follower-to-connection ratio | 1.5:1+ | Indicates content reach beyond network |
InMail/Message Metrics
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| InMail response rate | 15-25% | With personalized messages |
| Message open rate | 50%+ | For direct messages |
---
Content Performance by Format
Format Performance Rankings (2024-2025 Data)
| Format | Avg Engagement Rate | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-image carousel | 6.6% | How-to guides, lists, storytelling |
| Native documents (PDF) | 6.1% | In-depth guides, presentations |
| Native video | 5.6% | Personal stories, behind-the-scenes |
| Polls | 4.5% | Audience research, engagement |
| Text-only posts | 3.5% | Thought leadership, stories |
| Link posts | 2.5% | Sharing external content |
Video Metrics
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| View rate | 30-40% | Percentage of impressions that watch |
| Industry average | 35% | Benchmark for video performance |
| 3-second views | High | Initial hook success |
| Watch time | 50%+ | Content holding attention |
Optimal Content Lengths
| Format | Optimal Length |
|---|---|
| Text posts | 1,200-1,500 characters |
| Carousels | 8-12 slides |
| Videos | 30-90 seconds |
| Articles | 1,500-2,000 words |
---
Industry Benchmarks
Important: Always identify the user's industry first, then apply the relevant benchmarks below. The skill works for ANY professional profile.
How to Determine Industry Context
Ask the user or infer from their profile: 1. What industry/sector do they work in? 2. What is their target audience? 3. Are they B2B, B2C, or internal-facing? 4. Are they a consultant/freelancer or employee?
---
Technology & Software
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 3-5% | Technical audiences engage thoughtfully |
| Profile views/week | 40-80 | Higher during job market activity |
| SSI score | 65-75 | Network-focused |
| Top content | Technical tutorials, career insights, industry trends |
Key Keywords: Software Development, Engineering, Product Management, Agile, Cloud, DevOps, AI/ML, Data Science
---
Web3/Blockchain/Crypto
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 4-7% | Highly engaged niche community |
| Profile views/week | 50-100 | Active networking ecosystem |
| SSI score | 65-80 | Relationship-driven |
| Top content | Protocol updates, market analysis, technical deep-dives |
Key Keywords: Blockchain, Web3, DeFi, Smart Contracts, Solidity, DAO, Tokenomics
---
Finance & Banking
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 2-4% | More conservative engagement |
| Profile views/week | 30-60 | Quality over quantity |
| SSI score | 60-70 | Relationship-focused |
| Top content | Market insights, regulatory updates, thought leadership |
Key Keywords: Investment Banking, Asset Management, Private Equity, Risk Management, Financial Analysis, Compliance
---
Consulting & Professional Services
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 3-5% | Thought leadership valued |
| Profile views/week | 50-80 | Higher when marketing services |
| SSI score | 70-80 | Relationship-building critical |
| Inbound leads/month | 2-5 | From content and profile |
| Top content | Case studies, frameworks, client success stories |
Key Keywords: Strategy, Management Consulting, Advisory, Transformation, Implementation, Change Management
---
Marketing & Communications
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 4-6% | Creative content performs well |
| Profile views/week | 50-100 | High visibility expected |
| SSI score | 70-80 | Network and content focused |
| Top content | Campaign results, creative showcases, trends |
Key Keywords: Digital Marketing, Brand Strategy, Content Marketing, SEO, Social Media, Communications, PR
---
Sales & Business Development
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 3-5% | Relationship-building content works |
| Profile views/week | 60-120 | Prospecting activity drives views |
| SSI score | 75-85 | Highest SSI expectations |
| Top content | Sales tips, industry insights, success stories |
Key Keywords: Business Development, Account Management, Enterprise Sales, SaaS Sales, Partnerships, Revenue
---
Healthcare & Life Sciences
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 2-3% | More reserved professional culture |
| Profile views/week | 20-50 | Niche but targeted |
| SSI score | 55-65 | Lower platform adoption |
| Top content | Research updates, clinical insights, policy commentary |
Key Keywords: Healthcare, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, Biotech, Research, Patient Care
---
Legal
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 2-3% | Conservative engagement |
| Profile views/week | 25-50 | Targeted professional network |
| SSI score | 55-65 | Relationship over content |
| Top content | Legal updates, case analysis, regulatory changes |
Key Keywords: Corporate Law, Litigation, Compliance, Contracts, M&A, IP, Employment Law
---
Human Resources & Recruiting
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 4-6% | People-focused content resonates |
| Profile views/week | 50-100 | High platform activity |
| SSI score | 70-80 | Network-centric role |
| Top content | Hiring trends, workplace culture, career advice |
Key Keywords: Talent Acquisition, HR Strategy, People Operations, Learning & Development, Employee Experience
---
Education & Academia
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 3-5% | Knowledge-sharing valued |
| Profile views/week | 30-60 | Varies by role |
| SSI score | 55-70 | Growing adoption |
| Top content | Research findings, teaching insights, industry connections |
Key Keywords: Education, Research, Academic, Teaching, Curriculum, EdTech, Higher Education
---
Creative & Design
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 4-7% | Visual content performs well |
| Profile views/week | 40-80 | Portfolio visibility important |
| SSI score | 60-75 | Work speaks for itself |
| Top content | Portfolio pieces, design process, creative insights |
Key Keywords: UX Design, UI Design, Graphic Design, Brand Design, Creative Direction, Visual Design
---
Manufacturing & Operations
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 2-4% | More traditional industry |
| Profile views/week | 20-50 | Targeted networking |
| SSI score | 50-65 | Lower platform emphasis |
| Top content | Process improvements, industry trends, leadership |
Key Keywords: Operations, Supply Chain, Manufacturing, Logistics, Quality, Lean, Six Sigma
---
Nonprofit & Social Impact
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 4-6% | Mission-driven content resonates |
| Profile views/week | 30-60 | Varies by organization size |
| SSI score | 60-70 | Relationship-focused |
| Top content | Impact stories, cause awareness, volunteer opportunities |
Key Keywords: Nonprofit, Social Impact, Philanthropy, NGO, Fundraising, Community Development
---
Real Estate
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 3-5% | Local market content works |
| Profile views/week | 40-80 | Lead generation focus |
| SSI score | 65-75 | Relationship-driven |
| Top content | Market updates, property insights, investment tips |
Key Keywords: Real Estate, Property Management, Commercial Real Estate, Investment, Development
---
Entrepreneurship & Startups
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 5-8% | Founder stories resonate |
| Profile views/week | 60-120 | High visibility needed |
| SSI score | 70-85 | Network is everything |
| Top content | Founder journey, lessons learned, startup insights |
Key Keywords: Startup, Founder, Entrepreneur, Venture, Growth, Innovation, Bootstrapped
---
Competitor/Peer Analysis Framework
Use this framework to benchmark against top performers in your niche.
Identifying Benchmarks
Find 5-7 "aspirational profiles": 1. Leaders in your exact role/industry 2. People with 10,000+ followers in your niche 3. Active content creators in your space 4. People who regularly get inbound opportunities
Competitive Analysis Checklist
| Element | Your Profile | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | Gap Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headline (keywords) | ||||
| About section (hook quality) | ||||
| Follower count | ||||
| Avg. engagement per post | ||||
| Posting frequency/week | ||||
| Content formats used | ||||
| Featured section items | ||||
| Recommendations count | ||||
| Skills count |
Competitive Scoring (0-10 each)
| Dimension | Your Profile | Top Competitor | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual branding | |||
| Headline clarity | |||
| About persuasiveness | |||
| Experience depth | |||
| Content quality | |||
| Engagement levels | |||
| Network strength | |||
| TOTAL | /70 | /70 |
Action Items from Competitor Analysis
For each gap identified: 1. What specifically is the competitor doing better? 2. Can you replicate this approach? 3. How can you differentiate while improving? 4. What's a realistic timeline to close the gap?
---
Engagement Rate Deep Dive
Calculation Examples
Example 1 - Low Engagement:
Post: 1,376 impressions, 15 reactions, 1 comment, 0 shares
Engagement Rate = (15 + 1 + 0) / 1,376 × 100 = 1.16%
Status: 🔴 Below target (aim for 3%+)Example 2 - Good Engagement:
Post: 2,500 impressions, 75 reactions, 12 comments, 3 shares
Engagement Rate = (75 + 12 + 3) / 2,500 × 100 = 3.6%
Status: ✅ On targetExample 3 - Excellent Engagement:
Post: 5,000 impressions, 300 reactions, 45 comments, 20 shares
Engagement Rate = (300 + 45 + 20) / 5,000 × 100 = 7.3%
Status: 🟢 Excellent - viral potentialImproving Low Engagement
If engagement rate is below 2%: 1. Hook problem: First line not compelling enough 2. Content-audience mismatch: Topic doesn't resonate 3. Posting time: Wrong time for your audience 4. Format issue: Try different content format 5. CTA missing: Add clear call-to-action
Engagement Rate by Follower Count
| Follower Count | Expected Engagement Rate |
|---|---|
| Under 1,000 | 4-8% (small but engaged) |
| 1,000-5,000 | 3-5% (growth phase) |
| 5,000-10,000 | 2-4% (scaling) |
| 10,000-50,000 | 1.5-3% (broad reach) |
| 50,000+ | 1-2% (mass audience) |
Note: Higher follower counts typically have lower engagement rates due to audience dilution.
---
Tracking and Measurement Schedule
Daily Tracking
- Post engagement (reactions, comments)
- New connection requests
- Message responses
Weekly Tracking
- Profile views
- Post impressions
- Search appearances
- Follower growth
Monthly Tracking
- SSI score
- Overall engagement rate
- Top-performing content
- Network growth rate
- Goal progress
Quarterly Review
- Trend analysis
- Strategy adjustment
- Benchmark comparison
- Goal setting
---
KPI Dashboard Template
| Metric | Current | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SSI Score | _ /100 | 70+ | ⬜ |
| Profile Views/Week | _ | 50+ | ⬜ |
| Search Appearances | _ | 30+ | ⬜ |
| Engagement Rate | _% | 3%+ | ⬜ |
| Follower Count | _ | Growing | ⬜ |
| Connection Count | _ | 500+ | ⬜ |
| Posts/Week | _ | 3+ | ⬜ |
| Comments Given/Week | _ | 20+ | ⬜ |
Status Key:
- ✅ On target
- 🟡 Close to target
- 🔴 Needs improvement
LinkedIn Profile Scoring Framework
Table of Contents
1. Visual Identity Scoring 2. Headline Scoring 3. About Section Scoring 4. Experience Scoring 5. Skills & Endorsements Scoring 6. Recommendations Scoring 7. Activity & Content Scoring 8. Overall Score Calculation
---
Visual Identity Scoring (15% of total)
Profile Photo (0-10)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Professional headshot, excellent lighting, face fills 60-70% of frame, warm expression, clean background, industry-appropriate attire |
| 7-8 | Good quality photo, professional appearance, decent lighting, appropriate background |
| 5-6 | Acceptable photo, some issues with lighting/background/cropping, face visible |
| 3-4 | Low quality, unprofessional, distracting background, or poorly cropped |
| 1-2 | Very low quality, inappropriate, or barely visible |
| 0 | No photo or default avatar |
Photo Scoring Checklist (start at 10, subtract for issues):
- [ ] Face not clearly visible (-3)
- [ ] Sunglasses/hat obscuring face (-2)
- [ ] Cropped from group photo (-2)
- [ ] Distracting or cluttered background (-1)
- [ ] Photo appears outdated (>5 years) (-1)
- [ ] Poor lighting (too dark/bright/harsh shadows) (-1)
- [ ] Low resolution/blurry (-1)
- [ ] Unprofessional attire for industry (-1)
- [ ] Not smiling/unapproachable expression (-0.5)
- [ ] Face doesn't fill 60-70% of frame (-0.5)
Bonus Points:
- [ ] Verified badge visible (+0.5)
- [ ] Premium quality/studio lighting (+0.5)
- [ ] Perfect industry alignment (+0.5)
Red Flags (automatic deductions):
- Sunglasses or face partially hidden
- Group photo or cropped image
- Outdated photo (5+ years old)
- Unprofessional attire or setting
- Low resolution or blurry
- Logo or avatar instead of face
Banner Image (0-10)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Custom branded banner, clear value proposition, professional design, relevant to industry, includes tagline or key message |
| 7-8 | Custom banner, industry-relevant, professional appearance |
| 5-6 | Basic custom banner or relevant stock image |
| 3-4 | Low-quality banner or unrelated imagery |
| 1-2 | Distracting or unprofessional banner |
| 0 | Default LinkedIn banner |
---
Headline Scoring (15% of total)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Clear value proposition, includes target audience, specific results/benefits, relevant keywords, memorable, uses full 220 characters effectively |
| 7-8 | Good value proposition, includes role and expertise, some keywords |
| 5-6 | Describes role clearly, missing value proposition or target audience |
| 3-4 | Just job title and company, no differentiation |
| 1-2 | Vague or unclear, no useful information |
| 0 | Empty or default text |
Headline Formula Check:
- [ ] States who they are/what they do
- [ ] Identifies who they help (target audience)
- [ ] Explains value/benefit they provide
- [ ] Contains relevant keywords
- [ ] Differentiates from competitors
Example Scoring by Industry:
| Industry | Low Score (2-3) | Medium Score (5-6) | High Score (8-9) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tech | "Software Engineer" | "Software Engineer at Google" | "Senior Software Engineer |
| Finance | "Financial Analyst" | "Financial Analyst | Investment Banking" |
| Healthcare | "Nurse" | "Registered Nurse | ICU" |
| Legal | "Lawyer" | "Attorney | Corporate Law" |
| Marketing | "Marketing Manager" | "Digital Marketing Manager | B2B SaaS" |
| HR | "Recruiter" | "Technical Recruiter | Startups" |
| Sales | "Sales Representative" | "Account Executive | Enterprise Software" |
| Consulting | "Consultant" | "Management Consultant | Strategy" |
---
About Section Scoring (15% of total)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Compelling hook in first 3 lines, clear story/journey, specific achievements with metrics, relevant keywords, strong CTA, proper formatting, uses most of 2,600 characters |
| 7-8 | Good structure, includes achievements, some metrics, clear offering |
| 5-6 | Describes role and experience, missing story or metrics, no CTA |
| 3-4 | Basic description, generic content, poor formatting |
| 1-2 | Minimal content, unclear value |
| 0 | Empty |
Structure Checklist:
- [ ] Hook (first 3 lines compelling)
- [ ] Personal story/journey
- [ ] What they do and who they help
- [ ] Specific achievements with numbers
- [ ] Skills and expertise areas
- [ ] Call-to-action (contact info, link, invitation)
Formatting Check:
- [ ] Short paragraphs (2-3 sentences)
- [ ] Strategic use of line breaks
- [ ] Emojis used sparingly and professionally
- [ ] Easy to scan
---
Experience Scoring (20% of total)
Completeness (0-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | All relevant positions listed, complete date ranges, company logos linked |
| 4 | Most positions listed, minor gaps |
| 3 | Key positions only, some gaps |
| 2 | Incomplete history, missing key roles |
| 1 | Only current/recent position |
| 0 | Empty |
Quality of Descriptions (0-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Quantified achievements (%, $, #), specific outcomes, keyword-rich, media attached |
| 4 | Clear achievements with some metrics, good descriptions |
| 3 | Descriptions present but generic, few metrics |
| 2 | Basic descriptions, job duties only |
| 1 | Minimal or no descriptions |
| 0 | Empty |
Achievement Checklist per Role:
- [ ] Quantified results (revenue, growth %, team size, etc.)
- [ ] Scope of responsibility clear
- [ ] Key projects mentioned
- [ ] Skills demonstrated
- [ ] Media attachments (if applicable)
---
Skills & Endorsements Scoring (10% of total)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | 50+ skills listed, top 3 pinned strategically, 99+ endorsements on key skills, skills align with target role keywords |
| 7-8 | 30-50 skills, good endorsement counts, relevant skills pinned |
| 5-6 | 15-30 skills, some endorsements, mostly relevant |
| 3-4 | 5-15 skills, few endorsements |
| 1-2 | Under 5 skills, minimal endorsements |
| 0 | No skills listed |
Skills Checklist:
- [ ] At least 5 skills listed (minimum for "All-Star" profile)
- [ ] Top 3 skills are most relevant to target role
- [ ] Skills include industry keywords
- [ ] Endorsements from credible connections
---
Recommendations Scoring (10% of total)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | 10+ recommendations, diverse sources (managers, peers, clients), recent (within 2 years), specific and detailed |
| 7-8 | 5-10 recommendations, good variety, mostly recent |
| 5-6 | 3-5 recommendations, some variety |
| 3-4 | 1-2 recommendations, limited scope |
| 1-2 | Single old or generic recommendation |
| 0 | No recommendations |
Quality Factors:
- Specificity (mentions projects, skills, outcomes)
- Relevance to current career goals
- Credibility of recommender
- Recency (within last 2 years preferred)
- Variety (different relationship types)
---
Activity & Content Scoring (15% of total)
Posting Frequency (0-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Posts 3+ times per week consistently |
| 4 | Posts 1-2 times per week |
| 3 | Posts 2-4 times per month |
| 2 | Posts occasionally (monthly or less) |
| 1 | Rarely posts (every few months) |
| 0 | No posting activity |
Engagement Quality (0-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | High engagement rate (5%+), active comments, meaningful discussions |
| 4 | Good engagement (2-5%), some comments and shares |
| 3 | Average engagement (1-2%), occasional interaction |
| 2 | Low engagement (<1%), few reactions |
| 1 | Minimal engagement |
| 0 | No engagement or activity |
Engagement Rate Calculation
Formula:
Engagement Rate = (Reactions + Comments + Shares) / Impressions × 100Calculation Example:
Post with: 1,376 impressions, 15 reactions, 1 comment, 0 shares
Engagement Rate = (15 + 1 + 0) / 1,376 × 100 = 1.16%
→ This is "Average" (1-2%) - needs improvementBenchmarks by Follower Count:
| Followers | Expected Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| <1,000 | 4-8% | Small but engaged audience |
| 1,000-5,000 | 3-5% | Growth phase |
| 5,000-10,000 | 2-4% | Scaling |
| 10,000+ | 1.5-3% | Broad reach, lower rates normal |
Content Checklist:
- [ ] Regular posting schedule
- [ ] Variety of formats (text, images, carousels, video, polls)
- [ ] Original thought leadership content
- [ ] Engagement with others' posts
- [ ] Responds to comments on own posts
---
Services Section Scoring (Bonus for Consultants/Freelancers)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | 3-5 well-defined services, keyword-rich titles, aligned with headline positioning, clear value propositions |
| 7-8 | Services listed with good descriptions, relevant to expertise |
| 5-6 | Basic services listed, generic descriptions |
| 3-4 | 1-2 services, poorly defined |
| 1-2 | Services enabled but empty or irrelevant |
| 0 | Not using Services section (may be appropriate for non-consultants) |
Services Checklist:
- [ ] Services section enabled (if consultant/freelancer)
- [ ] 3-5 services listed
- [ ] Service titles include target keywords
- [ ] Descriptions explain value/outcomes
- [ ] Aligned with headline and About section
- [ ] Pricing indication (optional but helpful)
Note: Services section is weighted as bonus points for consultants/freelancers. Not applicable for employees in corporate roles.
---
Featured Section Scoring (Bonus)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | 4-6 high-quality items, portfolio pieces, case studies, best content, lead magnets |
| 7-8 | 3-4 relevant items, good variety |
| 5-6 | 1-2 items, relevant but limited |
| 3-4 | Items present but outdated or irrelevant |
| 1-2 | Default items (profile sections) only |
| 0 | Featured section empty or not used |
Ideal Featured Items:
- Best-performing posts or articles
- Portfolio pieces or case studies
- Media appearances or interviews
- Lead magnets or free resources
- "Work with me" or services page
- Publications or research
---
Overall Score Calculation
Weighted Score Formula
Overall Score = (Visual × 0.15) + (Headline × 0.15) + (About × 0.15) +
(Experience × 0.20) + (Skills × 0.10) +
(Recommendations × 0.10) + (Activity × 0.15)Score Interpretation
| Score Range | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Elite | Top 1% profile, exceptional personal brand, thought leader status |
| 80-89 | Excellent | Strong professional presence, well-optimized, attracting opportunities |
| 70-79 | Good | Solid foundation, some gaps to address, above average |
| 60-69 | Average | Functional profile, missing key optimizations, room for improvement |
| 50-59 | Below Average | Significant gaps, not leveraging LinkedIn effectively |
| Below 50 | Needs Work | Major improvements required across multiple areas |
Priority Improvement Matrix
Based on score gaps, prioritize improvements:
1. Immediate fixes (if score < 5):
- Profile photo
- Headline
- About section hook
2. High-priority (if score < 7):
- Experience descriptions
- Featured section
- Skills pinning
3. Growth focus (if score 7-8):
- Content strategy
- Recommendations
- Engagement tactics
4. Excellence (if score 8+):
- Thought leadership content
- Newsletter launch
- Speaking opportunities
---
LinkedIn Features Assessment
Creator Mode Evaluation
| Criteria | Enable If | Keep Off If |
|---|---|---|
| Posting frequency | 3+ posts/week | Less than weekly |
| Content focus | Thought leadership | Job seeking primarily |
| Follower goal | Growing audience | Quality connections |
| Newsletter interest | Yes | No |
Open to Work Assessment
| Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Active job search | Enable (recruiters only) |
| Passive but open | Enable (recruiters only) |
| Not job seeking | Disable |
| Freelancer/Consultant | Use "Providing Services" instead |
Providing Services Assessment
| Criteria | Enable If |
|---|---|
| Freelancer/Consultant | Yes |
| Accepting new clients | Yes |
| Have clear service offerings | Yes |
| Want inbound leads | Yes |
Newsletter Evaluation
| Criteria | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Followers 1,000+ | Consider launching |
| Consistent content creator | Good candidate |
| Unique expertise to share | Strong candidate |
| Time to write weekly/biweekly | Required |
---
Profile Completeness Scoring
LinkedIn "All-Star" profile requires:
| Element | Required | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Profile photo | ✅ | 10 |
| Location | ✅ | 5 |
| Industry | ✅ | 5 |
| Current position (with description) | ✅ | 15 |
| Two past positions | ✅ | 10 |
| Education | ✅ | 10 |
| Skills (5+) | ✅ | 10 |
| Summary/About | ✅ | 15 |
| Connections (50+) | ✅ | 10 |
| Custom additions (bonus): | ||
| Custom URL | Recommended | +5 |
| Banner image | Recommended | +5 |
| Featured section | Recommended | +5 |
| Recommendations (3+) | Recommended | +10 |
---
Keyword Optimization Scoring
Keyword Density Check
For each target keyword, check presence in:
| Location | SEO Weight | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Headline | High | 1-2 keywords |
| About section | High | 3-5 keywords |
| Experience titles | Medium | Natural inclusion |
| Experience descriptions | Medium | 2-3 per role |
| Skills section | High | All relevant |
Keyword Research Process
1. Identify 5-10 keywords for target role/industry 2. Check current presence in profile 3. Analyze competitor profiles for keyword ideas 4. Map keywords to profile sections 5. Add naturally without keyword stuffing