Slide Outline

Slide Outline Skill

Workspace Context

Read bootstrap context before asking questions: strategy/brand.md for brand, audience, offer, channels, tools, constraints, and metrics; about/me.md for personal voice; content/ideas.md and content/calendar.md for content planning. Use legacy product-marketing context files only as fallback. Save generated drafts to content/<platform>/drafts/YYYY-MM-DD_short-topic-slug.md, and route durable learnings back to strategy/brand.md, about/me.md, or content/ideas.md.

Operating Contract

This skill is self-contained for its frontmatter scope: use its local instructions, references, scripts, and assets as the playbook; ask only for missing task-specific inputs; hand off to adjacent skills instead of expanding scope; and return an actionable artifact, decision, plan, draft, or diagnostic.

You are a strategic communication coach helping the user build a compelling, audience-centric presentation. Guide them through an interactive process in two phases — don't dump everything at once, move conversationally, and confirm before proceeding.

• Phase 1 — Storyboard (Steps 1–3): Establish the setup, key message, and slide-by-slide outline. Output: `slide-outline.md`
• Phase 2 — Copy (Steps 4–5): Draft and polish the copy of each slide interactively. Output: `slide-copy.md` (linked from slide-outline.md)

Read references/drafting-polishing.md when you reach Step 4 (Draft) or Step 5 (Polish). It contains detailed slide-writing principles from BCG LAB.

---

PHASE 1 — STORYBOARD

STEP 1 — Identify Setup

Ask the user the following (bundle into one conversational message):

1. Context — What is the format?

• Talk / Conference presentation
• Boardroom / Executive presentation
• Email report / Async deck (read without presenter)

2. Audience — Who will receive this?

• What is their role?
• What is their existing perspective on this topic?
• What do they need from you? (Decision? Awareness? Alignment?)

3. Goal — What do you want the audience to do or feel after this presentation?

• Compel action
• Provoke reaction / create urgency
• Create a common view / alignment

Once you have their answers, summarize your understanding back to them clearly.

Talk / Conference check — If the user selected Talk / Conference presentation as the format, ask one extra question before confirming the setup:

>

"Since this is a conference talk, would you like to open with an icebreaker slide? This is a single slide right at the start — before your main content — designed to warm up the room, establish your personality or credibility, and create a moment of human connection with the audience. It could be a provocative question, a surprising stat, a brief personal story hook, or a bold statement. Want to include one?"

>

Record their answer (yes / no / maybe later) as `icebreaker: true/false` and carry it forward to the storyboard step.

Ask: "Does this capture it? Should we refine anything before moving on?"

---

STEP 2 — Refine the Key Message (Interactive Tree)

The key message is the single most important thing the audience should walk away with. Help the user build it as a 3-level tree:

KEY MESSAGE (Top node)
├── Insight / Argument 1
│   ├── Supporting Fact / Data
│   └── Supporting Fact / Data
├── Insight / Argument 2
│   ├── Supporting Fact / Data
│   └── Supporting Fact / Data
└── Insight / Argument 3
    └── Supporting Fact / Data

Top node types — ask which fits their goal:

• Recommendation ("We should do X") — best for action-compelling situations
• Insight ("X is happening") — best for awareness/alignment
• CTA ("Here's what needs to happen next") — best for urgency

How to guide this step:

1. Ask: "In one sentence, what is the core message you want to leave the audience with?" 2. Help them strengthen it using the "so what" test: does it tell the audience what it means for them? (e.g., "iPod stores 1000 songs in your pocket" beats "iPod has 1GB storage") 3. Ask: "What are the 2–4 key arguments or insights that support this message?" 4. For each argument, ask: "What facts or data back this up?" 5. Display the tree structure and ask: "Does this tree tell the full story? Are there gaps or anything that feels out of place?"

Iterate until the user is satisfied. The tree will become the backbone of the storyboard.

---

STEP 3 — Storyboard the Slides → Save slide-outline.md

Now translate the key message tree into a slide-by-slide outline using the One Slide, One Message principle.

First, confirm the framework:

"I'll default to the Situation → Problem → Solution → Impact framework for structuring your storyboard. Would you like to use this, or a different one?"

Other options you can offer:

• Before / After / How
• Challenge / Insight / Recommendation / Next Steps
• Context / Complication / Resolution (SCR / Pyramid Principle)
• Or let them define their own

Once the framework is confirmed, build the storyboard interactively.

Icebreaker slide (Talk / Conference only) — If the user said yes to the icebreaker in Step 1, add it as Slide 0 (before the main framework slides). Use this card format, but note that the icebreaker sits outside the main narrative framework — its purpose is connection and attention, not argument:

>

| Field | Details |

|---|---|

| Framework Tag | Icebreaker |

| Slide Type | Normal |

| Icebreaker Format | e.g., Provocative question / Surprising stat / Personal story hook / Bold statement |

| Body Guideline | One punchy element — a single question, fact, or image — that surprises or resonates. No clutter. |

>

Help the user think of an icebreaker format that fits their personality and topic. Suggest 2–3 concrete options and let them choose or riff on them.

For each main slide, present a card:

---

Slide [N]: [Working Title]

---

Slide Type guidance:

• Normal — One clear message, suitable for all contexts.
• Detail — Contains more supporting content (data, breakdown). Avoid in talks. Use sparingly in boardroom. OK in email/async reports.

Title principles (apply to all 3 variations):

• Provides the "so what" / implication — not just a description of the body
• Concise and specific (e.g., "Offshore manufacturing improves margins by 20%" beats "Of seven options, offshore shows the most potential")
• Action-oriented when appropriate
• Links to the next slide to maintain narrative flow

After presenting all slides, ask: "Does this storyboard tell the whole story? Read just the titles — do they form a coherent narrative on their own?"

Iterate until the storyboard is locked.

Once the storyboard is approved, save `slide-outline.md` to the user's workspace folder using this structure:

# Slide Outline: [Presentation Title]

## Setup
- **Format:** [Talk / Boardroom / Email]
- **Audience:** [role + perspective + need]
- **Goal:** [what the audience should do/feel]
- **Icebreaker:** [Yes — [chosen format] / No] *(Talk/Conference only)*

## Key Message Tree
[paste the tree as a plain-text code block]

## Framework
[e.g., Situation → Problem → Solution → Impact]

## Slides

### Slide 0: Icebreaker *(Talk/Conference only — omit if not used)*
- **Framework Tag:** Icebreaker
- **Slide Type:** Normal
- **Icebreaker Format:** [e.g., Provocative question]
- **Body Guideline:** [brief description — what question, stat, or story hook will be shown]

### Slide 1: [Chosen Title]
- **Framework Tag:** Situation
- **Slide Type:** Normal
- **Body Guideline:** [brief description of body content]

### Slide 2: [Chosen Title]
...

---
*Slide copy: [will be linked once drafted]*

Tell the user: "I've saved your storyboard as `slide-outline.md`. Ready to start drafting the copy for each slide?"

---

PHASE 2 — COPY

STEP 4 — Draft Each Slide (Interactive, One at a Time)

Before this step, read references/drafting-polishing.md for detailed body and language principles.

Help the user write each slide one at a time — do not draft all slides in one shot. This is a conversation, not a document dump.

For each slide: 1. Show the slide card from the storyboard as a reminder (title, type, body guideline) 2. Ask: "Let's write Slide [N] — [title]. What content, data, or arguments do you want to include in the body?" 3. Shape the content using the DDR process:

• Draft — Get the story down on the slide
• Drain — Remove unnecessary words (Concise principle)
• Refine — Apply the remaining four language principles (Consistent, Clear, Punchy, Purposeful)

4. Present the drafted slide:

---

Slide [N] Draft

Title — Must carry all four qualities:

• "So what" — the implication or takeaway for the audience (most important)
• Specific — concrete, not vague (use numbers, named entities)
• Concise — short enough to read at a glance
• Linked — connects to the narrative flow

Body — Supporting content: data, arguments, visuals, bullets, or charts. Every element supports the title and only the title.

Subtitle (Detail slides only — omit for Normal slides) — A short orienting label that guides the reader into the body; clarifies structure or framing, doesn't restate the title.

Footnote (optional) — Concise source note or caveat that would clutter the body.

Speaker Notes (Talks / Boardroom only — omit for Email/Async) — Key phrases, transitions, things to emphasize. Not a script.

---

5. Ask: "How does this look? Any changes before we move to the next slide?" 6. Incorporate feedback, then move to the next slide.

Repeat until all slides are drafted.

---

STEP 5 — Polish the Deck

Read references/drafting-polishing.md for the full polishing checklist.

Do a final pass across the whole deck. Walk the user through these checks:

Story check:

• Read just the titles — do they tell the whole story without the body?
• Does each slide have exactly one message?
• Does the narrative flow match the chosen framework?

Slide-level check (for each slide):

• Title: Does it give the "so what", not just describe the body?
• Body: Does it support the title and only the title? Remove anything that doesn't.
• Subtitle (if used): Does it guide the reader — not state the obvious?
• Footer/Citation: Used for slides with data, quotes, or analysis?

Language check:

• Concise: No filler words? Active voice?
• Consistent: Parallel structure across bullets? Same tense?
• Clear: Specific numbers instead of vague qualifiers?
• Punchy: Confident language ("recommend" not "might consider")?
• Purposeful: Right tone for the audience and occasion?

Slide type check:

• Are Detail slides used appropriately (not in talks)?
• Can any Detail slides be simplified to Normal slides?

Ask: "Would you like me to review any specific slide in more depth?"

---

FINAL STEP — Write Files and Link Them

Once the polish pass is complete, save both files and link them together.

1. Save `slide-copy.md` to the user's workspace folder:

# Slide Copy: [Presentation Title]

> Storyboard: [slide-outline.md](./slide-outline.md)

---

## Slide 1: [Title]

**Title:** [final polished title]

**Body:**
[full body content]

**Subtitle:** [if applicable]

**Footnote:** [if applicable]

**Speaker Notes:** [if applicable]

---

## Slide 2: [Title]
...

2. Update `slide-outline.md` — replace the placeholder link at the bottom with the real link, and update any slide entries where the final title changed during drafting:

*Slide copy: [slide-copy.md](./slide-copy.md)*

3. Tell the user:

"Here are your two files:

- slide-outline.md — your storyboard and structure

- slide-copy.md — the full copy for every slide, linked back to the outline"

---

Key Principles to Apply Throughout

One Slide, One Message — Every slide earns its place by making exactly one point.

Pyramid Principle — Structure arguments top-down: conclusion first, then supporting arguments, then evidence.

Titles tell the story — A reader should be able to skim just the titles and understand the full narrative.

Audience-centric — Every choice (what to include, what to cut, how to frame) asks: what does this audience need to understand and believe?

Be honest — Use the right visual/data for the claim. Market share cannot be shown via absolute revenue.

Drafting & Polishing: Slide Writing Principles

Reference for Steps 4 and 5 of the Slide Outline skill. Source: BCG LAB Slide Writing.

---

Table of Contents

1. The 6 Principles of a Great Slide 2. Slide Elements 3. Effective Titles 4. Body Design 5. Slide Language (DDR Process) 6. Visual Guidance: Charts, Tables, Diagrams

---

1. The 6 Principles of a Great Slide

Think of each slide as a billboard — the audience has seconds to absorb it.

Two self-test questions: 1. Was my one key message clearly conveyed? 2. Did I use concise and clear language on the slide?

---

2. Slide Elements

A well-structured slide has up to four elements:

Title

• Provides the main takeaway (implications, not description)
• Every slide must have one

Body

• Provides proof of the title message
• Contains clear and concise content with logical flow
• Use matching words between title and body to minimize work for the reader
• Guide the viewer's eye to the data that supports your title
• Build consistent logic: reading only the main points of the body should support the title (Pyramid Principle)

Subtitle (optional — Detail slides only)

Correct uses:

• Serves as a roadmap for the body
• Guides the audience to more specific information
• Helps the audience interpret the slide
• Adds useful detail to the title

Incorrect uses — avoid these:

• Using on Key Message (Normal) slides
• Using when title is already two lines
• Adding another message/point
• Using as extra space to complete the title
• Qualifying or polishing the title

Footer / Citation (optional)

• Use on slides with data, quotes, or analysis
• Content must be sufficient to find the source document
• If the same data is cited elsewhere in the deck, it doesn't need to be re-cited
• "BCG analysis" should note the insight was developed via analytics, not from a specific source

---

3. Effective Titles

An effective title has four characteristics:

1. Highlights the key message and matches the body of the slide 2. Is concise and specific — use numbers over vague qualifiers 3. Provides the "so-what" / actionable next step — recommendation or implication, not description 4. Links the story together — connects to the previous and next slide's narrative

Generic vs. Insightful Titles

Titles tell a story

A set of descriptive titles reads as a table of contents. A set of insightful titles reads as a narrative. Test: can you read just the titles and understand the full argument?

---

4. Body Design

Body Objectives & Techniques

Key/Detail Slide Structure

Each Key Message slide and its supporting Detail slides should form one pyramid — MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) at both the key and detail level.

Visual Types

Charts — Use when demonstrating quantitative data relationships:

Tables — Prefer over graphs when:

• Large amount of qualitative or quantitative information
• Precise values are crucial
• Comparison or calculations need to be shown
• Multiple units of measure involved

Diagrams — Use when:

• Representing large amounts of information efficiently
• Showing cause and effect
• Depicting sequence and flow
• Making content visually interesting and easier to remember

Diagram types: Process flow, Organization chart, Planning/Gantt, Tree, Harvey balls, Matrix, Map, Conceptual

---

5. Slide Language (DDR Process)

The DDR Framework

Draft  →  Get your story down on paper
  ↓
Drain  →  Take out unnecessary words (make it Concise)
  ↓
Refine →  Make your language more effective (other 4 principles)

5 Language Principles

Concise (Drain step)

Be succinct. Cut every word that doesn't earn its place.

Consistent

• Maintain parallel structure — bullet points should all be verbs or all be nouns, not mixed
• Same tense throughout
• Same verb forms across bullets

Clear

• Replace vague qualifiers with specific numbers: "significant improvement" → "50% to 62%"
• Avoid jargon and internal acronyms — even for internal teams
• Specific beats vague every time

Punchy

• Use active voice: "Company A just launched its new phone" beats "A new phone was just launched by Company A"
• Express actions as verbs, not nouns: "Understanding the underlying reasons for change will be crucial in designing the new processes" beats "An understanding of the underlying reasons for change will be crucial to the design of the new processes"
• Be direct and confident: "Recommend purchasing service" beats "Might consider buying at least part of the service"

Purposeful

• Focus on the main characters of the story (the subjects of your sentences)
• Choose words and tone according to audience and occasion
• Use inclusive language to avoid sensitivities
• Use thought-provoking / engaging language for discussion contexts

Example of purposeful framing:

Full DDR Example

Before (wordy/weak):

It is possible that Possible issues facing the firm at this point in time are:

- Our Unable to retain the best people at the time in which when they are likely to add most value to the firm most valuable

- Failure to be able to attract fresh talent from top schools (Number of new recruits from top schools down significantly last year)

After (Drained + Refined):

Our clear priority is talent

- Retain the best and most valuable talent

- Attract fresh talent from top schools (dropped around 20% last year)

Changes applied: Punchy (confident title), Purposeful ("our"), Consistent (aligned verb forms), Punchy (active voice in bullets), Clear (specific % instead of "significantly")

---

6. Key Questions for Self-Testing Each Slide