
E2e Tests Studio
- 1.6k installs
- 26.9k repo stars
- Updated August 5, 2026
- mastra-ai/mastra
e2e-tests-studio is an agent skill for writing Playwright behavior E2E tests for Mastra playground UI with required BDD structure.
About
The e2e-tests-studio skill generates Playwright E2E tests for packages/playground-ui and packages/playground that validate product behavior not UI states. Required BDD structure uses one outer test.describe for the unit, inner test.describe when preconditions, and each test asserting one observable outcome enforced by e2e-bdd/test-needs-when-describe. Behavior patterns cover configuration affecting agent responses, data persistence after reload, tool execution output content, workflow step chaining, streaming chat context, and error recovery retries. Kitchen-sink fixtures represent realistic scenarios with expectedBehavior metadata. Use when modifying React components, playground features, or studio UI requiring behavior-focused Playwright specs. Agents should follow the SKILL.md workflow end to end, grounding classification in documented commands, file paths, prerequisites, and troubleshooting notes rather than improvising steps. Write Playwright E2E behavior tests for Mastra playground UI changes with required BDD describe structure. Invoke when User modifies playground UI, needs E2E tests, or mentions Playwright behavior validation. Best for Developers modifying Mastra playgrou.
- Test product behavior not UI states like dropdown opens.
- Required BDD: outer unit describe, when precondition, one outcome per test.
- Behavior patterns: config affects API, persistence, tool output, workflows.
- Kitchen-sink fixtures with scenario description and expectedBehavior.
- Run via pnpm build:cli then kitchen-sink dev on localhost:4111.
E2e Tests Studio by the numbers
- 1,602 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +77 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #467 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
e2e-tests-studio capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- bdd test structure enforcement · behavior focused test patterns · kitchen sink fixture design · playwright persistence and api interception test
- Use cases
- testing · frontend
What e2e-tests-studio says it does
Tests must verify that product features WORK correctly, not just that UI elements render.
Every E2E spec MUST follow the same BDD shape as the MSW tests.
npx skills add https://github.com/mastra-ai/mastra --skill e2e-tests-studioAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1.6k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 26.9k |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | August 5, 2026 |
| Repository | mastra-ai/mastra ↗ |
How do I write Playwright E2E tests that verify Mastra playground product behavior not just UI states?
Write Playwright E2E behavior tests for Mastra playground UI changes with required BDD describe structure.
Who is it for?
Developers modifying Mastra playground or playground-ui needing behavior validation tests.
Skip if: Skip for unit tests, backend-only changes, or UI snapshot tests without behavior assertions.
When should I use this skill?
User modifies playground UI, needs E2E tests, or mentions Playwright behavior validation.
What you get
BDD-structured Playwright specs asserting observable outcomes for playground feature changes.
- Playwright E2E spec files
- Behavior-focused test scenarios
By the numbers
- Targets two Mastra packages: packages/playground-ui and packages/playground
- Specifies model claude-opus-4-5 in skill metadata
Files
E2E Behavior Validation for Frontend Modifications
Core Principle: Test Product Behavior, Not UI States
CRITICAL: Tests must verify that product features WORK correctly, not just that UI elements render.
What NOT to test (UI States):
- ❌ "Dropdown opens when clicked"
- ❌ "Modal appears after button click"
- ❌ "Loading spinner shows during request"
- ❌ "Form fields are visible"
- ❌ "Sidebar collapses"
What TO test (Product Behavior):
- ✅ "Selecting an LLM provider configures the agent to use that provider"
- ✅ "Creating a new agent persists it and shows in the agents list"
- ✅ "Running a tool with parameters returns the expected output"
- ✅ "Chat messages stream correctly and maintain conversation context"
- ✅ "Workflow execution triggers tools in the correct order"
BDD Structure (REQUIRED)
Every E2E spec MUST follow the same BDD shape as the MSW tests. In packages/playground, e2e-bdd/test-needs-when-describe enforces this shape.
The structure has exactly three levels:
1. Outer `test.describe` = the unit under test (one page or feature per file). 2. Inner `test.describe('when …')` = exactly ONE precondition. The title MUST start with when. 3. Each `test` = exactly ONE observable outcome.
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
import { resetStorage } from '../__utils__/reset-storage';
test.describe('Tools list page', () => {
// the unit
test.afterEach(async () => {
await resetStorage();
});
test.describe('when a registered tool is clicked', () => {
// ONE precondition (starts with "when")
test('navigates to that tool detail page', async ({ page }) => {
// ONE outcome
await page.goto('/tools');
await page.locator('text=Get current weather for a location').click();
await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/tools\/weatherInfo$/);
});
test('shows the tool name as the page heading', async ({ page }) => {
// ONE outcome
await page.goto('/tools');
await page.locator('text=Get current weather for a location').click();
await expect(page.locator('h2')).toHaveText('weatherInfo');
});
});
});Rules:
- One outer
test.describeper file naming the unit. - Every leaf
testlives inside atest.describe('when …')precondition group. No top-level flat `test()`. - Split a multi-assertion
test()only where assertions represent distinct outcomes; keep tightly-coupled assertions that prove a single outcome together. Never drop an assertion. - Place
beforeEach/afterEachin the narrowestdescribescope that needs them.
Prerequisites
Requires Playwright MCP server. If the browser_navigate tool is unavailable, instruct the user to add it:
claude mcp add playwright -- npx @playwright/mcp@latestStep 1: Understand the Feature Intent
Before writing ANY test, answer these questions:
1. What user problem does this feature solve? 2. What is the expected outcome when the feature works correctly? 3. What data flows through the system? (user input → API → state → UI) 4. What should persist after page reload? 5. What downstream effects should this action have?
Document these answers as comments in your test file.
Step 2: Build and Start
pnpm build:cli
cd packages/playground/e2e/kitchen-sink && pnpm devVerify server at http://localhost:4111
Step 3: Map Feature to Behavior Tests
Feature-to-Test Mapping Guide
| Feature Category | What to Test | Example Assertion |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Configuration | Config changes affect agent behavior | Send message → verify response uses selected model |
| LLM Provider Selection | Selected provider is used in requests | Intercept API call → verify provider in request payload |
| Tool Execution | Tool runs with correct params & returns result | Execute tool → verify output matches expected transformation |
| Workflow Execution | Steps execute in order, data flows between steps | Run workflow → verify each step's output feeds next step |
| Chat/Streaming | Messages persist, context maintained across turns | Multi-turn conversation → verify context awareness |
| MCP Server Tools | Server tools are callable and return data | Call MCP tool → verify response structure and content |
| Memory/Persistence | Data survives page reload | Create item → reload → verify item exists |
| Error Handling | Errors surface correctly to user | Trigger error condition → verify error message + recovery |
Step 4: Write Behavior-Focused Tests
Test Structure Template
import { test, expect, Page } from '@playwright/test';
import { resetStorage } from '../__utils__/reset-storage';
import { selectFixture } from '../__utils__/select-fixture';
import { nanoid } from 'nanoid';
/**
* FEATURE: [Name of feature]
* USER STORY: As a user, I want to [action] so that [outcome]
* BEHAVIOR UNDER TEST: [Specific behavior being validated]
*/
test.describe('[Feature Name] - Behavior Tests', () => {
let page: Page;
test.beforeEach(async ({ browser }) => {
const context = await browser.newContext();
page = await context.newPage();
});
test.afterEach(async () => {
await resetStorage(page);
});
test.describe('when [the single precondition for these outcomes]', () => {
test('[verb describing the single observable outcome]', async () => {
// ARRANGE: Set up preconditions
// - Navigate to the feature
// - Configure any required state
// ACT: Perform the user action that triggers the behavior
// ASSERT: Verify the OUTCOME, not the UI state
// - Check data persistence
// - Verify downstream effects
// - Confirm API calls made correctly
});
});
});Behavior Test Patterns
Pattern 1: Configuration Affects Behavior
test.describe('when a different LLM provider is selected', () => {
test('uses that provider for agent responses', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await page.goto('/agents/my-agent/chat');
// Intercept API to verify provider
let capturedProvider: string | null = null;
await page.route('**/api/chat', route => {
const body = JSON.parse(route.request().postData() || '{}');
capturedProvider = body.provider;
route.continue();
});
// ACT: Select a different provider
await page.getByTestId('provider-selector').click();
await page.getByRole('option', { name: 'OpenAI' }).click();
// Send a message to trigger the agent
await page.getByTestId('chat-input').fill('Hello');
await page.getByTestId('send-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify the selected provider was used
await expect.poll(() => capturedProvider).toBe('openai');
});
});Pattern 2: Data Persistence
test.describe('when a new agent is created', () => {
test('persists after page reload', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await page.goto('/agents');
const agentName = `Test Agent ${nanoid()}`;
// ACT: Create new agent
await page.getByTestId('create-agent-button').click();
await page.getByTestId('agent-name-input').fill(agentName);
await page.getByTestId('save-agent-button').click();
// Wait for creation to complete
await expect(page.getByText(agentName)).toBeVisible();
// ASSERT: Verify persistence
await page.reload();
await expect(page.getByText(agentName)).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10000 });
});
});Pattern 3: Tool Execution Produces Correct Output
test.describe('when the weather tool is executed with a city', () => {
test('returns formatted weather data for that city', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await selectFixture(page, 'weather-success');
await page.goto('/tools/weather-tool');
// ACT: Execute tool with parameters
await page.getByTestId('param-city').fill('San Francisco');
await page.getByTestId('execute-tool-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify OUTPUT content, not just that output appears
const output = page.getByTestId('tool-output');
await expect(output).toContainText('temperature');
await expect(output).toContainText('San Francisco');
// Verify structured data if applicable
const outputText = await output.textContent();
const outputData = JSON.parse(outputText || '{}');
expect(outputData).toHaveProperty('temperature');
expect(outputData).toHaveProperty('conditions');
});
});Pattern 4: Workflow Step Chaining
test.describe('when a multi-step workflow is run', () => {
test('passes data between steps correctly', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await selectFixture(page, 'workflow-multi-step');
const sessionId = nanoid();
await page.goto(`/workflows/data-pipeline?session=${sessionId}`);
// ACT: Trigger workflow execution
await page.getByTestId('workflow-input').fill('test input data');
await page.getByTestId('run-workflow-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify each step received correct input from previous step
// Wait for completion
await expect(page.getByTestId('workflow-status')).toHaveText('completed', { timeout: 30000 });
// Check step outputs show data transformation chain
const step1Output = await page.getByTestId('step-1-output').textContent();
const step2Output = await page.getByTestId('step-2-output').textContent();
// Verify step 2 received step 1's output as input
expect(step2Output).toContain(step1Output);
});
});Pattern 5: Streaming Chat with Context
test.describe('when a multi-turn conversation is held', () => {
test('maintains conversation context across messages', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await selectFixture(page, 'contextual-chat');
const chatId = nanoid();
await page.goto(`/agents/assistant/chat/${chatId}`);
// ACT: Multi-turn conversation
await page.getByTestId('chat-input').fill('My name is Alice');
await page.getByTestId('send-button').click();
await expect(page.getByTestId('assistant-message').last()).toBeVisible({ timeout: 20000 });
await page.getByTestId('chat-input').fill('What is my name?');
await page.getByTestId('send-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify context was maintained
const response = page.getByTestId('assistant-message').last();
await expect(response).toContainText('Alice', { timeout: 20000 });
});
});Pattern 6: Error Recovery
test.describe('when the API fails during tool execution', () => {
test('shows an actionable error and allows a successful retry', async () => {
// ARRANGE: Set up failure fixture
await selectFixture(page, 'api-failure');
await page.goto('/tools/flaky-tool');
// ACT: Trigger the error
await page.getByTestId('execute-tool-button').click();
// ASSERT: Error is shown with recovery option
await expect(page.getByTestId('error-message')).toContainText('failed');
await expect(page.getByTestId('retry-button')).toBeVisible();
// Switch to success fixture and retry
await selectFixture(page, 'api-success');
await page.getByTestId('retry-button').click();
// Verify recovery worked
await expect(page.getByTestId('tool-output')).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10000 });
await expect(page.getByTestId('error-message')).not.toBeVisible();
});
});Step 5: Update Existing Tests
When a test file already exists:
1. Read the existing tests to understand current coverage 2. Identify if tests are UI-focused or behavior-focused 3. Refactor UI-focused tests to verify behavior instead:
Refactoring Example
BEFORE (UI-focused):
test('dropdown opens when clicked', async () => {
await page.getByTestId('model-dropdown').click();
await expect(page.getByRole('listbox')).toBeVisible();
});AFTER (Behavior-focused + BDD nesting):
test.describe('when a model is selected from the dropdown', () => {
test('updates and persists the agent configuration', async () => {
// Open dropdown and select model
await page.getByTestId('model-dropdown').click();
await page.getByRole('option', { name: 'GPT-4' }).click();
// Verify the selection persists and affects behavior
await page.reload();
await expect(page.getByTestId('model-dropdown')).toHaveText('GPT-4');
// Optionally: verify the model is used in actual requests
// (via request interception or checking response metadata)
});
});Step 6: Kitchen-Sink Fixtures for Behavior Testing
Fixtures should represent realistic scenarios, not just mock data:
Fixture Naming Convention
<feature>-<scenario>.fixture.ts
Examples:
- agent-with-tools.fixture.ts
- chat-multi-turn-context.fixture.ts
- workflow-parallel-execution.fixture.ts
- tool-validation-error.fixture.ts
- mcp-server-timeout.fixture.tsFixture Content Requirements
Each fixture must define:
1. Scenario description (what behavior it enables testing) 2. Expected outcomes (what assertions should pass) 3. Edge cases covered (error states, empty states, etc.)
// fixtures/agent-provider-switch.fixture.ts
export const agentProviderSwitch = {
name: 'agent-provider-switch',
description: 'Tests that switching LLM providers changes agent behavior',
// Mock responses for different providers
responses: {
openai: { content: 'Response from OpenAI', model: 'gpt-4' },
anthropic: { content: 'Response from Anthropic', model: 'claude-3' },
},
expectedBehavior: {
// When provider is switched, subsequent messages use new provider
providerSwitchAffectsNextMessage: true,
// Provider selection persists across page reload
providerPersistsOnReload: true,
},
};Step 7: Run and Validate
cd packages/playground && pnpm test:e2eTest Quality Checklist
Before considering tests complete, verify:
- [ ] Each test has a clear user story comment
- [ ] One outer
test.describenames the unit under test - [ ] Every
testis nested in atest.describe('when …')precondition block (no flat top-leveltest()) - [ ] Each
testasserts exactly ONE observable outcome - [ ] Tests verify OUTCOMES, not intermediate UI states
- [ ] Tests would FAIL if the feature broke (not just if UI changed)
- [ ] Persistence is verified via
page.reload()where applicable - [ ] Error scenarios are covered
- [ ] Tests use appropriate timeouts for async operations
- [ ] Fixtures represent realistic usage scenarios
Quick Reference
| Step | Command/Action |
|---|---|
| Build | pnpm build:cli |
| Start | cd packages/playground/e2e/kitchen-sink && pnpm dev |
| App URL | http://localhost:4111 |
| Routes | @packages/playground/src/App.tsx |
| Run tests | cd packages/playground && pnpm test:e2e |
| Test dir | packages/playground/e2e/tests/ |
| Fixtures | packages/playground/e2e/kitchen-sink/fixtures/ |
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do Instead |
|---|---|
| Test that modal opens | Test that modal action completes and persists |
| Test that button is clickable | Test that clicking button produces expected result |
| Test loading spinner appears | Test that loaded data is correct |
| Test form validation message shows | Test that invalid form cannot submit AND valid form succeeds |
| Test dropdown has options | Test that selecting option changes system behavior |
| Test sidebar navigation works | Test that navigated page has correct data/functionality |
| Assert element is visible | Assert element contains expected data/state |
Top-level flat test() with no precondition describe | Nest every test in a test.describe('when …') block |
One test() asserting several unrelated outcomes | One test() per observable outcome |
Related skills
How it compares
Use this instead of generic React testing skills when Mastra playground changes need behavior-focused Playwright coverage with documented UI-state anti-patterns.
FAQ
What must every E2E spec follow?
One outer describe for the unit, inner describe('when …') preconditions, and each test asserting one observable outcome.
UI states or behavior?
Behavior — verify configuration changes agent responses, data persists, tools return correct output, not that modals open.
Is e2e-tests-studio safe to install?
Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.