Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
mukul975 avatar

Analyzing Cyber Kill Chain

  • 471 installs
  • 27.3k repo stars
  • Updated August 2, 2026
  • mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills

analyzing-cyber-kill-chain is a Security agent skill that maps intrusion forensics to Lockheed Martin's seven-phase Cyber Kill Chain for developers and security engineers who need structured post-incident analysis and de

About

analyzing-cyber-kill-chain is a Security skill in mukul975's Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills library that walks agents through post-incident intrusion analysis using Lockheed Martin's seven-phase Cyber Kill Chain. The workflow maps observed adversary actions from reconnaissance through actions on objectives, marks where defenses succeeded or failed, cross-references MITRE ATT&CK techniques for technique-level detail, and outputs courses of action per phase so teams can recommend earlier controls. Install it with npx skills add for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or other agentskills.io-compatible agents when you need kill-chain reports for threat intelligence, executive briefings, or prevention-focused control design. The skill ships at version 1.0.0 under Apache 2.0 and encodes practitioner workflows rather than generic checklists, with YAML frontmatter for fast agent discovery during incident response sessions.

  • Kill-chain analysis
  • Threat modeling
  • Security review

Analyzing Cyber Kill Chain by the numbers

  • 471 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +21 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #514 of 2,203 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-cyber-kill-chain

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs471
repo stars27.3k
Security audit3 / 3 scanners passed
Last updatedAugust 2, 2026
Repositorymukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills

How do you map intrusion forensics to the cyber kill chain?

Analyze an intrusion against the cyber kill-chain model.

Who is it for?

Security engineers and developers running post-incident reviews who need a repeatable kill-chain framework tied to MITRE ATT&CK.

Skip if: Teams needing real-time SIEM automation or ATT&CK-only detection engineering without kill-chain narrative framing.

When should I use this skill?

A developer or security engineer asks for kill chain analysis, intrusion phase mapping, Lockheed Martin kill chain, or post-incident attack progression review.

What you get

Kill-chain phase map, MITRE ATT&CK cross-reference, detection-gap notes, and per-phase courses of action in a structured analysis report.

  • Kill-chain analysis report
  • Per-phase courses of action

By the numbers

  • Maps intrusion activity across Lockheed Martin's 7-phase Cyber Kill Chain
  • Skill version 1.0.0 in the Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills library

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Analyzing Cyber Kill Chain

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Conducting post-incident analysis to determine how far an adversary progressed through an attack sequence
  • Designing layered defensive controls with the goal of interrupting attacks at the earliest possible phase
  • Producing threat intelligence reports that communicate attack progression to non-technical stakeholders

Do not use this skill as a standalone framework — combine with MITRE ATT&CK for technique-level granularity beyond what the 7-phase kill chain provides.

Prerequisites

  • Complete incident timeline with forensic artifacts mapped to specific adversary actions
  • MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise matrix for technique-level mapping within each kill chain phase
  • Access to threat intelligence on the suspected adversary group's typical kill chain progression
  • Post-incident report or IR timeline from responding team

Workflow

Step 1: Map Observed Actions to Kill Chain Phases

The Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain consists of seven phases. Map all observed adversary actions:

Phase 1 - Reconnaissance: Adversary gathers target information before attack.

  • Indicators: DNS queries from adversary IP, LinkedIn scraping, job posting analysis, Shodan scans of organization infrastructure

Phase 2 - Weaponization: Adversary creates attack tool (malware + exploit).

  • Indicators: Malware compilation timestamps, exploit document metadata, builder artifacts in malware samples

Phase 3 - Delivery: Adversary transmits weapon to target.

  • Indicators: Phishing emails, malicious attachments, drive-by downloads, USB drops, supply chain compromise

Phase 4 - Exploitation: Adversary exploits vulnerability to execute code.

  • Indicators: CVE exploitation events in application/OS logs, memory corruption artifacts, shellcode execution

Phase 5 - Installation: Adversary establishes persistence on target.

  • Indicators: New scheduled tasks, registry run keys, service installation, web shells, bootkits

Phase 6 - Command & Control (C2): Adversary communicates with compromised system.

  • Indicators: Beaconing traffic (regular intervals), DNS tunneling, HTTPS to uncommon domains, C2 framework signatures (Cobalt Strike, Sliver)

Phase 7 - Actions on Objectives: Adversary achieves goals.

  • Indicators: Data staging/exfiltration, lateral movement, ransomware execution, destructive activity

Step 2: Identify Phase Completion and Detection Points

Create a phase matrix for the incident:

Phase 1: Recon        → Completed (undetected)
Phase 2: Weaponize    → Completed (undetected — pre-attack)
Phase 3: Delivery     → Completed; phishing email bypassed SEG
Phase 4: Exploit      → Completed; CVE-2023-23397 exploited
Phase 5: Install      → DETECTED: EDR flagged scheduled task creation (attack stalled here)
Phase 6: C2           → Not achieved (installation blocked)
Phase 7: Objectives   → Not achieved

For each phase completed without detection, document the defensive control gap.

Step 3: Map to MITRE ATT&CK for Technique Detail

Each kill chain phase maps to multiple ATT&CK tactics:

  • Delivery → Initial Access (TA0001)
  • Exploitation → Execution (TA0002)
  • Installation → Persistence (TA0003), Privilege Escalation (TA0004)
  • C2 → Command and Control (TA0011)
  • Actions on Objectives → Exfiltration (TA0010), Impact (TA0040)

Within each phase, enumerate specific ATT&CK techniques observed and map to existing detections.

Step 4: Identify Courses of Action per Phase

For each phase, document applicable defensive courses of action (COAs):

  • Detect COA: What detection would alert on adversary activity in this phase?
  • Deny COA: What control would prevent the adversary from completing this phase?
  • Disrupt COA: What control would interrupt the adversary mid-phase?
  • Degrade COA: What control would reduce the adversary's effectiveness in this phase?
  • Deceive COA: What deception (honeypots, canary tokens) would expose activity in this phase?
  • Destroy COA: What active defense capability would neutralize adversary infrastructure?

Step 5: Produce Kill Chain Analysis Report

Structure findings as: 1. Attack narrative (timeline of phases) 2. Phase-by-phase analysis with evidence 3. Detection point analysis (what worked, what failed) 4. Defensive recommendation per phase prioritized by cost/effectiveness 5. Control improvement roadmap

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Kill ChainSequential model of adversary intrusion phases; breaking any link theoretically stops the attack
Courses of Action (COA)Defensive responses mapped to each kill chain phase: detect, deny, disrupt, degrade, deceive, destroy
BeaconingRegular, periodic C2 check-in pattern from compromised host to adversary server; detectable by frequency analysis
Phase CompletionAdversary successfully finishes a kill chain phase and progresses to the next; defense-in-depth aims to prevent this
Intelligence Gain/LossAnalysis of whether detecting at Phase 5 (vs. Phase 3) reduced intelligence about adversary capabilities or intent

Tools & Systems

  • MITRE ATT&CK Navigator: Overlay kill chain phases with ATT&CK technique coverage for integrated analysis
  • Elastic Security EQL: Event Query Language for querying multi-phase attack sequences in Elastic SIEM
  • Splunk ES: Timeline visualization and correlation searches for kill chain phase sequencing
  • MISP: Kill chain tagging via galaxy clusters for structured incident event documentation

Common Pitfalls

  • Linear assumption: Adversaries don't always progress linearly — they may skip phases (weaponization already complete from previous campaign) or loop back (re-establish C2 after detection).
  • Ignoring Phases 1 and 2: Reconnaissance and weaponization occur before the defender has visibility. Intelligence about these phases requires external sources (OSINT, threat intelligence).
  • Missing insider threats: The kill chain was designed for external adversaries. Insider threats may skip directly to Phase 7 without traversing earlier phases.
  • Confusing with ATT&CK tactics: The 7-phase kill chain and 14 ATT&CK tactics are complementary but not directly equivalent. Maintain distinction to prevent analytic confusion.

Related skills

How it compares

Pick analyzing-cyber-kill-chain when you need executive-readable attack progression narratives; use pure ATT&CK mapping skills when technique coverage matrices are the primary deliverable.

FAQ

What frameworks does analyzing-cyber-kill-chain use?

analyzing-cyber-kill-chain centers on Lockheed Martin's seven-phase Cyber Kill Chain and cross-references MITRE ATT&CK for technique detail. The parent Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills repo maps skills to NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE D3FEND, and related frameworks for broader security conte

When should developers activate analyzing-cyber-kill-chain?

analyzing-cyber-kill-chain activates during post-incident analysis, prevention-focused control design, and threat intelligence reporting. Trigger phrases include kill chain analysis, intrusion kill chain, attack phase mapping, and Lockheed Martin kill chain framework requests.

Is Analyzing Cyber Kill Chain safe to install?

skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.

Securityauditappsec

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.