Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
nickcrew avatar

Condition Based Waiting

  • 2 installs
  • 28 repo stars
  • Updated June 29, 2026
  • nickcrew/claude-cortex

Replaces arbitrary test timeouts with condition polling that waits for actual state changes to eliminate flaky, timing-dependent tests.

About

Fixes race conditions and flaky tests by swapping arbitrary timeouts for polling that waits on real state changes. A developer uses it when tests have timing dependencies or inconsistent pass/fail behavior.

  • Condition polling instead of timing guesses
  • Clear guidance on when to use it and when not to

Condition Based Waiting by the numbers

  • 2 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #1,680 of 2,154 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/nickcrew/claude-cortex --skill condition-based-waiting

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs2
repo stars28
Last updatedJune 29, 2026
Repositorynickcrew/claude-cortex

What it does

Replaces arbitrary test timeouts with condition polling that waits for actual state changes to eliminate flaky, timing-dependent tests.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Condition-Based Waiting

Overview

Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.

Core principle: Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.

When to Use

digraph when_to_use {
    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
    "Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
    "Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
    "Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];

    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
}

Use when:

  • Tests have arbitrary delays (setTimeout, sleep, time.sleep())
  • Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
  • Tests timeout when run in parallel
  • Waiting for async operations to complete

Don't use when:

  • Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals)
  • Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout

Core Pattern

// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

Quick Patterns

ScenarioPattern
Wait for eventwaitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))
Wait for statewaitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')
Wait for countwaitFor(() => items.length >= 5)
Wait for filewaitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))
Complex conditionwaitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)

Implementation

Generic polling function:

async function waitFor<T>(
  condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
  description: string,
  timeoutMs = 5000
): Promise<T> {
  const startTime = Date.now();

  while (true) {
    const result = condition();
    if (result) return result;

    if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
      throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
    }

    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
  }
}

See @example.ts for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (waitForEvent, waitForEventCount, waitForEventMatch) from actual debugging session.

Common Mistakes

❌ Polling too fast: setTimeout(check, 1) - wastes CPU ✅ Fix: Poll every 10ms

❌ No timeout: Loop forever if condition never met ✅ Fix: Always include timeout with clear error

❌ Stale data: Cache state before loop ✅ Fix: Call getter inside loop for fresh data

When Arbitrary Timeout IS Correct

// Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output
await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200));   // Then: wait for timed behavior
// 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified

Requirements: 1. First wait for triggering condition 2. Based on known timing (not guessing) 3. Comment explaining WHY

Real-World Impact

From debugging session (2025-10-03):

  • Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files
  • Pass rate: 60% → 100%
  • Execution time: 40% faster
  • No more race conditions

Related skills

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.