Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
obra avatar

Condition Based Waiting

  • 247 installs
  • 733 repo stars
  • Updated October 14, 2025
  • obra/superpowers-skills

Run verification commands and read output before claiming tests pass, builds succeed, or work is complete.

About

condition-based waiting — Verification Before Completion stops agents from lying about done—every success claim requires a fresh command, full output, and evidence cited in the same message. It applies before commits, PRs, and task handoffs. Solo builders use it to prevent false-green reports that waste rework cycles.

  • Gate function: identify proof command, run it fresh, read full output, then claim status.
  • Red-flag phrases like 'should pass' and 'looks correct' are explicitly banned.
  • Covers tests, linters, builds, agent delegation, and requirement checklists.

Condition Based Waiting by the numbers

  • 247 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +25 installs in the week ending Jul 18, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #757 of 2,184 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
  • Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers-skills --skill condition-based-waiting

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs247
repo stars733
Security audit3 / 3 scanners passed
Last updatedOctober 14, 2025
Repositoryobra/superpowers-skills

What it does

Run verification commands and read output before claiming tests pass, builds succeed, or work is complete.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Condition-Based Waiting

Overview

Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.

Core principle: Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.

When to Use

digraph when_to_use {
    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
    "Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
    "Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
    "Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];

    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
}

Use when:

  • Tests have arbitrary delays (setTimeout, sleep, time.sleep())
  • Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
  • Tests timeout when run in parallel
  • Waiting for async operations to complete

Don't use when:

  • Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals)
  • Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout

Core Pattern

// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

Quick Patterns

ScenarioPattern
Wait for eventwaitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))
Wait for statewaitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')
Wait for countwaitFor(() => items.length >= 5)
Wait for filewaitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))
Complex conditionwaitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)

Implementation

Generic polling function:

async function waitFor<T>(
  condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
  description: string,
  timeoutMs = 5000
): Promise<T> {
  const startTime = Date.now();

  while (true) {
    const result = condition();
    if (result) return result;

    if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
      throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
    }

    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
  }
}

See @example.ts for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (waitForEvent, waitForEventCount, waitForEventMatch) from actual debugging session.

Common Mistakes

❌ Polling too fast: setTimeout(check, 1) - wastes CPU ✅ Fix: Poll every 10ms

❌ No timeout: Loop forever if condition never met ✅ Fix: Always include timeout with clear error

❌ Stale data: Cache state before loop ✅ Fix: Call getter inside loop for fresh data

When Arbitrary Timeout IS Correct

// Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output
await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200));   // Then: wait for timed behavior
// 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified

Requirements: 1. First wait for triggering condition 2. Based on known timing (not guessing) 3. Comment explaining WHY

Real-World Impact

From debugging session (2025-10-03):

  • Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files
  • Pass rate: 60% → 100%
  • Execution time: 40% faster
  • No more race conditions

Related skills

FAQ

Is Condition Based Waiting safe to install?

skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.