Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
oimiragieo avatar

Project Analyzer

  • 114 installs
  • 36 repo stars
  • Updated July 14, 2026
  • oimiragieo/agent-studio

Map repo layout, dependencies, and risk areas before scoping refactors, migrations, or agent onboarding to an unfamiliar monorepo or legacy codebase.

About

project-analyzer guides agents through holistic codebase inspection: directory roles, dependency graphs, entry points, and architectural smells. It supports validation and scoping decisions by turning opaque repositories into actionable maps, so teams estimate refactors, integrations, and agent automation with fewer surprises once build work starts.

  • Repo-wide structure mapping
  • Dependency and coupling scan
  • Risk and hotspot identification
  • Informs migration scope
  • Accelerates unfamiliar codebase onboarding

Project Analyzer by the numbers

  • 114 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +1 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #434 of 1,352 Code Review & Quality skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill project-analyzer

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs114
repo stars36
Last updatedJuly 14, 2026
Repositoryoimiragieo/agent-studio

What it does

Map repo layout, dependencies, and risk areas before scoping refactors, migrations, or agent onboarding to an unfamiliar monorepo or legacy codebase.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

References (archive): SCAFFOLD_SKILLS_ARCHIVE_MAP.md — ProjectAnalyzer monorepo/service detection from Auto-Claude-develop analysis/analyzers.

<identity> Project Analyzer - Automated brownfield codebase analysis for rapid project onboarding and understanding. </identity>

<capabilities>

  • Detecting project type (frontend, backend, fullstack, library, cli, mobile, monorepo)
  • Identifying frameworks and libraries from manifests and structure
  • Generating file statistics and language breakdown
  • Mapping component relationships and module structure
  • Detecting architecture patterns (MVC, layered, microservices, etc.)
  • Analyzing dependency health and outdated packages
  • Identifying code quality indicators (linting, testing, type safety)
  • Detecting technical debt and anti-patterns
  • Generating prioritized improvement recommendations

</capabilities>

<instructions> <execution_process>

Step 1: Identify Project Root

Locate project root by finding manifest files:

1. Search for package manager files:

  • package.json (Node.js/JavaScript/TypeScript)
  • requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, setup.py (Python)
  • go.mod (Go)
  • Cargo.toml (Rust)
  • pom.xml, build.gradle (Java/Maven/Gradle)
  • composer.json (PHP)

2. Identify project root:

  • Directory containing primary package manager file
  • Handle monorepos (multiple package.json files)
  • Detect workspace configuration

3. Validate project root:

  • Check for .git directory
  • Verify source code directories exist
  • Ensure manifest files are parsable

Step 2: Detect Project Type

Classify project based on manifest files and directory structure:

1. Frontend Projects:

  • Indicators: React, Vue, Angular, Svelte dependencies
  • Directory: src/components/, public/, assets/
  • Frameworks: Next.js, Nuxt.js, Gatsby, Vite

2. Backend Projects:

  • Indicators: Express, FastAPI, Django, Flask, Gin dependencies
  • Directory: routes/, controllers/, models/, api/
  • Frameworks: Next.js API routes, FastAPI, Express

3. Fullstack Projects:

  • Indicators: Both frontend and backend frameworks
  • Directory: Combined frontend + backend structure
  • Frameworks: Next.js, Remix, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js

4. Library/Package Projects:

  • Indicators: No application-specific directories
  • Files: index.ts, lib/, dist/, build/
  • Manifests: library field in package.json

5. CLI Projects:

  • Indicators: bin field in package.json
  • Files: CLI entry points, command parsers
  • Dependencies: Commander, Yargs, Inquirer

6. Mobile Projects:

  • Indicators: React Native, Flutter, Ionic dependencies
  • Files: android/, ios/, mobile/
  • Frameworks: React Native, Expo, Flutter

7. Monorepo Projects:

  • Indicators: workspaces in package.json, pnpm-workspace.yaml
  • Structure: Multiple packages in subdirectories
  • Tools: Turborepo, Nx, Lerna

8. Microservices Projects:

  • Indicators: Multiple service directories
  • Files: docker-compose.yml, service configs
  • Structure: Service-based organization

Step 3: Framework Detection

Identify frameworks from manifest files and imports:

1. Read package.json dependencies (Node.js):

  • Parse dependencies and devDependencies
  • Detect framework versions
  • Categorize by type (framework, ui-library, testing, etc.)

2. Read requirements.txt (Python):

  • Parse Python dependencies
  • Detect FastAPI, Django, Flask
  • Identify version constraints

3. Analyze imports (optional deep scan):

  • Scan source files for import statements
  • Detect used vs declared dependencies
  • Identify framework-specific patterns

4. Framework Categories:

  • Framework: React, Next.js, FastAPI, Express
  • UI Library: Material-UI, Ant Design, Chakra UI
  • State Management: Redux, Zustand, Pinia
  • Testing: Jest, Vitest, Cypress, Playwright
  • Build Tool: Vite, Webpack, Rollup, esbuild
  • Database: Prisma, TypeORM, SQLAlchemy
  • ORM: Prisma, Sequelize, Mongoose
  • API: tRPC, GraphQL, REST
  • Auth: NextAuth, Auth0, Clerk
  • Logging: Winston, Pino, Bunyan
  • Monitoring: Sentry, Datadog, New Relic

5. Confidence Scoring:

  • 1.0: Framework listed in dependencies
  • 0.8: Framework detected from imports
  • 0.6: Framework inferred from structure

Step 4: File Statistics

Generate quantitative project statistics:

1. Count files by type:

  • Use glob patterns for common extensions
  • Exclude: node_modules/, .git/, dist/, build/
  • Group by language/file type

2. Count lines of code:

  • Read source files and count lines
  • Exclude empty lines and comments (optional)
  • Calculate total LOC per language

3. Identify largest files:

  • Track file sizes (line count)
  • Report top 10 largest files
  • Flag files > 1000 lines (violates micro-service principle)

4. Calculate averages:

  • Average file size (lines)
  • Average directory depth
  • Files per directory

5. Language Detection:

  • Map extensions to languages:
  • .ts, .tsx → TypeScript
  • .js, .jsx → JavaScript
  • .py → Python
  • .go → Go
  • .rs → Rust
  • .java → Java
  • .md → Markdown
  • .json → JSON
  • .yaml, .yml → YAML

Step 5: Structure Analysis

Analyze project structure and architecture:

1. Identify root directories:

  • Classify directories by purpose:
  • source: src/, app/, lib/
  • tests: test/, __tests__/, cypress/
  • config: config/, .config/
  • docs: docs/, documentation/
  • build: dist/, build/, out/
  • scripts: scripts/, bin/
  • assets: assets/, static/, public/

2. Detect entry points:

  • Main entry: index.ts, main.py, app.py
  • App entry: app.ts, server.ts, app/page.tsx
  • Handler: handler.ts, lambda.ts
  • CLI: cli.ts, bin/

3. Detect architecture pattern:

  • MVC: models/, views/, controllers/
  • Layered: presentation/, business/, data/
  • Hexagonal: domain/, application/, infrastructure/
  • Microservices: Multiple service directories
  • Modular: Feature-based organization
  • Flat: All files in src/

4. Detect module system:

  • Check package.json for "type": "module" (ESM)
  • Scan for import/export (ESM) vs require (CommonJS)
  • Identify mixed module systems

Step 6: Dependency Analysis

Analyze dependency health:

1. Count dependencies:

  • Production dependencies
  • Development dependencies
  • Total dependency count

2. Check for outdated packages (optional):

  • Run npm outdated or equivalent
  • Parse output for outdated packages
  • Identify major version updates (breaking changes)

3. Security scan (optional):

  • Run npm audit or equivalent
  • Identify vulnerabilities by severity
  • Flag critical security issues

Step 7: Code Quality Indicators

Detect code quality tooling:

1. Linting Configuration:

  • Detect: .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js, ruff.toml
  • Tool: ESLint, Ruff, Flake8, Pylint
  • Run linter if configured (optional)

2. Formatting Configuration:

  • Detect: .prettierrc, pyproject.toml (Black/Ruff)
  • Tool: Prettier, Black, Ruff

3. Testing Framework:

  • Detect: Jest, Vitest, Pytest, Cypress
  • Count test files
  • Check for coverage configuration

4. Type Safety:

  • Detect TypeScript: tsconfig.json
  • Check strict mode: "strict": true
  • Detect Python typing: mypy, pyright

Step 8: Pattern Detection

Identify common patterns and anti-patterns:

1. Good Practices:

  • Modular component structure
  • Comprehensive test coverage
  • TypeScript strict mode enabled
  • CI/CD configuration present

2. Anti-Patterns:

  • Large files (> 1000 lines)
  • Missing tests
  • Outdated dependencies
  • No linting configuration

3. Neutral Patterns:

  • Specific architecture choices
  • Framework-specific patterns

Step 9: Technical Debt Analysis

Calculate technical debt score:

1. Debt Indicators:

  • Outdated Dependencies: Count outdated packages
  • Missing Tests: Low test file ratio
  • Dead Code: Unused imports/exports (optional)
  • Complexity: Large files, deep nesting
  • Documentation: Missing README, docs
  • Security: Known vulnerabilities
  • Performance: Bundle size, load time

2. Debt Score (0-100):

  • 0-20: Excellent health
  • 21-40: Good health, minor issues
  • 41-60: Moderate debt, needs attention
  • 61-80: High debt, refactoring recommended
  • 81-100: Critical debt, major overhaul needed

3. Remediation Effort:

  • Trivial: < 1 hour
  • Minor: 1-4 hours
  • Moderate: 1-3 days
  • Major: 1-2 weeks
  • Massive: > 2 weeks

Step 10: Generate Recommendations

Create prioritized improvement recommendations:

1. Categorize Recommendations:

  • Security: Critical vulnerabilities, outdated auth
  • Performance: Bundle optimization, lazy loading
  • Maintainability: Refactor large files, add tests
  • Testing: Increase coverage, add E2E tests
  • Documentation: Add README, API docs
  • Architecture: Improve modularity, separation of concerns
  • Dependencies: Update packages, remove unused

2. Prioritize by Impact:

  • P0: Critical security, blocking production
  • P1: High impact, affects reliability
  • P2: Medium impact, improves quality
  • P3: Low impact, nice-to-have

3. Estimate Effort and Impact:

  • Effort: trivial, minor, moderate, major, massive
  • Impact: low, medium, high, critical

Step 11: Validate Output

Validate analysis output against schema:

1. Schema Validation:

  • Validate against project-analysis.schema.json
  • Ensure all required fields present
  • Check data types and formats

2. Output Metadata:

  • Analyzer version
  • Analysis duration (ms)
  • Files analyzed count
  • Files skipped count
  • Errors encountered

</execution_process>

<performance> Performance Requirements:

  • Target: < 30 seconds for typical projects (< 10k files)
  • Optimization:
  • Skip large directories: node_modules/, .git/, dist/
  • Use parallel file processing
  • Cache results for incremental analysis
  • Limit deep scans to essential files
  • Use streaming for large file counts

</performance>

<integration> Integration with Conductor:

  • Provides automated project discovery
  • Eliminates manual context gathering
  • Enables 80% faster brownfield onboarding
  • Feeds project context to chat interface

Integration with Other Skills:

  • rule-selector: Auto-select rules based on detected frameworks
  • repo-rag: Semantic search for architectural patterns
  • dependency-analyzer: Deep dependency analysis

</integration>

<best_practices>

1. Progressive Disclosure: Start with manifest analysis, add deep scans if needed 2. Performance First: Skip expensive operations for large projects 3. Fail Gracefully: Handle missing files, parse errors 4. Validate Output: Always validate against schema 5. Cache Results: Store analysis output for reuse 6. Incremental Updates: Re-analyze only changed files </best_practices> </instructions>

<examples> <usage_example> Programmatic Usage:

# Analyze current project
node .claude/tools/analysis/project-analyzer/analyzer.mjs

# Analyze specific directory
node .claude/tools/analysis/project-analyzer/analyzer.mjs /path/to/project

# Output to file
node .claude/tools/analysis/project-analyzer/analyzer.mjs --output .claude/context/artifacts/project-analysis.json

Agent Invocation:

# Analyze current project
Analyze this project

# Generate comprehensive analysis
Perform full project analysis and save to artifacts

# Quick analysis (manifest only)
Quick project type detection

</usage_example>

<formatting_example> Sample Output (.claude/context/artifacts/project-analysis.json):

{
  "analysis_id": "analysis-llm-rules-20250115",
  "project_type": "fullstack",
  "analyzed_at": "2025-01-15T10:30:00.000Z",
  "project_root": "C:\\dev\\projects\\LLM-RULES",
  "stats": {
    "total_files": 1243,
    "total_lines": 125430,
    "languages": {
      "JavaScript": 45230,
      "TypeScript": 38120,
      "Markdown": 25680,
      "JSON": 12400,
      "YAML": 4000
    },
    "file_types": {
      ".js": 234,
      ".mjs": 156,
      ".ts": 89,
      ".md": 312,
      ".json": 145
    },
    "directories": 87,
    "avg_file_size_lines": 101,
    "largest_files": [
      {
        "path": ".claude/tools/enforcement-gate.mjs",
        "lines": 1520
      }
    ]
  },
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "nextjs",
      "version": "14.0.0",
      "category": "framework",
      "confidence": 1.0,
      "source": "package.json"
    },
    {
      "name": "react",
      "version": "18.2.0",
      "category": "framework",
      "confidence": 1.0,
      "source": "package.json"
    }
  ],
  "structure": {
    "root_directories": [
      {
        "name": ".claude",
        "purpose": "config",
        "file_count": 543
      },
      {
        "name": "conductor-main",
        "purpose": "source",
        "file_count": 234
      }
    ],
    "entry_points": [
      {
        "path": "conductor-main/src/index.ts",
        "type": "main"
      }
    ],
    "architecture_pattern": "modular",
    "module_system": "esm"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "production": 45,
    "development": 23
  },
  "code_quality": {
    "linting": {
      "configured": true,
      "tool": "eslint"
    },
    "formatting": {
      "configured": true,
      "tool": "prettier"
    },
    "testing": {
      "framework": "vitest",
      "test_files": 89,
      "coverage_configured": true
    },
    "type_safety": {
      "typescript": true,
      "strict_mode": true
    }
  },
  "tech_debt": {
    "score": 35,
    "indicators": [
      {
        "category": "complexity",
        "severity": "medium",
        "description": "3 files exceed 1000 lines",
        "remediation_effort": "moderate"
      }
    ]
  },
  "recommendations": [
    {
      "priority": "P1",
      "category": "maintainability",
      "title": "Refactor large files",
      "description": "Break down files > 1000 lines into smaller modules",
      "effort": "moderate",
      "impact": "high"
    }
  ],
  "metadata": {
    "analyzer_version": "1.0.0",
    "analysis_duration_ms": 2340,
    "files_analyzed": 1243,
    "files_skipped": 3420,
    "errors": []
  }
}

</formatting_example> </examples>

Smart Categorization Scoring (Inspired by Skill_Seekers smart_categorize)

When classifying files, directories, or components into categories, use weighted keyword scoring instead of simple string matching to prevent false positives:

Signal SourceScore WeightExample
File path/URL3 points/api/routes/ matches "API" category
File/class name2 pointsAuthService.ts matches "Authentication"
File content/imports1 pointimport express matches "Backend"

Threshold: Require 2+ total points before assigning a category. Falls back to "other" if no category scores above threshold. This prevents weak single-signal matches from misclassifying components.

Category keywords (extend per project type):

  • API: route, endpoint, controller, handler, middleware, api, rest, graphql
  • Auth: auth, login, session, jwt, oauth, token, credential, permission
  • Database: model, schema, migration, seed, repository, entity, query
  • Testing: test, spec, fixture, mock, stub, e2e, integration
  • Config: config, env, setting, constant, option, feature-flag
  • UI: component, view, page, layout, template, style, theme

Three-Stream Analysis (Inspired by Skill_Seekers unified_codebase_analyzer)

For comprehensive project understanding, analyze three parallel streams:

Stream 1 — Code Analysis: AST patterns, framework detection, dependency graph, architecture classification. This is the existing core workflow (Steps 1-11).

Stream 2 — Documentation: README quality, API docs existence, inline doc coverage, changelog maintenance, contribution guides. Score: docFiles / totalFiles weighted by type.

Stream 3 — Community/Operations: Git activity (commit frequency, contributor count), CI/CD configuration, issue templates, PR templates, release workflow, Docker/container setup.

Combine all three streams into the output JSON under analysis.streams:

{
  "streams": {
    "code": { "score": 0.85, "findings": [...] },
    "documentation": { "score": 0.60, "findings": [...] },
    "operations": { "score": 0.75, "findings": [...] }
  },
  "compositeHealth": 0.73
}

Design Pattern Recognition (Inspired by Skill_Seekers C3.1 PatternRecognizer)

Detect common design patterns with confidence scoring:

PatternDetection SignalConfidence Threshold
SingletonPrivate constructor + static instance0.80
Factorycreate* methods returning interface types0.70
Observersubscribe/on/emit/addEventListener0.70
StrategyInterface + multiple implementations0.60
DecoratorWrapper classes with same interface0.60
RepositoryData access layer abstraction0.70
MiddlewareChain-of-responsibility in request pipeline0.70

Output detected patterns in the analysis JSON with location, confidence, and evidence:

{
  "patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Factory",
      "category": "Creational",
      "confidence": 0.85,
      "location": "src/services/UserFactory.ts",
      "evidence": ["createUser method", "returns IUser interface"]
    }
  ]
}

References

For additional detection patterns extracted from the Auto-Claude analysis framework, see:

  • references/auto-claude-patterns.md - Monorepo indicators, SERVICE_INDICATORS, SERVICE_ROOT_FILES, infrastructure detection, convention detection
  • references/service-patterns.md - Service type detection (frontend, backend, library), framework-specific patterns, entry point detection
  • references/database-patterns.md - Database configuration file patterns, ORM detection (Prisma, SQLAlchemy, TypeORM, Drizzle, Mongoose), connection string patterns
  • references/route-patterns.md - Express, FastAPI, Flask, Django, Next.js, Go, Rust API route detection patterns

These references provide comprehensive regex patterns and detection logic for brownfield codebase analysis.

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

Related skills

Code Review & Qualitybackendfrontendtesting

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.