
Workflow Patterns
- 1 installs
- 36 repo stars
- Updated July 14, 2026
- oimiragieo/agent-studio
Guides TDD task implementation with an 11-step red-green-refactor lifecycle, phase checkpoints, git commits, and verification protocols recorded in a plan.md.
About
This skill lays out an 11-step TDD lifecycle per task, from selecting the next plan.md item through writing failing tests, implementing, and committing with verification gates. A developer uses it to implement tasks from a plan with quality assurance.
- 11-step red-green-refactor task lifecycle
- Phase checkpoints and git-commit verification protocol
Workflow Patterns by the numbers
- 1 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,750 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 31, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill workflow-patternsAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 36 |
| Last updated | July 14, 2026 |
| Repository | oimiragieo/agent-studio ↗ |
What it does
Guides TDD task implementation with an 11-step red-green-refactor lifecycle, phase checkpoints, git commits, and verification protocols recorded in a plan.md.
Files
Workflow Patterns
Guide for implementing tasks using TDD workflow, managing phase checkpoints, handling git commits, and executing the verification protocol that ensures quality throughout implementation.
When to Use This Skill
- Implementing tasks from a track's plan.md
- Following TDD red-green-refactor cycle
- Completing phase checkpoints
- Managing git commits and notes
- Understanding quality assurance gates
- Handling verification protocols
- Recording progress in plan files
TDD Task Lifecycle
Follow these 11 steps for each task:
Step 1: Select Next Task
Read plan.md and identify the next pending [ ] task. Select tasks in order within the current phase. Do not skip ahead to later phases.
Step 2: Mark as In Progress
Update plan.md to mark the task as [~]:
- [~] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validationCommit this status change separately from implementation.
Step 3: RED - Write Failing Tests
Write tests that define the expected behavior before writing implementation:
- Create test file if needed
- Write test cases covering happy path
- Write test cases covering edge cases
- Write test cases covering error conditions
- Run tests - they should FAIL
Example:
def test_validate_user_email_valid():
user = User(email="test@example.com")
assert user.validate_email() is True
def test_validate_user_email_invalid():
user = User(email="invalid")
assert user.validate_email() is FalseStep 4: GREEN - Implement Minimum Code
Write the minimum code necessary to make tests pass:
- Focus on making tests green, not perfection
- Avoid premature optimization
- Keep implementation simple
- Run tests - they should PASS
Step 5: REFACTOR - Improve Clarity
With green tests, improve the code:
- Extract common patterns
- Improve naming
- Remove duplication
- Simplify logic
- Run tests after each change - they should remain GREEN
Step 6: Verify Coverage
Check test coverage meets the 80% target:
pytest --cov=module --cov-report=term-missingIf coverage is below 80%:
- Identify uncovered lines
- Add tests for missing paths
- Re-run coverage check
Step 7: Document Deviations
If implementation deviated from plan or introduced new dependencies:
- Update tech-stack.md with new dependencies
- Note deviations in plan.md task comments
- Update spec.md if requirements changed
Step 8: Commit Implementation
Create a focused commit for the task:
git add -A
git commit -m "feat(user): implement email validation
- Add validate_email method to User class
- Handle empty and malformed emails
- Add comprehensive test coverage
Task: 2.1
Track: user-auth_20250115"Commit message format:
- Type: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore
- Scope: affected module or component
- Summary: imperative, present tense
- Body: bullet points of changes
- Footer: task and track references
Step 9: Attach Git Notes
Add rich task summary as git note:
git notes add -m "Task 2.1: Implement user validation
Summary:
- Added email validation using regex pattern
- Handles edge cases: empty, no @, no domain
- Coverage: 94% on validation module
Files changed:
- src/models/user.py (modified)
- tests/test_user.py (modified)
Decisions:
- Used simple regex over email-validator library
- Reason: No external dependency for basic validation"Step 10: Update Plan with SHA
Update plan.md to mark task complete with commit SHA:
- [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation `abc1234`Step 11: Commit Plan Update
Commit the plan status update:
git add .claude/context/tracks/*/plan.md
git commit -m "docs: update plan - task 2.1 complete
Track: user-auth_20250115"Phase Completion Protocol
When all tasks in a phase are complete, execute the verification protocol:
Identify Changed Files
List all files modified since the last checkpoint:
git diff --name-only <last-checkpoint-sha>..HEADEnsure Test Coverage
For each modified file:
1. Identify corresponding test file 2. Verify tests exist for new/changed code 3. Run coverage for modified modules 4. Add tests if coverage < 80%
Run Full Test Suite
Execute complete test suite:
pytest -v --tb=shortAll tests must pass before proceeding.
Generate Manual Verification Steps
Create checklist of manual verifications:
## Phase 1 Verification Checklist
- [ ] User can register with valid email
- [ ] Invalid email shows appropriate error
- [ ] Database stores user correctly
- [ ] API returns expected response codesWAIT for User Approval
Present verification checklist to user:
Phase 1 complete. Please verify:
1. [ ] Test suite passes (automated)
2. [ ] Coverage meets target (automated)
3. [ ] Manual verification items (requires human)
Respond with 'approved' to continue, or note issues.Do NOT proceed without explicit approval.
Create Checkpoint Commit
After approval, create checkpoint commit:
git add -A
git commit -m "checkpoint: phase 1 complete - user-auth_20250115
Verified:
- All tests passing
- Coverage: 87%
- Manual verification approved
Phase 1 tasks:
- [x] Task 1.1: Setup database schema
- [x] Task 1.2: Implement user model
- [x] Task 1.3: Add validation logic"Record Checkpoint SHA
Update plan.md checkpoints table:
## Checkpoints
| Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status |
| ------- | -------------- | ---------- | -------- |
| Phase 1 | def5678 | 2025-01-15 | verified |
| Phase 2 | | | pending |Quality Assurance Gates
Before marking any task complete, verify these gates:
Passing Tests
- All existing tests pass
- New tests pass
- No test regressions
Coverage >= 80%
- New code has 80%+ coverage
- Overall project coverage maintained
- Critical paths fully covered
Style Compliance
- Code follows style guides
- Linting passes
- Formatting correct
Documentation
- Public APIs documented
- Complex logic explained
- README updated if needed
Type Safety
- Type hints present (if applicable)
- Type checker passes
- No type: ignore without reason
No Linting Errors
- Zero linter errors
- Warnings addressed or justified
- Static analysis clean
Security Audit
- No secrets in code
- Input validation present
- Authentication/authorization correct
- Dependencies vulnerability-free
Git Integration
Commit Message Format
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
<footer>Types:
feat: New featurefix: Bug fixrefactor: Code change without feature/fixtest: Adding testsdocs: Documentationchore: Maintenance
Git Notes for Rich Summaries
Attach detailed notes to commits:
git notes add -m "<detailed summary>"View notes:
git log --show-notesBenefits:
- Preserves context without cluttering commit message
- Enables semantic queries across commits
- Supports track-based operations
SHA Recording in plan.md
Always record the commit SHA when completing tasks:
- [x] **Task 1.1**: Setup schema `abc1234`
- [x] **Task 1.2**: Add model `def5678`This enables:
- Traceability from plan to code
- Semantic revert operations
- Progress auditing
Handling Deviations
During implementation, deviations from the plan may occur. Handle them systematically:
Types of Deviations
Scope Addition Discovered requirement not in original spec.
- Document in spec.md as new requirement
- Add tasks to plan.md
- Note addition in task comments
Scope Reduction Feature deemed unnecessary during implementation.
- Mark tasks as
[-](skipped) with reason - Update spec.md scope section
- Document decision rationale
Technical Deviation Different implementation approach than planned.
- Note deviation in task completion comment
- Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed
- Document why original approach was unsuitable
Requirement Change Understanding of requirement changes during work.
- Update spec.md with corrected requirement
- Adjust plan.md tasks if needed
- Re-verify acceptance criteria
Deviation Documentation Format
When completing a task with deviation:
- [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement validation `abc1234`
- DEVIATION: Used library instead of custom code
- Reason: Better edge case handling
- Impact: Added email-validator to dependenciesError Recovery
Failed Tests After GREEN
If tests fail after reaching GREEN:
1. Do NOT proceed to REFACTOR 2. Identify which test started failing 3. Check if refactoring broke something 4. Revert to last known GREEN state 5. Re-approach the implementation
Checkpoint Rejection
If user rejects a checkpoint:
1. Note rejection reason in plan.md 2. Create tasks to address issues 3. Complete remediation tasks 4. Request checkpoint approval again
Blocked by Dependency
If task cannot proceed:
1. Mark task as [!] with blocker description 2. Check if other tasks can proceed 3. Document expected resolution timeline 4. Consider creating dependency resolution track
Best Practices
1. Never skip RED: Always write failing tests first 2. Small commits: One logical change per commit 3. Immediate updates: Update plan.md right after task completion 4. Wait for approval: Never skip checkpoint verification 5. Rich git notes: Include context that helps future understanding 6. Coverage discipline: Don't accept coverage below target 7. Quality gates: Check all gates before marking complete 8. Sequential phases: Complete phases in order 9. Document deviations: Note any changes from original plan 10. Clean state: Each commit should leave code in working state 11. Fast feedback: Run relevant tests frequently during development 12. Clear blockers: Address blockers promptly, don't work around them
Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.mdAfter completing:
- New pattern ->
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md - Issue found ->
.claude/context/memory/issues.md - Decision made ->
.claude/context/memory/decisions.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
Invoke the workflow-patterns skill and follow it exactly as presented to you
'use strict';
/**
* Post-execute hook for workflow-patterns
* Auto-generated by enterprise-bundle-scaffolder
*
* Records metrics after skill execution.
*/
function postExecute(_context) {
// Record execution metrics
return { ok: true, skill: 'workflow-patterns' };
}
module.exports = { postExecute };
'use strict';
/**
* Pre-execute hook for workflow-patterns
* Auto-generated by enterprise-bundle-scaffolder
*
* Validates inputs before skill execution.
*/
function preExecute(context) {
// Validate skill invocation context
if (!context || typeof context !== 'object') {
return { allow: true, message: 'workflow-patterns: no context to validate' };
}
return { allow: true };
}
module.exports = { preExecute };
workflow-patterns Research Requirements
Generated: 2026-02-28
Skill Description
TDD task implementation patterns - red-green-refactor cycle, phase checkpoints, git commits, and verification protocols for quality assurance.
Research Areas
- Current best practices for workflow-patterns
- Industry standards and tooling
- Integration patterns
Source References
- To be populated by skill-updater research phase
workflow-patterns Rules
Purpose
TDD task implementation patterns - red-green-refactor cycle, phase checkpoints, git commits, and verification protocols for quality assurance.
Best Practices
- Follow established patterns
- Validate inputs at boundaries
Integration Points
See SKILL.md for complete documentation.
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "workflow-patternsInput",
"description": "Input schema for TDD task implementation patterns - red-green-refactor cycle, phase checkpoints, git commits, and verification protocols for quality assurance.",
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": true,
"properties": {
"target": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target file or path for the skill to operate on"
},
"options": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Additional options for skill execution",
"additionalProperties": true
}
}
}
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "workflow-patternsOutput",
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": true,
"properties": {
"ok": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"summary": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
#!/usr/bin/env node
'use strict';
/**
* workflow-patterns - Enterprise Skill Script
* Auto-generated by enterprise-bundle-scaffolder
*/
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
// Parse arguments
const args = process.argv.slice(2);
const options = {};
for (let i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
if (args[i].startsWith('--')) {
const key = args[i].slice(2);
const value = args[i + 1] && !args[i + 1].startsWith('--') ? args[++i] : true;
options[key] = value;
}
}
if (options.help) {
console.log(`
workflow-patterns - Enterprise Skill
Usage:
node main.cjs --check <file> Check a file against guidelines
node main.cjs --list List all guidelines
node main.cjs --help Show this help
Description:
TDD task implementation patterns - red-green-refactor cycle, phase checkpoints, git commits, and verification protocols for quality assurance.
`);
process.exit(0);
}
if (options.list) {
console.log('Guidelines for workflow-patterns:');
console.log('See SKILL.md for full guidelines');
process.exit(0);
}
console.log('workflow-patterns skill loaded. Use with Claude for code review.');
workflow-patterns Implementation Template
Goal
- Define target outcome and acceptance criteria.
TDD
1. Red 2. Green 3. Refactor
Verification
- lint
- format
- targeted tests