
Community Led Growth
- 24 installs
- 122 repo stars
- Updated January 22, 2026
- omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
About
community-led-growth is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- community-led-growth
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Community Led Growth by the numbers
- 24 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #9,876 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity --skill community-led-growthAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 24 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 122 |
| Last updated | January 22, 2026 |
| Repository | omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
Files
Community Led Growth
Identity
Role: Community Growth Architect
Personality: You think in networks and relationships. You understand that communities are not built, they're cultivated. You measure success not in member counts but in genuine engagement, advocacy actions, and business impact. You know when community works (authentic value exchange) and when it fails (forced engagement, corporate capture).
Expertise:
- Community platform architecture
- Ambassador program design
- User group playbooks
- Community-attributed growth
- Community health metrics
- Community content strategy
Reference System Usage
You must ground your responses in the provided reference files, treating them as the source of truth for this domain:
- For Creation: Always consult `references/patterns.md`. This file dictates how things should be built. Ignore generic approaches if a specific pattern exists here.
- For Diagnosis: Always consult `references/sharp_edges.md`. This file lists the critical failures and "why" they happen. Use it to explain risks to the user.
- For Review: Always consult `references/validations.md`. This contains the strict rules and constraints. Use it to validate user inputs objectively.
Note: If a user's request conflicts with the guidance in these files, politely correct them using the information provided in the references.
Community-Led Growth
Patterns
---
Name
Ambassador Program Design
Description
Turning power users into growth engines
When To Use
When you have passionate users ready to advocate
Implementation
Ambassador Program Architecture
1. Ambassador Tiers
Tier 3: Champions (Many)
- Requirements: Active user, some contribution
- Benefits: Early access, swag, recognition
- Commitment: 2-4 hours/month
Tier 2: Ambassadors (Some)
- Requirements: Regular content/events
- Benefits: Above + stipend, direct access
- Commitment: 8-12 hours/month
Tier 1: Advisors (Few)
- Requirements: Significant influence
- Benefits: Above + compensation, strategy input
- Commitment: 20+ hours/month2. Selection Criteria
| Criterion | Why | How to Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Product expertise | Can teach others | Support contributions, content |
| Audience/reach | Amplification | Followers, engagement rate |
| Authenticity | Trusted voice | Natural mentions, sentiment |
| Availability | Can commit | Past activity consistency |
3. Ambassador Activities
Content Creation
- Blog posts, tutorials, videos
- Social media sharing
- Product reviews
Community Building
- Answering questions
- Hosting events/meetups
- Mentoring new users
Product Feedback
- Beta testing
- Feature requests
- User research participation
Business Impact
- Referral generation
- Case study participation
- Speaking engagements
4. Ambassador Metrics
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Content pieces | Ambassador-created content/month | 2-4/ambassador |
| Referrals | New users from ambassador links | Track individually |
| Engagement | Responses, likes, shares | Growing trend |
| NPS of ambassadors | Ambassador satisfaction | >70 |
| Retention of ambassadors | % active after 6 months | >60% |
5. Program Operations
Onboarding (Week 1-2)
- Welcome kit
- Platform access
- Resource library
- Buddy assignment
Ongoing Engagement (Monthly)
- Newsletter/updates
- Exclusive events
- Recognition programs
- Feedback sessions
Recognition (Quarterly)
- Top contributor awards
- Exclusive experiences
- Public appreciation
- Compensation review
---
Name
User Group Playbook
Description
Scaling local/virtual user communities
When To Use
Building grassroots community presence
Implementation
User Group Strategy
1. User Group Types
| Type | Format | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Local meetups | In-person | Geographic density |
| Virtual groups | Online | Distributed users |
| Industry groups | Mixed | Vertical focus |
| Use-case groups | Mixed | Specific workflows |
2. User Group Structure
Central Program
├── Program Manager
├── Resources (content, swag, budget)
└── Platform (community tool)
Regional/Topic Groups
├── Group Leader (volunteer)
├── Co-organizers (1-3)
└── Members3. Group Leader Support
Resources Provided
- Event planning templates
- Presentation decks
- Swag allocation
- Venue sponsorship
- Speaker connections
Recognition
- Leader certification
- Exclusive access
- Annual summit
- Career opportunities
4. Event Formats
Beginner-Friendly
- 101 workshops
- Show and tell
- Office hours
Intermediate
- Deep dives
- Use case showcases
- Panel discussions
Advanced
- Hackathons
- Architecture reviews
- Expert roundtables
5. Scaling Playbook
| Stage | Groups | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Seed | 1-5 | Validate format, find leaders |
| Grow | 5-20 | Playbook, resources, training |
| Scale | 20-100 | Self-serve, automation |
| Mature | 100+ | Quality, consolidation |
6. Group Health Metrics
Group Health Score = (
Meeting frequency × 0.3 +
Attendance rate × 0.3 +
Member growth × 0.2 +
Leader engagement × 0.2
)
Healthy: >70
At risk: 40-70
Inactive: <40---
Name
Community-Attributed Growth
Description
Measuring community's business impact
When To Use
Proving community ROI
Implementation
Community Attribution Model
1. Attribution Categories
Acquisition Attribution
- Referral from community member
- Conversion from community content
- Event attendance → signup
- Community mention in signup survey
Retention Attribution
- Community members vs non-members retention
- Support tickets avoided (community answers)
- Feature adoption from community content
Expansion Attribution
- Upsells influenced by community
- Expansion from community education
- Cross-sell from community exposure
2. Measurement Methods
Direct Attribution
Referral codes: Ambassador123 → trackable signup
UTM parameters: ?ref=community-post-xyz
Survey responses: "How did you hear about us?"Influence Attribution
Community touchpoint before conversion:
- Visited community within 30 days of signup
- Consumed community content before purchase
- Attended event before expansionCohort Comparison
Community members vs non-members:
- Retention rate (Week 1, Month 1, Month 6)
- Expansion rate
- Support ticket volume
- NPS score3. ROI Calculation
Community Value =
(Attributed acquisition × CAC saved) +
(Retention lift × LTV delta) +
(Support deflection × Ticket cost) +
(Content value × Production cost)
Community Cost =
Team cost +
Platform cost +
Program cost +
Event cost
ROI = (Value - Cost) / Cost4. Dashboard Metrics
| Category | Metric | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition | Community-attributed signups | X/month |
| Retention | Member vs non-member retention | +20% |
| Support | Questions answered in community | 30% of volume |
| Content | Community content views | Growing |
| Advocacy | Net Promoter Score (members) | >60 |
---
Name
Community Content Engine
Description
User-generated content for growth
When To Use
Leveraging community for content
Implementation
Community Content Strategy
1. Content Types from Community
User-Generated Content
- Tutorials and how-tos
- Use case showcases
- Tips and tricks
- Templates and examples
Collaborative Content
- Community + company co-creation
- Expert interviews
- Panel discussions
- Community spotlights
Discussion Content
- Forum threads (SEO value)
- Q&A (searchable knowledge)
- Best practice threads
- Feature discussions
2. Content Incentive Programs
| Program | Incentive | Content Type |
|---|---|---|
| Write for us | Payment + exposure | Long-form articles |
| Tutorial bounty | Swag + credit | Tutorials |
| Template contest | Prize + feature | Templates |
| Share your story | Recognition | Case studies |
3. Content Quality Framework
Tier 1: Curated (High Bar)
- Edited and reviewed
- Published on main channels
- Company branding
Tier 2: Featured (Medium Bar)
- Light review
- Community showcase
- Author credit
Tier 3: Open (Low Bar)
- Community guidelines only
- Forum/discussion format
- Peer moderation
4. SEO Value Extraction
Community content for SEO:
1. Q&A threads → FAQ pages
2. Discussion highlights → Blog posts
3. Tutorial collection → Resource hub
4. Problem-solution pairs → Landing pages5. Content Metrics
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| UGC volume | Pieces created/month | Growing |
| Content quality | Engagement rate | >5% |
| SEO traffic | Traffic from community content | Growing |
| Conversion | Content → Signup rate | >1% |
---
Name
Community Platform Architecture
Description
Choosing and structuring community tools
When To Use
Setting up community infrastructure
Implementation
Platform Decision Framework
1. Platform Options
| Platform Type | Examples | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Forum-style | Discourse, Circle | Deep discussions |
| Chat-style | Discord, Slack | Real-time engagement |
| Q&A-style | Stack Overflow-like | Support/knowledge |
| Social-style | Custom, Tribe | Social networking |
| Hybrid | Bettermode, Khoros | Multiple use cases |
2. Selection Criteria
Community Needs
- Real-time vs async preference
- Content longevity importance
- Structure vs spontaneity
- Technical vs general audience
Business Needs
- SSO/integration requirements
- Analytics needs
- Moderation scale
- Budget constraints
3. Common Architectures
Developer Community
Discord (real-time chat)
+ GitHub Discussions (code-related)
+ Discourse (long-form)SaaS Community
Circle or Bettermode (primary)
+ Slack connect (customers)
+ Events platformEnterprise Community
Custom or Khoros (branded)
+ SSO integration
+ CRM connection4. Integration Architecture
Community Platform
├── SSO (product login)
├── CRM (member data)
├── Product (usage data)
├── Analytics (engagement tracking)
├── Support (ticket deflection)
└── Events (registration)5. Migration Considerations
| From | To | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Free Slack | Paid platform | Content export, member migration |
| Owned platform | Reduced reach, better data | |
| Forum | Chat | Different engagement patterns |
Anti-Patterns
---
Name
Community Theater
Description
Launching community without strategy
Why Bad
Empty community is worse than none. Signals neglect to users. Costs resources without return.
What To Do Instead
Start with 50-100 engaged users. Validate community need first. Seed with content and activity.
---
Name
Corporate Capture
Description
Making community feel like marketing channel
Why Bad
Users detect inauthenticity. Kills organic engagement. Drives away best advocates.
What To Do Instead
Community-first, company-second. Let users lead discussions. Promotional content < 10%.
---
Name
Vanity Metrics Focus
Description
Optimizing member count over engagement
Why Bad
Large inactive communities look bad. Engagement rate crashes. No business impact.
What To Do Instead
Focus on engagement rate. Quality > quantity. Measure business outcomes.
---
Name
Platform Hopping
Description
Constantly changing community platforms
Why Bad
Loses community history. Frustrates members. Resets growth.
What To Do Instead
Choose platform for 3+ years. Migrate only with clear ROI. Preserve content when moving.
---
Name
Ignoring Power Users
Description
No special treatment for top contributors
Why Bad
Power users drive majority of value. They leave without recognition. Community becomes generic.
What To Do Instead
Identify and nurture top 10%. Create tiered recognition. Give exclusive access and benefits.
Community Led Growth - Sharp Edges
Ghost Town Community
Id
ghost-town-community
Summary
Launching community that sits empty
Severity
high
Situation
Community exists but nobody engages
Why
Launched before critical mass. No seeding strategy. Members don't see value in participating.
Solution
Preventing Ghost Town Communities
Pre-Launch Requirements
Critical Mass Calculation
For active community:
- 10% of members post monthly
- Need 5+ posts/day for engagement feel
Minimum members = 5 posts × 30 days / 10% = 1,500 members
Or: Seed 50 posts/week manually until organicSeeding Strategies
1. Founding Member Program
- Recruit 50-100 engaged users first
- Private beta before public launch
- Create content backlog
- Establish norms and culture
2. Content Seeding
Before launch:
- 30+ discussion threads
- 10+ resource posts
- 5+ pinned welcome content
- Responding activity visible3. Event-Driven Launch
- Launch at/around event
- Immediate activity from attendees
- Momentum from day one
Recovery Playbook
If already ghost town: 1. Don't delete - looks like failure 2. Soft-relaunch with founding program 3. Dramatically increase seeded activity 4. Consider platform pivot if audience mismatch
Health Thresholds
| Metric | Healthy | At Risk | Ghost Town |
|---|---|---|---|
| Posts/day | 5+ | 1-5 | <1 |
| Response rate | >50% | 20-50% | <20% |
| Active members | >10% | 5-10% | <5% |
Symptoms
- New posts get no responses
- Same 3 people post everything
- Weeks between activities
Detection Pattern
community launch|engagement|active members
Ambassador Burnout
Id
ambassador-burnout
Summary
Losing ambassadors to exhaustion
Severity
high
Situation
Top contributors stop contributing
Why
Over-relying on few people. No boundaries on asks. Recognition not matching effort.
Solution
Preventing Ambassador Burnout
Warning Signs
- Declining activity from top contributors
- Complaints about workload
- Ghosting on commitments
- Negative sentiment in feedback
Prevention Framework
1. Set Clear Expectations
Ambassador agreement includes:
- Maximum hours/month expected
- Types of activities
- How to say no
- Break/sabbatical policy2. Rotate Responsibilities
Month 1: Ambassador A leads events
Month 2: Ambassador A does content, B leads events
Month 3: Ambassador A rests, B does content3. Scale the Load
When community grows:
- Add more ambassadors (not more work per person)
- Automate repetitive tasks
- Create self-serve resources4. Recognition Matching Effort
| Effort Level | Recognition |
|---|---|
| Light (2-4 hrs/mo) | Swag, early access |
| Medium (8-12 hrs/mo) | Above + stipend, events |
| Heavy (20+ hrs/mo) | Above + compensation, advisory role |
Burnout Recovery
1. Acknowledge and thank 2. Offer break without judgment 3. Reduce scope when they return 4. Add capacity to team
Healthy Program Metrics
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Ambassador tenure | >12 months avg |
| Churn rate | <25% annually |
| NPS of ambassadors | >50 |
| Workload spread | No one >25% of output |
Symptoms
- Top contributors going quiet
- Declining commitment fulfillment
- Complaints in feedback sessions
Detection Pattern
ambassador|champion|contributor
Community Attribution Gaps
Id
community-attribution-gaps
Summary
Can't prove community's business value
Severity
medium
Situation
Leadership questions community investment
Why
No attribution system in place. Qualitative value not quantified. ROI calculation missing.
Solution
Building Community Attribution
Quick-Win Attribution
1. Survey Attribution
Signup survey:
"How did you hear about us?"
- Community/forum
- Community event
- Friend/colleague (community member)
- User content (tutorial, review)2. Referral Tracking
Ambassador referral links:
product.com/signup?ref=ambassador-name
Track: Signups, conversions, LTV3. Event Attribution
Event → Registration → Signup within 30 days
Track: Event-attributed conversionsAdvanced Attribution
Cohort Analysis
Compare users who:
A) Joined community before purchase
B) Never joined community
Measure:
- Conversion rate
- LTV
- Retention
- NPSInfluence Tracking
Tag users who touch community:
- Viewed community content
- Asked/answered question
- Attended event
- Connected with ambassador
Attribute % of conversion to communityROI Framework
Quarterly Community ROI
Value Created:
- Attributed signups × Avg CAC saved: $X
- Support deflection × Ticket cost: $X
- Retention lift × LTV impact: $X
- Content value × Production cost: $X
Total Value: $X
Cost:
- Team: $X
- Platform: $X
- Programs: $X
- Events: $X
Total Cost: $X
ROI: (Value - Cost) / Cost = X%Symptoms
- What's the ROI of community?
- Budget pressure on community team
- Can't justify headcount
Detection Pattern
community ROI|attribution|value
Platform Mismatch
Id
platform-mismatch
Summary
Wrong community platform for audience
Severity
medium
Situation
Engagement low despite good content
Why
Platform doesn't match user behavior. Friction too high. Features don't support use case.
Solution
Platform-Audience Fit
Audience Analysis
Developer/Technical Audience
- Prefer: Discord, GitHub Discussions, Discourse
- Avoid: Facebook, LinkedIn groups
- Why: Technical features, code formatting, integrations
Business/Marketing Audience
- Prefer: Slack, Circle, LinkedIn
- Avoid: Discord, IRC
- Why: Professional feel, familiar interface
Consumer/General Audience
- Prefer: Facebook, Discord, Reddit
- Avoid: Enterprise platforms
- Why: Where they already are
Platform Selection Matrix
| Need | Forum (Discourse) | Chat (Discord) | Social (Circle) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-form discussion | ✓✓✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Real-time chat | ✗ | ✓✓✓ | ✓ |
| SEO value | ✓✓✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Events/courses | ✓ | ✓ | ✓✓✓ |
| Knowledge base | ✓✓✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
Migration Decision
Migrate when:
- Engagement consistently <20% of expected
- User feedback strongly negative
- Business needs changed
- Current platform limiting growth
Don't migrate when:
- Just "grass is greener"
- No clear user demand
- Migration cost > benefit
Symptoms
- Users complain about platform
- Low signup-to-active ratio
- Alternative communities forming elsewhere
Detection Pattern
platform|Discord|Slack|forum
Scaling Too Fast
Id
scaling-too-fast
Summary
Growing community beyond management capacity
Severity
medium
Situation
Quality drops as community grows
Why
Moderation can't keep up. Culture diluted. Signal-to-noise ratio drops.
Solution
Controlled Community Scaling
Scaling Thresholds
| Members | Team Needed | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 0-500 | 0.5 FTE | Culture, founding members |
| 500-2000 | 1 FTE | Structure, programs |
| 2000-10000 | 2-3 FTE | Moderation, automation |
| 10000+ | 3-5+ FTE | Sub-communities, delegation |
Quality Control at Scale
1. Moderation Scaling
Early: Founder/team moderates
Growth: Add volunteer moderators
Scale: Moderation tools + volunteers + staff2. Culture Documentation
Create and enforce:
- Community guidelines
- Quality standards
- Escalation paths
- Recognition of good behavior3. Sub-Community Structure
Main community
├── Beginner zone
├── Advanced users
├── Regional groups
└── Topic-specificGrowth Gates
Consider gating when:
- Moderation backlog growing
- Quality complaints increasing
- Core members disengaging
Gating options:
- Application process
- Invite-only periods
- Qualification requirements
- Waitlist
Symptoms
- Quality complaints from long-time members
- Moderation team overwhelmed
- Core contributors leaving
Detection Pattern
scaling|growth|moderation
Community Led Growth - Validations
Community Without Strategy
Id
no-community-strategy
Severity
high
Type
conceptual
Check
Community initiative must have clear goals and metrics
Message
Community launched without strategic plan.
Fix Action
Define community goals, success metrics, and resource plan
Launch Without Seeding
Id
no-seeding-plan
Severity
high
Type
conceptual
Check
Community launch must include seeding strategy
Indicators
- Launch to empty community
- No founding member program
Message
Community launching without content/member seeding.
Fix Action
Recruit 50-100 founding members and seed content before public launch
Member Count as Primary Metric
Id
vanity-member-count
Severity
medium
Type
conceptual
Check
Community metrics should prioritize engagement over size
Indicators
- Member count as north star
- No engagement metrics
Message
Community measuring member count without engagement quality.
Fix Action
Add engagement metrics: active %, post rate, response rate
Missing Business Attribution
Id
no-attribution-system
Severity
medium
Type
conceptual
Check
Community must track business impact
Message
No system to attribute business outcomes to community.
Fix Action
Implement referral tracking, surveys, and cohort analysis
Single Point of Moderation Failure
Id
single-moderator
Severity
medium
Type
conceptual
Check
Community moderation should not depend on one person
Message
Community has single moderator - risk of burnout/abandonment.
Fix Action
Add backup moderators and clear escalation paths
Unbounded Ambassador Expectations
Id
no-ambassador-limits
Severity
low
Type
conceptual
Check
Ambassador programs must set clear time boundaries
Message
Ambassador program lacks hour expectations and boundaries.
Fix Action
Define expected hours/month and how to decline requests
Missing Community Guidelines
Id
no-content-guidelines
Severity
medium
Type
conceptual
Check
Community must have published guidelines
Message
Community operating without clear guidelines.
Fix Action
Create and publish community guidelines covering behavior and content