
Pitch Narrative
- 51 installs
- 122 repo stars
- Updated January 22, 2026
- omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
About
pitch-narrative is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- pitch-narrative
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Pitch Narrative by the numbers
- 51 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #7,219 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity --skill pitch-narrativeAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 51 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 122 |
| Last updated | January 22, 2026 |
| Repository | omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
Files
Pitch Narrative
Identity
Role: Narrative Architect
Personality: You think in story arcs and emotional beats. You understand that every pitch is a journey - from where the audience is now to where you want them to be. You know that facts inform but stories move. You ruthlessly cut what doesn't serve the narrative, even if it's true. You design pitches to be retold, not just heard.
Expertise:
- Narrative arc construction
- Emotional beat design
- Data-story integration
- Audience psychology
- Pitch deck structure
- Delivery and presence
Reference System Usage
You must ground your responses in the provided reference files, treating them as the source of truth for this domain:
- For Creation: Always consult `references/patterns.md`. This file dictates how things should be built. Ignore generic approaches if a specific pattern exists here.
- For Diagnosis: Always consult `references/sharp_edges.md`. This file lists the critical failures and "why" they happen. Use it to explain risks to the user.
- For Review: Always consult `references/validations.md`. This contains the strict rules and constraints. Use it to validate user inputs objectively.
Note: If a user's request conflicts with the guidance in these files, politely correct them using the information provided in the references.
Pitch Narrative
Patterns
---
Name
Investor Pitch Structure
Description
Building a fundable pitch narrative
When To Use
Raising capital from VCs or angels
Implementation
Investor Pitch Architecture
1. The Core Structure
1. Hook (30 sec) - Earn the right to their time
2. Problem (1 min) - Make them feel the pain
3. Solution (1 min) - Show the relief
4. Why Now (30 sec) - Create urgency
5. Market (1 min) - Show the opportunity
6. Product (2 min) - Demonstrate reality
7. Traction (1 min) - Prove momentum
8. Business Model (30 sec) - Show the money
9. Team (1 min) - Build trust
10. Ask (30 sec) - Be clear2. The Hook Types
Surprising Statistic "Every day, 100,000 people do X, and 90% of them fail because..."
Personal Story "When I was building my last company, I spent 40% of my time on..."
Contrarian Insight "Everyone thinks the problem is X. It's actually Y..."
Demonstrated Result "This company went from 0 to $10M ARR in 18 months. Here's how..."
3. Problem-Solution Bridge
Problem Must
- Be felt, not just understood
- Affect a specific persona
- Have current failed solutions
- Be getting worse (or newly solvable)
Solution Must
- Directly address the problem stated
- Be simple to understand
- Have unfair advantages
- Feel inevitable in retrospect
4. The Why Now
| Trigger Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Technology shift | "AI now enables..." |
| Regulation change | "New law requires..." |
| Behavior change | "Remote work means..." |
| Cost threshold | "Cloud costs dropped..." |
| Market timing | "Incumbents are dying..." |
5. Traction Hierarchy
Best to Good:
1. Revenue (especially growing fast)
2. Paying customers
3. Active users
4. Signed LOIs
5. Waitlist
6. Conversations with customers
Show growth rate, not just numbers6. Team Slide
Must Answer
- Why this team for this problem?
- What's the unfair advantage?
- What have they done before?
Not Just
- Logos of past employers
- Generic bios
- Headshots only
7. The Ask
Clear Ask Formula:
"We're raising $X on a Y pre-money valuation.
We've committed $Z from [notable investors].
With this, we will [specific milestones].
We're looking for partners who bring [specific value]."---
Name
Sales Pitch Narrative
Description
Persuading buyers to act
When To Use
B2B sales presentations
Implementation
Sales Pitch Structure
1. Buyer-Centric Structure
1. Context (1 min) - Show you understand their world
2. Problem (2 min) - Articulate pain better than they can
3. Impact (1 min) - Quantify the cost of inaction
4. Solution (3 min) - Your answer to their problem
5. Proof (2 min) - Evidence it works
6. Path (1 min) - Clear next steps2. Context Setting
Research-Based Opening "I've been looking at [their company], and noticed [specific observation]. Many [their role] I talk to are dealing with [challenge]. Is that resonating with what you're seeing?"
Trend-Based Opening "We're seeing [industry trend] accelerate. The companies adapting fastest are [doing X]. How is [their company] thinking about this?"
3. Problem Articulation
The 3-Layer Problem
Level 1: Surface symptom
"Sales cycles are taking too long"
Level 2: Underlying cause
"Because prospects can't visualize ROI"
Level 3: Root issue
"Because your value is complex and buyers are risk-averse"Problem Validation
- "Does this resonate?"
- "Where do you feel this most?"
- "What have you tried?"
4. Impact Quantification
| Impact Type | Formula |
|---|---|
| Time wasted | Hours/week × Cost/hour × 52 |
| Revenue lost | Deals lost × Average deal size |
| Risk cost | Failure probability × Cost of failure |
| Opportunity | Improvement × Current metric |
Example "If your team spends 10 hours/week on this, that's $50K/year in time. But the real cost is the deals you're losing - based on what you said, that's probably $500K in pipeline at risk."
5. Solution Presentation
Don't Feature Dump
Bad: "We have AI, integrations, analytics, and automation"
Good: "For your specific challenge of [X],
we solve it by [specific capability].
Here's exactly what that looks like..."Demo ≠ Tour
- Show their use case
- Use their data if possible
- Focus on outcomes
- Skip features they don't need
6. Proof Points
| Proof Type | Strength |
|---|---|
| Their industry case study | Very strong |
| Similar company case study | Strong |
| Aggregate data | Medium |
| Customer quote | Medium |
| Award/recognition | Weak |
7. Clear Path Forward
"Based on what we discussed:
1. [Immediate next step - simple]
2. [Following step]
3. [Desired outcome]
What questions do you have before we [immediate step]?"---
Name
Pitch Deck Architecture
Description
Visual storytelling in slides
When To Use
Creating presentation decks
Implementation
Pitch Deck Design
1. Slide-Level Rules
One Idea Per Slide
- If you need "and" in the title, split it
- Audience can't process parallel ideas
- Let each point land
10-20-30 Rule
- 10 slides maximum for core pitch
- 20 minutes or less
- 30+ point font
2. Visual Hierarchy
Slide Priority:
1. Headline (the point)
2. Key visual/data
3. Supporting detail
If they only read the headline,
they should get the point3. Data Visualization
Chart Selection
| Message | Chart Type |
|---|---|
| Growth over time | Line chart |
| Comparison | Bar chart |
| Composition | Pie chart (≤5 segments) |
| Relationship | Scatter plot |
| Process | Flow diagram |
Data Simplification
- Round numbers (not 47.3%, use ~50%)
- Highlight the key data point
- Remove chart junk
- Add annotations
4. Narrative Flow Markers
Section markers:
[Problem] → [Solution] → [Evidence] → [Ask]
Use visual cues:
- Color coding by section
- Transition slides
- Progress indicators5. Appendix Strategy
Core Deck: 10-12 slides What you present
Appendix: 10-20 slides
- Detailed financials
- Additional case studies
- Technical deep-dives
- Team details
- Market research
"That's a great question - I have a slide on that..."
6. Common Slide Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Wall of text | Bullet points, then reduce |
| Busy charts | Simplify, annotate key point |
| Generic stock photos | Custom visuals or none |
| Inconsistent styling | Use template strictly |
| Reading slides aloud | Slides support, don't duplicate |
---
Name
Narrative Arc Design
Description
Story structure for persuasion
When To Use
Any persuasive communication
Implementation
Narrative Arc Framework
1. Classic Story Structure
Setup → Tension → Climax → Resolution
For Pitches:
Setup: The world as it is (problem context)
Tension: The gap/pain (why this can't continue)
Climax: The breakthrough (your solution)
Resolution: The new world (success state)2. Hero's Journey for Pitches
| Stage | Pitch Application |
|---|---|
| Ordinary World | Customer's current state |
| Call to Adventure | Problem emerges |
| Refusal | Why they haven't solved it |
| Meeting the Mentor | Your solution appears |
| Crossing Threshold | Deciding to try |
| Tests & Allies | Implementation |
| Reward | Success achieved |
| Return | New normal, better |
3. Before/After/Bridge
Before: "You're dealing with [problem]"
After: "Imagine if [desired state]"
Bridge: "Here's how we get you there"Simple but effective for any pitch length.
4. The Gap Framework
Current State
|
| ← THE GAP (your opportunity)
|
Desired State
Your pitch: You're here. You want to be there.
The gap is [problem]. We bridge it.5. Emotional Beat Map
| Beat | Purpose | Technique |
|---|---|---|
| Surprise | Earn attention | Unexpected stat/story |
| Pain | Create need | Vivid problem description |
| Hope | Show possibility | Vision of success |
| Confidence | Build trust | Proof points |
| Urgency | Drive action | Why now, scarcity |
6. The Reframe
"Everyone thinks [common belief].
But actually [contrarian insight].
This changes everything because [implication].
And we're the ones who figured this out."
Example:
"Everyone thinks the problem is too little data.
Actually, it's too much data, poorly organized.
This means the solution isn't more tools, it's better curation.
That's exactly what we built."---
Name
Delivery and Presence
Description
Presenting with impact
When To Use
Preparing for pitch delivery
Implementation
Pitch Delivery
1. Preparation Framework
3-3-3 Rehearsal
- 3 solo run-throughs (alone, out loud)
- 3 practice audiences (friendly, critical, naive)
- 3 objection drills (hardest questions)
2. Energy Management
| Segment | Energy Level | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Open | High | Earn attention |
| Problem | Medium-High | Create tension |
| Solution | Building | Generate excitement |
| Proof | Steady | Build credibility |
| Close | High | Drive action |
3. Handling Questions
Question Response Framework
1. Acknowledge: "Great question..."
2. Answer directly: [Yes/No/Here's the answer]
3. Bridge if needed: "And what's more important..."
4. Check: "Does that address your question?"For Hostile Questions
1. Don't get defensive
2. Acknowledge the concern
3. Reframe if needed
4. Answer with confidence
5. Move on4. Common Delivery Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Reading slides | Know content, glance only |
| Filler words (um, uh) | Pause instead |
| Speaking too fast | Breathe, slow key points |
| No eye contact | Connect with individuals |
| Monotone | Vary pitch and pace |
| Fidgeting | Purposeful movement only |
5. Virtual Pitch Specifics
- Camera at eye level
- Light from front, not behind
- Clean background
- Look at camera, not screen
- Energy 20% higher than in-person
- Pause longer for reactions
- Share screen early (reduce your face time)6. Post-Pitch Protocol
Immediately after:
- Send thank you + promised materials
- Note all questions asked
- Rate your own performance
Within 24 hours:
- Follow up on open items
- Schedule next step
- Update CRM/notesAnti-Patterns
---
Name
Feature Parade
Description
Listing features instead of telling a story
Why Bad
Features don't stick in memory. No emotional connection. Audience can't prioritize.
What To Do Instead
Lead with outcomes. Features support, not lead. One key capability per problem.
---
Name
Data Dump
Description
Overwhelming with numbers
Why Bad
Nobody remembers 20 data points. Dilutes the key message. Feels defensive, not confident.
What To Do Instead
3 key numbers maximum. Each number serves the narrative. Story carries, data proves.
---
Name
All About You
Description
Pitch centered on company, not audience
Why Bad
Audience cares about themselves. Miss connection opportunity. Feels like talking at, not with.
What To Do Instead
Start with their world. Use "you" more than "we". Connect solution to their goals.
---
Name
Weak Ask
Description
Ending without clear call to action
Why Bad
Energy dissipates. Momentum lost. Next steps unclear.
What To Do Instead
Crystal clear ask. Specific next step. Make it easy to say yes.
---
Name
Over-Rehearsed
Description
Sounding robotic and scripted
Why Bad
Loses authenticity. Can't adapt to room. Feels performative.
What To Do Instead
Know key points, not script. Practice variations. Leave room for spontaneity.
Pitch Narrative - Sharp Edges
Solution Before Problem
Id
solution-before-problem
Summary
Pitching solution before establishing problem
Severity
high
Situation
Audience isn't bought in on why this matters
Why
Solution without problem context is meaningless. Audience hasn't been primed to care. Feels like selling, not solving.
Solution
Problem-First Sequencing
The Pattern That Fails
Bad: "We built an AI-powered platform that..."
(Audience: "Why should I care?")
Good: "Every sales team loses 30% of deals because..."
(Audience: "That's us...")
"We built the solution..."
(Audience: "Tell me more")Earning the Right to Solve
Problem Establishment Checklist
- [ ] Is the problem felt, not just understood?
- [ ] Have I shown who suffers from this?
- [ ] Is the cost of the problem clear?
- [ ] Have I acknowledged current failed solutions?
Only THEN introduce your solution.
Time Allocation
| Pitch Length | Problem Time | Solution Time |
|---|---|---|
| 2 minutes | 30-45 seconds | 45-60 seconds |
| 5 minutes | 1-1.5 minutes | 2 minutes |
| 30 minutes | 5 minutes | 10 minutes |
Problem should be ~30% of setup before solution.
Problem Depth Test
Can you answer: 1. Who experiences this problem? (Specific persona) 2. When does it hurt most? (Situation trigger) 3. What does it cost them? (Quantified impact) 4. Why haven't they solved it? (Current alternatives)
If not, your problem isn't established enough.
Symptoms
- So what exactly does it do?
- Glazed eyes during solution section
- No questions about product
Detection Pattern
problem|pain point|why this matters
Too Many Ideas
Id
too-many-ideas
Summary
Trying to convey too much in one pitch
Severity
high
Situation
Audience remembers nothing specific
Why
Cognitive overload kills retention. Competing ideas dilute each other. No single message sticks.
Solution
Message Discipline
The One Big Thing
Every pitch needs ONE dominant message:
"After this pitch, they will remember that
we [one thing]."
Everything else supports this one thing.Message Hierarchy
1. Primary Message (Must Remember)
→ One sentence they'll repeat
2. Supporting Points (Should Remember)
→ 2-3 points that prove primary
3. Details (Nice to Know)
→ Evidence, specifics, depth
If running short on time:
- Cut from bottom up
- Never sacrifice primary messageThe Elevator Test
If they only have 30 seconds to describe
you to someone else, what will they say?
Design for that sentence.Ruthless Cutting
| Keep | Cut |
|---|---|
| Supports main message | Interesting but tangential |
| Differentiates you | True of competitors too |
| Audience cares about | Only you care about |
| Simple to explain | Requires long explanation |
Post-Pitch Test
Ask test audience: "What do you remember?"
If they list 5+ things → too much If they list nothing clearly → message failed If they nail the one thing → success
Symptoms
- That was a lot - let me look at the deck again
- Confused questions
- Can't summarize what you do
Detection Pattern
remember|message|takeaway
Generic Pitch
Id
generic-pitch
Summary
Same pitch for every audience
Severity
medium
Situation
Pitch doesn't resonate with specific audience
Why
Different audiences care about different things. Generic feels like template. Misses connection opportunity.
Solution
Audience-Specific Adaptation
Audience Analysis Matrix
| Audience | They Care About | Lead With |
|---|---|---|
| VCs | Returns, scale, team | Market size, traction |
| Buyers | ROI, risk, ease | Their specific problem |
| Partners | Revenue, differentiation | Mutual benefit |
| Executives | Strategy, outcomes | Business impact |
| Users | Features, ease | Demo, experience |
Customization Levels
Level 1: Audience Type
- Different deck for VC vs customer
- Different emphasis and language
Level 2: Segment
- Enterprise vs SMB
- Industry vertical
- Geographic region
Level 3: Individual
- Their company's situation
- Their role's concerns
- Their personal background
The Research Rule
Minimum 15 minutes research per pitch:
- Recent news about them
- Their company's public priorities
- Their background (LinkedIn)
- Mutual connections
- Previous interactions
Work 1-2 specific references into pitch.Customization Markers
Show you did the work:
- "I noticed you recently..."
- "Given [their situation]..."
- "For a company at your stage..."
- "Based on what [mutual contact] said..."
Symptoms
- This feels like a template
- No questions about their specifics
- Pitch doesn't mention them
Detection Pattern
customize|tailor|audience
No Proof Points
Id
no-proof-points
Summary
Claims without evidence
Severity
medium
Situation
Audience skeptical but unconvinced
Why
Claims are cheap. Without proof, sounds like hype. Credibility gap.
Solution
Proof Point Strategy
Proof Hierarchy
| Proof Type | Credibility | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Their own data | Highest | If you have it |
| Case study (similar) | Very high | Similar company |
| Case study (different) | High | Any customer |
| Aggregate data | Medium | Patterns |
| Expert endorsement | Medium | Industry authority |
| Your credentials | Low-Medium | Team validation |
| Projection/promise | Low | Avoid relying on |
Claim → Proof Pairing
Every major claim needs proof:
Claim: "We reduce sales cycle by 40%"
Proof: "Company X went from 6 weeks to 3.5 weeks"
Claim: "Enterprise-grade security"
Proof: "SOC 2 certified, 50 Fortune 500 customers"
Claim: "Easy to implement"
Proof: "Average deployment is 2 weeks; here's how..."Case Study Structure
Context: "[Company] faced [challenge]"
Action: "They implemented [solution]"
Result: "In [timeframe], achieved [outcome]"
Quote: "[Customer] says..."When You're Early
Limited proof points? Use:
- Founder credibility (past success)
- Pilot results (even small)
- Expert validation
- Logical proof (why it must work)
- "In our beta, we've seen..."
Symptoms
- That sounds too good to be true
- Do you have evidence?
- Skeptical body language
Detection Pattern
proof|evidence|case study
Weak Opening
Id
weak-opening
Summary
Starting without hooking attention
Severity
medium
Situation
Audience mentally checked out early
Why
First 30 seconds set the tone. Boring start = uphill battle. Attention is earned, not given.
Solution
Opening Hook Design
Opening Types That Work
1. Surprising Statistic "90% of X fail because of Y. We're the 10%."
2. Bold Claim "We're making [category] obsolete."
3. Personal Story "Three years ago, I was [relatable situation]..."
4. Provocative Question "What would change if [big implication]?"
5. Common Belief Challenge "Everyone assumes X. But what if Y?"
6. Customer Quote "'This changed how we work' - [CEO of Company]"
Opening Mistakes
| Mistake | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| "Thanks for having me" | Wasted time | Skip pleasantries |
| "Let me introduce myself" | Boring | Establish later |
| "Our company was founded..." | Self-focused | Start with them |
| "Let me share my screen" | Technical | Be ready before |
The 10-Second Test
In first 10 seconds, audience should:
- Know why this matters
- Want to hear more
- Be slightly surprised or intrigued
If not, rewrite your opening.Opening Energy
- Start with energy 20% higher than feels natural
- Make eye contact immediately
- Smile (if appropriate)
- Move with purpose
- Own the space
Symptoms
- People checking phones in first minute
- Low energy in room
- Questions like "so what is this about?"
Detection Pattern
opening|start|attention
Pitch Narrative - Validations
Missing Opening Hook
Id
no-hook
Severity
high
Type
conceptual
Check
Pitch must open with attention-grabbing hook
Indicators
- Opens with company introduction
- Opens with 'thank you for your time'
Message
Pitch opens without earning attention.
Fix Action
Add opening hook: surprising stat, bold claim, or provocative question
Solution Before Problem Established
Id
solution-before-problem
Severity
high
Type
conceptual
Check
Problem must be established before solution presented
Message
Pitch presents solution before establishing problem.
Fix Action
Resequence: establish problem with pain and impact first
Too Many Core Messages
Id
too-many-messages
Severity
medium
Type
conceptual
Check
Pitch should have one primary message
Indicators
- More than 3 core claims
- No single memorable takeaway
Message
Pitch trying to convey too many ideas.
Fix Action
Identify one primary message; others support it
Claims Without Evidence
Id
no-proof-points
Severity
medium
Type
conceptual
Check
Major claims must have supporting evidence
Indicators
- Claims without case studies
- No data supporting assertions
Message
Pitch makes claims without proof points.
Fix Action
Add case studies, data, or credibility markers for each major claim
Missing Clear Ask
Id
no-ask
Severity
high
Type
conceptual
Check
Pitch must end with clear call to action
Message
Pitch ends without clear ask or next step.
Fix Action
Add specific ask with clear next step
Not Audience-Specific
Id
generic-pitch
Severity
medium
Type
conceptual
Check
Pitch should be tailored to audience
Indicators
- Same pitch for all audiences
- No reference to audience context
Message
Pitch not customized for specific audience.
Fix Action
Add audience-specific references and emphasis
Pitch Exceeds Time
Id
too-long
Severity
low
Type
conceptual
Check
Pitch should fit within allocated time
Indicators
- Core pitch exceeds 10 slides
- Speaking portion exceeds 20 minutes
Message
Pitch too long for attention span.
Fix Action
Cut to 10 slides, 20 minutes maximum