
Docs Sync
- 124 installs
- 3.5k repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- openai/openai-agents-js
openai-agents-js docs sync skill auditing docs/ against implementation for gaps and staleness.
About
openai-agents-js documentation sync skill. Analyzes main branch code and configuration against docs/ directory to identify gaps, inaccuracies, and stale pages. Used when asked to audit doc coverage, sync docs with code, or prepare documentation updates after API changes. Compares exported APIs, configuration options, and example code against written documentation, producing a prioritized list of doc fixes aligned with monorepo package structure.
- Audits docs/ against main branch implementation and config
- Finds missing, incorrect, and outdated documentation pages
- Prioritizes doc fixes after API or configuration changes
- Aligned with openai-agents-js monorepo package structure
- Triggers on audit doc coverage or sync docs with code requests
Docs Sync by the numbers
- 124 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +4 installs in the week ending Jul 26, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #612 of 1,879 Documentation skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
docs-sync capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- audit doc coverage · identify stale docs · prioritize doc fixes
- Use cases
- documentation
What docs-sync says it does
Analyze main branch implementation and configuration to find missing, incorrect, or outdated documentation in docs/.
npx skills add https://github.com/openai/openai-agents-js --skill docs-syncAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 124 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 3.5k |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | openai/openai-agents-js ↗ |
Which documentation in openai-agents-js is missing or outdated?
Audit docs/ against main branch implementation to find missing, incorrect, or outdated documentation in openai-agents-js.
Who is it for?
Maintainers auditing or syncing openai-agents-js documentation after code changes.
Skip if: Writing docs for unrelated repositories.
When should I use this skill?
User asks to audit doc coverage, sync docs with code, or find outdated docs/ pages.
What you get
Prioritized list of doc updates aligning docs/ with current main branch code.
Files
Docs Sync
Overview
Identify doc coverage gaps and inaccuracies by comparing main branch features and configuration options against the current docs structure, then propose targeted improvements.
Workflow
1. Confirm scope and base branch
- Identify the current branch and default branch (usually
main). - Prefer analyzing the current branch to keep work aligned with in-flight changes.
- If the current branch is not
main, analyze only the diff vsmainto scope doc updates. - Avoid switching branches if it would disrupt local changes; use
git show main:<path>orgit worktree addwhen needed.
2. Build a feature inventory from the selected scope
- If on
main: inventory the full surface area and review docs comprehensively. - If not on
main: inventory only changes vsmain(feature additions/changes/removals). - Focus on user-facing behavior: public exports, configuration options, environment variables, CLI commands, default values, and documented runtime behaviors.
- Capture evidence for each item (file path + symbol/setting).
- Use targeted search to find option types and feature flags (for example:
rg "Options",rg "process.env",rg "export"). - When the topic involves OpenAI platform features, invoke
$openai-knowledgeto pull current details from the OpenAI Developer Docs MCP server instead of guessing, while treating the SDK source code as the source of truth when discrepancies appear. - For MCP SDK (
modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk) or Vercel AI SDK (@ai-sdk/*) topics, optionally use Deepwiki MCP for quick lookups, and still treat the SDK source code as the source of truth.
3. Doc-first pass: review existing pages
- Walk each relevant page under
docs/src/content/docs(excludingdocs/src/content/docs/openai). - Identify missing mentions of important, supported options (opt-in flags, env vars), customization points, or new features from
packages/. - Propose additions where users would reasonably expect to find them on that page.
4. Code-first pass: map features to docs
- Review the current docs information architecture under
docs/src/content/docs. - Determine the best page/section for each feature based on existing patterns and package boundaries.
- Identify features that lack any doc page or have a page but no corresponding content.
- Note when a structural adjustment would improve discoverability.
5. Detect gaps and inaccuracies
- Missing: features/configs present in main but absent in docs.
- Incorrect/outdated: names, defaults, or behaviors that diverge from main.
- Structural issues (optional): pages overloaded, missing overviews, or mis-grouped topics.
6. Produce a Docs Sync Report and ask for approval
- Provide a clear report with evidence, suggested doc locations, and proposed edits.
- Ask the user whether to proceed with doc updates.
7. If approved, apply changes (English only)
- Edit only English docs in
docs/src/content/docs/**. - Exclude
docs/src/content/docs/openaifrom review and updates. - Do not edit
docs/src/content/docs/ja,docs/src/content/docs/ko, ordocs/src/content/docs/zh. - Keep changes aligned with the existing docs style and navigation.
- Place any code snippets under
examples/docs/<doc-filename>/so the directory name matches the target doc file, mirroring existing patterns. - Verify doc code snippets build successfully with
pnpm -F docs-code build-checkand fix issues before handoff.
Output format
Use this template when reporting findings:
Docs Sync Report
- Doc-first findings
- Page + missing content → evidence + suggested insertion point
- Code-first gaps
- Feature + evidence → suggested doc page/section (or missing page)
- Incorrect or outdated docs
- Doc file + issue + correct info + evidence
- Structural suggestions (optional)
- Proposed change + rationale
- Proposed edits
- Doc file → concise change summary
- Questions for the user
References
references/doc-coverage-checklist.md
interface:
display_name: "Docs Sync"
short_description: "Audit docs coverage and propose targeted updates"
default_prompt: "Use $docs-sync to audit the current branch against docs/ and propose targeted documentation updates."
Doc Coverage Checklist
Use this checklist to scan the selected scope (main = comprehensive, or current-branch diff) and validate documentation coverage.
Feature inventory targets
- Public exports: classes, functions, types, and module entry points.
- Configuration options:
*Optionstypes, default config objects, and builder patterns. - Environment variables or runtime flags.
- CLI commands, scripts, and example entry points that define supported usage.
- User-facing behaviors: retry, timeouts, streaming, errors, logging, telemetry, and data handling.
- Deprecations, removals, or renamed settings.
Doc-first pass (page-by-page)
- Review each relevant English page (excluding
docs/src/content/docs/openai). - Look for missing opt-in flags, env vars, or customization options that the page implies.
- Add new features that belong on that page based on user intent and navigation.
Code-first pass (feature inventory)
- Map features to the closest existing page based on package or feature area.
- Prefer updating existing pages over creating new ones unless the topic is clearly new.
- Use conceptual pages for cross-cutting concerns (auth, errors, streaming, rate limits).
- Keep quick-start flows minimal; move advanced details into deeper pages.
- Exclude
docs/src/content/docs/openaifrom coverage checks and updates.
Evidence capture
- Record the main-branch file path and symbol/setting name.
- Note defaults or behavior-critical details for accuracy checks.
- Avoid large code dumps; a short identifier is enough.
Red flags for outdated or incorrect docs
- Option names/types no longer exist or differ from code.
- Default values or allowed ranges do not match implementation.
- Features removed in code but still documented.
- New behaviors introduced without corresponding docs updates.
When to propose structural changes
- A page mixes unrelated audiences (quick-start + deep reference) without clear separation.
- Multiple pages duplicate the same concept without cross-links.
- New feature areas have no obvious home in the nav structure.
Diff mode guidance (current branch vs main)
- Focus only on changed behavior: new exports/options, modified defaults, removed features, or renamed settings.
- Use
git diff main...HEAD(or equivalent) to constrain analysis. - Document removals explicitly so docs can be pruned if needed.
Patch guidance
- Keep edits scoped and aligned to existing tone and format.
- Update cross-links when moving or renaming sections.
- Leave translated docs untouched; English-only updates.
Related skills
FAQ
What gets compared?
Main branch implementation, configuration, and exported APIs against docs/ content.
What output should I expect?
Identified missing pages, incorrect statements, and outdated examples needing updates.
When should I run this?
After API changes or when asked to audit documentation coverage in the monorepo.