
Usability Testing
- 11 installs
- 233 repo stars
- Updated June 23, 2026
- owl-listener/designpowers
Helps with testing & qa tasks during AI-assisted development.
About
usability-testing is a Claude Code skill for testing & qa. It helps developers move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- usability-testing
- Testing & QA
- AI-coding skill
Usability Testing by the numbers
- 11 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,539 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 1, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/owl-listener/designpowers --skill usability-testingAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 11 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 233 |
| Last updated | June 23, 2026 |
| Repository | owl-listener/designpowers ↗ |
What it does
Helps with testing & qa tasks during AI-assisted development.
Files
Usability Testing
Testing with real people is how you find out if the design works — not by looking at it, but by watching someone use it.
When to Use
- After design-builder produces a working prototype
- Before declaring a design complete
- When the design-critic flags persona coverage gaps
- When assumptions about user behaviour need evidence
Process
Step 1: Define What You're Testing
Write 3-5 task scenarios that map to the core jobs in the brief. Each task:
- Starts with a realistic trigger — "You just bought a new plant and want to add it to the app"
- Has a clear success condition — "The plant appears in your list with a watering schedule"
- Does not tell the user how — never say "tap the + button"
Step 2: Select Participants
Recruit 5-8 participants. At minimum include:
- 1 person who uses a screen reader
- 1 person over 60
- 1 person who is not a native speaker of the interface language
- 1 person with low tech confidence
Reference inclusive-personas for the ability spectrum.
Step 3: Choose Method
| Method | When to use | Minimum participants |
|---|---|---|
| Moderated think-aloud | New flows, complex interactions | 5 |
| Unmoderated remote | Simple tasks, large sample | 8-12 |
| Guerrilla (hallway) | POC validation, time-constrained | 3-5 |
| Accessibility audit with AT users | After build, before ship | 2-3 |
Step 4: Write the Test Script
1. Welcome — explain what you're testing (the design, not them) 2. Background — 2-3 questions about their relationship to the problem 3. Tasks — present each scenario one at a time, observe silently 4. Debrief — "What was hardest?" "What would you change?"
Never help during a task. Silence is data.
Step 5: Analyse Findings
Classify outcomes per task:
- Completed easily — no hesitation, no errors
- Completed with difficulty — hesitation or errors but recovered
- Failed — could not complete
- Completed wrong — thought they succeeded but didn't
Severity: Critical (blocks 2+ participants), Major (significant difficulty), Minor (noticed but not impeding).
Step 6: Turn Findings Into Actions
Every finding becomes a design action: "[Severity] [What happened] → [Design action] → [Which agent handles it]"
What You Deliver
- Task success rates table
- Ranked findings by severity
- Design actions with agent assignments
- Recommendation: iterate / ship / rethink
Integration
- Informed by:
inclusive-personas,design-discovery - Feeds into:
design-lead,design-builder,design-strategist