
Audit Stories
- 34 installs
- 87 repo stars
- Updated June 9, 2026
- owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
About
audit-stories is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- audit-stories
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Audit Stories by the numbers
- 34 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +5 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #8,855 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill audit-storiesAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 34 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 87 |
| Last updated | June 9, 2026 |
| Repository | owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
Files
Audit User Stories for Inclusion
Review an existing set of user stories and identify where disability and diverse abilities have been overlooked — then add the missing criteria without creating separate accessibility tickets.
Process
Step 1: Gather Stories
Collect the user stories to audit. This could be a sprint backlog, a feature's full story set, or an epic.
Step 2: Check Each Story
Using inclusive-user-stories, review each story's acceptance criteria for:
- Keyboard operability
- Screen reader support
- Visual accessibility (contrast, colour independence, zoom)
- Motor accessibility (target size, timing, precision)
- Cognitive accessibility (plain language, error recovery, undo)
Flag any story where one or more of these are missing.
Step 3: Check for Assumption Bias
Using edge-case-identification, for each story ask:
- What input method does this assume?
- What sensory ability does this assume?
- What cognitive capacity does this assume?
- What context does this assume?
- What "edge cases" have been dismissed that are daily reality
for some users?
Step 4: Add Missing Criteria
For each flagged story, write the specific acceptance criteria that need to be added. Don't create separate stories — add directly to the existing ones.
Output
Deliver an audit report:
1. Summary — number of stories reviewed, number with gaps, most common gap type 2. Story-by-story findings — each story with its missing criteria listed 3. Added criteria — the specific acceptance criteria to add to each story, ready to paste into the backlog 4. Patterns — recurring gaps that suggest a systemic issue (e.g., "no story in this sprint mentions keyboard access")