
Cognitive Load Assessment
- 37 installs
- 87 repo stars
- Updated June 9, 2026
- owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
About
cognitive-load-assessment is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- cognitive-load-assessment
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Cognitive Load Assessment by the numbers
- 37 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +5 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #8,545 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill cognitive-load-assessmentAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 37 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 87 |
| Last updated | June 9, 2026 |
| Repository | owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
Files
Cognitive Load Assessment
Assess cognitive load across three dimensions and provide actionable recommendations to reduce unnecessary burden on users.
The Three Types of Cognitive Load
Intrinsic load — complexity inherent in the task itself. A tax return is intrinsically complex. You cannot simplify the tax code. Focus: break into manageable steps, provide context, explain terms.
Extraneous load — complexity added by the design, not the task. Confusing navigation, unclear labels, inconsistent patterns, visual clutter. Focus: eliminate ruthlessly. Every instance is a fixable design failure.
Germane load — effort invested in the actual task. This is the load you WANT. The user engaging with their real goal. Focus: maximise this by removing the other two.
Assessment Framework
For each screen or step, evaluate:
| Dimension | Low (good) | Medium (review) | High (redesign) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decisions required | 0–1 | 2–3 | 4+ |
| Items to remember | None | 1–2 | 3+ |
| New concepts to learn | None | 1 | 2+ |
| Steps to complete | 1–2 | 3–5 | 6+ |
| Reading complexity | Plain language | Some jargon | Dense/technical |
| Visual complexity | Clean, focused | Moderate | Cluttered |
If any dimension rates High, that screen needs redesign before launch.
How to Assess
1. Walk through the flow as a user who is tired, stressed, and unfamiliar 2. At each screen, count: decisions, things to remember, new concepts 3. Note where you pause, re-read, or feel uncertain — those are load spikes 4. Map the load type: is the difficulty intrinsic or extraneous? 5. Recommend specific reductions for each extraneous load source
Reduction Strategies
- Progressive disclosure: show only what the current step needs
- Smart defaults: pre-select the most common option
- Chunking: group into sets of 3–5 related items
- Recognition over recall: show options, don't make users remember
- Persistent context: show key selections throughout a flow
- One primary action per screen: de-emphasise secondary actions
Output Format
Present the assessment as a screen-by-screen table showing load ratings, followed by prioritised recommendations sorted by impact.