
Tdd Migration Pipeline
- 457 installs
- 3.9k repo stars
- Updated January 26, 2026
- parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
tdd-migration-pipeline is an orchestrator-only continuous-claude-v3 skill that migrates or rewrites codebases using full TDD and delegated agents for developers who need large refactors without orchestrator context bloat
About
tdd-migration-pipeline is an orchestrator-only workflow from parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 for migrating or rewriting codebases with test-driven guarantees. The orchestrator never reads files, writes code, or validates directly—it instructs delegated agents and passes paths, not file contents, keeping context growth at zero. Allowed tools are Task, TodoWrite, Read, and Bash. Use it when moving between languages or frameworks, rewriting systems under behavioral contracts, or running large refactors where subagents execute TDD cycles. Core principle: zero orchestrator execution; all implementation and validation happens in delegated workers piped scoped context.
- tdd-migration-pipeline
Tdd Migration Pipeline by the numbers
- 457 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #939 of 4,347 Backend & APIs skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 --skill tdd-migration-pipelineAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 457 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 3.9k |
| Last updated | January 26, 2026 |
| Repository | parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 ↗ |
How do you migrate a codebase with TDD and agents?
Use tdd-migration-pipeline for development tasks
Who is it for?
Developers running language or framework migrations who want an orchestrator that delegates TDD cycles to subagents without growing main context.
Skip if: Small single-file edits, migrations without automated tests, or workflows where the main agent should directly read and write code.
When should I use this skill?
The user plans a language/framework migration, large rewrite with behavioral contracts, or requests zero-context-growth orchestrated TDD refactoring.
What you get
Migrated source files, passing TDD test suites, and delegated-agent execution logs without orchestrator code edits.
- migrated source code
- passing test suites
- orchestration task plan
Files
TDD Migration Pipeline
Orchestrator-only workflow for migrating or rewriting codebases. You do NOT read files, write code, or validate anything yourself. You only instruct agents and pipe context (paths, not contents).
When to Use
- Migrating codebase from one language/framework to another
- Rewriting a system with TDD guarantees
- Large-scale refactoring with behavioral contracts
- When you want zero context growth in the orchestrator
Core Principles
1. ZERO orchestrator execution - only instruct and pipe context 2. All work done by agents - you never read/write/validate 3. Context window stays flat - pass paths, not contents 4. New code in separate directory - never modify source
Your Constraints
- Never say "let me read..." or "looking at..."
- Only say "Agent X: do Y with Z"
- Your context should NOT grow during execution
- All agents must use
qltyandtldrskills
Pipeline Phases
Phase 1: SPEC
Instruct spec-agent (use scout or architect):
- Analyze {source_path} using tldr-skill
- Output: spec.md with behavioral contracts, types, edge casesAgent prompt template:
Analyze the codebase at {source_path} using tldr commands (tldr structure, tldr extract, tldr calls).
Create spec.md with:
- All behavioral contracts (what each function/class promises)
- Input/output types
- Edge cases and invariants
- Dependencies between components
Write to: {target_dir}/spec.mdPhase 2: FAILING TESTS
Instruct test-agent (use arbiter):
- Read spec.md
- Write failing tests in {target_dir}/tests/
- Tests should define expected behavior before implementation
Instruct review-agent (use critic):
- Validate tests cover spec completely
- No gaps in behavioral coveragePhase 3: ADVERSARIAL (x3 iterations)
Instruct premortem-agent (use premortem skill):
- Review spec + tests
- Identify failure modes, race conditions, edge cases
- DO NOT ASK - just add mitigations directly to spec
- Run 3 passes with fresh perspective each timeKey: Each pass should find NEW issues, not repeat previous ones.
Phase 4: PHASED PLAN
Instruct planner-agent (use architect or plan-agent):
- Input: spec.md + tests + mitigations
- Output: phased-plan.yaml
- Requirements:
- Dependency-ordered phases
- Each phase = one testable unit
- Clear inputs/outputs per phasePhase 5: BUILD LOOP (per phase)
For each phase in phased-plan.yaml:
Instruct builder-agent (use kraken or spark):
- Write code to pass tests for this phase
- Use qlty for quality checks
- Run tests after each change
Instruct review-agent (use critic or judge):
- Validate implementation matches spec
- Check for regressions in previous phases
- Verify no breaking changesPhase 6: INTEGRATION VALIDATION
Instruct integration-agent (use atlas or validator):
- Use tldr to diff against {reference_repo}
- Check for:
- No race conditions
- No hangs or deadlocks
- No breaking changes vs original
- All behavioral contracts preserved
- Output: validation-report.mdInvocation
When invoking this workflow, specify:
SOURCE: {path to source code}
TARGET_DIR: {new folder for migrated code}
TARGET_LANG: {typescript|python|go|rust|etc}
REFERENCE_REPO: {url or path for final diff comparison}
SKILLS: [tldr-code, qlty-check, {domain-specific}]Agent Mapping
| Phase | Agent Type | Subagent |
|---|---|---|
| Spec | research | scout or architect |
| Tests | validate | arbiter |
| Review | review | critic or judge |
| Premortem | review | premortem skill |
| Plan | plan | architect or plan-agent |
| Build | implement | kraken (large) or spark (small) |
| Integration | validate | atlas or validator |
Example Orchestration
# Phase 1
Task(scout): "Analyze /src/old-system using tldr structure and tldr extract.
Create spec.md at /migration/spec.md with all behavioral contracts."
# Phase 2
Task(arbiter): "Read /migration/spec.md. Write failing tests to /migration/tests/
that define expected behavior."
Task(critic): "Review /migration/spec.md vs /migration/tests/.
Report any behavioral gaps."
# Phase 3 (x3)
Task(premortem): "Review /migration/spec.md and /migration/tests/.
Identify failure modes. Add mitigations directly to spec. Pass 1/3."
[repeat with "Pass 2/3", "Pass 3/3"]
# Phase 4
Task(architect): "From /migration/spec.md and /migration/tests/,
create /migration/phased-plan.yaml with dependency-ordered phases."
# Phase 5 (loop)
Task(kraken): "Implement phase 1 from /migration/phased-plan.yaml.
Code goes in /migration/src/. Run tests after."
Task(critic): "Review /migration/src/ against /migration/spec.md.
Check for spec compliance and regressions."
[repeat for each phase]
# Phase 6
Task(atlas): "Run full integration tests on /migration/src/.
Use tldr to diff against /src/old-system.
Output /migration/validation-report.md."Anti-Patterns (DO NOT)
- Reading files into your context ("let me check the code...")
- Writing code directly ("I'll implement this function...")
- Validating anything yourself ("looking at the tests, I see...")
- Modifying the source directory
- Skipping the adversarial phase
- Running build without tests first
Success Criteria
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] qlty reports clean
- [ ] tldr diff shows no breaking changes
- [ ] No race conditions or hangs
- [ ] validation-report.md confirms behavioral equivalence
Related skills
FAQ
Does tdd-migration-pipeline write code in the orchestrator?
tdd-migration-pipeline forbids the orchestrator from reading files, writing code, or validating tests directly; it only instructs delegated agents and passes paths to keep orchestrator context growth at zero.
Which tools can tdd-migration-pipeline use?
tdd-migration-pipeline allows Task, TodoWrite, Read, and Bash for orchestration—spawning subagents, tracking todos, and coordinating a TDD migration pipeline without the main agent implementing changes itself.