File Organizer
- 69 installs
- 1 repo stars
- Updated March 16, 2026
- pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
file-organizer is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.
- file-organizer
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
File Organizer by the numbers
- 69 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #5,786 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill file-organizerAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 69 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 1 |
| Last updated | March 16, 2026 |
| Repository | pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
File Organizer
Overview
Design and maintain well-organized project structures that scale with team and codebase growth. This skill covers monorepo patterns, feature-based vs layer-based architecture, naming conventions, index/barrel files, configuration file placement, and documentation structure.
Apply this skill whenever a project's file organization needs to be established, audited, or restructured for clarity and scalability.
Multi-Phase Process
Phase 1: Assessment
1. Audit current project structure and identify pain points 2. Measure project size (file count, team size, feature count) 3. Identify existing naming conventions and import patterns 4. Catalog configuration file locations 5. Check for circular dependencies or deep nesting
STOP — Do NOT propose a new structure without understanding the current state and its pain points.
Phase 2: Strategy Selection
1. Choose organization strategy using decision table below 2. Define naming conventions and file placement rules 3. Plan barrel export boundaries 4. Establish configuration file placement rules 5. Document import ordering convention
STOP — Do NOT begin migration without documenting the target structure and getting team alignment.
Phase 3: Migration Planning
1. Plan migration path for existing projects (incremental, not big-bang) 2. Identify files that move and their new locations 3. Map import changes required 4. Create automated codemods where possible 5. Define rollback plan if migration causes issues
STOP — Do NOT execute migration without verifying tests pass at each incremental step.
Phase 4: Execution and Validation
1. Move one feature or module at a time 2. Update imports using automated tools 3. Verify tests pass after each move 4. Remove old structure after complete migration 5. Document conventions for team reference
Architecture Strategy Decision Table
| Project Size | Team Size | Recommendation | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 20 files | 1-2 devs | Layer-based | Simple, low overhead |
| 20-100 files | 2-5 devs | Hybrid | Balance of simplicity and scalability |
| 100+ files | 5+ devs | Feature-based | Self-contained modules reduce conflicts |
| Multiple apps sharing code | Any | Monorepo | Shared packages with clear boundaries |
| Rapid prototype / MVP | 1-3 devs | Layer-based | Speed over structure, refactor later |
| Enterprise, multiple teams | 10+ devs | Feature-based + Monorepo | Team ownership per feature module |
Architecture Patterns
Feature-Based (Domain-Driven)
Organize by business domain. Each feature is self-contained.
src/
features/
auth/
components/
LoginForm.tsx
SignupForm.tsx
hooks/
useAuth.ts
api/
auth.api.ts
types/
auth.types.ts
utils/
auth.utils.ts
__tests__/
auth.test.ts
index.ts # Public API (barrel export)
dashboard/
components/
hooks/
api/
types/
index.ts
billing/
...
shared/ # Cross-feature shared code
components/
Button.tsx
Modal.tsx
hooks/
useDebounce.ts
utils/
format.ts
types/
common.types.tsBest for: Teams > 5 developers, medium-large applications, clear domain boundaries.
Layer-Based (Technical)
Organize by technical concern.
src/
components/
Button.tsx
Modal.tsx
LoginForm.tsx
DashboardCard.tsx
hooks/
useAuth.ts
useDebounce.ts
services/
auth.service.ts
billing.service.ts
utils/
format.ts
validation.ts
types/
auth.types.ts
billing.types.ts
pages/
Home.tsx
Dashboard.tsxBest for: Small teams (1-3), simple applications, rapid prototyping.
Hybrid (Recommended Default)
Combine both: shared layer + feature modules.
src/
app/ # App-level concerns
layout.tsx
providers.tsx
routes.tsx
features/ # Feature modules
auth/
dashboard/
billing/
components/ # Shared UI components
ui/ # Design system atoms
layout/ # Layout components
hooks/ # Shared hooks
lib/ # Shared utilities
types/ # Shared types
config/ # App configuration
styles/ # Global stylesMonorepo Patterns
Turborepo / pnpm Workspaces
root/
apps/
web/ # Next.js web app
package.json
api/ # API server
package.json
mobile/ # React Native app
package.json
packages/
ui/ # Shared component library
package.json
config/ # Shared configs (ESLint, TypeScript)
eslint/
typescript/
package.json
utils/ # Shared utilities
package.json
types/ # Shared type definitions
package.json
package.json # Root workspace config
turbo.json # Turborepo pipeline config
pnpm-workspace.yamlPackage Boundaries
- Apps depend on packages, never on other apps
- Packages can depend on other packages
- No circular dependencies
- Each package has a clear, single responsibility
- Shared packages export via
index.tsbarrel
Configuration Sharing
// packages/config/typescript/base.json
{
"compilerOptions": {
"strict": true,
"moduleResolution": "bundler",
"target": "ES2022"
}
}
// apps/web/tsconfig.json
{
"extends": "@repo/config/typescript/nextjs",
"include": ["src"]
}Naming Conventions
Files and Directories
| Type | Convention | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Components | PascalCase | UserProfile.tsx |
| Hooks | camelCase with use prefix | useAuth.ts |
| Utilities | camelCase | formatDate.ts |
| Types | camelCase with .types suffix | auth.types.ts |
| Tests | same name with .test suffix | UserProfile.test.tsx |
| Styles | same name with .module.css suffix | UserProfile.module.css |
| Constants | camelCase or UPPER_SNAKE in file | config.ts |
| API/Services | camelCase with .api or .service | auth.api.ts |
| Directories | kebab-case | user-profile/ |
Component File Naming
# Single-file component
Button.tsx
# Component with co-located files
Button/
Button.tsx
Button.test.tsx
Button.stories.tsx
Button.module.css
index.ts # Re-exports ButtonImport Ordering Convention
// 1. External packages
import React from 'react';
import { useQuery } from '@tanstack/react-query';
// 2. Internal packages (monorepo)
import { Button } from '@repo/ui';
// 3. Feature-level imports
import { useAuth } from '@/features/auth';
// 4. Relative imports (same feature)
import { LoginForm } from './LoginForm';
import { authSchema } from './auth.types';
// 5. Styles
import styles from './Auth.module.css';Index Files and Barrel Exports
Barrel Export Pattern
// features/auth/index.ts — Public API
export { LoginForm } from './components/LoginForm';
export { useAuth } from './hooks/useAuth';
export type { User, AuthState } from './types/auth.types';
// Do NOT export internal implementation details
// Do NOT export utility functions used only within the featureBarrel Export Decision Table
| Context | Use Barrel? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Feature module public API | Yes, always | Clean boundary, controlled surface area |
| Shared component library | Yes, always | Single import point for consumers |
| Utility libraries | Yes, always | Discoverability for shared functions |
| Inside a feature (internal) | No | Import directly, avoid indirection |
| Would cause circular dependencies | No | Break the cycle, import directly |
| Hurts tree-shaking (verified) | No | Use direct imports for bundle size |
Configuration File Placement
Root-Level Configuration
root/
.editorconfig # Editor settings
.eslintrc.js # ESLint config (or eslint.config.js)
.gitignore # Git ignore rules
.prettierrc # Prettier config
.env.example # Environment variable template
docker-compose.yml # Docker composition
Dockerfile # Container build
package.json # Dependencies and scripts
tsconfig.json # TypeScript config
next.config.js # Framework config
tailwind.config.ts # Tailwind config
vitest.config.ts # Test configEnvironment Files
.env # Local defaults (gitignored)
.env.example # Template with dummy values (committed)
.env.local # Local overrides (gitignored)
.env.development # Development-specific (committed or not)
.env.production # Production-specific (committed or not)
.env.test # Test-specific (committed or not)Documentation Structure
docs/
architecture/
adr/ # Architecture Decision Records
001-framework.md
002-database.md
diagrams/
api/ # API documentation
guides/
getting-started.md
deployment.md
contributing.mdMigration Strategy
Incremental Migration (Recommended)
1. Create the target structure alongside existing code 2. Move one feature/module at a time 3. Update imports using automated codemods 4. Verify with tests after each move 5. Remove old structure after complete migration
Automated Tools
ts-morph: programmatic TypeScript refactoringjscodeshift: JavaScript codemods- IDE refactoring: rename/move with automatic import updates
- ESLint
import/order: enforce import ordering
Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | What To Do Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Deeply nested folders (> 4 levels) | Hard to navigate, long import paths | Flatten structure, use path aliases |
utils/ as a dumping ground | Becomes unmaintainable junk drawer | Organize utils by domain or purpose |
| Circular dependencies between features | Build failures, unclear ownership | Features import only from shared or own modules |
| Barrel exports re-exporting everything | Kills tree-shaking, bloats bundles | Export only the public API |
| Inconsistent naming (mixed conventions) | Cognitive load, merge conflicts | Pick one convention, enforce with linter |
| Config scattered across multiple locations | Hard to find and maintain | All config at project root |
| Tests in separate directory tree | Hard to find tests for a file | Co-locate tests with source code |
| 100+ files in one flat folder | Impossible to navigate | Group into sub-modules or features |
| Index files containing logic | Unexpected side effects on import | Index files only re-export |
| Big-bang migration (move everything at once) | High risk, hard to rollback | Incremental moves with tests after each |
Anti-Rationalization Guards
- Do NOT restructure without understanding current pain points -- assess first.
- Do NOT skip the team alignment step -- structure changes affect everyone.
- Do NOT migrate everything at once -- move one module at a time with test verification.
- Do NOT create deeply nested structures "for future scalability" -- flatten until complexity demands it.
- Do NOT ignore barrel export impact on bundle size -- verify with bundle analyzer.
Integration Points
| Skill | How It Connects |
|---|---|
senior-frontend | Frontend project structure follows feature-based or hybrid patterns |
senior-architect | Architecture decisions inform module boundaries and package structure |
senior-fullstack | Full-stack projects need coordinated frontend/backend organization |
clean-code | Naming conventions and module boundaries support clean code principles |
deployment | Monorepo structure affects CI/CD pipeline configuration |
laravel-specialist | Laravel projects follow framework-specific directory conventions |
Skill Type
FLEXIBLE — Choose the organization strategy that fits the project's size, team structure, and complexity. The naming conventions and barrel export patterns are recommendations that should be adapted to existing project conventions.