Self Learning
- 68 installs
- 1 repo stars
- Updated March 16, 2026
- pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
self-learning is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.
- self-learning
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Self Learning by the numbers
- 68 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #5,858 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill self-learningAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 68 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 1 |
| Last updated | March 16, 2026 |
| Repository | pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
Overview
The self-learning skill automatically discovers, understands, and persists project context across sessions. It builds a mental model of the codebase, tech stack, conventions, and team preferences by scanning actual project artifacts. Without self-learning, every session starts from zero — with it, the agent accumulates institutional knowledge that improves accuracy and reduces errors over time.
Announce at start: "I'm using the self-learning skill to understand this project."
---
Phase 1: Trigger Identification
Determine which trigger activated this skill:
| Trigger | Context | Action |
|---|---|---|
| New project | No memory files exist | Full discovery (Phases 2-5) |
| Unfamiliar area | Working in unknown part of codebase | Targeted discovery (Phase 2-3 for that area) |
| User correction | User says "that's wrong" or corrects an assumption | Correction protocol (Phase 6) |
Explicit /learn | User invokes the command | Full discovery (Phases 2-5) |
| Session start | Memory files exist but may be stale | Load and validate memory (Phase 7) |
STOP: Identify your trigger before proceeding. Different triggers require different phases.
---
Phase 2: Project Structure Scan
Use Explore agents to examine these files in order of priority:
| File/Directory | What It Reveals | Priority |
|---|---|---|
package.json / pyproject.toml / go.mod / Cargo.toml / composer.json | Tech stack, dependencies, scripts | Critical |
README.md / CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md | Project purpose, conventions, rules | Critical |
| Directory structure (top 2 levels) | Architecture pattern (monorepo, MVC, hexagonal, etc.) | Critical |
tsconfig.json / eslint.config.* / .prettierrc / phpstan.neon | Coding standards, strictness level | High |
.gitignore | What is excluded, deployment hints | High |
docker-compose.yml / Dockerfile | Infrastructure, services | Medium |
.github/workflows/ / .gitlab-ci.yml | CI/CD setup, required checks | Medium |
.env.example | Environment variables, external services | Medium |
specs/ / docs/ | Existing specifications and documentation | Medium |
Action: For each file found, extract key facts. Do NOT read every file — scan strategically.
STOP: Complete the structure scan before analyzing code patterns.
---
Phase 3: Code Pattern Analysis
Examine 3-5 representative files to identify patterns:
| Pattern Category | What to Look For | Example Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Naming conventions | Variable/function/file naming | camelCase, snake_case, kebab-case, PascalCase |
| Import/export | Module organization | Barrel exports, relative vs absolute paths, path aliases |
| Error handling | How failures are managed | try/catch, Result types, error boundaries, custom exceptions |
| Testing patterns | Test framework and style | File naming (*.test.ts vs *.spec.ts), structure (describe/it vs test) |
| State management | How data flows | Redux, Zustand, Context, Vuex, Pinia, Livewire |
| API patterns | Communication style | REST, GraphQL, tRPC, RPC, WebSocket |
| Database access | Data layer approach | ORM (Prisma, Eloquent, TypeORM), raw SQL, query builder |
| Component patterns | UI structure | Atomic design, feature folders, co-located styles |
Action: Open 3-5 files from different areas of the codebase. Record observed patterns with specific examples.
---
Phase 4: Git History Analysis
git log --oneline -20 # Recent commits — development velocity, commit style
git shortlog -sn -20 # Active contributors
git branch -a # Branching strategy
git log --diff-filter=A --name-only --pretty=format: -10 | head -30 # Recently added filesExtract: Development velocity, commit message conventions, branching strategy, active areas.
STOP: Complete all discovery phases before persisting to memory.
---
Phase 5: Persist to Memory
Update the following memory files (create if they do not exist, append if they do):
memory/project-context.md
# Project Context
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->
## Purpose
[What this project does, who it is for]
## Tech Stack
- Language: [e.g., TypeScript 5.x]
- Framework: [e.g., Next.js 15]
- Database: [e.g., PostgreSQL via Prisma]
- Testing: [e.g., Vitest + Playwright]
- CI/CD: [e.g., GitHub Actions]
## Architecture
[e.g., Monorepo with apps/ and packages/]
[Key directories and their purposes]
## Key Dependencies
[Critical libraries and their roles]memory/learned-patterns.md
# Learned Patterns
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->
## Naming Conventions
[What was observed with specific examples]
## Code Organization
[Import patterns, file structure, module boundaries]
## Error Handling
[How errors are handled in this project with examples]
## Testing Approach
[Framework, patterns, naming, coverage expectations]memory/user-preferences.md
# User Preferences
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->
## Communication Style
[Terse? Detailed? Prefers code over explanation?]
## Workflow Preferences
[PR workflow? Branch naming? Commit style?]
## Review Preferences
[What they focus on in reviews?]memory/decisions-log.md
# Decisions Log
<!-- Updated by self-learning and brainstorming skills -->
## YYYY-MM-DD: [Decision Title]
**Decision:** [What was decided]
**Context:** [Why this came up]
**Rationale:** [Why this was chosen over alternatives]
**Alternatives considered:** [What else was considered]---
Phase 6: Correction Protocol
When the user corrects an assumption:
1. Acknowledge the correction immediately — do not defend the wrong assumption 2. Identify which memory file should be updated 3. Update the memory file with the correction, including date and context 4. Apply the correction to current work immediately 5. Propagate — check if the correction invalidates other assumptions in memory
| Correction Type | Memory File to Update | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Naming convention wrong | learned-patterns.md | "We use snake_case, not camelCase" |
| Tech stack wrong | project-context.md | "We use Vitest, not Jest" |
| Workflow preference | user-preferences.md | "Always create PRs, never push to main" |
| Architecture misunderstanding | project-context.md | "That is a microservice, not a monolith" |
| Decision context | decisions-log.md | "We chose X because of Y, not Z" |
Do NOT skip the memory update. Corrections that are not persisted will be repeated.
---
Phase 7: Session Start — Memory Validation
When memory files already exist:
1. Load all memory files from memory/ directory 2. Check Last updated dates — flag anything older than 30 days 3. Spot-check 2-3 facts against current codebase (e.g., does package.json still list the same framework?) 4. If discrepancies found, run a targeted re-scan of the changed area 5. Update stale entries with current information
---
Decision Table: Discovery Depth
| Situation | Discovery Depth | Time Budget |
|---|---|---|
| Brand new project, no memory files | Full (all phases) | 3-5 minutes |
| New area of known project | Targeted (Phase 2-3 for that area only) | 1-2 minutes |
| User correction | Correction protocol only (Phase 6) | 30 seconds |
| Session start with existing memory | Validation only (Phase 7) | 1 minute |
| Major refactor detected (many changed files) | Full re-scan | 3-5 minutes |
---
Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes
| What NOT to Do | Why It Fails | What to Do Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Read every file in the project | Wastes context window, slow | Scan strategically: config files first, then 3-5 representative code files |
| Assume conventions from one file | One file may be an outlier | Verify patterns across 2+ files before persisting |
| Overwrite memory files completely | Loses historical context and user corrections | Append or update specific sections, preserve history |
| Skip git history | Misses development velocity and team patterns | Always check recent commits and contributors |
| Persist guesses as facts | Poisons future sessions with wrong context | Only persist observations backed by evidence |
| Ignore user corrections | Repeats the same mistakes | Corrections override observations immediately |
| Deep-dive into implementation details | Loses the forest for the trees | Focus on patterns and conventions, not specific logic |
| Skip memory validation on session start | Uses stale context | Always spot-check memory against current codebase |
---
Anti-Rationalization Guards
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I already know this framework" | You do not know THIS project's conventions. Scan. |
| "The memory files are recent enough" | Spot-check anyway. Code changes fast. |
| "This correction is minor" | Minor corrections prevent major errors. Persist it. |
| "I will remember this without writing it down" | You will not. Sessions are independent. Persist to memory. |
| "Scanning will take too long" | Not scanning leads to wrong assumptions that take longer to fix. |
Do NOT skip memory persistence. If you discovered it, write it down.
---
Integration Points
| Skill | Relationship |
|---|---|
using-toolkit | Triggers self-learning at session start |
brainstorming | Loads project context before idea generation |
planning | Uses learned patterns to propose consistent approaches |
code-review | Checks code against learned conventions |
auto-improvement | Records discovery effectiveness metrics |
resilient-execution | Failure patterns inform future approach selection |
---
Concrete Examples
Discovery Command Sequence
# Step 1: Identify tech stack
cat package.json | head -50
# or
cat composer.json | head -50
# or
cat pyproject.toml
# Step 2: Check project structure
ls -la
ls -la src/ || ls -la app/ || ls -la lib/
# Step 3: Examine coding standards
cat tsconfig.json 2>/dev/null || cat phpstan.neon 2>/dev/null
cat .eslintrc* 2>/dev/null || cat .prettierrc* 2>/dev/null
# Step 4: Git activity
git log --oneline -20
git shortlog -sn -20Memory Update After Correction
## 2026-03-15: Naming Convention Correction
**Previous assumption:** Project uses camelCase for database columns
**Correction:** Project uses snake_case for database columns (user corrected)
**Evidence:** Checked `migrations/` directory — all columns use snake_case
**Updated:** learned-patterns.md, Naming Conventions section---
Key Principles
- Observe, do not assume — base learnings on evidence from the codebase
- Incremental updates — append to memory files, do not overwrite
- Verify before persisting — double-check observations with 2+ examples
- Respect corrections — user corrections override observations immediately
- Stay current — re-scan when significant changes occur
---
Skill Type
RIGID — Discovery phases must be followed in order. Memory persistence is mandatory. Corrections must be recorded immediately. Do not skip phases or rationalize away the need to scan.