Senior Frontend
- 68 installs
- 1 repo stars
- Updated March 16, 2026
- pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
Helps with frontend development tasks.
About
senior-frontend is a Claude Code skill for frontend development. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.
- senior-frontend
- Frontend Development
- AI-coding skill
Senior Frontend by the numbers
- 68 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #1,163 of 2,245 Frontend Development skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill senior-frontendAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 68 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 1 |
| Last updated | March 16, 2026 |
| Repository | pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents ↗ |
What it does
Helps with frontend development tasks.
Files
Senior Frontend Engineer
Overview
Deliver production-grade frontend code following a structured three-phase workflow: context discovery, development, and handoff. This skill enforces strict quality standards including atomic design component architecture, comprehensive state management patterns, SSR/SSG/ISR optimization, and mandatory >85% test coverage with Vitest, React Testing Library, and Playwright.
Announce at start: "I'm using the senior-frontend skill for production-grade React/TypeScript development."
---
Phase 1: Context Discovery
Goal: Understand the existing codebase before writing any code.
Actions
1. Analyze existing codebase structure and conventions 2. Identify the tech stack version (React 18/19, Next.js 14/15, TypeScript version) 3. Review existing component library and design system 4. Check state management approach already in use 5. Understand build tooling and CI pipeline 6. Map existing test infrastructure and coverage
STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until:
- [ ] Tech stack versions are identified
- [ ] Existing patterns and conventions are documented
- [ ] Test infrastructure is mapped
- [ ] State management approach is identified
---
Phase 2: Development
Goal: Implement with strict TypeScript, atomic design, and TDD.
Actions
1. Design component architecture following atomic design 2. Implement with TypeScript strict mode 3. Write tests alongside implementation (TDD when appropriate) 4. Optimize for performance (bundle size, rendering, loading) 5. Ensure accessibility compliance
Component Architecture Decision Table (Atomic Design)
| Level | Description | Business Logic | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atoms | Smallest building blocks | None | Button, Input, Icon, Badge |
| Molecules | Composed of atoms | Minimal | FormField, SearchBar, Card |
| Organisms | Complex with business logic | Yes | DataTable, NavigationBar, CommentThread |
| Templates | Page structure without data | Layout only | DashboardLayout, AuthLayout |
| Pages | Templates connected to data | Data fetching | UsersPage, SettingsPage |
Atom Example
interface ButtonProps extends React.ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement> {
variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary' | 'ghost' | 'danger';
size?: 'sm' | 'md' | 'lg';
isLoading?: boolean;
}
export function Button({ variant = 'primary', size = 'md', isLoading, children, ...props }: ButtonProps) {
return (
<button className={cn(buttonVariants({ variant, size }))} disabled={isLoading || props.disabled} {...props}>
{isLoading ? <Spinner size={size} /> : children}
</button>
);
}State Management Decision Table
| State Type | Solution | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Server state | React Query / TanStack Query | API data, caching, sync |
| Form state | React Hook Form + Zod | Form validation, submission |
| Global UI state | Zustand | Theme, sidebar open, modals |
| Local UI state | useState / useReducer | Component-specific state |
| URL state | nuqs / useSearchParams | Filters, pagination, tabs |
| Complex local | useReducer | Multiple related state transitions |
| Shared context | React Context | Theme, locale, auth (infrequent updates) |
SSR / SSG / ISR Decision Table (Next.js App Router)
| Pattern | Use When | Cache Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Static (SSG) | Content rarely changes | Build time |
| ISR | Content changes periodically | Revalidate interval |
| SSR | Content changes per request | No cache |
| Client | User-specific, interactive | Browser |
Server vs Client Component Decision
| Need | Component Type |
|---|---|
| Direct data fetching | Server (default) |
| Event handlers (onClick, onChange) | Client ('use client') |
| useState / useReducer | Client |
| useEffect / useLayoutEffect | Client |
| Browser APIs (window, localStorage) | Client |
| Third-party libs using client features | Client |
| No interactivity needed | Server (default) |
STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 3 until:
- [ ] Components follow atomic design hierarchy
- [ ] TypeScript strict mode is enabled, no
anytypes - [ ] Tests are written for all components
- [ ] Accessibility is verified (axe-core)
---
Phase 3: Handoff
Goal: Verify quality gates and prepare for review.
Actions
1. Verify test coverage meets >85% threshold 2. Run full lint and type check 3. Document complex components with JSDoc/TSDoc 4. Create Storybook stories for UI components 5. Performance audit (Lighthouse, bundle analysis)
Performance Checklist
- [ ] Bundle size < 200KB gzipped (initial load)
- [ ] Largest Contentful Paint < 2.5s
- [ ] First Input Delay < 100ms
- [ ] Cumulative Layout Shift < 0.1
- [ ] Images: next/image with proper sizing and formats
- [ ] Fonts: next/font with display swap
- [ ] No layout thrashing (batch DOM reads/writes)
- [ ] Virtualization for lists > 100 items
Coverage Thresholds
{
"coverageThreshold": {
"global": {
"branches": 85,
"functions": 85,
"lines": 85,
"statements": 85
}
}
}STOP — Handoff complete when:
- [ ] Test coverage >85% verified
- [ ] Lint and type check pass with zero errors
- [ ] Performance audit completed
- [ ] Complex components documented
---
Testing Requirements
Unit Tests (Vitest + React Testing Library)
describe('Button', () => {
it('renders children', () => {
render(<Button>Click me</Button>);
expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Click me' })).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('shows loading state', () => {
render(<Button isLoading>Click me</Button>);
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled();
});
it('calls onClick when clicked', async () => {
const onClick = vi.fn();
render(<Button onClick={onClick}>Click me</Button>);
await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'));
expect(onClick).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
});
});Integration Tests
- Component compositions (form submission flow)
- Data fetching with MSW (Mock Service Worker)
- Routing and navigation
- Error boundaries and fallbacks
E2E Tests (Playwright)
test('user can complete checkout', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('/products');
await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Add to cart' }).first().click();
await page.getByRole('link', { name: 'Cart' }).click();
await expect(page.getByText('1 item')).toBeVisible();
await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Checkout' }).click();
});---
React Query Patterns
function useUsers(filters: UserFilters) {
return useQuery({
queryKey: ['users', filters],
queryFn: () => fetchUsers(filters),
staleTime: 5 * 60 * 1000,
placeholderData: keepPreviousData,
});
}
function useUpdateUser() {
const queryClient = useQueryClient();
return useMutation({
mutationFn: updateUser,
onMutate: async (newUser) => {
await queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: ['users'] });
const previous = queryClient.getQueryData(['users']);
queryClient.setQueryData(['users'], (old) =>
old.map(u => u.id === newUser.id ? { ...u, ...newUser } : u)
);
return { previous };
},
onError: (err, newUser, context) => {
queryClient.setQueryData(['users'], context.previous);
},
onSettled: () => {
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: ['users'] });
},
});
}---
Memoization Decision Table
| Technique | Use When | Do NOT Use When |
|---|---|---|
useMemo | Expensive computation, referential equality for deps | Simple calculations, primitive values |
useCallback | Functions passed to memoized children | Functions not passed as props |
React.memo | Component re-renders often with same props | Props change on every render |
| None | Default — do not memoize | Always profile first |
---
Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Is Wrong | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
useEffect for data fetching | Race conditions, no caching, no dedup | React Query or Server Components |
| Prop drilling more than 2 levels | Tight coupling, maintenance burden | Composition, context, or Zustand |
| Business logic in components | Untestable, unreusable | Extract to hooks or utility functions |
| Barrel exports | Breaks tree-shaking, slower builds | Direct imports |
| Testing implementation details | Brittle tests that break on refactor | Test behavior: user actions and outcomes |
any type anywhere | Defeats TypeScript's purpose | unknown + type guards |
| Inline styles for non-dynamic values | Inconsistent, hard to maintain | CSS modules, Tailwind, or styled-components |
| Memoizing everything | Adds complexity, often slower | Profile first, memoize second |
---
Documentation Lookup (Context7)
Use mcp__context7__resolve-library-id then mcp__context7__query-docs for up-to-date docs. Returned docs override memorized knowledge.
react— when uncertain about hooks API, component lifecycle, or React 19+ featuresnext.js— for App Router, Server Components, or Next.js-specific APIstypescript— for advanced type patterns or compiler optionstailwindcss— for utility classes, configuration, or plugin APIvitest— for test runner API, matchers, or mock utilities
---
Integration Points
| Skill | Relationship |
|---|---|
testing-strategy | Strategy defines frontend test frameworks |
test-driven-development | Components are built with TDD cycle |
react-best-practices | Detailed React patterns complement this skill |
performance-optimization | Frontend performance follows optimization methodology |
code-review | Review verifies component architecture and test coverage |
clean-code | Code quality principles apply to component code |
webapp-testing | Playwright E2E tests use this skill's page structure |
acceptance-testing | UI acceptance criteria drive component tests |
---
Key Principles
- TypeScript strict mode, no
any(useunknown+ type guards) - Prefer composition over inheritance
- Colocate tests, styles, and stories with components
- Server Components by default; Client Components only when required
- Error boundaries at route and feature boundaries
- Accessibility is not optional (test with axe-core)
---
Skill Type
FLEXIBLE — Adapt component architecture and state management to the existing project conventions. The three-phase workflow is strongly recommended. Test coverage must target >85%. TypeScript strict mode is non-negotiable.