Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
pixel-process-ug avatar

Senior Frontend

  • 68 installs
  • 1 repo stars
  • Updated March 16, 2026
  • pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents

Helps with frontend development tasks.

About

senior-frontend is a Claude Code skill for frontend development. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.

  • senior-frontend
  • Frontend Development
  • AI-coding skill

Senior Frontend by the numbers

  • 68 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +2 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #1,163 of 2,245 Frontend Development skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill senior-frontend

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs68
repo stars1
Last updatedMarch 16, 2026
Repositorypixel-process-ug/superkit-agents

What it does

Helps with frontend development tasks.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Senior Frontend Engineer

Overview

Deliver production-grade frontend code following a structured three-phase workflow: context discovery, development, and handoff. This skill enforces strict quality standards including atomic design component architecture, comprehensive state management patterns, SSR/SSG/ISR optimization, and mandatory >85% test coverage with Vitest, React Testing Library, and Playwright.

Announce at start: "I'm using the senior-frontend skill for production-grade React/TypeScript development."

---

Phase 1: Context Discovery

Goal: Understand the existing codebase before writing any code.

Actions

1. Analyze existing codebase structure and conventions 2. Identify the tech stack version (React 18/19, Next.js 14/15, TypeScript version) 3. Review existing component library and design system 4. Check state management approach already in use 5. Understand build tooling and CI pipeline 6. Map existing test infrastructure and coverage

STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until:

  • [ ] Tech stack versions are identified
  • [ ] Existing patterns and conventions are documented
  • [ ] Test infrastructure is mapped
  • [ ] State management approach is identified

---

Phase 2: Development

Goal: Implement with strict TypeScript, atomic design, and TDD.

Actions

1. Design component architecture following atomic design 2. Implement with TypeScript strict mode 3. Write tests alongside implementation (TDD when appropriate) 4. Optimize for performance (bundle size, rendering, loading) 5. Ensure accessibility compliance

Component Architecture Decision Table (Atomic Design)

LevelDescriptionBusiness LogicExample
AtomsSmallest building blocksNoneButton, Input, Icon, Badge
MoleculesComposed of atomsMinimalFormField, SearchBar, Card
OrganismsComplex with business logicYesDataTable, NavigationBar, CommentThread
TemplatesPage structure without dataLayout onlyDashboardLayout, AuthLayout
PagesTemplates connected to dataData fetchingUsersPage, SettingsPage

Atom Example

interface ButtonProps extends React.ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement> {
  variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary' | 'ghost' | 'danger';
  size?: 'sm' | 'md' | 'lg';
  isLoading?: boolean;
}

export function Button({ variant = 'primary', size = 'md', isLoading, children, ...props }: ButtonProps) {
  return (
    <button className={cn(buttonVariants({ variant, size }))} disabled={isLoading || props.disabled} {...props}>
      {isLoading ? <Spinner size={size} /> : children}
    </button>
  );
}

State Management Decision Table

State TypeSolutionWhen to Use
Server stateReact Query / TanStack QueryAPI data, caching, sync
Form stateReact Hook Form + ZodForm validation, submission
Global UI stateZustandTheme, sidebar open, modals
Local UI stateuseState / useReducerComponent-specific state
URL statenuqs / useSearchParamsFilters, pagination, tabs
Complex localuseReducerMultiple related state transitions
Shared contextReact ContextTheme, locale, auth (infrequent updates)

SSR / SSG / ISR Decision Table (Next.js App Router)

PatternUse WhenCache Strategy
Static (SSG)Content rarely changesBuild time
ISRContent changes periodicallyRevalidate interval
SSRContent changes per requestNo cache
ClientUser-specific, interactiveBrowser

Server vs Client Component Decision

NeedComponent Type
Direct data fetchingServer (default)
Event handlers (onClick, onChange)Client ('use client')
useState / useReducerClient
useEffect / useLayoutEffectClient
Browser APIs (window, localStorage)Client
Third-party libs using client featuresClient
No interactivity neededServer (default)

STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 3 until:

  • [ ] Components follow atomic design hierarchy
  • [ ] TypeScript strict mode is enabled, no any types
  • [ ] Tests are written for all components
  • [ ] Accessibility is verified (axe-core)

---

Phase 3: Handoff

Goal: Verify quality gates and prepare for review.

Actions

1. Verify test coverage meets >85% threshold 2. Run full lint and type check 3. Document complex components with JSDoc/TSDoc 4. Create Storybook stories for UI components 5. Performance audit (Lighthouse, bundle analysis)

Performance Checklist

  • [ ] Bundle size < 200KB gzipped (initial load)
  • [ ] Largest Contentful Paint < 2.5s
  • [ ] First Input Delay < 100ms
  • [ ] Cumulative Layout Shift < 0.1
  • [ ] Images: next/image with proper sizing and formats
  • [ ] Fonts: next/font with display swap
  • [ ] No layout thrashing (batch DOM reads/writes)
  • [ ] Virtualization for lists > 100 items

Coverage Thresholds

{
  "coverageThreshold": {
    "global": {
      "branches": 85,
      "functions": 85,
      "lines": 85,
      "statements": 85
    }
  }
}

STOP — Handoff complete when:

  • [ ] Test coverage >85% verified
  • [ ] Lint and type check pass with zero errors
  • [ ] Performance audit completed
  • [ ] Complex components documented

---

Testing Requirements

Unit Tests (Vitest + React Testing Library)

describe('Button', () => {
  it('renders children', () => {
    render(<Button>Click me</Button>);
    expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Click me' })).toBeInTheDocument();
  });

  it('shows loading state', () => {
    render(<Button isLoading>Click me</Button>);
    expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled();
  });

  it('calls onClick when clicked', async () => {
    const onClick = vi.fn();
    render(<Button onClick={onClick}>Click me</Button>);
    await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'));
    expect(onClick).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
  });
});

Integration Tests

  • Component compositions (form submission flow)
  • Data fetching with MSW (Mock Service Worker)
  • Routing and navigation
  • Error boundaries and fallbacks

E2E Tests (Playwright)

test('user can complete checkout', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/products');
  await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Add to cart' }).first().click();
  await page.getByRole('link', { name: 'Cart' }).click();
  await expect(page.getByText('1 item')).toBeVisible();
  await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Checkout' }).click();
});

---

React Query Patterns

function useUsers(filters: UserFilters) {
  return useQuery({
    queryKey: ['users', filters],
    queryFn: () => fetchUsers(filters),
    staleTime: 5 * 60 * 1000,
    placeholderData: keepPreviousData,
  });
}

function useUpdateUser() {
  const queryClient = useQueryClient();
  return useMutation({
    mutationFn: updateUser,
    onMutate: async (newUser) => {
      await queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: ['users'] });
      const previous = queryClient.getQueryData(['users']);
      queryClient.setQueryData(['users'], (old) =>
        old.map(u => u.id === newUser.id ? { ...u, ...newUser } : u)
      );
      return { previous };
    },
    onError: (err, newUser, context) => {
      queryClient.setQueryData(['users'], context.previous);
    },
    onSettled: () => {
      queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: ['users'] });
    },
  });
}

---

Memoization Decision Table

TechniqueUse WhenDo NOT Use When
useMemoExpensive computation, referential equality for depsSimple calculations, primitive values
useCallbackFunctions passed to memoized childrenFunctions not passed as props
React.memoComponent re-renders often with same propsProps change on every render
NoneDefault — do not memoizeAlways profile first

---

Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes

Anti-PatternWhy It Is WrongCorrect Approach
useEffect for data fetchingRace conditions, no caching, no dedupReact Query or Server Components
Prop drilling more than 2 levelsTight coupling, maintenance burdenComposition, context, or Zustand
Business logic in componentsUntestable, unreusableExtract to hooks or utility functions
Barrel exportsBreaks tree-shaking, slower buildsDirect imports
Testing implementation detailsBrittle tests that break on refactorTest behavior: user actions and outcomes
any type anywhereDefeats TypeScript's purposeunknown + type guards
Inline styles for non-dynamic valuesInconsistent, hard to maintainCSS modules, Tailwind, or styled-components
Memoizing everythingAdds complexity, often slowerProfile first, memoize second

---

Documentation Lookup (Context7)

Use mcp__context7__resolve-library-id then mcp__context7__query-docs for up-to-date docs. Returned docs override memorized knowledge.

  • react — when uncertain about hooks API, component lifecycle, or React 19+ features
  • next.js — for App Router, Server Components, or Next.js-specific APIs
  • typescript — for advanced type patterns or compiler options
  • tailwindcss — for utility classes, configuration, or plugin API
  • vitest — for test runner API, matchers, or mock utilities

---

Integration Points

SkillRelationship
testing-strategyStrategy defines frontend test frameworks
test-driven-developmentComponents are built with TDD cycle
react-best-practicesDetailed React patterns complement this skill
performance-optimizationFrontend performance follows optimization methodology
code-reviewReview verifies component architecture and test coverage
clean-codeCode quality principles apply to component code
webapp-testingPlaywright E2E tests use this skill's page structure
acceptance-testingUI acceptance criteria drive component tests

---

Key Principles

  • TypeScript strict mode, no any (use unknown + type guards)
  • Prefer composition over inheritance
  • Colocate tests, styles, and stories with components
  • Server Components by default; Client Components only when required
  • Error boundaries at route and feature boundaries
  • Accessibility is not optional (test with axe-core)

---

Skill Type

FLEXIBLE — Adapt component architecture and state management to the existing project conventions. The three-phase workflow is strongly recommended. Test coverage must target >85%. TypeScript strict mode is non-negotiable.

Related skills

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.