Testing Strategy
- 66 installs
- 1 repo stars
- Updated March 16, 2026
- pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
Helps with testing & qa tasks.
About
testing-strategy is a Claude Code skill for testing & qa. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.
- testing-strategy
- Testing & QA
- AI-coding skill
Testing Strategy by the numbers
- 66 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #1,120 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill testing-strategyAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 66 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 1 |
| Last updated | March 16, 2026 |
| Repository | pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents ↗ |
What it does
Helps with testing & qa tasks.
Files
Testing Strategy
Overview
Analyze the project context and recommend a comprehensive testing strategy. This skill selects appropriate frameworks, defines the testing pyramid, establishes coverage thresholds, and generates test configuration files. The goal is a repeatable, measurable testing foundation that the team can maintain.
Announce at start: "I'm using the testing-strategy skill to define the testing approach."
---
Phase 1: Analyze Project
Goal: Understand the current stack, existing tests, and CI setup before recommending anything.
Actions
1. Identify the tech stack (language, framework, runtime) 2. Survey existing tests (what testing exists already?) 3. Review CI/CD pipeline (how do tests run?) 4. Measure current coverage levels 5. Map external dependencies (services, databases, APIs)
Discovery Commands
# Identify test files
find . -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" | head -30
# Check for test config
ls vitest.config.* jest.config.* pytest.ini pyproject.toml .mocharc.* 2>/dev/null
# Check current coverage
cat coverage/coverage-summary.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No coverage report found"
# Check CI config
cat .github/workflows/*.yml 2>/dev/null | head -50STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until:
- [ ] Tech stack is identified
- [ ] Existing test infrastructure is mapped
- [ ] CI pipeline status is known
- [ ] External dependencies are listed
---
Phase 2: Recommend Testing Pyramid
Goal: Select frameworks and define the pyramid ratios.
Framework Selection Table
| Stack | Unit | Integration | E2E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node.js/TS | Vitest | Vitest + Supertest | Playwright |
| React/Next.js | Vitest + Testing Library | Vitest + MSW | Playwright/Cypress |
| Python | pytest | pytest + httpx | Playwright |
| Go | testing + testify | testing + testcontainers | Playwright |
| Rust | cargo test | cargo test + testcontainers | - |
| PHP/Laravel | Pest/PHPUnit | Pest + HTTP tests | Playwright/Dusk |
Testing Pyramid Ratios
/\
/ \ E2E Tests (10%)
/ \ Critical user journeys only
/------\
/ \ Integration Tests (30%)
/ \ API endpoints, DB queries, service interactions
/------------\
/ \ Unit Tests (60%)
/ \ Pure functions, business logic, utilitiesWhat to Test at Each Level
| Level | Test These | Do NOT Test These |
|---|---|---|
| Unit (60%) | Pure functions, business logic, data transformations, validations, state management | Framework internals, third-party libraries |
| Integration (30%) | API endpoints, database queries, service-to-service calls, auth flows | Individual functions in isolation |
| E2E (10%) | Critical user journeys (signup, purchase), cross-browser, accessibility | Edge cases (handle at unit level) |
STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 3 until:
- [ ] Framework selection matches the tech stack
- [ ] Pyramid ratios are defined
- [ ] Testing scope at each level is documented
---
Phase 3: Define Coverage Thresholds
Goal: Set realistic, enforceable coverage targets.
Coverage Threshold Table
| Category | Minimum | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 70% | 85% | Lines covered |
| Critical paths | 90% | 95% | Auth, payments, data access |
| New code (PRs) | 80% | 90% | Enforced in CI |
| Utilities | 95% | 100% | Pure functions are easy to test |
Threshold Selection Decision Table
| Project Maturity | Overall Minimum | New Code Minimum | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenfield | 80% | 90% | Start high, maintain standard |
| Active (good coverage) | 70% | 85% | Maintain and improve |
| Legacy (low coverage) | 50% | 80% | Raise floor gradually |
| Prototype/MVP | 60% | 70% | Cover critical paths, accept gaps |
STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 4 until:
- [ ] Coverage thresholds are realistic for the project maturity
- [ ] Critical path coverage targets are defined
- [ ] CI enforcement strategy is decided
---
Phase 4: Generate Configuration
Goal: Produce working test configuration files and CI integration.
Actions
1. Generate test runner config (vitest.config.ts, jest.config.js, pytest.ini) 2. Configure coverage with thresholds 3. Add test commands to CI workflow 4. Set up test environment (.env.test, test databases)
Example: Vitest Config
import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config';
export default defineConfig({
test: {
globals: true,
environment: 'jsdom',
coverage: {
provider: 'v8',
reporter: ['text', 'json', 'html'],
thresholds: {
lines: 80,
functions: 80,
branches: 80,
statements: 80,
},
},
include: ['src/**/*.test.{ts,tsx}'],
},
});STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 5 until:
- [ ] Config files are syntactically valid
- [ ] Coverage thresholds match Phase 3 decisions
- [ ] CI integration commands are defined
---
Phase 5: Create Test Templates
Goal: Provide example test files demonstrating project conventions.
Actions
1. Create a unit test example with Arrange-Act-Assert 2. Create an integration test with setup/teardown 3. Create mock/stub patterns for external dependencies 4. Create test data factories/fixtures 5. Create a snapshot test example (when appropriate)
STOP — Verification Gate before claiming complete:
- [ ] Framework selection matches tech stack
- [ ] Coverage thresholds are realistic
- [ ] Test configuration files are valid
- [ ] Example tests actually run
- [ ] CI integration is configured
---
Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Is Wrong | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Testing implementation details | Breaks on every refactor, provides false confidence | Test behavior and outcomes |
| Excessive mocking | Tests nothing real, mocks mask real failures | Mock at boundaries only |
| Brittle CSS selectors in E2E | Break with styling changes | Use data-testid or accessible roles |
| Test interdependence | Ordering failures, flaky in CI | Each test must run independently |
| Slow tests blocking CI | Developers skip running tests | Parallelize, use test databases, mock external APIs |
| Snapshot overuse | Snapshots approved without reading, stale baselines | Use for stable output only |
| No coverage enforcement in CI | Coverage degrades over time | Enforce thresholds in CI pipeline |
| Same coverage target everywhere | Utilities and critical paths differ | Use per-category thresholds |
---
Decision Table: Mock Strategy
| Dependency Type | Mock Strategy | Example |
|---|---|---|
| External API | MSW / nock / responses | Third-party payment API |
| Database | Test database or in-memory | PostgreSQL test container |
| File system | Virtual FS or temp directory | File upload processing |
| Time/Date | Fake timers | Expiration logic |
| Environment vars | Override in test setup | Feature flags |
| Random/UUID | Seed or stub | ID generation |
---
Integration Points
| Skill | Relationship |
|---|---|
test-driven-development | Strategy defines frameworks; TDD defines the cycle |
acceptance-testing | Strategy includes acceptance test infrastructure |
code-review | Review checks that tests follow the defined strategy |
senior-frontend | Frontend testing uses strategy-selected frameworks |
senior-backend | Backend testing uses strategy-selected frameworks |
performance-optimization | Load tests are part of the overall testing strategy |
webapp-testing | Playwright E2E tests follow strategy pyramid |
---
Key Principles
- Test behavior, not implementation — what it does, not how
- Fast feedback — unit tests should run in seconds
- Deterministic — no flaky tests, no time-dependent logic
- Readable — tests are documentation; make them clear
- Maintainable — tests should help refactoring, not block it
---
Skill Type
FLEXIBLE — Adapt framework selection and coverage thresholds to the project context. The five-phase process and testing pyramid structure are strongly recommended but can be scaled to project size.