
Traditional Chinese Humanizer
- 2 installs
- Updated May 30, 2026
- quan0715/traditional-chinese-humanizer-skill
Rewrites Traditional Chinese drafts into natural Taiwan-facing writing, removing AI smell, empty polish, translationese, and unsupported claims while preserving meaning.
About
Edits Traditional Chinese content for Taiwan professional and marketing contexts to sound human and precise rather than AI-generated or Simplified-Chinese-leaning. A developer uses it when producing or reviewing zh-TW copy that reads over-polished, slogan-heavy, or mechanically translated.
- Preserves facts, numbers, entities, and terminology while removing filler
- Applies Taiwan usage and downgrades claims that evidence cannot support
Traditional Chinese Humanizer by the numbers
- 2 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,659 of 1,879 Marketing & SEO skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/quan0715/traditional-chinese-humanizer-skill --skill traditional-chinese-humanizerAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 2 |
|---|---|
| Last updated | May 30, 2026 |
| Repository | quan0715/traditional-chinese-humanizer-skill ↗ |
What it does
Rewrites Traditional Chinese drafts into natural Taiwan-facing writing, removing AI smell, empty polish, translationese, and unsupported claims while preserving meaning.
Files
Traditional Chinese Humanizer
Overview
Use this skill to turn Traditional Chinese drafts into natural, precise, Taiwan-facing writing without losing meaning. The goal is not to make text casual; it is to remove AI smell, empty polish, translationese, and unsupported claims while preserving the reader's task, evidence, and tone.
This skill is portable. It can be used by itself or loaded from OpenPress writing workflows.
Workflow
1. Identify the text's job: decision memo, proposal, product copy, report, documentation, social post, email, or article. 2. Preserve facts, claims, constraints, numbers, named entities, source attributions, and required terminology. 3. Scan for AI-writing patterns. For long or high-risk drafts, read references/ai-patterns.md. 4. Rewrite in Traditional Chinese with Taiwan usage. Read references/taiwan-style.md when the draft contains Simplified Chinese, PRC phrasing, or awkward direct translation. 5. Check evidence strength. Downgrade or remove claims that cannot be supported by the provided material. 6. Deliver the revised text first. Add a short change note only when it helps the user understand editorial decisions.
Core Rules
- Say the actual point directly. Do not use dramatic contrast to compensate for thin substance.
- Prefer concrete subjects, verbs, situations, numbers, limits, and outcomes over abstract nouns.
- Keep each paragraph responsible for one idea. A reader should know who did what, under what condition, and why it matters.
- Use active phrasing unless the actor is unknown or irrelevant.
- Avoid over-promising. Without evidence, do not write "最佳", "顛覆", "重新定義", "革命性", "前所未有", or equivalent claims.
- Trust the reader. Remove filler openings, excessive transitions, generic conclusions, and chatbot politeness.
- Vary sentence length. Use short sentences for judgments, longer sentences only when they carry real detail.
- Use Traditional Chinese and Taiwan common usage. Keep established technical terms in English when forced translation would be less clear.
High-Risk Patterns
Treat these as review triggers:
| Pattern | Problem | Rewrite Direction |
|---|---|---|
這不是 A,而是 B | Delays the real point and often creates fake depth | State B's concrete capability or difference directly |
不只是 A,更是 B | Stacks two vague claims | Split current capability from actual result |
讓 X 不再只是 Y | Sounds like a slogan | Describe the new behavior, use case, or responsibility |
把每一次 A 都變成 B | Turns process into vague aspiration | Say what is recorded, compared, produced, or changed each time |
透過 A,讓 B 更 C | Hides the actor and action | Make A the subject and name the action |
X 可以被/能被 Y | Passive packaging makes responsibility unclear | Say who uses X to do what |
在這個快速變動的時代 | Generic opening | Start with the reader's concrete problem |
打造有溫度的... | Emotional but not operational | Name the interaction, support, or feedback that creates the difference |
業界專家指出 | Vague attribution | Provide a named source, or remove the claim |
| three-item rhythm everywhere | Feels mechanically comprehensive | Use two, four, or a sentence when that is more accurate |
Editing Moves
1. Delete the formula: remove contrast scaffolding, generic trend openings, softening phrases, and decorative emphasis. 2. Recover the claim: identify whether the sentence is about a feature, result, risk, limitation, opinion, or next action. 3. Add missing specifics: actor, audience, scenario, data, timing, dependency, or tradeoff. 4. Match the tone: professional content can still have voice, but it should not sound like a speech, ad slogan, or chatbot reply. 5. Read aloud once. If every sentence has the same cadence, revise the rhythm.
Tables and Structured Text
Tables should scan like tables, not paragraphs.
- If the column says "規模", the cell should usually be only a number and unit.
- If the column says "狀態", avoid repeating "目前", "已經", "已支援", or "完成".
- If the column says "能力", "功能", or "備註", prefer noun phrases or short clauses.
- Move causal explanations, caveats, and evidence to the paragraph before or after the table.
Subject Continuity
Do not restart every sentence with the product, company, or founder name. Once the subject is established, continue with "產品", "平台", "團隊", "這項設計", or omit the subject when clear.
Keep the full name when:
- ambiguity would confuse the reader,
- the paragraph changes subject,
- the sentence is a conclusion that intentionally returns to the main actor.
Output Format
Default:
[revised Traditional Chinese text]When useful:
[revised Traditional Chinese text]
修改重點:
- [specific change]
- [specific change]Avoid long diagnostic lists unless the user asks for review details.
Final Check
- Are any slogan frames still present?
- Does each paragraph include a real subject and action?
- Are claims supported by supplied evidence?
- Is the language Traditional Chinese with Taiwan usage?
- Are English technical terms preserved when they are clearer than forced translation?
- Does the text sound like a competent person wrote it for a reader, not like a model performing polish?
interface:
display_name: "Traditional Chinese Humanizer"
short_description: "繁體中文 AI 腔清理、人性化改寫與台灣語感精修校正"
default_prompt: "Use $traditional-chinese-humanizer to polish this Traditional Chinese draft so it sounds natural, precise, and less AI-generated."
AI writing patterns
Use this reference when a draft is long, public-facing, high-stakes, or visibly AI-generated. Apply judgment; do not mechanically replace every phrase if the sentence already carries precise meaning.
Empty significance
Watch for claims that inflate importance without evidence:
標誌著...關鍵時刻彰顯...重要性反映更廣泛的趨勢深深植根於不可磨滅的印記持續演變的格局
Rewrite by naming the actual event, role, evidence, or consequence.
Before:
這次更新標誌著產品創新旅程中的重要里程碑,彰顯團隊對未來工作型態的承諾。
After:
這次更新新增批次匯入、權限分層與離線草稿,讓管理者可以先整理資料,再分批開放給團隊使用。
Promotional language
Watch for:
無縫,全方位,前所未有,突破性,沉浸式打造,賦能,開啟新篇章,重新定義更智慧,更有溫度,極致體驗
Rewrite with product behavior, workflow effect, or measurable outcome.
Vague attribution
Avoid vague authorities unless the source is named:
業界專家指出多份報告顯示外界普遍認為有觀察者表示
Use a named source, a supplied document, or remove the sentence.
Chatbot residue
Remove conversation scaffolding when it appears inside deliverable text:
當然可以以下是...希望這對你有幫助如果你需要,我也可以...你說得完全正確
Rewrite as the actual content.
Passive packaging
High-risk forms:
讓資料可以被使用讓問題被看見內容能被有效管理這些資訊將被整合
Rewrite with an actor:
系統整理資料,供教師匯出成班級報表後台標示逾期項目,讓管理者先處理高風險案件
Mechanical structure
Watch for:
- every paragraph ending with a short "therefore" sentence,
- every list item starting with bold labels and a colon,
- repeated three-part lists,
- repeated
此外,然而,值得注意的是, - overuse of em dashes or decorative punctuation.
Rewrite by combining list items, changing sentence length, or deleting transitions that do not change meaning.
Generic conclusions
Avoid endings like:
未來值得期待邁向更美好的明天這只是開始持續追求卓越
End with a concrete next step, limitation, result, or open question.
Human voice without sloppiness
Human writing can have a view. It can admit uncertainty, choose a sharper verb, or use a short sentence after a dense one. Keep that voice grounded in the material. Do not add jokes, emotional claims, or first-person phrasing unless the genre supports it.
Taiwan Traditional Chinese style
Use this reference when a draft includes Simplified Chinese, PRC phrasing, translated English structure, or mixed regional vocabulary.
Script and vocabulary
Use Traditional Chinese. Prefer Taiwan common usage when choices differ.
| Avoid | Prefer |
|---|---|
| 通过 | 透過 / 經由 / 用 |
| 支持(系統功能語境) | 支援 |
| 信息 | 資訊 |
| 用户 | 使用者 |
| 质量 | 品質 |
| 创建 | 建立 |
| 查看 | 檢視 / 查看(依語境) |
| 优化 | 優化 |
| 数据 | 資料 / 數據(依語境) |
| 项目 | 專案 / 項目(依語境) |
| 屏幕 | 螢幕 |
| 默认 | 預設 |
| 反馈 | 回饋 |
| 服务器 | 伺服器 |
| 软件 | 軟體 |
| 发布 | 發布 / 上線(依語境) |
| 运营 | 營運 / 經營 |
Translationese
Rewrite direct English structures into natural Chinese.
| Awkward | Better |
|---|---|
| 這允許使用者... | 使用者可以... |
| 這有助於提升... | 這能提升... / 因此... |
| 其提供了一個... | 它提供... / 這項功能提供... |
| 進行一個檢查 | 檢查 |
| 做出一個決定 | 決定 |
| 對於使用者來說 | 對使用者而言 / 使用者... |
| 基於...的原因 | 因為... |
Technical terms
Do not force-translate terms that professional readers expect in English:
API,OAuth,SDK,CLIedge case,spec,pipeline,token,promptKPI,OKR,SOP
If a Chinese term is clearer and common, use Chinese:
採購週期監考流程鑑別度學習歷程權限控管
Use one term consistently inside the same document.
Tone
Professional Traditional Chinese should be precise before it is polished.
- Use
協助,支援,提供,整理,標示,追蹤,比對,檢視,降低,縮短. - Be careful with
打造,賦能,顛覆,革新,重塑,全方位. - Do not add idioms or literary phrasing just to sound human.
- Prefer a clear short sentence over a beautiful vague one.