
File Todos
- 17 installs
- 49 repo stars
- Updated February 11, 2026
- ratacat/claude-skills
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
file-todos is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- file-todos
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
File Todos by the numbers
- 17 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #10,813 of 16,556 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/ratacat/claude-skills --skill file-todosAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 17 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 49 |
| Last updated | February 11, 2026 |
| Repository | ratacat/claude-skills ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
File-Based Todo Tracking Skill
Overview
The todos/ directory contains a file-based tracking system for managing code review feedback, technical debt, feature requests, and work items. Each todo is a markdown file with YAML frontmatter and structured sections.
This skill should be used when:
- Creating new todos from findings or feedback
- Managing todo lifecycle (pending → ready → complete)
- Triaging pending items for approval
- Checking or managing dependencies
- Converting PR comments or code findings into tracked work
- Updating work logs during todo execution
File Naming Convention
Todo files follow this naming pattern:
{issue_id}-{status}-{priority}-{description}.mdComponents:
- issue_id: Sequential number (001, 002, 003...) - never reused
- status:
pending(needs triage),ready(approved),complete(done) - priority:
p1(critical),p2(important),p3(nice-to-have) - description: kebab-case, brief description
Examples:
001-pending-p1-mailer-test.md
002-ready-p1-fix-n-plus-1.md
005-complete-p2-refactor-csv.mdFile Structure
Each todo is a markdown file with YAML frontmatter and structured sections. Use the template at todo-template.md as a starting point when creating new todos.
Required sections:
- Problem Statement - What is broken, missing, or needs improvement?
- Findings - Investigation results, root cause, key discoveries
- Proposed Solutions - Multiple options with pros/cons, effort, risk
- Recommended Action - Clear plan (filled during triage)
- Acceptance Criteria - Testable checklist items
- Work Log - Chronological record with date, actions, learnings
Optional sections:
- Technical Details - Affected files, related components, DB changes
- Resources - Links to errors, tests, PRs, documentation
- Notes - Additional context or decisions
YAML frontmatter fields:
---
status: ready # pending | ready | complete
priority: p1 # p1 | p2 | p3
issue_id: "002"
tags: [rails, performance, database]
dependencies: ["001"] # Issue IDs this is blocked by
---Common Workflows
Creating a New Todo
To create a new todo from findings or feedback:
1. Determine next issue ID: ls todos/ | grep -o '^[0-9]\+' | sort -n | tail -1 2. Copy template: cp assets/todo-template.md todos/{NEXT_ID}-pending-{priority}-{description}.md 3. Edit and fill required sections:
- Problem Statement
- Findings (if from investigation)
- Proposed Solutions (multiple options)
- Acceptance Criteria
- Add initial Work Log entry
4. Determine status: pending (needs triage) or ready (pre-approved) 5. Add relevant tags for filtering
When to create a todo:
- Requires more than 15-20 minutes of work
- Needs research, planning, or multiple approaches considered
- Has dependencies on other work
- Requires manager approval or prioritization
- Part of larger feature or refactor
- Technical debt needing documentation
When to act immediately instead:
- Issue is trivial (< 15 minutes)
- Complete context available now
- No planning needed
- User explicitly requests immediate action
- Simple bug fix with obvious solution
Triaging Pending Items
To triage pending todos:
1. List pending items: ls todos/*-pending-*.md 2. For each todo:
- Read Problem Statement and Findings
- Review Proposed Solutions
- Make decision: approve, defer, or modify priority
3. Update approved todos:
- Rename file:
mv {file}-pending-{pri}-{desc}.md {file}-ready-{pri}-{desc}.md - Update frontmatter:
status: pending→status: ready - Fill "Recommended Action" section with clear plan
- Adjust priority if different from initial assessment
4. Deferred todos stay in pending status
Use slash command: /triage for interactive approval workflow
Managing Dependencies
To track dependencies:
dependencies: ["002", "005"] # This todo blocked by issues 002 and 005
dependencies: [] # No blockers - can work immediatelyTo check what blocks a todo:
grep "^dependencies:" todos/003-*.mdTo find what a todo blocks:
grep -l 'dependencies:.*"002"' todos/*.mdTo verify blockers are complete before starting:
for dep in 001 002 003; do
[ -f "todos/${dep}-complete-*.md" ] || echo "Issue $dep not complete"
doneUpdating Work Logs
When working on a todo, always add a work log entry:
### YYYY-MM-DD - Session Title
**By:** Claude Code / Developer Name
**Actions:**
- Specific changes made (include file:line references)
- Commands executed
- Tests run
- Results of investigation
**Learnings:**
- What worked / what didn't
- Patterns discovered
- Key insights for future workWork logs serve as:
- Historical record of investigation
- Documentation of approaches attempted
- Knowledge sharing for team
- Context for future similar work
Completing a Todo
To mark a todo as complete:
1. Verify all acceptance criteria checked off 2. Update Work Log with final session and results 3. Rename file: mv {file}-ready-{pri}-{desc}.md {file}-complete-{pri}-{desc}.md 4. Update frontmatter: status: ready → status: complete 5. Check for unblocked work: grep -l 'dependencies:.*"002"' todos/*-ready-*.md 6. Commit with issue reference: feat: resolve issue 002
Integration with Development Workflows
| Trigger | Flow | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Code review | /workflows:review → Findings → /triage → Todos | Review agent + skill |
| PR comments | /resolve_pr_parallel → Individual fixes → Todos | gh CLI + skill |
| Code TODOs | /resolve_todo_parallel → Fixes + Complex todos | Agent + skill |
| Planning | Brainstorm → Create todo → Work → Complete | Skill |
| Feedback | Discussion → Create todo → Triage → Work | Skill + slash |
Quick Reference Commands
Finding work:
# List highest priority unblocked work
grep -l 'dependencies: \[\]' todos/*-ready-p1-*.md
# List all pending items needing triage
ls todos/*-pending-*.md
# Find next issue ID
ls todos/ | grep -o '^[0-9]\+' | sort -n | tail -1 | awk '{printf "%03d", $1+1}'
# Count by status
for status in pending ready complete; do
echo "$status: $(ls -1 todos/*-$status-*.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l)"
doneDependency management:
# What blocks this todo?
grep "^dependencies:" todos/003-*.md
# What does this todo block?
grep -l 'dependencies:.*"002"' todos/*.mdSearching:
# Search by tag
grep -l "tags:.*rails" todos/*.md
# Search by priority
ls todos/*-p1-*.md
# Full-text search
grep -r "payment" todos/Key Distinctions
File-todos system (this skill):
- Markdown files in
todos/directory - Development/project tracking
- Standalone markdown files with YAML frontmatter
- Used by humans and agents
Rails Todo model:
- Database model in
app/models/todo.rb - User-facing feature in the application
- Active Record CRUD operations
- Different from this file-based system
TodoWrite tool:
- In-memory task tracking during agent sessions
- Temporary tracking for single conversation
- Not persisted to disk
- Different from both systems above
Brief Task Title
Replace with a concise title describing what needs to be done.
Problem Statement
What is broken, missing, or needs improvement? Provide clear context about why this matters.
Example:
- Template system lacks comprehensive test coverage for edge cases discovered during PR review
- Email service is missing proper error handling for rate-limit scenarios
- Documentation doesn't cover the new authentication flow
Findings
Investigation results, root cause analysis, and key discoveries.
- Finding 1 (with specifics: file, line number if applicable)
- Finding 2
- Key discovery with impact assessment
- Related issues or patterns discovered
Example format:
- Identified 12 missing test scenarios in
app/models/user_test.rb - Current coverage: 60% of code paths
- Missing: empty inputs, special characters, large payloads
- Similar issues exist in
app/models/post_test.rb(~8 scenarios)
Proposed Solutions
Present multiple options with pros, cons, effort estimates, and risk assessment.
Option 1: [Solution Name]
Approach: Describe the solution clearly.
Pros:
- Benefit 1
- Benefit 2
Cons:
- Drawback 1
- Drawback 2
Effort: 2-3 hours
Risk: Low / Medium / High
---
Option 2: [Solution Name]
Approach: Describe the solution clearly.
Pros:
- Benefit 1
- Benefit 2
Cons:
- Drawback 1
- Drawback 2
Effort: 4-6 hours
Risk: Low / Medium / High
---
Option 3: [Solution Name]
(Include if you have alternatives)
Recommended Action
To be filled during triage. Clear, actionable plan for resolving this todo.
Example: "Implement both unit tests (covering each scenario) and integration tests (full pipeline) before merging. Estimated 4 hours total effort. Target coverage > 85% for this module."
Technical Details
Affected files, related components, database changes, or architectural considerations.
Affected files:
app/models/user.rb:45- full_name methodapp/services/user_service.rb:12- validation logictest/models/user_test.rb- existing tests
Related components:
- UserMailer (depends on user validation)
- AccountPolicy (authorization checks)
Database changes (if any):
- Migration needed? Yes / No
- New columns/tables? Describe here
Resources
Links to errors, tests, PRs, documentation, similar issues.
- PR: #1287
- Related issue: #456
- Error log: [link to AppSignal incident]
- Documentation: [relevant docs]
- Similar patterns: Issue #200 (completed, ref for approach)
Acceptance Criteria
Testable checklist items for verifying completion.
- [ ] All acceptance criteria checked
- [ ] Tests pass (unit + integration if applicable)
- [ ] Code reviewed and approved
- [ ] (Example) Test coverage > 85%
- [ ] (Example) Performance metrics acceptable
- [ ] (Example) Documentation updated
Work Log
Chronological record of work sessions, actions taken, and learnings.
2025-11-12 - Initial Discovery
By: Claude Code
Actions:
- Identified 12 missing test scenarios
- Analyzed existing test coverage (file:line references)
- Reviewed similar patterns in codebase
- Drafted 3 solution approaches
Learnings:
- Similar issues exist in related modules
- Current test setup supports both unit and integration tests
- Performance testing would be valuable addition
---
(Add more entries as work progresses)
Notes
Additional context, decisions, or reminders.
- Decision: Include both unit and integration tests for comprehensive coverage
- Blocker: Depends on completion of issue #001
- Timeline: Priority for sprint due to blocking other work