
Market Research
- 3 installs
- 591 repo stars
- Updated July 24, 2026
- rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills
Performs market research for iOS/macOS app ideas including TAM/SAM/SOM sizing, growth trends, market maturity, entry barriers, and revenue potential.
About
Performs deep market research for app ideas with TAM/SAM/SOM sizing, growth analysis, entry barriers, and revenue potential. A developer uses it to assess the market opportunity behind an app idea.
- TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing
- Growth trends, entry barriers, and revenue estimation
Market Research by the numbers
- 3 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +1 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #2,390 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills --skill market-researchAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 3 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 591 |
| Last updated | July 24, 2026 |
| Repository | rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills ↗ |
What it does
Performs market research for iOS/macOS app ideas including TAM/SAM/SOM sizing, growth trends, market maturity, entry barriers, and revenue potential.
Files
Market Research Skill
Performs deep market research for iOS/macOS app ideas. Provides market sizing, growth analysis, and opportunity assessment.
When This Skill Activates
Use this Skill when the user wants to:
- Understand market size and potential
- Analyze market growth trends
- Calculate TAM/SAM/SOM
- Assess market maturity
- Identify entry barriers
- Understand distribution channels
- Estimate revenue potential
- Deep-dive after initial problem discovery
This is a follow-up to the product-agent skill — use this when you need market depth.
What This Skill Does
1. Market Sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM)
- TAM (Total Addressable Market): Total revenue opportunity if you captured 100% of the market
- SAM (Serviceable Available Market): Segment of TAM you can reach with your product/distribution
- SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market): Realistic share you can capture in near term (1-3 years)
2. Growth Analysis
- Historical growth rates
- Future projections (3-5 years)
- Growth drivers
- Market trends
3. Market Maturity Assessment
- Stage: Emerging, Growing, Mature, or Declining
- Market lifecycle position
- Implications for new entrants
4. Entry Barriers
- Technical barriers
- Brand/network effects
- Regulatory requirements
- Capital requirements
- Customer acquisition costs
5. Distribution Channels
- How apps in this category reach users
- App Store dynamics
- Alternative channels (web, enterprise, etc.)
6. Revenue Potential
- Average revenue per user (ARPU)
- Conversion rates
- LTV (Lifetime Value)
- Revenue models in use
Output Structure
{
"market_category": "Task Management",
"market_sizing": {
"tam": {
"value": "$4.5B",
"description": "Global productivity software market",
"methodology": "Total potential revenue if product served all users globally"
},
"sam": {
"value": "$900M",
"description": "iOS/macOS task management apps (20% of TAM)",
"methodology": "Addressable via App Store distribution on Apple platforms"
},
"som": {
"value": "$45M",
"description": "Realistic 3-year capture (5% of SAM)",
"methodology": "Based on typical indie app market share penetration"
}
},
"market_growth": {
"historical_growth": "12% CAGR (2021-2025)",
"projected_growth": "10% CAGR (2026-2030)",
"growth_drivers": [
"Remote work adoption",
"Increased digital task management",
"Mobile-first workflows"
],
"headwinds": [
"Market saturation",
"Consolidation toward major players"
]
},
"market_maturity": {
"stage": "Mature",
"characteristics": [
"Established leaders (Todoist, Things)",
"Clear product categories",
"Slowing growth rate",
"Focus on feature differentiation"
],
"implications": "Differentiation critical. Hard to compete on basics. Must have unique angle."
},
"entry_barriers": {
"low": [
"Technical implementation (task management is straightforward)"
],
"medium": [
"Building user base in crowded market",
"Achieving reliable sync across devices"
],
"high": [
"Brand recognition (Todoist, Things have 10+ years)",
"Network effects (team collaboration features)",
"Customer switching costs (data lock-in)"
],
"overall_assessment": "Medium-High - Technical execution is achievable, but market position is difficult"
},
"distribution_channels": {
"primary": {
"channel": "App Store",
"percentage": "75%",
"dynamics": "Discoverability challenging. ASO critical. Top charts dominated by established apps."
},
"secondary": [
{
"channel": "Direct website",
"percentage": "15%",
"dynamics": "For power users. Allows higher pricing. Better for subscription retention."
},
{
"channel": "Word of mouth / Communities",
"percentage": "10%",
"dynamics": "Productivity communities, Reddit, Twitter. High-intent users."
}
]
},
"revenue_potential": {
"arpu": {
"freemium": "$12/year (5% convert at $20/year)",
"paid_only": "$30-40/year",
"premium": "$60-100/year"
},
"conversion_rates": {
"free_to_paid": "3-7% industry average",
"trial_to_paid": "15-25% with 14-day trial"
},
"ltv": "$150-300 (2-5 year user lifecycle)",
"realistic_year_1": "$50K-200K (1K-5K users at $40 ARPU)",
"realistic_year_3": "$500K-2M (10K-50K users with growth)",
"path_to_scale": "Requires strong differentiation, word-of-mouth growth, and retention >85%"
},
"market_opportunity_score": "6/10 - Moderate",
"reasoning": "Large market with growth, but mature and competitive. Success requires clear differentiation and excellent execution. Not a 'gold rush' market, but sustainable business possible for well-positioned product."
}How to Perform Market Research
Step 1: Define Market Scope
Question: What exact market are you analyzing?
- "Task management apps" (broad)
- "iOS task management apps" (narrower)
- "AI-powered task management for Apple users" (specific)
Start specific for better analysis.Step 2: Size the Market (TAM/SAM/SOM)
TAM Calculation:
Method 1: Top-down
- Global productivity software market: $50B
- Task management segment: ~10% = $5B TAM
Method 2: Bottom-up
- Potential users globally: 500M knowledge workers
- Willing to pay for task management: 20% = 100M
- Average spend: $50/year
- TAM = 100M × $50 = $5BSAM Calculation:
Filter TAM by what you can reach:
- TAM: $5B global
- Your distribution: iOS/macOS App Store only
- Apple users: ~30% of market = $1.5B
- Addressable via App Store: 60% = $900M SAMSOM Calculation:
Realistic capture in 3 years:
- SAM: $900M
- New entrant market share: 0.5-2% realistic
- With strong differentiation: 5% optimistic
- SOM = $900M × 1-5% = $9M-45MStep 3: Assess Growth
Use WebSearch to find:
- Market research reports
- Growth rate data
- Trend articles
Key searches:
"[category] market size 2026"
"[category] growth rate"
"[category] market trends 2026"Step 4: Determine Maturity
Indicators:
Emerging (Good for new entrants):
- High growth (>20% CAGR)
- No clear leaders
- Rapid innovation
- Unclear best practices
Growing (Good opportunity):
- Strong growth (10-20% CAGR)
- Leaders emerging
- Product-market fit established
- Room for differentiation
Mature (Differentiation required):
- Moderate growth (5-10% CAGR)
- Clear leaders
- Established patterns
- Compete on specific niches
Declining (Avoid):
- Negative or flat growth
- Consolidation
- Commoditization
Step 5: Identify Barriers
Low barriers → Easier entry but more competition High barriers → Harder entry but better moat if you succeed
Assess:
- Technical complexity
- Brand importance
- Network effects
- Switching costs
- Capital needs
Step 6: Map Distribution
For iOS/macOS apps:
- App Store (primary) - understand ranking factors
- TestFlight (beta)
- Direct website (for pro users)
- SetApp / Bundle services
- Enterprise/B2B channels
Step 7: Estimate Revenue
Key metrics to research:
- Industry ARPU
- Typical conversion rates
- Churn rates
- User acquisition costs
Reality check:
Year 1: 1K-5K users (realistic for indie)
Year 2: 5K-20K users (with growth)
Year 3: 20K-100K users (if successful)
At $40 ARPU:
Year 1: $40K-200K
Year 2: $200K-800K
Year 3: $800K-4MCommon Questions
"How do I calculate TAM without market reports?"
Bottom-up approach: 1. Estimate target user count (e.g., "iOS users who manage tasks") 2. Research willingness to pay (look at competitor pricing) 3. Multiply: TAM = Users × Average Spend
Proxy approach: 1. Find similar market (e.g., "Calendar apps") 2. Adjust for your market differences 3. Validate with multiple sources
"What's a 'good' market size?"
For indie developers:
- SOM > $5M: Good opportunity
- SOM $1-5M: Viable if low competition
- SOM < $1M: Likely too small unless niche/passion project
Remember: $1M SOM = ~25K users at $40 ARPU (achievable!)
"How mature is too mature?"
Mature markets CAN work if:
- You have clear differentiation
- Targeting underserved niche
- Better execution than incumbents
- Novel business model
Avoid if:
- No differentiation angle
- Dominant players with network effects
- Declining growth
- Your idea is "me too"
Integration with Other Skills
Use market-research after initial discovery:
1. product-agent → Problem validation
2. market-research → Market opportunity sizing
3. competitive-analysis → Understand players
4. → Decision: Build vs. Don't BuildExample Research Flow
User asks: "Research the market for habit tracking apps"
You do:
1. Define scope:
- "iOS habit tracking apps targeting personal development users"
2. Calculate TAM/SAM/SOM:
- TAM: Personal development app market $3B
- SAM: iOS habit tracking apps $300M (10%)
- SOM: Realistic 3-year capture $15M (5%)
3. Growth analysis (WebSearch):
- Search: "habit tracking app market growth 2026"
- Result: 15% CAGR, driven by wellness trends
4. Maturity:
- Stage: Growing (strong leaders emerging but room for innovation)
- Key players: Streaks, Habitica, Way of Life
5. Barriers:
- Low: Technical (habit tracking is simple)
- Medium: Building habit formation psychology
- High: Established apps have user data (switching cost)
6. Distribution:
- App Store: 80% (ASO critical)
- Wellness communities: 15%
- Influencer partnerships: 5%
7. Revenue potential:
- ARPU: $20/year (mix of $2.99 one-time and $5/mo subscriptions)
- Year 3 realistic: $300K (15K users)
8. Present findings:
Market Research: Habit Tracking Apps
Market Size:
- TAM: $3B (personal development apps)
- SAM: $300M (iOS habit tracking)
- SOM: $15M (5% realistic 3-year capture)
Growth: 15% CAGR (wellness trend-driven)
Maturity: Growing (opportunity for innovation)
Opportunity Score: 7/10 - Good
Reasoning: Growing market with room for differentiation.
Not overcrowded like task management. Wellness trend tailwind.
Success depends on unique habit formation approach and
strong retention (>70%).
Revenue Potential:
- Year 1: $20K-100K
- Year 3: $200K-1M
- Requires: Good ASO, word-of-mouth, community buildingTips for Accurate Research
1. Use Multiple Sources: Don't rely on one number 2. Be Conservative: Better to underestimate than over 3. Validate with Proxies: Compare to similar successful apps 4. Check App Annie/Sensor Tower: For actual app market data 5. Read Financial Reports: Public companies disclose market data
When to Run This Analysis
Perfect timing:
- After discovery shows potential
- Before committing to development
- When seeking funding (investors want market size)
- When setting revenue goals
Skip if:
- Discovery showed "DON'T BUILD"
- Just experimenting/learning
- Building for personal use only
Output File Location
Save market research results to one of these locations:
market-research.md(project root)docs/market-research.md(if docs folder exists)
Format: Use the JSON structure in the Output Structure section, wrapped in a markdown code block with context and summary.
Integration: The PRD generator skill will automatically look for this file and integrate the insights into the PRD's Market Context section (TAM/SAM/SOM, growth trends, entry barriers, revenue expectations).
---
Remember: Market research informs GO/NO-GO decisions. A big market with competition beats a tiny market with no competition (usually).
{
"market_category": "Task Management Apps (iOS/macOS)",
"analysis_date": "2026-01",
"market_sizing": {
"tam": {
"value": "$4.5B",
"description": "Global productivity software market",
"calculation": "Productivity software market ($50B) × Task management segment (9%)"
},
"sam": {
"value": "$900M",
"description": "iOS/macOS task management apps",
"calculation": "TAM ($4.5B) × Apple platform users (30%) × App Store addressable (67%)"
},
"som": {
"value": "$45M",
"description": "Realistic 3-year market capture",
"calculation": "SAM ($900M) × New entrant realistic share (5%)"
}
},
"market_growth": {
"historical_cagr_2021_2025": "12%",
"projected_cagr_2026_2030": "10%",
"growth_drivers": [
"Remote and hybrid work adoption",
"Digital task management replacing paper",
"Mobile-first workflows",
"Integration with other productivity tools"
],
"headwinds": [
"Market saturation with established players",
"Free/bundled alternatives (Apple Reminders)",
"Consolidation toward ecosystem apps (Notion, Microsoft)"
]
},
"market_maturity": {
"stage": "Mature",
"lifecycle_position": "Late growth / Early maturity",
"characteristics": [
"Established market leaders with 5-10+ years presence",
"Clear product categories and user expectations",
"Feature parity across top apps",
"Competition on UX and specific features",
"Price compression (race to free tier)"
],
"implications_for_new_entrants": "Differentiation is critical. Cannot compete on 'basic task management'. Must have unique value proposition (AI, specific workflow, design excellence)."
},
"entry_barriers": {
"technical": {
"level": "Low",
"details": "Task management is well-understood problem. Open source libraries available. Cloud sync via CloudKit/iCloud."
},
"brand": {
"level": "High",
"details": "Strong brand equity with Todoist, Things, OmniFocus. Users trust established apps with their data."
},
"network_effects": {
"level": "Medium",
"details": "Team/collaboration features create lock-in. Individual use has weak network effects."
},
"switching_costs": {
"level": "Medium-High",
"details": "Users have existing tasks, projects, and workflows. Migration friction. Habit formation around current app."
},
"capital_requirements": {
"level": "Low",
"details": "Indie developer can build MVP. Main costs: development time, marketing."
},
"customer_acquisition": {
"level": "High",
"details": "CAC $20-50 per user. Organic discovery difficult. ASO and word-of-mouth critical."
},
"overall_assessment": "Medium-High barriers. Biggest challenges: brand recognition and customer acquisition in crowded market."
},
"distribution_channels": {
"app_store": {
"percentage": "75%",
"characteristics": "Primary channel. Discoverability challenging. ASO critical. Top charts dominated by established apps.",
"success_factors": ["Strong ASO", "User reviews/ratings", "Regular updates", "Feature screenshots"]
},
"direct_website": {
"percentage": "15%",
"characteristics": "Power users. Higher pricing possible. Better for subscription retention.",
"success_factors": ["SEO", "Content marketing", "Free trial", "Demo"]
},
"word_of_mouth": {
"percentage": "10%",
"characteristics": "Productivity communities, Reddit, Twitter, YouTube. High-intent users with lower CAC.",
"success_factors": ["Exceptional UX", "Unique features", "Community engagement"]
}
},
"revenue_potential": {
"arpu": {
"freemium_model": "$12-15/year (5-7% convert to $20-25/year premium)",
"paid_only_model": "$30-40/year",
"premium_positioning": "$60-100/year"
},
"conversion_rates": {
"free_to_paid": "3-7% (industry average for productivity apps)",
"trial_to_paid": "15-25% (with 7-14 day trial)",
"annual_vs_monthly": "40% choose annual (better LTV)"
},
"churn": {
"monthly": "5-8%",
"annual": "30-40% yearly",
"notes": "Task management has moderate churn. Habit formation improves retention."
},
"ltv": {
"range": "$150-300",
"calculation": "2-5 year user lifecycle at $40-60 annual revenue",
"notes": "Higher LTV for annual subscribers and power users"
},
"realistic_projections": {
"year_1": {
"users": "1K-5K",
"revenue": "$40K-200K",
"arpu": "$40"
},
"year_3": {
"users": "10K-50K",
"revenue": "$400K-2M",
"arpu": "$40"
},
"path_to_scale": "Requires: (1) Strong differentiation, (2) Word-of-mouth growth engine, (3) Retention >85%, (4) Effective ASO"
}
},
"market_segments": {
"individual_users": {
"size": "70% of market",
"characteristics": "Personal task management. Price sensitive. Less willing to pay for premium features.",
"competitors": "Todoist, Things, Apple Reminders"
},
"teams": {
"size": "25% of market",
"characteristics": "Collaboration features required. Higher willingness to pay. Longer sales cycles.",
"competitors": "Asana, Monday.com, Todoist Business"
},
"power_users": {
"size": "5% of market",
"characteristics": "GTD practitioners. Want advanced features. Willing to pay premium.",
"competitors": "OmniFocus, Things (via ecosystem)"
}
},
"opportunity_score": "6/10",
"opportunity_assessment": "Moderate",
"detailed_reasoning": "Large market ($900M SAM) with continued growth (10% CAGR) indicates opportunity. However, mature market with strong incumbents creates high barriers. Success requires: (1) Clear differentiation (AI, unique workflow, or design excellence), (2) Excellent execution on core features, (3) Effective customer acquisition strategy. Not a 'gold rush' market but sustainable business possible with right positioning. Best opportunities in underserved niches (e.g., specific professions, AI-first, Apple-native premium).",
"recommendations": [
"Target specific niche rather than broad 'task management'",
"Focus on differentiation (AI features, unique UX, specific workflow)",
"Plan for 18-24 month runway to build user base",
"Prioritize retention over acquisition initially",
"Consider freemium with strong free tier to build base",
"Build for word-of-mouth (exceptional UX, unique value)",
"Realistic year-3 goal: $500K-1M revenue (sustainable indie business)"
]
}