
Self Improving Agent Builder
- 105 installs
- 70 repo stars
- Updated July 26, 2026
- rysweet/amplihack
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
self-improving-agent-builder is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.
- self-improving-agent-builder
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Self Improving Agent Builder by the numbers
- 105 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +1 installs in the week ending Jul 26, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #4,114 of 16,556 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/rysweet/amplihack --skill self-improving-agent-builderAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 105 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 70 |
| Last updated | July 26, 2026 |
| Repository | rysweet/amplihack ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
Self-Improving Agent Builder
Purpose
Run a closed-loop improvement cycle on any goal-seeking agent implementation:
EVAL -> ANALYZE -> RESEARCH -> IMPROVE -> RE-EVAL -> DECIDE -> (repeat)Each iteration measures L1-L12 progressive test scores, identifies failures with error_analyzer.py, runs a research step with hypothesis/evidence/ counter-arguments, applies targeted fixes, and gates promotion through regression checks.
When I Activate
- "improve agent" or "self-improving loop"
- "agent eval loop" or "run improvement cycle"
- "benchmark agents" or "compare SDK implementations"
- "iterate on agent scores" or "fix agent regressions"
Quick Start
User: "Run the self-improving loop on the mini-framework agent for 3 iterations"
Skill: Executes 3 iterations of EVAL->ANALYZE->RESEARCH->IMPROVE->RE-EVAL->DECIDE
Reports per-iteration scores, net improvement, and commits/reverts.Runner Script
The self-improvement loop is implemented as a Python CLI:
# Basic usage
python -m amplihack.eval.self_improve.runner --sdk mini --iterations 3
# Full options
python -m amplihack.eval.self_improve.runner \
--sdk mini \
--iterations 5 \
--improvement-threshold 2.0 \
--regression-tolerance 5.0 \
--levels L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 \
--output-dir ./eval_results/self_improve \
--dry-run # evaluate only, don't apply changesSource: crates/amplihack-eval/src/self_improve/runner.rs
The Loop (6 Phases per Iteration)
Phase 1: EVAL
Run the L1-L12 progressive test suite on the current agent implementation.
Execution:
python -m amplihack.eval.progressive_test_suite \
--agent-name <agent_name> \
--output-dir <output_dir>/iteration_N/eval \
--levels L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6Output: Per-level scores and overall baseline.
Phase 2: ANALYZE
Classify failures using error_analyzer.py. Maps each failed question to a failure taxonomy (retrieval_insufficient, temporal_ordering_wrong, etc.) and the specific code component responsible.
amplihack eval run --analyze --score-threshold 0.6
# Classifies each failure by:
# failure_mode -> affected_component -> prompt_templatePhase 3: RESEARCH (New)
The critical thinking step that prevents blind changes. For each proposed improvement:
1. State hypothesis: What specific change will fix the failure? 2. Gather evidence: From eval results, failure patterns, baseline scores 3. Consider counter-arguments: What could go wrong? Risk of regression? 4. Make decision: Apply, skip, or defer with full reasoning
Decisions are logged in research_decisions.json for auditability.
Decision criteria:
- Apply: Clear failure pattern + prompt template available + low score
- Skip: Score above 50% (likely stochastic variation)
- Defer: Ambiguous evidence, needs more data
Phase 4: IMPROVE
Apply the improvements approved by the research step. Priority order:
1. Prompt template improvements (safest, highest impact) 2. Retrieval strategy adjustments 3. Code logic fixes (most risky, needs careful review)
Phase 5: RE-EVAL
Re-run the same eval suite after applying fixes to measure impact.
Phase 6: DECIDE
Promotion gate:
- Net improvement >= +2% overall score: COMMIT the changes
- Any single level regression > 5%: REVERT all changes
- Otherwise: COMMIT with marginal improvement note
Configuration
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
sdk_type | mini | Which SDK: mini/claude/copilot/microsoft |
max_iterations | 5 | Maximum improvement iterations |
improvement_threshold | 2.0 | Minimum % improvement to commit |
regression_tolerance | 5.0 | Maximum % regression on any level |
levels | L1-L6 | Which levels to evaluate |
output_dir | ./eval_results/self_improve | Results directory |
dry_run | false | Evaluate only, don't apply changes |
CLI Usage
amplihack eval run \
--sdk-type mini \
--max-iterations 3 \
--improvement-threshold 2.0 \
--regression-tolerance 5.0 \
--levels L1,L2,L3,L4,L5,L6 \
--output-dir ./eval_results/self_improve4-Way Benchmark Mode
Compare all SDK implementations side by side:
User: "Run a 4-way benchmark comparing all SDK implementations"
Skill: Runs eval suite on mini, claude, copilot, microsoft
Generates comparison table with scores, LOC, and coverage.Integration Points
crates/amplihack-eval/src/self_improve/runner.rs: Self-improvement loop runnercrates/amplihack-eval/src/self_improve/error_analyzer.rs: Failure classificationcrates/amplihack-eval/src/progressive_test_suite.rs: L1-L12 eval runnercrates/amplihack-agents/src/goal_seeking/sdk_adapters/: All 4 SDK implementationscrates/amplihack-eval/src/metacognition_grader.rs: Advanced eval dimensionscrates/amplihack-eval/src/teaching_session.rs: L7 teaching quality eval