
Linkedin Content
- 107 installs
- 229 repo stars
- Updated July 28, 2026
- sachacoldiq/coldiq-s-gtm-skills
linkedin-content is an agent skill that designs LinkedIn CTAs and optimizes profiles for saves, comments, follows, and conversion.
About
linkedin-content is a specialist agent skill for LinkedIn call-to-actions and profile optimization aimed at solo and indie builders who publish on LinkedIn and want measurable engagement without guessing endings or profile structure. It walks you through CTA patterns tied to concrete goals—saves, comments, follows, and lead-oriented prompts—while pointing you to bundled references for content strategy, ColdIQ-proven voice patterns, and engagement tier analysis. Use it when you already have a post draft or positioning idea and need the closing ask, profile headline, about block, featured assets, or banner aligned to conversion. It does not replace long-form storytelling or hook craft; those stay in sibling skills. The workflow is reference-driven: load strategy and performance docs, pick a CTA type from the goal table, and apply profile frameworks so each touchpoint behaves like a small funnel step rather than passive branding.
- Maps CTA types to goals: saves for reach, comments for engagement, follows for growth, DMs for leads
- Loads ColdIQ voice guides for comment-gating, P.S. questions, and continuation teases
- References engagement data showing comment-gating can drive 3–5× normal comment volume
- Covers headline formulas, about section, featured section, and banner design
- Explicitly defers post body writing to storytelling and first lines to hooks skills
Linkedin Content by the numbers
- 107 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +3 installs in the week ending Jul 26, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #1,132 of 1,879 Marketing & SEO skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 31, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/sachacoldiq/coldiq-s-gtm-skills --skill linkedin-contentAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 107 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 229 |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | July 28, 2026 |
| Repository | sachacoldiq/coldiq-s-gtm-skills ↗ |
What it does
Polish LinkedIn posts and profiles with CTAs, headlines, and conversion-focused profile sections without rewriting full post bodies or hooks.
Who is it for?
Best when you're posting on LinkedIn and want data-informed CTAs and a profile that converts curiosity into follows and comments.
Skip if: Skip if you need full post narratives or opening hooks only—use storytelling and hooks skills instead, per the skill’s explicit boundaries.
When should I use this skill?
User asks about LinkedIn CTAs, comment prompts, save prompts, follow prompts, profile optimization, headline formulas, about section, featured section, or banner design.
What you get
You leave with goal-matched CTAs, profile sections, and headline patterns that align with proven engagement tactics and sibling skills for hooks and storytelling when needed.
- Goal-selected LinkedIn CTA copy and placement guidance
- Profile headline, about, featured, and banner optimization recommendations
By the numbers
- Comment-gating CTAs are documented as driving 3–5× normal comment volume versus typical posts
- CTA goal table covers four primary goals: maximize reach, boost engagement, grow followers, generate leads
Files
LinkedIn CTAs & Profile Optimization
You are a specialist in crafting LinkedIn call-to-actions that drive saves, comments, and follows, and in optimizing LinkedIn profiles as conversion funnels.
Reference
Load {SKILL_BASE}/resources/references/content-strategy.md for the complete CTA patterns, profile optimization frameworks, and headline formulas. Read {SKILL_BASE}/resources/voice/coldiq-writing-guide.md for comment gating patterns, P.S. question templates, and continuation tease formulas proven on ColdIQ accounts. Read {SKILL_BASE}/resources/performance/engagement-data-analysis.md for data on which CTA styles drive S/A-tier engagement (comment-gating = 3-5x normal comment volume).
CTA Types by Goal
| Goal | CTA Type | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Maximize reach | Save prompt | "Save this for your next [situation]." |
| Boost engagement | Comment prompt | "What's your #1 challenge with [topic]? Drop it below." |
| Grow followers | Follow prompt | "I share [topic] frameworks weekly. Follow for more." |
| Generate leads | DM prompt | "DM me '[keyword]' and I'll send you the template." |
| Build email list | Link-in-comments | "I wrote a full guide on this. Link in comments." |
CTA Design Rules
1. One CTA per post -- multiple CTAs dilute action 2. Be specific -- "Comment your biggest hiring mistake" beats "Let me know what you think" 3. Lower the barrier -- "Drop a [emoji]" is easier than "Write a paragraph" 4. Match CTA to content -- frameworks = save, opinions = comment, personal brand = follow 5. Saves are weighted 5x -- always consider "is this saveable?" when writing
High-Performing CTA Templates
Save-driving: "Bookmark this for next time you [situation]. You'll thank yourself."
Comment-driving: "I'm curious -- what would you add to this list? Drop your #1 in the comments."
Debate-driving: "Agree or disagree? I'll respond to every comment."
Follow-driving: "I break down [niche] strategies like this every week. Follow along."
DM-driving: "Want the full [template/checklist/framework]? DM me '[keyword]' and I'll send it over."
Profile as Conversion Funnel
Your profile is a landing page. Every element must convert visitors into followers, connections, or leads.
Headline Formulas (220 characters max)
| Formula | Example |
|---|---|
| "I help [audience] [result]" | "I help B2B SaaS companies generate pipeline through cold outreach" |
| "Role \ | Niche + Proof" |
| "Role \ | What you do \ |
Avoid: "visionary," "guru," "ninja," "thought leader," or job title alone.
About Section (2,600 chars max)
[HOOK - First 2 lines visible before "see more"]
[PROBLEM YOU SOLVE - 2-3 sentences]
[YOUR APPROACH - 3-5 sentences]
[PROOF - 3-5 bullet points with specific results]
[WHO I WORK WITH - 2-3 sentences]
[CTA - exact next step: DM, email, book a call]Featured Section (Priority Order)
1. Lead magnet / free resource (drives email list) 2. Best-performing LinkedIn post (social proof) 3. Case study / testimonial (proof of results) 4. Newsletter (subscriber growth) 5. Media appearance (authority)
Max 3-5 items. Most important = leftmost. Update monthly.
Banner Design
- Dimensions: 1584 x 396 pixels (4:1 ratio)
- Keep critical text in center (edges cropped on mobile)
- Include: tagline, website URL, key offering, or social proof
Comment Gating (Highest Engagement CTA)
Comment-gated posts drive 3-5x normal comment volume. The algorithm sees massive comments → boosts distribution.
Keyword Comment Gate:
Comment "INTENT" below and I'll share it.
Comment "STACK" and I'll send you the full breakdown.
Comment "CLAUDE" and make sure we're connected so I can DM it to you.P.S. Question Closers (proven highest-performing):
P.S: What tool should I add to this stack?
P.S: How are your cold email campaigns doing right now?
P.S: What's the ONE tool you can't live without?
P.S: Which part of this system would you want more detail on?Continuation Tease:
I'm running out of space... Continuing in the comments 👇
Make sure to follow so you don't miss the next breakdown.Examples
Example 1 -- Post about a sales framework (goal: saves): End with: "Save this framework for your next pipeline review. Repost if your team needs it too."
Example 2 -- Contrarian take on hiring (goal: comments): End with: "Controversial? Maybe. But I've seen it play out 50+ times. What's your experience -- does culture fit matter more than skills? Tell me below."
Example 3 -- Profile rewrite for a B2B founder: Headline: "Helping B2B teams book 30+ meetings/month | CEO @ Acme | 500+ companies served" About hook: "Your outbound isn't broken. Your targeting is." Featured: lead magnet PDF (slot 1), top LinkedIn post (slot 2), customer case study (slot 3).
LinkedIn Graphic Design Brief Templates
Structured templates for creating infographics, carousels, and animated visuals to accompany LinkedIn posts.
---
Infographic Brief Template
# Graphic Design Brief: [Title]
## Content Type
[Single infographic / Carousel / Animated infographic]
## Dimensions
- LinkedIn feed: 1050 x 1380px (portrait, max feed real estate)
- Carousel: 1080 x 1350px per slide
- Square: 1080 x 1080px
## Header Section
[Title text — large, bold]
[Subtitle — lighter weight]
[Author name / company branding — top-right]
## Content Sections
### Section 1: [Name]
**Layout:** [left/right/full-width]
**Content:**
- [Bullet points of what goes in this section]
- [Include specific numbers, tool names, metrics]
### Section 2: [Name]
[Same structure]
## Visual Elements
- Tool logos to include: [list]
- Icons needed: [list]
- Flow diagram / arrows / connectors: [describe]
## Design Notes
- [Specific callouts for the designer]
- [Emphasis points — what should be BIG]
- [Typography hierarchy]---
Carousel Brief Template
# Carousel Brief: [Title]
## Slide Count: [X slides]
## Cover Slide (SLIDE 1)
**Hook text:** [Large, bold statement]
**Subtext:** [Supporting line]
**Visual:** [What the cover should look like]
**Bottom:** "Swipe for the framework →"
## SLIDE 2: [Title]
**Layout:** [Split, full-width, comparison, etc.]
**Content:** [What goes on this slide]
**Key stat to highlight:** [The big number]
**Design notes:** [Colors, emphasis]
## SLIDE 3-N: [Continue pattern]
## Final Slide (CTA)
**Text:** [CTA copy]
**Elements:** [Profile photo, logo, website]---
Animated Infographic Notes
- Speed up to 1.5-2x for LinkedIn autoplay
- Loop seamlessly (end state = start state)
- Convert to GIF for audio-less content (outperforms video)
- Keep under 15 seconds for max loops in feed
- Big title visible in first frame (acts as second hook)
---
Format Selection Guide
| Content Type | Best Visual | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Tech stack / system architecture | Single infographic (1050x1380) | Dense data, all in one view |
| Step-by-step / multi-topic | Carousel (1080x1350/slide) | Natural slide progression |
| Maximum feed real estate | Animated infographic | Movement catches eye, loops in feed |
| Before/after / tool battles | Comparison graphic | Side-by-side layout |
| Personal stories / hot takes | Text-only | Let the story breathe |
---
Carousel Best Practices
- 8-12 slides is the optimal range
- Cover slide = second hook (must stop the scroll on its own)
- Large text readable on mobile (16pt+ minimum)
- One idea per slide — never crowd slides
- Consistent design language across all slides
- CTA on last slide (follow, comment, visit profile)
- "Swipe →" indicator on cover and early slides
---
Infographic Best Practices
- Big title visible = acts as a second hook in the feed
- Key stat should be the largest text element
- Use white/card-based sections for readability
- Include tool logos for instant recognition
- Flow diagrams with arrows for process visualization
- Reference past infographics for style consistency
LinkedIn Engagement Data Analysis
Performance insights from 86+ posts analyzed across ColdIQ's founder accounts (Mich Lieben, Kenny Damian) and COO (Alex Vacca).
---
Mich Lieben — 43-Post Analysis (65K+ followers)
Key Metrics
- Average: 326 reactions, 174 comments per post
- Best: 789 reactions, 424 comments (personal vulnerability story)
- Average character count: 2,192
- Top performer chars: 2,000-2,300 (story/vulnerability)
Engagement Tier Breakdown
| Tier | Reactions | What Triggers It |
|---|---|---|
| S-Tier (700+) | 789 | Personal vulnerability, failure stories, founder journey |
| A-Tier (500+) | 520-574 | European tech angle, annual results with specific $ |
| B-Tier (350-500) | 370-518 | Revenue hooks, comment-gated resources, team involvement |
| C-Tier (250-350) | 253-348 | Tech stack breakdowns, tool comparisons, how-to's |
| D-Tier (<250) | 161-244 | Product launches, category overviews, short promos |
Hook Patterns Ranked by Engagement
1. VULNERABILITY — Personal failure/journey stories (789 avg reactions) 2. COMMENT-GATED + AI — "Use this Claude setup, it handles 90%" + resource giveaway (692 comments — highest comment count) 3. REVENUE + SPECIFIC $ — "$4M ARR", "$534,000 added in January" (500+ reactions consistently) 4. EUROPEAN ANGLE — "But have you seen what's being built in Europe?" (520-545 reactions) 5. TEAM/CULTURE — "We get the whole team involved" (383 reactions, but SHORT post — 851 chars with carousel) 6. TECH STACK REVEALS — "Here's every tool we use" (375 reactions, reliable performer) 7. TIME SAVINGS — "What took hours now takes minutes" (366 reactions)
#1 Insight: Vulnerability Outperforms Everything
The highest-performing post (789 reactions, 424 comments) was a personal story about 7 failed businesses — clothing brand, lottery, newsletter failures — and what each taught him. NOT a tech stack post.
Character Count Sweet Spots
| Post Type | Optimal Length | Engagement |
|---|---|---|
| Carousel companion text | 800-900 chars | 370-383 reactions (high for length) |
| Story/vulnerability | 2,000-2,300 chars | 789 reactions (highest) |
| Tech stack breakdown | 2,400-2,900 chars | 300-575 reactions |
| Educational how-to | 2,500-2,950 chars | 250-350 reactions |
| Comment-gated resource | 2,300-2,400 chars | 439 reactions + 692 comments |
Top-Performing Patterns
Pattern 1: Full Company Breakdown
- Hook: "$7M ARR. Here's every tool we use."
- Structure: Department-by-department with specific tools + team members
- Engagement: 300-375 reactions, 150-165 comments
Pattern 2: Educational How-To
- Hook: "How the top 1% make cold email work in 2026"
- Structure: 8-9 numbered principles with sub-bullets
- Engagement: 250-280 reactions, 140-145 comments
Pattern 3: AI/Tool Deep Dive
- Hook: "I spent 300+ hours using Claude Code for GTM"
- Structure: Numbered tool list with specific use cases + API integrations
- Engagement: 280-310 reactions, 170+ comments
Pattern 4: European Tech Angle
- Hook: "Silicon Valley gets all the headlines. But Europe..."
- Structure: Company-by-company breakdown with use cases
- Engagement: 500+ reactions (highest for non-vulnerability)
Pattern 5: LinkedIn Growth Meta-Content
- Hook: "I just crossed 65,000 followers. Here's every tool I used."
- Structure: Category-by-category tool stack
- Engagement: 300+ reactions
---
Kenny Damian — 43-Post Analysis
Key Metrics
- Average: 131 reactions, 138 comments per post
- Comments:reactions ratio: 1.05:1 (comment-heavy — his audience comments more than they react)
- Average character count: 1,701
- Top performer chars: 1,689 (shorter = better for Kenny)
Kenny vs Mich Comparison
| Dimension | Kenny | Mich |
|---|---|---|
| Avg reactions | 131 | 326 |
| Avg comments | 138 | 174 |
| Comments:reactions ratio | 1.05:1 (comment-heavy) | 0.53:1 (reaction-heavy) |
| Avg char count | 1,701 | 2,192 |
| Top performer chars | 1,689 (shorter = better) | 2,040 |
| Voice | Practitioner, hands-on | CEO, strategic |
| Strongest content | AI workflows + resource giveaways | Company breakdowns + revenue |
Key insight: Kenny's top posts are SHORTER than his average. Mich's top posts are LONGER. Kenny's audience wants tactical, grab-and-go content. Mich's wants comprehensive breakdowns.
Kenny's S-Tier Formula (3,000+ engagement)
AI Agents/Automation + Revenue Number + Comment-Gated Resource = VIRALBoth S-tier posts (3,398 and 2,982 total engagement) followed this exact formula: 1. Hook with AI + specific $ impact 2. Show the exact workflow/system 3. Gate a downloadable resource behind "Comment [KEYWORD]"
Engagement Tiers
| Tier | Engagement | Pattern | Example Hook |
|---|---|---|---|
| S (1000+) | 2,982-3,398 | AI agents + revenue + comment-gate | "These are the 6 AI Agents we deploy across our >$10M ARR clients" |
| A (300+) | 352-413 | ROI math + automation workflow + comment-gate | "10 hours X 8 reps = 80 hrs. That's $10,000 saved monthly" |
| B (100-300) | 127-223 | Step-by-step frameworks, tool breakdowns | "Here's the 9-step system that gets 20-30% replies" |
| C (50-100) | 56-96 | Tool reviews, process breakdowns | "Inside Google AI Studio (free), I tested:" |
Hook Patterns Ranked
1. AI + REVENUE + COMMENT_GATE — "6 AI Agents across >$10M ARR clients" (3,398 engagement) 2. TOOL_SPECIFIC + COMMENT_GATE — "Use this Claude project setup 👇" (2,982 engagement) 3. ROI MATH — "10 hours X 8 reps = 80 hrs = $10,000 saved" (413 engagement) 4. DATA SOURCE LIST + COMMENT_GATE — "60+ data sources. 95% use only three. Comment LIST" (352 engagement) 5. STEP-BY-STEP FRAMEWORK — "Here's the 9-step system that gets 20-30% replies" (212 engagement) 6. BEFORE/AFTER COMPARISON — "Cut list from 10K to 3.2K. Replies jumped 4.2% to 6.8%" (91 engagement)
Content Sweet Spots
| Post Type | Best Length | Engagement |
|---|---|---|
| Comment-gated resource | 800-1,500 chars | S/A tier (highest) |
| AI workflow breakdown | 1,500-2,100 chars | S/A tier |
| Step-by-step framework | 1,200-1,800 chars | B tier (reliable) |
| Tool review/comparison | 1,000-1,500 chars | B/C tier |
| Full system breakdown | 2,300-2,800 chars | B/C tier |
| Personal reflection | 1,300-1,700 chars | C tier |
Kenny's Untapped Opportunities
1. Vulnerability/personal story — Mich's #1 post type (789 reactions). Kenny hasn't gone deep here. 2. European angle — Consistently gets 500+ for Mich. Kenny is based in Europe. 3. Revenue transparency — When Mich shares specific ColdIQ revenue, it's A/S tier. 4. Animated infographics — Static visuals perform well. Animated = 2-3x more reach.
---
Alex Vacca — Top Patterns (COO, high engagement)
Pattern 1: Comment-Gated Value
- Hook: "We've sent 23M cold emails. These 54 signals got 5-11% reply rates."
- Structure: Short teaser + "Comment INTENT to get it"
- Engagement: 218 reactions, 565 comments
- Why it works: Massive comment count = algorithm boost
Pattern 2: SDR Playbook
- Hook: "We run pipelines for 80+ clients. Here's our SDR prioritization system."
- Structure: Priority 0-7 ranked framework
- Engagement: 175 reactions, 138 comments
Pattern 3: Agency Scaling Advice
- Hook: "Agency owners doing $5K-$50K/month, this will sound familiar."
- Structure: Problem → story → client result → CTA
- Engagement: 111 reactions, 101 comments
Pattern 4: ABM Case Study with Numbers
- Hook: "Last week I talked to a Head of Marketing who spent $120K on ABM."
- Structure: Conversation format → before/after numbers
- Engagement: 174 reactions, 150 comments
Pattern 5: Stage-Based Strategy Framework
- Hook: "The real competitive advantage isn't working harder."
- Structure: Revenue-stage breakdown (Pre-$1M → $1-10M → $10M+)
- Engagement: 289 reactions, 147 comments
Pattern 6: Relationship/Community Building
- Hook: "Create a mafia in your niche."
- Structure: Name drops + specific relationships + philosophy
- Engagement: 278 reactions, 142 comments
---
The Engagement Multiplier Formula
Posts that combine these 5 elements get the highest engagement:
1. Specific $ in the hook — not "grew revenue" but "$534,000 added in January" 2. Contrarian or surprising angle — Europe > Silicon Valley, failures > wins 3. Visual companion — infographic or carousel doubles reach 4. Comment gate — "Comment X to get it" drives 3-5x normal comment volume 5. Name drops with follower counts — builds network effect
---
Reference Data
- Kenny's 43 posts with full content + engagement:
linkedin-content/resources/posts/kenny-posts-reference.csv - Mich's 43 posts with full content + engagement:
linkedin-content/resources/posts/mich-posts-reference.csv - Columns: engagement_rank, hook, reactions, comments, total_engagement, char_count, full_content
LinkedIn Content Strategy: Hooks, Frameworks & Profile Optimization
Hook Writing Techniques
The hook is text visible before the "see more" fold — ~210 characters on mobile (2-3 lines). This is the most important element of any LinkedIn post.
Hook Formulas
| Formula | Template | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Specific Result | "I [action] [timeframe]. Here's [result]." | "I cold-emailed 500 CEOs in 30 days. 47 replied." |
| Myth Buster | "[Common belief] is wrong. Here's why." | "Posting every day on LinkedIn is wrong. Here's why." |
| Listicle Tease | "[Number] [things] that [outcome]. #[X] is underrated." | "7 LinkedIn hacks that 10x'd my reach. #4 is underrated." |
| Before/After | "Last year: [bad state]. Today: [good state]. The difference?" | "Last year: 50 followers. Today: 50,000. The difference?" |
| Curiosity Gap | "I discovered [something] that [category] don't want you to know." | "I discovered why most LinkedIn advice is designed to fail." |
| Social Proof | "[Authority/Number] taught me [lesson]." | "After working with 200+ founders, I noticed one pattern." |
| Direct Address | "If you're [situation], read this." | "If you're posting on LinkedIn with zero engagement, read this." |
| Controversial Take | "[Strong opinion]. And I'll die on this hill." | "Networking events are a waste of time. And I'll die on this hill." |
First Line Strategies
1. Bold Contrarian Statement
- "Cold outreach is dead. Here's what replaced it."
- "Your LinkedIn headline is costing you clients."
2. Specific Number + Unexpected Outcome
- "I analyzed 1,000 LinkedIn posts. Only 3% went viral. Here's what they had in common."
- "147 sales calls. 0 deals. Then I changed one thing."
3. Personal Confession / Vulnerability
- "I got fired 6 months ago. Best thing that ever happened to me."
- "My biggest career mistake cost me $200K."
4. Question That Reframes
- "What if everything you know about hiring is wrong?"
- "Why do 90% of startups fail while copying successful ones?"
5. Pattern Interrupt
- Start with a single word: "Stop." / "Wait." / "Unpopular opinion:"
- Lead with emotion that contrasts professional tone: "I cried in a board meeting."
Curiosity Gap Techniques
- Withhold the key detail: "One change to my morning routine made everything click."
- Imply a secret: "Most people don't know this about LinkedIn's algorithm."
- Unexpected juxtaposition: "A rejection email led to my best client."
- Promise a reveal: "I'll share the exact framework at the end of this post."
- Numbered incompleteness: "There are 3 types of LinkedIn posts. Most people only know 2."
Hook Don'ts
- Do NOT start with "I'm excited to announce..." (generic, low engagement)
- Do NOT start with a question answerable with "no" (people scroll past)
- Do NOT use clickbait the post doesn't deliver on
- Do NOT start with hashtags or mentions
- Do NOT bury the hook after a preamble
Storytelling Frameworks for LinkedIn
AIDA (Attention - Interest - Desire - Action)
[ATTENTION] I lost my biggest client last Tuesday.
[INTEREST] They represented 40% of our revenue. The email was two sentences.
"We're going in a different direction. Thanks for everything."
[DESIRE] That night, I rewrote our entire onboarding process. I added
monthly check-ins, quarterly reviews, and a client health score.
Within 3 weeks, our retention rate went from 72% to 94%.
[ACTION] If you're not measuring client health, you're waiting for
the breakup email. Save this post for the framework I used.PAS (Problem - Agitate - Solution)
[PROBLEM] You're posting on LinkedIn 5x a week and getting 12 likes.
[AGITATE] Meanwhile, people with half your expertise are getting 10K views
per post. They're landing clients in DMs. Speaking gigs.
Podcast invites. It's not your content. It's your format.
[SOLUTION] I switched from text-only to carousels 6 months ago.
Same ideas. Same audience. 5x the reach. Here's the
exact template I use:BAB (Before - After - Bridge)
BEFORE: I spent 3 hours writing LinkedIn posts. Got 200 views.
Felt like shouting into the void.
AFTER: I spend 30 minutes per post. Average 15K views.
Get 2-3 inbound leads per week.
THE BRIDGE: I created a content system with 3 parts:
1. Hook library (50 proven first lines)
2. Framework templates (fill in the blank structures)
3. Engagement ritual (15 min post-publish routine)Additional Frameworks
"One Thing" Framework: Hook → Brief context → Single key insight → Evidence/proof → Takeaway → CTA
"Mistake > Lesson" Framework: Hook ("I made a costly mistake...") → What happened → What it cost → What you learned → Why you're grateful → CTA
"Listicle with Depth" Framework: Hook ("[X] things I learned...") → Items with 1-2 line explanations → Last item most surprising → CTA
"Contrarian Take" Framework: Hook ("[Popular belief] is wrong.") → Acknowledge → Evidence → Reframe → Nuance → CTA
Storytelling Rules
1. Specificity beats generality: "$47,312 in Q3" > "a lot of money" 2. One post = one idea: Never cover multiple topics 3. 6th-grade reading level: Short sentences. Simple words. 4. Use dialogue: "My boss said: 'You're not ready.' I said: 'Watch me.'" 5. End with the reader: Transform "what I learned" into "what you can do" 6. Vulnerability is not weakness: Sharing failures builds trust 7. Tension drives reading: Create tension early, resolve late
Profile Optimization
Headline Formulas (220 characters max)
Formula 1: "I help [audience] [achieve result]"
- "I help B2B SaaS companies generate pipeline through cold outreach"
Formula 2: "Role | Niche Authority + Proof"
- "Head of Growth @ Acme | Helped 3 startups reach $10M ARR"
Formula 3: "[Role] | [What you do] | [Social proof/CTA]"
- "Fractional CMO | Revenue-focused marketing for B2B | Former HubSpot"
Formula 4: "Niche Keyword + Differentiator"
- "The only LinkedIn strategist who guarantees results"
Best Practices:
- Lead with what you do for others, not job title alone
- Include relevant keywords for LinkedIn search
- Avoid buzzwords: "visionary," "guru," "ninja," "thought leader"
- Use pipe "|" or bullet "·" to separate phrases
About Section Framework (2,600 chars max)
[HOOK - First 2 lines visible before "see more"]
Compelling statement about who you help and what makes you different.
[THE PROBLEM YOU SOLVE - 2-3 sentences]
Paint the pain your audience feels.
[YOUR APPROACH - 3-5 sentences]
How you solve the problem. Your unique methodology.
[PROOF - 3-5 bullet points]
- Specific results achieved
- Notable clients or companies
- Relevant certifications
- Media features or speaking
[WHO I WORK WITH - 2-3 sentences]
Describe ideal client clearly so they self-identify.
[CTA - 1-2 sentences]
Exact next step. DM? Book a call? Email?
Email: your@email.comFeatured Section (Top of Profile)
Priority order: 1. Lead magnet / free resource (drives email list) 2. Best-performing LinkedIn post (social proof) 3. Case study / testimonial (proof of results) 4. Newsletter (subscriber growth) 5. Media appearance (authority)
Tips: Max 3-5 items, custom thumbnails, most important = leftmost, update monthly.
Banner Design
- Dimensions: 1584 x 396 pixels (4:1 ratio)
- Keep critical text in center (edges cropped on mobile)
- Communicate: who you are, what you do, value prop
- Include: tagline, website URL, key offering, or social proof
Social Proof Elements
1. Recommendations: 5-10+ from clients/colleagues with specific prompts 2. Skills endorsements: Pin top 3 relevant skills, aim for 99+ 3. Activity section: Consistent, high-quality posting = trust 4. Experience descriptions: Include metrics ("Grew team from 5 to 25, +340% revenue") 5. Follower count: >5,000 signals authority 6. Custom URL: Claim linkedin.com/in/yourname
Key Takeaways
1. Saves are the new likes — create content worth bookmarking 2. Carousels dominate — invest in 8-12 slide educational carousels 3. First 90 minutes matter most — be present and engaged after posting 4. Hook in 210 characters — first line determines if anyone reads the rest 5. 3-4 posts/week — sweet spot for growth without burnout 6. Comments are a growth channel — 15+ meaningful comments daily 7. Newsletters compound — every subscriber = guaranteed notification 8. Niche > broad — algorithm rewards topic consistency 9. Vulnerability + insight = engagement — failures + professional lesson 10. Profile = landing page — optimize as conversion funnel
LinkedIn Algorithm & Content Performance (2024-2026)
How the Feed Algorithm Works
LinkedIn's feed algorithm operates in 4 phases:
Phase 1: Content Quality Filter
- Post classified as spam, low-quality, or clear
- AI checks for engagement bait, pod activity, and policy violations
- Clear posts enter distribution
Phase 2: Initial Distribution (Golden Hour)
- Post shown to ~8-15% of followers
- Algorithm measures engagement velocity (speed and volume)
- First 60-90 minutes determine 80%+ of total reach
Phase 3: Engagement Scoring
- Algorithm assigns "engagement credits" based on interaction type
- High-scoring posts enter viral distribution
- Sent to followers-of-followers and topic feeds
Phase 4: Extended Distribution
- Top posts continue receiving impressions for 24-72 hours
- Evergreen content can resurface days or weeks later
- Saves and shares extend lifecycle significantly
Engagement Weights (Relative Value)
| Action | Weight | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Save/Bookmark | ~5x | Strongest signal — user wants to revisit |
| Meaningful Comment (>15 words) | ~4x | Indicates deep engagement |
| Share with commentary | ~3-4x | Extends reach to new networks |
| Short Comment (<15 words) | ~2x | Engagement but lower quality |
| Reaction (Like) | ~1x | Baseline signal |
| Click "see more" | ~0.5-1x | Shows interest but lower commitment |
| Profile click | ~0.5x | Curiosity signal |
Dwell Time
- Time spent reading a post significantly affects its score
- Long-form posts and carousels benefit from extended dwell
- Even without interaction, 10+ seconds reading = positive signal
- Rapid scroll-past = negative signal
Content Velocity
- Speed of engagement matters more than total volume
- 20 comments in 30 minutes > 50 comments in 24 hours
- Algorithm front-loads distribution based on early signals
Topic Consistency
- Posting on the same 2-3 topics consistently = higher distribution
- Algorithm builds a "creator topic graph"
- Pivoting topics too often can reset your distribution
Content Format Performance
| Format | Reach Multiplier | Avg Engagement Rate | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carousels (PDF) | 2.5-3.5x | 3-5% | Educational content, frameworks |
| Text-Only Posts | 1x (baseline) | 2-3% | Stories, opinions, insights |
| Native Video | 1.2-2x | 2-4% | Personal brand, tutorials |
| Images with Text | 1-1.5x | 2-3% | Infographics, quotes |
| Polls | 0.8-1.2x | High clicks, low depth | Audience research (use sparingly) |
| Newsletters | Variable | 30-50% open rate | Deep content, subscriber growth |
| External Links | 0.3-0.6x | 1-2% | Driving off-platform traffic (penalized) |
Carousels / Document Posts
- Highest-performing organic format on LinkedIn
- Optimal slide count: 8-12 slides
- First slide acts as a "cover" — must be compelling like a headline
- Last slide should include a CTA (follow, comment, save)
- Design tips: large text (mobile-readable), consistent branding, one idea per slide
Text-Only Posts
- Optimal length: 800-1,300 characters
- "See more" fold at ~210 characters on mobile — hook must be here
- Single sentences per line with blank lines between
- Unicode characters for bullets/arrows, numbered lists
Native Video
- Optimal length: 30-90 seconds for feed, up to 10 min for tutorials
- Captions essential (85%+ watched on mute)
- Vertical (9:16) supported and recommended for mobile
- Talking-head + text overlay performs best
Polls
- Deprioritized in 2024-2025 due to low-quality abuse
- Use sparingly (max 1/week)
- 2-3 answer options outperform 4 options
Newsletters
- Subscribers get push notifications + email on publish
- Average open rates: 30-50%
- Indexed by Google (SEO benefit)
- Recommended frequency: weekly or biweekly
External Links
- Posts with links receive 40-60% less reach
- Workaround: post text natively, add link in first comment
- Alternative: "link in comments" mention
Posting Strategy
Best Times to Post
| Day | Best Times (local timezone) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tuesday | 7:30-8:30 AM, 12:00-1:00 PM | Top-performing day |
| Wednesday | 7:30-8:30 AM, 12:00-1:00 PM | Second-best |
| Thursday | 7:30-8:30 AM, 12:00-1:00 PM | Strong for B2B |
| Monday | 8:00-9:00 AM | Good but people catching up on emails |
| Friday | 7:30-8:30 AM | Moderate; drops after noon |
| Saturday | 9:00-11:00 AM | Less competition |
| Sunday | 7:00-9:00 PM | "Sunday evening prep" window |
Posting Frequency
| Frequency | Impact | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| 1x/week | Baseline | Beginners, busy professionals |
| 2-3x/week | Optimal for most | Growing creators |
| 4-5x/week | Diminishing returns | Full-time creators |
| Daily (7x) | Can hurt quality | Only if quality remains high |
| 2x/day | Counterproductive | Not recommended |
Sweet spot: 3-4 posts/week. Quality always beats quantity.
The Golden Hour Routine
T+0 min: Post goes live
T+0-5 min: Respond to immediate comments
T+5-15 min: Engage with 5-10 others' posts in your niche
T+15-30 min: Check back, respond to every comment
T+30-60 min: Continue engaging + responding
T+1-2 hrs: Final check, respond to remainingComment Strategy (Growth Hack)
- 15+ words per comment — add insight, share experience, ask questions
- 10-20 meaningful comments/day on posts in your niche
- Comment on posts from people with larger audiences
- Be early: first 30 minutes = top positioning
- Comment format: strong first sentence, line breaks, end with question
Engagement Pods
- LinkedIn actively detects and penalizes engagement pods since 2023-2024
- Algorithm identifies unnatural engagement patterns
- Alternative: Build genuine network of 10-20 peers who naturally engage
- Formal pods are increasingly risky; authentic mutual engagement is sustainable
LinkedIn Creator Tools
Newsletters
- Push notification + email to all subscribers per edition
- No subscriber limit
- Supports rich media
- First newsletter auto-invites all connections
- Limitation: only 1 newsletter at a time, can't export subscriber emails
LinkedIn Live
- 7x more reactions, 24x more comments than native video
- Requires third-party tool (StreamYard, Restream, OBS)
- Promote 24-48 hours before + 1 hour before
- Sweet spot: 30-60 minutes
- Repurpose recording into 3-5 short clips
Audio Events
- Deprioritized in favor of video and newsletters
- Low attendance unless large following
- Keep to 30-45 minutes max
Collaborative Articles
- AI-generated stubs, experts add perspectives
- Earn "Top Voice" badge with 5-10+ contributions
- Rank well in Google (LinkedIn domain authority)
- Low effort: 2-4 paragraphs per contribution
Scheduled Posts
- Native scheduling supported (up to 3 months ahead)
- Eliminates need for third-party tools
LinkedIn Campaign Frameworks
LinkedIn Limits (2024-2026)
Hard Limits
- 400 connection requests/month (non-premium)
- 800 Open InMails/month (premium)
- ~100-120 total interactions/day (unofficial but enforced)
Safe Daily Limits
- 15-20 DMs to existing connections
- 30-40 Open InMails
- 10-15 connection requests
- 40 "other" interactions (likes, comments, views)
What Counts as Interactions
- DMs, connection requests, InMails
- Profile views
- Post likes/comments
- Page likes
- Endorsements
- Joining events/groups
LinkedIn Warm-Up Protocol
When needed: Inactive or new accounts
Process:
- Days 1-10: 60 interactions/day maximum
- Only manual activity (no automation)
- Mix of views, likes, comments
- Gradual increase to full limits after warm-up
LinkedIn Copywriting Rules
1. Never over one paragraph 2. 3-4 sentences maximum 3. Create conversation, don't sell 4. Use auto-embedding resources:
- Loom videos (high engagement)
- LinkedIn posts (social proof)
- Webinar links (value offer)
- Newsletter signups (nurture path)
LinkedIn Campaign Sequence (Human-Like)
Step 1: View profile (Day 1)
↓
Step 2: Like a recent post (Day 1-2)
↓
Step 3: Send connection request (Day 2-3)
↓
[Wait for acceptance]
↓
Step 4: Send first message (4-24 hours after acceptance)
↓
Step 5: Follow-up if no response (Day 5-7)Scheduling Best Practices
- Timezone: Within prospect's working hours (9 AM - 6 PM their time)
- Days: Weekdays only (Mon-Thu best, Fri lower engagement)
- Breaks: At least one day off per week
- Timing: Message when they're likely online (inbox visibility)
High-Converting LinkedIn Targets
Tier 1 (Highest Priority):
- LinkedIn Webinar/Event attendees
- Post engagers (filter to ICP via Clay)
- Company page followers
- Profile viewers
Tier 2 (Good Priority):
- Recently created group members
- Newsletter subscribers
- Content commenters
Sales Navigator Must-Use Filter:
- "Posted within last 30 days" = Active user
- Critical to avoid wasting connection requests on inactive profiles
LinkedIn Message Templates
Profile Viewer Follow-Up
Hey {{first_name}}, noticed you checked out my profile.
What caught your attention?Reply rate: 28-35% (vs 8-12% cold)
Connection Acceptance Message
Thanks for connecting, {{first_name}}.
Quick q — what's your biggest challenge with {{relevant_topic}} right now?Post Engager Follow-Up
Hey {{first_name}}, saw you liked my post about {{topic}}.
Is {{pain_point}} something you're dealing with at {{company}}?Warm Intro Request
Hey {{first_name}}, noticed we both know {{mutual_connection}}.
I've been working with {{similar_company}} on {{topic}}.
Would you be open to a quick chat?LinkedIn Key Success Factors
1. Do not breach limits (most important rule) 2. Target active users only (don't waste 400 requests) 3. Keep messages super short (3-4 sentences max) 4. Incorporate eye-catching lead magnet 5. Make steps appear human (randomize timing) 6. Schedule within audience timezone 7. Message when they're online (inbox visibility)
LinkedIn Targeting Ideas
High Priority:
- LinkedIn Webinar/Event attendees
- Post engagement scrapers (filter to ICP via Clay)
- Company page followers
- Recently created LinkedIn group members
Sales Navigator Filters:
- "Posted within last 30 days" = active users
- Essential to avoid wasting connection requests
LinkedIn Post Structure Templates
5 proven post templates with character counts, layouts, and use cases. Based on analysis of ColdIQ posts achieving 200-500+ reactions.
---
Template A: The Comprehensive Breakdown (2,500-2,900 chars)
Best for: Tech stack reveals, company deep dives, system architectures
[HOOK with specific numbers]
[1-2 line credibility builder]
[Brief preview of what's coming]
1️⃣ [SECTION NAME]
[Brief intro]
We use:
- Tool A (specific use case)
- Tool B (specific use case)
- Tool C (specific use case)
2️⃣ [SECTION NAME]
[Context or insight]
For [specific outcome]:
→ Action with detail
→ Action with detail
→ Action with detail
[Continue for 5-7 sections]
P.S: [Engagement question]---
Template B: The Listicle Framework (2,000-2,500 chars)
Best for: Lessons learned, principles, frameworks, hiring advice
[HOOK with journey/result]
Here are X things I learned:
1. [Principle Name]
[2-3 sentence explanation]
→ Actionable sub-point
→ Actionable sub-point
→ Actionable sub-point
2. [Principle Name]
[Pattern explanation]
One way I do this:
→ Action step
→ Action step
[Continue for 5-8 principles]
P.S: [Question about their situation]---
Template C: The Case Study / Before-After (2,000-2,500 chars)
Best for: Client results (anonymized), campaign breakdowns, ROI stories
[HOOK: Bold result + metric]
[Context: What the situation was BEFORE]
Here's what was broken:
→ Problem 1 (with number)
→ Problem 2 (with number)
→ Problem 3 (with number)
Here's what we changed:
→ Fix 1 (specific action + tool)
→ Fix 2 (specific action + tool)
→ Fix 3 (specific action + tool)
The results after [timeframe]:
→ Metric 1 (before → after)
→ Metric 2 (before → after)
→ Metric 3 (before → after)
TAKEAWAY:
[1-2 sentence principle]
[Follow-up question or CTA]---
Template D: The Comment-Gated Lead Magnet (1,500-2,000 chars)
Best for: Maximum engagement, list building, lead magnet distribution
[HOOK: Bold claim with specific number]
[2-3 lines explaining WHY this matters]
[Brief preview of what you'll get — 3-5 bullet teaser]
→ Teaser point 1
→ Teaser point 2
→ Teaser point 3
[The "But here's the BONUS" escalation]
[Final CTA: Comment [KEYWORD] and I'll share it]Why it works: Comment-gating drives 3-5x normal comment volume. The algorithm sees massive comment count → boosts distribution. Best-performing posts on ColdIQ accounts consistently use this template.
---
Template E: The Conversational Story (1,800-2,500 chars)
Best for: Leadership, agency scaling, relationship content, personal takes
[HOOK: Punchy statement or provocative claim]
[Short personal story or observation — conversational, no fluff]
Here's the thing:
[Core insight in 2-3 sentences]
[Supporting points — short, punchy]
- Point 1
- Point 2
- Point 3
[Reflection or bigger-picture takeaway]
[Close with personal conviction, not a CTA]---
Template Selection Guide
| Post Type | Template | Optimal Length |
|---|---|---|
| Tech stack reveals | A | 2,500-2,900 chars |
| System architectures | A | 2,500-2,900 chars |
| Lessons learned | B | 2,000-2,500 chars |
| Frameworks / principles | B | 2,000-2,500 chars |
| Client results / ROI | C | 2,000-2,500 chars |
| Campaign breakdowns | C | 2,000-2,500 chars |
| Resource giveaways | D | 1,500-2,000 chars |
| Lead magnet distribution | D | 1,500-2,000 chars |
| Personal stories | E | 1,800-2,500 chars |
| Leadership / philosophy | E | 1,800-2,500 chars |
| Carousel companion text | Any (shortened) | 800-1,500 chars |
ColdIQ LinkedIn Writing Guide
Voice, tone, formatting, credibility tactics, and pre-publish checklist for ColdIQ content creators.
---
Content Philosophy — The ColdIQ DNA
1. Educate, don't sell — teach frameworks people can implement immediately 2. Data over opinions — every claim backed by specific numbers 3. Transparency wins — share real revenue, metrics, behind-the-scenes 4. Actionable depth — readers should be able to DO something after reading 5. Authority through access — name-drop tools, leaders, insider knowledge 6. Visuals multiply reach — infographics get 2-3x the engagement of text-only
---
Content Pillars (Rotate These)
| Pillar | Weight | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Tech Stack Reveals | 30% | Tool breakdowns, system architectures, API workflows |
| Growth Playbooks | 25% | LinkedIn growth, sales systems, outbound frameworks |
| Lessons & Frameworks | 20% | Things I learned, mistakes to avoid, principles |
| Results & Case Studies | 15% | Campaign metrics, pipeline generated, before/after |
| Behind-the-Scenes | 10% | Team culture, hiring, building in public |
---
Writing Voice & Tone
DO:
- Write conversationally, in first person ("I", "We")
- Use specific numbers: "$6,000,000" not "$6M" in hooks
- Use ellipses for dramatic pauses...
- Include parenthetical asides (like this)
- Use approximations with "~" for estimates
- Mix short punchy sentences with longer explanations
- Use fragments for emphasis. Like this.
- One idea per line for bullet points
- Use ">" for greater than: "> 50,000"
- Use "+" for approximate: "100+"
- Use commas in large numbers: "$6,000,000"
DON'T:
- Use corporate jargon ("leverage synergies", "thought leadership")
- Make vague claims without numbers
- Write in third person
- Use flowery or hype language ("amazing", "revolutionary", "game-changing")
- Oversell — let numbers do the talking
- Add emojis to every line (use sparingly: 1️⃣ for sections, 👇 for CTAs)
- Start with context — always start with the result
Sentence Rhythm:
Short punchy line.
Another one.
Then a longer sentence that adds context and explanation for people who want more depth.
Then back to short. Like this.---
Formatting Rules
Visual Hierarchy:
1. Emoji section headers: 1️⃣ 2️⃣ 3️⃣ for major sections 2. Arrows: → for actions/processes 3. Dashes: - for tool lists/items 4. Spacing: Double line break between sections, single within
Bullet Formats:
Main point:
- Sub-point (context or detail)
- Sub-point (context or detail)
For [outcome], use:
→ Action item
→ Action itemCharacter Limits by Post Type:
| Post Type | Character Range |
|---|---|
| Educational posts | 2,000-2,800 chars |
| Story/personal posts | 1,500-2,200 chars |
| Comment-gated posts | 1,200-1,800 chars |
| Carousel companion text | 800-1,500 chars |
---
Credibility Building Tactics
1. Name Dropping (with context)
"Mich Lieben just crossed 65,000 followers. His stack:"
"As [Name] at ColdIQ, I run outbound for 80+ B2B clients."2. Social Proof
"We publish ~200 LinkedIn pieces per month"
"Our team combines 300,000+ followers"
"This generated 2.5M+ monthly social impressions"3. Results-First
"LinkedIn generates 60% of all their meetings"
"This campaign added $2M in pipeline in 90 days"4. Transparency
"Exact revenue: $7M ARR"
"Tool costs: $1,500-2,000/mo total stack"
"Team: 35 FTEs + 12 fractional"---
Engagement & Closing Patterns
P.S. Questions (most effective closers):
P.S: What tool should I add to this stack?
P.S: How are your cold email campaigns doing right now?
P.S: What's the ONE tool you can't live without?
P.S: Which part of this system would you want more detail on?Comment Gating:
Comment "INTENT" below and I'll share it.
Comment "STACK" and I'll send you the full breakdown.
Want the template? Drop a 🔥 below.Continuation Tease:
I'm running out of space... Continuing in the comments 👇
Make sure to follow so you don't miss the next breakdown.---
When to Mention ColdIQ
- Subtle: "At ColdIQ, we use..." or "Including ourselves, at ColdIQ!"
- Direct: Only in hiring posts, company results, or when naturally relevant
- Never: In the hook, as the main focus, or without adding value first
---
Pre-Publish Checklist
- [ ] Hook includes specific number or bold claim
- [ ] Opens with result, not context
- [ ] Every major claim backed by specific data
- [ ] Includes 3+ tool mentions or name drops
- [ ] Character count in the sweet spot for this post type
- [ ] Emoji section headers (1️⃣ 2️⃣ 3️⃣) if applicable
- [ ] Mix of dashes (-) and arrows (→) for visual variety
- [ ] Ends with "P.S:" question or engagement prompt
- [ ] Written in first person ("I", "We")
- [ ] Scannable — not walls of text
- [ ] If visual: design brief is complete and handed off
- [ ] No selling in the hook
- [ ] Would I stop scrolling for this?
Related skills
How it compares
Use instead of generic “engagement bait” chat advice when you want structured CTA types and profile funnels tied to reference playbooks.
FAQ
Who is linkedin-content for?
Developers, GTM operators, and small teams who publish on LinkedIn and want specialist help on CTAs and profile conversion, not entire post drafts.
When should I use linkedin-content?
Use it during Grow content work when you need save/comment/follow prompts, DM-oriented CTAs, or headline, about, featured, and banner optimization; skip it for post body writing or hook-first lines.
Is linkedin-content safe to install?
Review the Security Audits panel on this Prism page and the upstream repo before enabling the skill in your agent; the skill is editorial guidance and does not require shell or secrets by itself.