
Cofounder Evaluator
- 114 installs
- 31 repo stars
- Updated August 2, 2026
- shipshitdev/library
Assess potential cofounder fit—skills, commitment, equity expectations, and working style—before formalizing partnership agreements or splitting ownership.
About
cofounder-evaluator helps founders systematically assess potential partners on skills, commitment, equity expectations, communication style, and decision-making before legal agreements or heavy build investment. It surfaces mismatch risks early so teams align on roles and scope during validation. Relevant for SaaS, API, and mobile startups forming a founding team.
- Evaluates skills complementarity and role clarity
- Surfaces commitment and equity expectation risks
- Checks working-style and decision-making fit
- Reduces costly founder conflict later
- Supports early team formation for technical ventures
Cofounder Evaluator by the numbers
- 114 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,320 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill cofounder-evaluatorAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 114 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 31 |
| Last updated | August 2, 2026 |
| Repository | shipshitdev/library ↗ |
What it does
Assess potential cofounder fit—skills, commitment, equity expectations, and working style—before formalizing partnership agreements or splitting ownership.
Files
Co-Founder Evaluator - Founding Team Assessment
Overview
Help founders make the critical decision of choosing (or validating) a co-founder using Hexa's methodology. Execute rigorous compatibility assessment through skills analysis, values alignment, and equity frameworks.
Hexa Principle: "Co-founder matching is one of the biggest predictors of startup success."
When This Activates
- "Should I work with this person"
- Finding a co-founder
- Co-founder fit/compatibility
- Equity splits
- "Do I need a co-founder"
- Co-founder conflict/concerns
- Solo vs. partnering
Evaluation Stack (Bottom Up)
1. Skills Complement - What each brings 2. Vision Alignment - Where you want to go 3. Values Alignment - What you believe matters 4. Working Style - How you collaborate daily
Solo vs. Co-founder
| Favors Solo | Favors Co-founder |
|---|---|
| 80%+ skills covered | Major skill gaps |
| Move fast alone | Need parallel execution |
| Prefer autonomy | Value debate/input |
| Strong network | Need complementary network |
| Bootstrapping | Raising (investors like teams) |
5+ either way: Follow that direction
Skills Matrix
Rate 1-5 for: Technical, Sales, Marketing, Finance/Ops, Leadership, Domain, Fundraising, Recruiting
Ideal: No overlaps >4, no gaps <2
Founder Archetypes
| Type | Best Paired With |
|---|---|
| Builder | Seller or Operator |
| Seller | Builder or Operator |
| Operator | Builder or Seller |
| Visionary | Executor |
Vision Alignment Questions
- 5-year vision?
- Company size goal?
- Exit preference ($10M vs $1B)?
- Time commitment?
Red Flag: Different answers = discuss before proceeding
Trial Period (8-12 weeks)
1. Coffee chats (2-4 weeks) 2. Mini project (2-4 weeks) 3. Full immersion (4-8 weeks) 4. Decision
Must pass: Delivered commitments, proactive communication, resolved disagreement, excited to continue
Equity Split Rules
- When in doubt: 50/50
- Always vest (4yr/1yr cliff)
- Get it in writing
| Situation | Split |
|---|---|
| Equal contribution | 50/50 |
| Idea + domain vs. execution | 55/45 - 60/40 |
| Full-time vs. part-time | 60/40 - 70/30 |
Red Flags (Stop)
- History of co-founder disputes
- Different commitment levels
- Can't resolve disagreements
- Reference concerns
- Gut says no
- Unwilling to vest
The 7-10 Year Question
"Would I want to work closely with this person, through extreme stress, for 7-10 years?"
If not enthusiastic yes, keep looking.
Integration
early-hiring-advisor- Build team after foundingidea-validator- Validate idea togetherexecution-accelerator- Make the decision
---
For complete assessment matrices, reference questions, agreement checklist, output templates, and common mistakes, see: references/full-guide.md
{
"name": "cofounder-evaluator",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Use this skill when users need to evaluate potential co-founders, assess founder compatibility, desi",
"author": {
"name": "Ship Shit Dev",
"email": "hello@shipshit.dev",
"url": "https://github.com/shipshitdev"
},
"license": "MIT",
"skills": "."
}
Co-Founder Evaluator - Full Guide
The Framework: Co-Founder Evaluation Stack
+----------------------------------------+
| WORKING STYLE |
| (How you collaborate daily) |
+----------------------------------------+
| VALUES ALIGNMENT |
| (What you believe matters) |
+----------------------------------------+
| VISION ALIGNMENT |
| (Where you want to go) |
+----------------------------------------+
| SKILLS COMPLEMENT |
| (What each brings) |
+----------------------------------------+Evaluate from bottom up. Skills first, then vision, then values, then working style.
Detailed Execution Workflow
Step 1: Solo vs. Co-founder Framework
| Factor | Favors Solo | Favors Co-founder |
|---|---|---|
| Skills | You have 80%+ of what's needed | Major skill gaps |
| Speed | Can move fast alone | Need parallel execution |
| Decision-making | Prefer autonomy | Value debate/input |
| Risk | Can handle alone | Need shared burden |
| Network | Strong existing network | Need complementary network |
| Motivation | Self-driven | Need accountability partner |
| Capital | Bootstrapping | Raising (investors like teams) |
Recommendation:
- 5+ factors favor solo: Consider going alone
- 5+ favor co-founder: Find the right partner
- Split: Either works—go with your gut
Step 2: Skills Matrix
| Skill Area | You | Them | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical/Product | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Gap/Overlap/Covered] |
| Sales/GTM | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Gap/Overlap/Covered] |
| Marketing | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Gap/Overlap/Covered] |
| Finance/Ops | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Gap/Overlap/Covered] |
| Leadership/Mgmt | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Gap/Overlap/Covered] |
| Domain Expertise | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Gap/Overlap/Covered] |
| Fundraising | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Gap/Overlap/Covered] |
| Recruiting | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Gap/Overlap/Covered] |
Ideal:
- Zero overlaps > 4: No wasted overlap
- Zero gaps < 2: All critical areas covered
- Complementary strengths: Each leads different areas
Common Founder Archetypes:
| Archetype | Strengths | Best Paired With |
|---|---|---|
| Builder | Product, engineering, design | Seller or Operator |
| Seller | Sales, BD, fundraising | Builder or Operator |
| Operator | Finance, ops, process | Builder or Seller |
| Visionary | Strategy, storytelling | Executor |
| Executor | Getting things done | Visionary |
Step 3: Vision Alignment Matrix
| Question | You | Them | Aligned? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-year vision | [Answer] | [Answer] | [Y/N/Discuss] |
| Company size goal | [Answer] | [Answer] | [Y/N/Discuss] |
| Exit preference | [Answer] | [Answer] | [Y/N/Discuss] |
| Risk tolerance | [Answer] | [Answer] | [Y/N/Discuss] |
| Time commitment | [Answer] | [Answer] | [Y/N/Discuss] |
| Work-life balance | [Answer] | [Answer] | [Y/N/Discuss] |
Red Flags:
- One wants $10M exit, other wants $1B
- Different commitment levels (full-time vs. part-time)
- Disagreement on company culture/values
- Different timelines for success
Step 4: Values Assessment
| Value | Your Priority (1-5) | Their Priority (1-5) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrity | [X] | [X] | [±X] |
| Speed/Urgency | [X] | [X] | [±X] |
| Quality/Craft | [X] | [X] | [±X] |
| Work-life balance | [X] | [X] | [±X] |
| Financial success | [X] | [X] | [±X] |
| Impact/Mission | [X] | [X] | [±X] |
| Team/Culture | [X] | [X] | [±X] |
| Customer focus | [X] | [X] | [±X] |
Warning Zone: Any gap > 2 points needs discussion.
Core Values Questions:
| Scenario | Their Answer | Concerning? |
|---|---|---|
| "Would you take a salary cut if needed?" | [Answer] | [Y/N] |
| "How do you handle bad news?" | [Answer] | [Y/N] |
| "What if we disagree on direction?" | [Answer] | [Y/N] |
| "How important is control to you?" | [Answer] | [Y/N] |
| "What would make you walk away?" | [Answer] | [Y/N] |
Step 5: Working Style Matrix
| Dimension | You | Them | Compatible? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Work hours | [Pattern] | [Pattern] | [Y/N/Flex] |
| Location | [Preference] | [Preference] | [Y/N/Flex] |
| Communication | [Style] | [Style] | [Y/N/Flex] |
| Decision-making | [Fast/Deliberate] | [Fast/Deliberate] | [Y/N/Flex] |
| Conflict style | [Style] | [Style] | [Y/N/Flex] |
| Feedback style | [Direct/Gentle] | [Direct/Gentle] | [Y/N/Flex] |
| Stress response | [Response] | [Response] | [Y/N/Flex] |
Critical Compatibility:
- Decision-making style
- Conflict resolution approach
- Communication frequency
Step 6: Trial Period Framework
| Phase | Duration | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Coffee chats | 2-4 weeks | Get to know each other |
| Mini project | 2-4 weeks | Work on something together |
| Full immersion | 4-8 weeks | Work like co-founders daily |
| Decision | After 8-12 weeks | Commit or part ways |
Trial Period Questions:
| After Trial | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Did they deliver what they committed? | [Y/N] |
| Did they communicate proactively? | [Y/N] |
| Did you resolve a disagreement? | [Y/N] |
| Would you want to do this for 7-10 years? | [Y/N] |
| Are you excited to work with them? | [Y/N] |
All 5 must be Yes to proceed.
Step 7: Reference Questions
| Question | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| "What's it like to work with them?" | General impression |
| "How do they handle stress?" | Startup reality |
| "How do they handle disagreement?" | Conflict style |
| "What's their biggest weakness?" | Self-awareness |
| "Would you work with them again?" | True signal |
| "What should I know before partnering?" | Red flags |
Step 8: Equity Split Framework
Equity Factors:
| Factor | Weight | You | Them |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idea origination | 5% | [%] | [%] |
| Domain expertise | 15% | [%] | [%] |
| Technical execution | 25% | [%] | [%] |
| Business/Sales | 25% | [%] | [%] |
| Capital contributed | 10% | [%] | [%] |
| Risk taken | 10% | [%] | [%] |
| Network/connections | 10% | [%] | [%] |
Common Splits:
| Situation | Typical Split |
|---|---|
| Equal contribution, equal risk | 50/50 |
| One has idea + domain, other executes | 55/45 or 60/40 |
| One full-time, one part-time | 60/40 to 70/30 |
| Significant capital contribution | Adjust 5-15% |
Rules of Thumb:
- When in doubt, go 50/50
- Small differences (55/45) often cause more resentment than they're worth
- Vesting solves the "what if they leave" problem
Step 9: Vesting Structure
Standard Vesting:
Year 1 (Cliff): 0% vested -> 25% vests at 12 months
Year 2: 25% -> 50% (monthly vesting)
Year 3: 50% -> 75% (monthly vesting)
Year 4: 75% -> 100% (monthly vesting)Vesting Scenarios:
| If They Leave... | They Keep | Unvested Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Before cliff (< 12 months) | Nothing | Returns to company |
| At 18 months | ~31% | Returns to company |
| At 2 years | 50% | Returns to company |
| At 3 years | 75% | Returns to company |
| After 4 years | 100% | Fully vested |
Step 10: Co-Founder Agreement Checklist
| Item | Agreed? | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Equity split | [Y/N] | [X%/Y%] |
| Vesting schedule | [Y/N] | [Terms] |
| Roles and responsibilities | [Y/N] | [Who does what] |
| Decision-making process | [Y/N] | [How you'll decide] |
| Salary/compensation | [Y/N] | [Initial terms] |
| IP assignment | [Y/N] | [All work belongs to company] |
| Non-compete terms | [Y/N] | [Terms] |
| Exit/departure terms | [Y/N] | [What happens if someone leaves] |
| Dispute resolution | [Y/N] | [How you'll handle conflicts] |
Red Flags Checklist
Stop if you see:
- [ ] History of co-founder disputes
- [ ] Different commitment levels (full vs. part-time)
- [ ] Vastly different exit expectations
- [ ] Can't resolve disagreements constructively
- [ ] Reference checks reveal concerns
- [ ] Gut feeling says no (trust it)
- [ ] Pressure to decide quickly
- [ ] Unwilling to vest equity
- [ ] Major values misalignment
- [ ] Poor communication in trial period
Common Mistakes to Avoid
1. Rushing the decision: Take 2-3 months minimum 2. Skipping the trial: Always work together first 3. Ignoring red flags: They don't get better 4. Equal split without discussion: 50/50 needs to be intentional 5. No vesting: Always vest equity 6. Verbal agreements: Get it in writing 7. Same skills: Complement, don't duplicate 8. Friendship bias: Friends make good friends, not always good co-founders 9. Desperation: Bad co-founder > good solo founder is wrong 10. Ignoring references: Talk to people who know them
The 7-10 Year Question
Before committing, ask yourself:
"Would I want to work closely with this person, through extreme stress, for the next 7-10 years?"
If the answer isn't an enthusiastic yes, keep looking.