
Agent Evaluation
Design behavioral tests, benchmarks, and production monitoring for LLM agents before you trust them on real user workflows.
Overview
Agent Evaluation is an agent skill most often used in Ship (also Operate monitoring and Build agent-tooling) that structures testing, benchmarking, and reliability measurement for LLM agents.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill agent-evaluationWhat is this skill?
- Behavioral testing and capability assessment for LLM agents
- Benchmark design aligned with AgentBench, τ-bench, and ToolEmu-style risk checks
- Reliability metrics and regression testing before production changes
- Production monitoring integration via ecosystems like Langsmith and Braintrust
- Explicit scope boundary: not model-training loss metrics or UX-only studies
- Skill cites that even top agents achieve less than 50% on some real-world benchmarks
Adoption & trust: 693 installs on skills.sh; 40.1k GitHub stars; 3/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits).
What problem does it solve?
Your agent demo works in chat but you have no behavioral tests, benchmarks, or monitoring to catch regressions on real tasks.
Who is it for?
Solo builders launching tool-using agents who already understand basic testing and want benchmark-aligned evals before scaling traffic.
Skip if: Pure model fine-tuning evaluation (loss/perplexity only) or teams that only need end-user UX surveys without agent capability gates.
When should I use this skill?
You are testing, benchmarking, or production-monitoring LLM agents and need capability, reliability, or regression coverage beyond informal prompts.
What do I get? / Deliverables
You get an evaluation plan with capability checks, reliability metrics, and production tracing hooks so releases are measurable instead of anecdotal.
- Evaluation plan covering behavioral tests and benchmark selection
- Reliability and regression metrics tied to production monitoring tooling
Recommended Skills
Journey fit
Spans multiple journey phases - primary shelf plus alternate fits below.
Agent evaluation is canonically a Ship concern because it gates release quality, even though monitoring continues in production. Testing is the right subphase for capability assessment, regression suites, and benchmark design called out in the skill scope.
Where it fits
Define capability suites while you wire tools and policies into a new orchestration graph.
Run behavioral and benchmark gates on staging before enabling the agent for paying users.
Track pass rates and risky tool-use patterns after each prompt or schema deploy.
How it compares
Use structured agent benchmarks and tracing instead of ad-hoc prompt retries as your quality gate.
Common Questions / FAQ
Who is agent-evaluation for?
Developers building autonomous or multi-step LLM agents who need release discipline similar to traditional QA, adapted to stochastic tool use.
When should I use agent-evaluation?
In Ship/testing before launch, in Build/agent-tooling while designing orchestration, and in Operate/monitoring when you need regression runs after tool or prompt changes.
Is agent-evaluation safe to install?
Eval workflows may invoke external benchmark platforms and tracing services; review their data retention policies and the Security Audits panel on this Prism page before connecting production traffic.
Workflow Chain
Requires first: testing fundamentals, llm fundamentals
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Agent Evaluation
# Agent Evaluation Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks ## Capabilities - agent-testing - benchmark-design - capability-assessment - reliability-metrics - regression-testing ## Prerequisites - Knowledge: Testing methodologies, Statistical analysis basics, LLM behavior patterns - Skills_recommended: autonomous-agents, multi-agent-orchestration - Required skills: testing-fundamentals, llm-fundamentals ## Scope - Does_not_cover: Model training evaluation (loss, perplexity), Fairness and bias testing, User experience testing - Boundaries: Focus is agent capability and reliability, Covers functional and behavioral testing ## Ecosystem ### Primary_tools - AgentBench - Multi-environment benchmark for LLM agents (ICLR 2024) - τ-bench (Tau-bench) - Sierra's real-world agent benchmark - ToolEmu - Risky behavior detection for agent tool use - Langsmith - LLM tracing and evaluation platform ### Alternatives - Braintrust - When: Need production monitoring integration LLM evaluation and monitoring - PromptFoo - When: Focus on prompt-level evaluation Prompt testing framework ### Deprecated - Manual testing only ## Patterns ### Statistical Test Evaluation Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions **When to use**: Evaluating stochastic agent behavior interface TestResult { testId: string; runId: string; passed: boolean; score: number; // 0-1 for partial credit latencyMs: number; tokensUsed: number; output: string; expectedBehaviors: string[]; actualBehaviors: string[]; } interface StatisticalAnalysis { passRate: number; confidence95: [number, number]; meanScore: number; stdDevScore: number; meanLatency: number; p95Latency: number; behaviorConsistency: number; } class StatisticalEvaluator { private readonly minRuns = 10; private readonly confidenceLevel = 0.95; async evaluateAgent( agent: Agent, testSuite: TestCase[] ): Promise<EvaluationReport> { const results: TestResult[] = []; // Run each test multiple times for (const test of testSuite) { for (let run = 0; run < this.minRuns; run++) { const result = await this.runTest(agent, test, run); results.push(result); } } // Analyze by test const byTest = this.groupByTest(results); const testAnalyses = new Map<string, StatisticalAnalysis>(); for (const [testId, testResults] of byTest) { testAnalyses.set(testId, this.analyzeResults(testResults)); } // Overall analysis const overall = this.analyzeResults(results); return { overall, byTest: testAnalyses, concerns: this.identifyConcerns(testAnalyses), recommendations: this.generateRecommendations(testAnalyses) }; } private analyzeResults(results: TestResult[]): StatisticalAnalysis { const passes = results.filter(r => r.passed); const passRate = passes.length / results.length; // Calculate confidence interval for pass rate const z = 1.96; // 95% confidence const se = Math.sqrt((passRate * (1 - passRate)) / results.length); const confidence95: [number, number] = [ Math.max(0, passRate - z * se), Math.min(1, passRate + z * se) ]; const scores = results.map(r => r.score); const latencies = results.map(r =>