Crucible Meta Governance

Meta-governance — 6 decision-layer patterns

Self-Evolving Skill: If any pattern here misled decisions, update the section AND append to references/evolution-log.md. Don't defer.

These patterns are meta-level — they're about the investigation itself, not its content. Invoke when a decision must be made: pivot vs persist, kill vs narrow, ship vs hold.

---

1. Physical-constraint-first pivot

When brute force yields null, extract the execution constraint and redesign the hypothesis class to fit it. Don't iterate on a hypothesis that ignores reality.

Session example: 17 directional-signal null campaigns → user pivoted:

"What's the best strategy for a highly random walk market?"

"I can only trade on a traditional MT5 broker that allows hedging positions."

From this came the synthetic straddle (BUY_STOP + SELL_STOP pending orders, OCO). Constraint-driven design unlocked the strategy class. The math (diffusive displacement in random walks: E[|ΔS|] > 0) was always available; what was missing was honoring the execution venue.

Ask yourself:

• What execution venue is the user actually on?
• What types of orders are possible?
• What's the realistic slippage / commission / spread?
• What position-sizing constraints apply?

If the hypothesis doesn't survive these questions, pivot the hypothesis, not the statistics.

---

2. Incremental artifact promotion (/tmp → repo early)

Move findings from /tmp/ to the persistent repo (audits/YYYY-MM-DD-slug/) as soon as a result survives two independent tests, not "when done".

Session anti-pattern: reproducers written in /tmp/ during exploration, causing reproducibility loss on reboot. The moment a result passed Gate C (OOS) it should have been promoted — not after the 4-gate suite completed.

Promotion triggers (at least one required):

• Result passed shuffled-null z > 3 AND hasn't been contradicted
• An agent synthesized a verdict that supersedes an earlier one
• A reproducer script ran successfully twice

Mechanics:

mkdir -p findings/evolution/audits/$(date +%Y-%m-%d)-slug
cp /tmp/reproducer.py /tmp/artifact.json findings/evolution/audits/.../
# Write CLAUDE.md navigator + verdict.md
# Append to evolution.jsonl

What's impermanent gets lost.

---

3. Gate-failure scopes not kills

When a signal fails one of the serial gates (see Skill B §2), downgrade its scope, don't kill it outright.

NGRAM3FU-STRADDLE-001 failed Gate D (XAUUSD, GBPUSD) but passed A/B/C/E. Status downgraded to eur-only, NOT killed. A year later, if XAUUSD develops different microstructure, it could be retested — this is the resurrect_if: trigger (see Skill D).

Principle: scope-narrowing preserves optionality. Hard kills lose negative knowledge.

---

4. Agent-lens disagreement as signal

When parallel agents DISAGREE, the disagreement itself is diagnostic.

Session example: 4 agents reported "lower rejection at bottom → 67.8% UP" as a signal. Agent 5 (hidden-signal hunter, critic) flagged it as label leakage. The disagreement pointed precisely at the bug.

When agents disagree:

1. Don't average or vote — map WHAT they disagree about 2. Check: does one agent's evidence involve an implicit assumption the other rejects? 3. Disagreement about mechanism → investigate mechanism (may be label leakage, confound, or real but lens-bound effect) 4. Disagreement about significance → check each agent's multiple-testing burden

Anti-pattern: picking the agent that gives the answer you want. If the critic-agent disagrees with the proposer-agents, the critic is usually right.

---

5. Context-budget discipline

Conversation and data context are scarce. Reserve them for the most ambiguous questions; compress known-good findings ruthlessly.

Hierarchy of compression:

• Raw bars (not for agents; 67 MB)
• Token-rendered bar sequences (60 KB; good for one agent)
• Stats tables (60 KB; consumable by 5 parallel agents) — PREFERRED
• Ledger entries (1 KB; tracks findings)

When context feels tight:

1. Emit a fresh audit folder with artifacts; future sessions load that, not the transcript 2. Drop detailed raw data from agent prompts; use markdown summaries 3. If you must hand off mid-session, write a handoff file in .planning/ (not plugin scope; see project root)

Signal: context is BLOCKED when: you find yourself re-reading the same file twice in one session; or agents ask for re-briefings; or you can't remember what was decided 10 turns ago. Compress to an audit folder.

---

6. Supersede-not-rewrite

When a later finding replaces an earlier one, add a new ledger entry with supersedes: "OLD-ID"; update the old entry with superseded_by: "NEW-ID". Never rewrite or delete.

Why:

• Future auditors need the trail, not the final answer
• A superseded finding may contain negative knowledge (why it failed) that informs future work
• Deletions create "mysterious silences" that agents can't interpret

Canonical chain from session:

NGRAM3FU-STRADDLE-001                     preliminary-positive
  ↓ supplemented by
NGRAM3FU-STRADDLE-001-GATES               gates-validated (Gate D failed → eur-only)
  ↓ supplemented by
NGRAM3FU-STRADDLE-001-FULL-HISTORY        confirmed at 7.18M bars
  ↓ supplemented by
NGRAM3FU-STRADDLE-001-FILTERED            Phase-L filter validated
  ↓ supplemented by
NGRAM3FU-STRADDLE-001-FULL-STACK          Phase-L + Phase-M final

Note supplements vs supersedes: supplement EXTENDS; supersede REPLACES. Pick the right relationship.

Anti-pattern: editing an old ledger entry because the finding "got better". That's rewriting history. Add a new entry.

---

Confirmation counts

---

Post-Execution Reflection

After invoking this skill:

1. Did a pattern save you from a bad decision? Increment confirmed count; note in references/evolution-log.md. 2. Did a pattern produce the wrong call? Demote it; record context + link to where it misled. 3. A new decision pattern emerged that isn't here? Draft a section. 4. A pattern could be better-phrased for future agents? Edit the text directly; log why.

evolution-log: c-meta-governance

Append-only. Newest entries on top.

Each entry: date, trigger (what happened), change (what was edited), evidence (link to audit folder / session ID).

---

2026-04-19 — Initial creation

Trigger: Session ca9d7ffa-ef5a-41d0-94c8-56f113a132f2. Consolidated 6 principles from findings/methodology/ + gap-analysis into this skill.

Change: Created SKILL.md with frontmatter + 6 principle sections + confirmation-count table + post-execution reflection.

Evidence: findings/evolution/audits/2026-04-19-ngram3fu-straddle/CHRONICLE.md, individual findings/methodology/*.md files.

Confirmations so far: see "Confirmation counts" table in parent SKILL.md.

Gaps to test (filled on first re-invocation):

• Does each principle's guidance hold on a DIFFERENT research hypothesis (not just NGRAM3FU-STRADDLE)?
• Are confirmation counts incremented / decremented as new evidence arrives?