
Staff Engineering Skills Retry Storms
- 7 installs
- 3 repo stars
- Updated June 16, 2026
- triggerdotdev/staff-engineering-skills
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
staff-engineering-skills-retry-storms is a Claude Code skill in the AI & Agent Building category.
- staff-engineering-skills-retry-storms
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Staff Engineering Skills Retry Storms by the numbers
- 7 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +1 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #12,545 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/triggerdotdev/staff-engineering-skills --skill staff-engineering-skills-retry-stormsAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 7 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 3 |
| Last updated | June 16, 2026 |
| Repository | triggerdotdev/staff-engineering-skills ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
Retry Storms Trap
The service is slow. Your retries made it slower. Before adding retry logic, ask: what happens when every client retries at the same time against an already-struggling service?
The Feedback Loop
Retry storms are a positive feedback loop: worse performance draws more retries, which worsens performance, which draws more retries. The only stable states are "working fine" and "completely dead."
Service slow → clients time out → retry → 2x load → slower
→ more timeouts → more retries → 4x load → collapseThe system can't recover under load because retries prevent the load from decreasing.
The Layer Multiplication Problem
Three layers of 3 retries = 27 backend calls for one user request.
User request
→ Gateway 3x → Service A 3x → Service B 3x → Database
= 3 × 3 × 3 = 27 database queriesEach layer multiplies independently. An agent adding "just 3 retries" to Service A doesn't know Service B already has 3. Nobody calculated the total.
Before adding retries, count the total retry multiplication across the full call chain.
Detection: When You're Building a Retry Storm
Stop and fix if you see:
1. Retry logic at multiple layers -- calculate worst-case total. More than ~10 for one user request is too many. Retry at ONE layer, ideally the outermost.
2. Retrying all errors, including 4xx -- 400/401/409 will never succeed on retry. Only retry 5xx, 429, 408, and network errors.
3. Fixed-interval retries or no backoff -- sleep(1000) makes all clients retry the same second. Use exponential backoff with jitter.
4. Retries without a circuit breaker -- retries into a dead service generate load that prevents recovery. A breaker stops sending after repeated failures, giving the service time to recover.
5. Timeout × retry count exceeds the user's patience -- 30s × 3 = 120s worst case; is the user still waiting? Each retry should use the remaining deadline, not a fresh timeout.
6. Retry logic in both the HTTP client library and application code -- Axios, AWS SDK, gRPC retry by default. App-level retries on top multiply silently. Check your client's default retry config.
Patterns
Only retry retriable errors
function isRetriable(error: unknown): boolean {
if (error instanceof HttpError) {
return error.status >= 500 || error.status === 429 || error.status === 408;
}
// Network errors (connection refused, DNS failure, TCP reset)
if (error instanceof TypeError && error.message.includes("fetch")) return true;
return false;
}| Status | Retry? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 400 / 422 | No | Input/validation wrong, won't change |
| 401 / 403 | No | Credentials wrong / permission denied |
| 404 | No | Resource doesn't exist |
| 409 Conflict | No | Operation already happened or state conflict |
| 429 Too Many Requests | Yes | Rate limited, back off and retry |
| 408 Request Timeout | Yes | Server timed out, may work on retry |
| 500+ Server Error | Yes | Transient server issue |
| Network error | Yes | Connection failed, may work on retry |
Exponential backoff with full jitter
async function retryWithBackoff<T>(
fn: () => Promise<T>,
options: { maxRetries?: number; baseDelayMs?: number } = {},
): Promise<T> {
const { maxRetries = 3, baseDelayMs = 200 } = options;
for (let attempt = 0; attempt <= maxRetries; attempt++) {
try {
return await fn();
} catch (error) {
if (attempt === maxRetries || !isRetriable(error)) throw error;
// Full jitter: random point in the exponential window
const delay = Math.random() * (baseDelayMs * 2 ** attempt);
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, delay));
}
}
throw new Error("unreachable");
}Full jitter (random * maxDelay) spreads retries across the entire backoff window. Without jitter, all clients that failed together retry together -- a thundering herd of retries.
Circuit breaker (stop retrying into a dead service)
class CircuitBreaker {
private failures = 0;
private lastFailure = 0;
private state: "closed" | "open" | "half-open" = "closed";
constructor(private threshold = 5, private resetMs = 30_000) {}
async call<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
if (this.state === "open") {
if (Date.now() - this.lastFailure > this.resetMs) this.state = "half-open"; // allow one test
else throw new CircuitBreakerOpenError(); // fail fast
}
try {
const result = await fn();
this.failures = 0;
this.state = "closed";
return result;
} catch (err) {
this.failures++;
this.lastFailure = Date.now();
if (this.failures >= this.threshold) this.state = "open";
throw err;
}
}
}When open, requests fail immediately instead of waiting for a timeout, giving the downstream service time to recover. After resetMs, one test request is allowed through; if it succeeds the circuit closes and traffic resumes.
Retry budget (system-level protection)
Limit retries as a percentage of total traffic, not per-request.
class RetryBudget {
private requests = 0;
private retries = 0;
constructor(private maxRetryRatio = 0.1, private minRetriesPerWindow = 10) {
setInterval(() => { this.requests = 0; this.retries = 0; }, 1000); // sliding window
}
recordRequest() { this.requests++; }
recordRetry() { this.retries++; }
shouldRetry(): boolean {
if (this.retries < this.minRetriesPerWindow) return true; // always allow some
return this.retries / Math.max(this.requests, 1) < this.maxRetryRatio;
}
}With a 10% budget at 1,000 req/s, at most 100 are retries -- the system can never generate more than 1.1x its normal load from retries. This is the approach used by Google's gRPC and the Google SRE book.
Deadline propagation
Pass the remaining time budget through the call chain; don't give each retry a fresh timeout.
async function handleRequest(req: Request) {
const deadline = Date.now() + 10_000; // 10s total budget
const resultA = await callWithDeadline(serviceA.fetch, deadline);
const resultB = await callWithDeadline(serviceB.fetch, deadline); // if A took 8s, B gets 2s
return combine(resultA, resultB);
}
async function callWithDeadline<T>(
fn: (timeoutMs: number) => Promise<T>,
deadline: number,
): Promise<T> {
const remaining = deadline - Date.now();
if (remaining <= 0) throw new DeadlineExceededError();
return fn(remaining);
}Without propagation, a retry starting 8s into a 10s budget gets a fresh 10s timeout and the user waits 18s total. With it, the retry gets 2s and fails fast.
Load shedding (server-side protection)
The server rejects requests when overloaded instead of accepting them and being slow.
class LoadShedder {
private active = 0;
constructor(private maxConcurrent: number) {}
async handle<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
if (this.active >= this.maxConcurrent) throw new HttpError(503, "Service overloaded");
this.active++;
try { return await fn(); }
finally { this.active--; }
}
}A fast 503 tells the client "try again later" or "try another instance" instead of tying up its resources while it waits. Load shedding keeps accepted requests fast and healthy.
Anti-Patterns
// Retries all errors including 4xx; fixed interval, no jitter
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
try { return await fetch(url); }
catch { await sleep(1000); }
}
// Layer multiplication: 3 × 3 × 3 = 27 backend calls
gateway: retry(3, () => serviceA())
serviceA: retry(3, () => serviceB())
serviceB: retry(3, () => database())
// Fresh timeout per retry: 30s × 4 attempts = 120s user wait
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
try { return await callWithTimeout(service, 30_000); }
catch { continue; }
}
// Library retries + app retries = silent multiplication
const axios = create({ retries: 3 });
async function call() { return retry(3, () => axios.get(url)); } // 9 totalRelated Traps
- Thundering Herd -- retries without jitter create thundering herds: all clients that failed together retry together. Exponential backoff with jitter is the same fix for both.
- Idempotency -- every operation you retry MUST be idempotent. Retrying a payment without an idempotency key charges the customer multiple times. Retries and idempotency are inseparable.
- Distributed System Fallacies -- fallacy #1 (the network is reliable) leads to both "no retries" and "too many retries." The correct middle ground is limited, budgeted retries with circuit breakers.
- Backpressure -- retries without budgets are a backpressure violation. Each retry adds work to an overwhelmed system instead of slowing down.