Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
vasilyu1983 avatar

Docs Ai Prd

  • 181 installs
  • 73 repo stars
  • Updated July 13, 2026
  • vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public

Helps with ai & agent building tasks.

About

docs-ai-prd is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.

  • docs-ai-prd
  • AI & Agent Building
  • AI-coding skill

Docs Ai Prd by the numbers

  • 181 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +9 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #3,045 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public --skill docs-ai-prd

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs181
repo stars73
Last updatedJuly 13, 2026
Repositoryvasilyu1983/ai-agents-public

What it does

Helps with ai & agent building tasks.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

PRDs & Project Context

Create product requirements and project context that humans and coding assistants can execute effectively.

Two capabilities: 1. PRDs & Specs - Requirements, specs, stories, acceptance criteria 2. Project Context - Architecture, conventions, tribal knowledge (CLAUDE.md)

Modern Best Practices (Jan 2026): Context engineering (right info, right format, right time), decision-first docs, testable requirements with acceptance criteria, metrics with formula + timeframe + data source, cross-tool portability.

Workflow (Use This Order)

1. Pick the deliverable (PRD, AI PRD, tech spec, story map, CLAUDE.md). 2. Gather inputs (problem evidence, users, constraints, dependencies, risks). 3. Fill the template (write decisions first; keep requirements testable). 4. Validate with checklists (requirements, edge cases, security/compliance as needed). 5. Hand off with next actions (implementation plan, owners, open questions).

Docs Folder + LLM Iteration Option (Any Repo)

Use this when a repository has a docs/ folder with:

  • research docs prepared for LLM consumption
  • feature docs/specs generated by LLMs during implementation

Run this flow before finalizing PRDs/specs: 1. Classify each file by purpose (Tutorial, How-to, Reference, Explanation) to prevent mixed doc types. 2. Tag each non-canonical file with lifecycle metadata (status, owner, last_verified, integrates_into, delete_by). 3. Pick one canonical doc per feature/decision; merge duplicate drafts into it. 4. Convert long research notes into short evidence-backed claims in canonical docs; keep links/dates for external facts. 5. Maintain a compact canonical library for LLMs with root anchors: AGENTS.md (agent instructions) and README.md (human + AI entrypoint), then link deeper specs from docs/. 6. Delete integrated drafts by delete_by date; do not keep .archive/ mirrors in docs/ unless compliance explicitly requires retention.

Quick Reference

PRDs & Specs

TaskTemplate
PRD creationassets/prd/prd-template.md
Tech specassets/spec/tech-spec-template.md
Planning checklistassets/planning/planning-checklist.md
Story mappingassets/stories/story-mapping-template.md
Gherkin/BDDassets/stories/gherkin-example-template.md
AI PRDassets/prd/ai-prd-template.md

Project Context (CLAUDE.md)

Context TypeTemplatePriority
Architectureassets/architecture-context.mdCritical
Conventionsassets/conventions-context.mdHigh
Key Filesassets/key-files-context.mdCritical
Minimal Startassets/minimal-claudemd.md5-min
Cross-Toolassets/cross-tool-context.mdMulti-tool

---

Decision Tree

User needs:
    ├─► AI-Assisted Coding?
    │   ├─ Non-trivial (>3 files)? → Planning checklist + agentic session
    │   └─ Simple (<3 files)? → Direct implementation
    │
    ├─► Repo has a docs folder with LLM-generated research/feature docs?
    │   └─ Use Docs Folder + LLM Iteration Option, then validate with qa-docs-coverage
    │
    ├─► Project Onboarding?
    │   ├─ New to codebase? → Generate CLAUDE.md
    │   └─ Quick context? → Minimal CLAUDE.md
    │
    └─► Traditional PRD?
        ├─ Product requirements? → PRD template
        ├─ AI feature? → AI PRD template
        └─ Acceptance criteria? → Gherkin/BDD

---

Cross-Tool Context Files

ToolLocationNotes
Claude CodeCLAUDE.md, .claude/Auto-loaded
Cursor.cursor/rules/Project rules
Copilot.github/copilot-instructions.mdWorkspace context
GenericAGENTS.mdTool-agnostic

---

CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md Guidance

  • Start minimal: assets/minimal-claudemd.md
  • Add only what’s needed: assets/architecture-context.md, assets/conventions-context.md, assets/key-files-context.md, assets/dependencies-context.md, assets/tribal-knowledge-context.md
  • Keep it executable: commands must run; include no secrets; prefer file paths over pasted code

---

Do / Avoid

Do

  • Start with executive summary (decision, users, scope, success)
  • Define acceptance criteria in testable language
  • Keep requirements unambiguous (must/should/may)
  • Link to supporting docs instead of pasting

Avoid

  • Vague requirements ("fast", "easy") without definitions
  • Mixing draft notes and final requirements
  • Metrics without measurement plan
  • Docs with no owner or review cadence
  • Dual-state wording that mixes live behavior, target behavior, and migration behavior in one statement

---

LLM Ambiguity Gate (Required for planning docs)

  • Label every behavior as exactly one of: Live now, Target, or Transition (with owner + end condition).
  • Label every metric as either Reference signal or Release blocker.
  • Define one canonical feature-gating contract per feature; all other docs must link to it instead of restating variants.
  • Keep assumptions/open questions separate from final decisions.
  • If conflicts exist across docs, mark one canonical source and add follow-up tasks to resolve mirrors.

---

Context Extraction

Use:

  • references/architecture-extraction.md for components/data flows
  • references/convention-mining.md for naming/patterns
  • references/tribal-knowledge-recovery.md for git-history “why”
  • references/docs-audit-commands.md for audit commands and tool fallbacks

---

Quality Checklist

PRD Quality

  • [ ] Clear problem statement
  • [ ] Measurable success criteria
  • [ ] Unambiguous acceptance criteria
  • [ ] Edge cases documented
  • [ ] AI can execute without clarification
  • [ ] Every behavior is labeled Live now, Target, or Transition
  • [ ] Metrics are labeled Reference signal or Release blocker
  • [ ] Each feature-gating rule has one canonical source (no conflicting duplicates)

CLAUDE.md Quality

  • [ ] Architecture reflects actual structure
  • [ ] Key files exist at listed locations
  • [ ] Conventions match actual patterns
  • [ ] Commands actually work
  • [ ] No sensitive information

---

Resources

ResourcePurpose
references/agentic-coding-best-practices.mdAI coding patterns
references/requirements-checklists.mdPRD validation
references/traditional-prd-writing.mdClassic PRD format
references/architecture-extraction.mdMining architecture
references/convention-mining.mdExtracting conventions
references/tribal-knowledge-recovery.mdGit history analysis
references/docs-audit-commands.mdAudit shell commands
references/stakeholder-alignment.mdStakeholder buy-in, RACI, conflict resolution
references/acceptance-criteria-patterns.mdTestable ACs, BDD, edge case coverage
references/prd-review-facilitation.mdRunning PRD reviews, feedback categorization
data/sources.jsonCurated external sources

Templates

CategoryTemplates
PRDsprd-template, ai-prd-template, tech-spec-template
Planningplanning-checklist, agentic-session-template
Storiesstory-mapping-template, gherkin-example-template
Contextarchitecture, conventions, key-files, minimal-claudemd
Stack-specificnodejs-context, python-context, react-context, go-context

Related Skills

SkillPurpose
docs-codebaseREADME, API docs, ADRs
qa-docs-coverageDocumentation gaps
product-managementProduct strategy
software-architecture-designSystem design

Fact-Checking

  • Use web search/web fetch to verify current external facts, versions, pricing, deadlines, regulations, or platform behavior before final answers.
  • Prefer primary sources; report source links and dates for volatile information.
  • If web access is unavailable, state the limitation and mark guidance as unverified.

Related skills

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.