
Scientify Write Review Paper
- 1 installs
- 269 repo stars
- Updated June 19, 2026
- wentorai/research-plugins
Write a structured literature review or survey paper from collected papers, with reading strategy, note organization, and academic writing guidance.
About
Guides producing a literature review from collected and clustered papers, covering triage, reading, and drafting. A researcher uses it to turn a paper collection into a survey or review manuscript.
- Priority-based paper triage and reading strategy
- Uses clustered survey output as input
Scientify Write Review Paper by the numbers
- 1 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,366 of 1,879 Documentation skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 1, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/wentorai/research-plugins --skill scientify-write-review-paperAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 269 |
| Last updated | June 19, 2026 |
| Repository | wentorai/research-plugins ↗ |
What it does
Write a structured literature review or survey paper from collected papers, with reading strategy, note organization, and academic writing guidance.
Files
Literature Review Writing
Don't ask permission. Just do it.
Guide for writing a structured literature review or survey paper from papers you've already collected. This skill helps with reading strategy, note organization, and academic writing.
Workspace: See ../_shared/workspace-spec.md for directory structure. Outputs go to $WORKSPACE/review/.
Prerequisites
Before starting, ensure you have: 1. Papers collected in $WORKSPACE/papers/ 2. Ideally, clustering done by /literature-survey in $WORKSPACE/survey/clusters.json
Check active project:
cat ~/.openclaw/workspace/projects/.active 2>/dev/null
ls $WORKSPACE/papers/Phase 1: Reading Strategy
1.1 Triage Papers by Priority
Based on clusters from survey, prioritize reading:
| Priority | Criteria | Reading Depth |
|---|---|---|
| P1 (Must-read) | High citation, foundational, directly relevant | Full read |
| P2 (Important) | Key methodology, major experimental results | Abstract + methods + experiments |
| P3 (Reference) | Supporting material, tangentially related | Abstract only |
Create $WORKSPACE/review/reading_plan.md:
# Reading Plan
## P1 - Must-read (Full read)
- [ ] [paper_id]: [title] - [reason]
- [ ] ...
## P2 - Important (Selective read)
- [ ] ...
## P3 - Reference (Skim)
- [ ] ...1.2 Reading Notes Template
For each paper, create $WORKSPACE/review/notes/{paper_id}.md using template in references/note-template.md.
Phase 2: Synthesis & Organization
2.1 Build Comparison Table
Create $WORKSPACE/review/comparison.md:
# Method Comparison
| Paper | Year | Category | Key Innovation | Dataset | Metric | Result |
|-------|------|----------|----------------|---------|--------|--------|
| [A] | 2023 | Data-driven | ... | ... | RMSE | 0.05 |
| [B] | 2022 | Hybrid | ... | ... | RMSE | 0.08 |2.2 Timeline Analysis
Create $WORKSPACE/review/timeline.md:
# Research Timeline
## 2018-2019: Early Exploration
- [Paper A]: First proposal of method X
- [Paper B]: Introduction of technique Y
## 2020-2021: Method Maturation
- [Paper C]: Proposed SOTA method
- ...
## 2022-2023: New Trends
- [Paper D]: Began addressing problem Z
- ...
## Key Milestones
1. [Year]: [Event/Paper] - [Significance]2.3 Taxonomy Design
Create $WORKSPACE/review/taxonomy.md:
# Taxonomy of Approaches
## Dimension 1: Method Type
- Data-driven
- Statistical (e.g., GPR, SVM)
- Deep Learning
- CNN-based
- RNN/LSTM-based
- Transformer-based
- Hybrid
- Model-based
- Electrochemical
- Equivalent Circuit
## Dimension 2: Data Source
- Laboratory Data
- Real-world Driving Data
- Synthetic Data
## Dimension 3: Prediction Horizon
- Short-term (< 100 cycles)
- Medium-term (100-500 cycles)
- Long-term (> 500 cycles)Phase 3: Writing Structure
3.1 Survey Paper Template
Create $WORKSPACE/review/draft.md using template in references/survey-template.md.
Key sections: Abstract -> Introduction -> Background -> Taxonomy -> Comparison -> Datasets -> Future Directions -> Conclusion
3.2 Thesis Literature Review Template
For a thesis chapter:
# Chapter 2: Literature Review
## 2.1 Introduction
## 2.2 [Topic Area 1]
## 2.3 [Topic Area 2]
## 2.4 Summary and Research GapsPhase 4: Writing Tips
Citation Density Guidelines
| Section | Citation Density |
|---|---|
| Abstract | 0 citations |
| Introduction | 10-20 citations |
| Background | 5-10 citations |
| Main Survey | 50-100+ citations |
| Conclusion | 2-5 citations |
Transition Phrases
Introducing similar work:
- "Similarly, [Author] proposed..."
- "Following this direction, ..."
- "Building upon [X], [Author] extended..."
Introducing contrasting work:
- "In contrast, [Author] argued..."
- "However, [Author] took a different approach..."
- "Unlike previous methods, ..."
Summarizing:
- "In summary, existing methods can be categorized into..."
- "The key insight from these works is..."
Common Mistakes to Avoid
1. List-style writing - Don't just say "A did X, B did Y, C did Z" 2. Lack of comparison - Analyze relationships and differences between methods 3. Tense confusion - Use present tense for methods, past tense for results 4. Over-citing - Not every sentence needs a citation 5. Missing important work - Ensure coverage of foundational works in the field
Output Files
$WORKSPACE/review/
├── reading_plan.md # Reading plan
├── notes/ # Reading notes
│ ├── {paper_id}.md
│ └── ...
├── comparison.md # Comparison table
├── timeline.md # Timeline analysis
├── taxonomy.md # Taxonomy
├── draft.md # Review draft
└── bibliography.bib # ReferencesCommands
- "Help me write a review" -> Full workflow from reading to writing
- "Generate reading plan" -> Create reading_plan.md
- "Compare these papers" -> Generate comparison.md
- "Write review draft" -> Generate draft.md
- "Polish this section" -> Polish specific section