
Data Storytelling
Turn data and analysis into a clear narrative with visuals and insights.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill data-storytellingWhat is this skill?
- Data storytelling
- Insight narrative
- Visualization
Adoption & trust: 11.7k installs on skills.sh; 36.5k GitHub stars; 3/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits).
Recommended Skills
Paper Context Resolverlllllllama/ai-paper-reproduction-skill
Repo Intake And Planlllllllama/ai-paper-reproduction-skill
Minimal Run And Auditlllllllama/ai-paper-reproduction-skill
Env And Assets Bootstraplllllllama/ai-paper-reproduction-skill
Analyze Projectlllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Ai Research Reproductionlllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Journey fit
Common Questions / FAQ
Is Data Storytelling safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Data Storytelling
# data-storytelling — detailed patterns and worked examples ## Story Frameworks ### Framework 1: The Problem-Solution Story ```markdown # Customer Churn Analysis ## The Hook "We're losing $2.4M annually to preventable churn." ## The Context - Current churn rate: 8.5% (industry average: 5%) - Average customer lifetime value: $4,800 - 500 customers churned last quarter ## The Problem Analysis of churned customers reveals a pattern: - 73% churned within first 90 days - Common factor: < 3 support interactions - Low feature adoption in first month ## The Insight [Show engagement curve visualization] Customers who don't engage in the first 14 days are 4x more likely to churn. ## The Solution 1. Implement 14-day onboarding sequence 2. Proactive outreach at day 7 3. Feature adoption tracking ## Expected Impact - Reduce early churn by 40% - Save $960K annually - Payback period: 3 months ## Call to Action Approve $50K budget for onboarding automation. ``` ### Framework 2: The Trend Story ```markdown # Q4 Performance Analysis ## Where We Started Q3 ended with $1.2M MRR, 15% below target. Team morale was low after missed goals. ## What Changed [Timeline visualization] - Oct: Launched self-serve pricing - Nov: Reduced friction in signup - Dec: Added customer success calls ## The Transformation [Before/after comparison chart] | Metric | Q3 | Q4 | Change | |----------------|--------|--------|--------| | Trial → Paid | 8% | 15% | +87% | | Time to Value | 14 days| 5 days | -64% | | Expansion Rate | 2% | 8% | +300% | ## Key Insight Self-serve + high-touch creates compound growth. Customers who self-serve AND get a success call have 3x higher expansion rate. ## Going Forward Double down on hybrid model. Target: $1.8M MRR by Q2. ``` ### Framework 3: The Comparison Story ```markdown # Market Opportunity Analysis ## The Question Should we expand into EMEA or APAC first? ## The Comparison [Side-by-side market analysis] ### EMEA - Market size: $4.2B - Growth rate: 8% - Competition: High - Regulatory: Complex (GDPR) - Language: Multiple ### APAC - Market size: $3.8B - Growth rate: 15% - Competition: Moderate - Regulatory: Varied - Language: Multiple ## The Analysis [Weighted scoring matrix visualization] | Factor | Weight | EMEA Score | APAC Score | | ----------- | ------ | ---------- | ---------- | | Market Size | 25% | 5 | 4 | | Growth | 30% | 3 | 5 | | Competition | 20% | 2 | 4 | | Ease | 25% | 2 | 3 | | **Total** | | **2.9** | **4.1** | ## The Recommendation APAC first. Higher growth, less competition. Start with Singapore hub (English, business-friendly). Enter EMEA in Year 2 with localization ready. ## Risk Mitigation - Timezone coverage: Hire 24/7 support - Cultural fit: Local partnerships - Payment: Multi-currency from day 1 ``` ## Visualization Techniques ### Technique 1: Progressive Reveal ```markdown Start simple, add layers: Slide 1: "Revenue is growing" [single line chart] Slide 2: "But growth is slowing" [add growth rate overlay] Slide 3: "Driven by one segment" [add segment breakdown] Slide 4: "Which is saturating" [add market share] Slide 5: "We need new segments" [add opportunity zones] ``` ### Technique 2: Contrast and Compare ```markdown Before/After: ┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┐ │ BEFORE │ AFTER │ │ │ │ │ Process: 5 days│ Process: 1 day │ │ Errors: 15% │ Errors: 2% │ │ Cost: $50/unit │ Cost: $20/unit │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ This/That (emphasize difference): ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CUSTOMER A vs B │ │ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │ ████████ │ │ ██ │ │ │ │ $45,000 │ │ $8,000 │ │ │ │ LTV │ │ LTV │ │ │ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │ │ Onboarded No onboarding │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` ### Technique 3: Annotation and Highlight ```python import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import pandas as pd fig, ax = plt.subpl