
Competitive Analysis
- 86 installs
- 213 repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- yonatangross/orchestkit
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
competitive-analysis is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- competitive-analysis
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Competitive Analysis by the numbers
- 86 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #4,993 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill competitive-analysisAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 86 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 213 |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | yonatangross/orchestkit ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
Competitive Analysis
Frameworks for analyzing competitive position and industry dynamics.
When to Use Porter's vs. SWOT
| Framework | Use When |
|---|---|
| Porter's Five Forces | Evaluating industry attractiveness; new market entry; strategic positioning |
| SWOT | Internal capability assessment; go/no-go decisions; strategy planning |
| Competitive Landscape Map | Visualizing whitespace; investor decks; positioning against specific competitors |
| Competitor Profiles | Battlecards for sales; feature gap analysis; threat assessment |
Use Porter's to understand the structural forces shaping the industry. Use SWOT to assess your specific position within it. Combine both for a complete picture.
Porter's Five Forces Template
## Porter's Five Forces: [Industry/Market]
### 1. Competitive Rivalry — Intensity: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Factor | Assessment |
|--------|------------|
| Number of competitors | |
| Industry growth rate | |
| Product differentiation | |
| Exit barriers | |
### 2. Threat of New Entrants — Threat Level: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Barrier | Strength |
|---------|----------|
| Economies of scale | |
| Brand loyalty | |
| Capital requirements | |
| Network effects | |
| Switching costs | |
### 3. Bargaining Power of Suppliers — Power: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Key suppliers, switching cost, concentration]
### 4. Bargaining Power of Buyers — Power: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Price sensitivity, alternatives available, buyer concentration]
### 5. Threat of Substitutes — Threat: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Alternative ways customers solve the same problem]
### Overall Industry Attractiveness: X/10
[Summary: which forces are most significant and why]SWOT Analysis
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
| (Internal +) | (Internal -) |
| * What we do well | * Where we lack |
| * Unique resources | * Resource gaps |
| * Competitive advantages| * Capability limits |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
| (External +) | (External -) |
| * Market trends | * Competitive pressure |
| * Unmet needs | * Regulatory changes |
| * Technology shifts | * Economic factors |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+TOWS Matrix (SWOT to Strategy)
| Strengths | Weaknesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunities | SO: Use strengths to capture opportunities | WO: Fix weaknesses to unlock opportunities |
| Threats | ST: Use strengths to mitigate threats | WT: Minimize weaknesses, avoid threats |
Competitor Profile Template
## Competitor: [Name]
### Overview
- Founded: [Year] | Funding: $[Amount] | Employees: [N]
- Target customer: [Segment]
- Pricing: [Model and range]
### Strengths / Weaknesses
+ [Strength 1]
+ [Strength 2]
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]
### Threat Assessment: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
- [Why this threat level]
- [Our differentiation vs. this competitor]Competitive Landscape Map
Plot competitors on two axes that matter most to buyers (e.g., price vs. features, ease of use vs. power):
HIGH PRICE
|
Premium Leaders | Luxury Niche
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp A] | | | [Comp B] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
|
LOW ────────────────────+──────────────────── HIGH
FEATURES | FEATURES
|
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp C] | | | [US] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
Budget Options | Value Leaders
|
LOW PRICEIdentify whitespace — quadrants with no incumbents that align with unmet buyer needs.
GitHub Signals for Competitive Tracking
# Star count and momentum
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count, forks: .forks_count}'
# Shipping velocity (recent releases)
gh release list --repo owner/repo --limit 5
# Community size
gh api repos/owner/repo/contributors --jq 'length'| Signal | Check Frequency |
|---|---|
| Star growth | Weekly |
| Release notes | Per release |
| Pricing changes | Monthly |
| Feature launches | Per announcement |
| Full analysis | Quarterly |
References
- Competitive Analysis Rules — Porter's, SWOT, landscape map, competitor profile templates
- Competitive Analysis Guide — Research methodology, data sources, update cadence
Related Skills
ork:market-sizing— Quantify opportunity size alongside competitive landscapeork:business-case— Build financial justification informed by competitive positionork:product-frameworks— Full product strategy toolkit (value prop, prioritization, OKRs)
---
Version: 1.0.0
Competitive Analysis Guide
Framework for systematic competitor research.
Competitor Categories
DIRECT COMPETITORS
└── Same problem, same solution approach
└── Example: Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
INDIRECT COMPETITORS
└── Same problem, different solution
└── Example: AI coding vs traditional IDE plugins
POTENTIAL COMPETITORS
└── Adjacent players who could enter
└── Example: Cloud providers adding AI toolsCompetitive Analysis Framework
1. Identify Competitors
# GitHub search for similar projects
gh search repos "langgraph workflow" --sort stars --limit 10
# Check related topics
gh api search/repositories?q=topic:ai-agents --jq '.items[].full_name'2. Build Competitor Profiles
## Competitor: [Name]
### Overview
- Founded: [Year]
- Funding: $[Amount]
- Team size: [N]
- Headquarters: [Location]
### Product
- Core offering: [Description]
- Target segment: [Who they serve]
- Pricing: [Model and range]
- Technology: [Key tech stack]
### Positioning
- Value proposition: [Their pitch]
- Key differentiators: [What they claim]
- Messaging: [How they talk about themselves]
### Strengths
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]
### Weaknesses
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]
### Market Presence
- GitHub stars: [N]
- Monthly growth: [%]
- Community activity: [Active/Moderate/Low]3. Feature Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core capability 1 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Core capability 2 | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ |
| Integration X | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Pricing (entry) | $X | $Y | $Z | $W |
| Open source | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
4. Positioning Map
EASE OF USE
│
┌────────────┼────────────┐
│ Us │ [B] │
HIGH ──────┼────────────┼────────────┼────── LOW
POWER │ │ │ POWER
│ [A] │ [C] │
└────────────┼────────────┘
│
COMPLEXITY5. SWOT Analysis
HELPFUL HARMFUL
┌─────────────┬─────────────┐
INTERNAL │ STRENGTHS │ WEAKNESSES │
│ • Our tech │ • Resources │
│ • Our team │ • Gaps │
├─────────────┼─────────────┤
EXTERNAL │ OPPORTUN. │ THREATS │
│ • Market │ • [Comp A] │
│ • Trends │ • Risks │
└─────────────┴─────────────┘GitHub Signals to Track
# Star count and growth
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count}'
# Issue activity (community engagement)
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{open_issues: .open_issues_count}'
# Recent releases (shipping velocity)
gh release list --repo owner/repo --limit 5
# Contributor count
gh api repos/owner/repo/contributors --jq 'length'Update Frequency
| Signal | Check Frequency |
|---|---|
| Star growth | Weekly |
| Release notes | Per release |
| Pricing changes | Monthly |
| Feature launches | Per announcement |
| Full analysis | Quarterly |
Rule Categories
1. Competitive Landscape (market) — HIGH — 1 rule
Porter's Five Forces, SWOT analysis, competitive mapping, and battlecard creation.
market-competitive.md— Industry dynamics analysis and competitive positioning frameworks
Competitive Analysis
Frameworks for analyzing competition and understanding industry dynamics.
Porter's Five Forces
+---------------------+
| Threat of New |
| Entrants |
| (Barrier height) |
+---------+-----------+
|
v
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
| Bargaining | | Competitive | | Bargaining |
| Power of |<---| Rivalry |--->| Power of |
| Suppliers | | (Intensity) | | Buyers |
+-----------------+ +---------+-------+ +-----------------+
|
v
+---------------------+
| Threat of |
| Substitutes |
| (Alternative ways) |
+---------------------+Force Analysis Template
## Porter's Five Forces: [Industry]
### 1. Competitive Rivalry -- Intensity: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Factor | Assessment |
|--------|------------|
| Number of competitors | |
| Industry growth rate | |
| Product differentiation | |
| Exit barriers | |
### 2. Threat of New Entrants -- Threat Level: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Barrier | Strength |
|---------|----------|
| Economies of scale | |
| Brand loyalty | |
| Capital requirements | |
| Network effects | |
### 3-5. [Supplier power, Buyer power, Substitutes]
[Same structure]
### Overall Industry Attractiveness: X/10SWOT Analysis
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
| (Internal +) | (Internal -) |
| * What we do well | * Where we lack |
| * Unique resources | * Resource gaps |
| * Competitive advantages| * Capability limits |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
| (External +) | (External -) |
| * Market trends | * Competitive pressure |
| * Unmet needs | * Regulatory changes |
| * Technology shifts | * Economic factors |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+SWOT to Strategy (TOWS Matrix)
| Strengths | Weaknesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunities | SO Strategies: Use strengths to capture opportunities | WO Strategies: Overcome weaknesses to capture opportunities |
| Threats | ST Strategies: Use strengths to mitigate threats | WT Strategies: Minimize weaknesses and avoid threats |
Competitive Landscape Map
HIGH PRICE
|
Premium | Luxury
Leaders | Niche
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp A] | | | [Comp B] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
|
LOW --------------------+-------------------- HIGH
FEATURES | FEATURES
|
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp C] | | | [US] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
Budget | Value
Options | Leaders
|
LOW PRICECompetitor Profile Template
## Competitor: [Name]
### Overview
- **Founded:** [Year]
- **Funding:** $[Amount]
- **Employees:** [N]
### Product
- **Core offering:** [Description]
- **Key features:** [List]
- **Pricing:** [Model]
- **Target customer:** [Segment]
### Strengths / Weaknesses
1. [Strength/Weakness]
2. [Strength/Weakness]
### Threat Assessment: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOWGitHub Signals to Track
# Star count and growth
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count}'
# Recent releases (shipping velocity)
gh release list --repo owner/repo --limit 5
# Contributor count
gh api repos/owner/repo/contributors --jq 'length'Update Frequency
| Signal | Check Frequency |
|---|---|
| Star growth | Weekly |
| Release notes | Per release |
| Pricing changes | Monthly |
| Feature launches | Per announcement |
| Full analysis | Quarterly |
Incorrect — Vague competitive assessment:
## Competitors
- Company A: Big player, lots of features
- Company B: Cheaper option
- Company C: New entrantCorrect — Structured competitive analysis with SWOT:
## Competitor: Company A
### Strengths / Weaknesses
+ Established brand, 60% market share
+ Enterprise features (SSO, RBAC)
- Legacy UI, poor mobile experience
- Slow release cycle (quarterly)
### Threat Assessment: HIGH
- Direct competitor in enterprise segment
- Strong sales team, existing relationships
### Our Differentiation
- Modern UX, mobile-first
- Weekly releases, faster iteration{
"skill": "competitive-analysis",
"version": "1.0.0",
"testCases": [
{
"id": "market-competitive",
"rule": "market-competitive",
"query": "Analyze the competitive landscape for our new cloud infrastructure monitoring product",
"expectedBehavior": [
"Applies Porter's Five Forces framework to assess overall industry competitive dynamics",
"Creates SWOT analysis with strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats identified",
"Builds a competitive positioning map plotting rivals on key differentiating dimensions",
"Includes structured competitor profile template with market share and key differentiators"
]
}
]
}