Learn

Learn to ship solo

Learn to ship solo — curated best practices, tutorials, and resources for building real products with AI coding tools.

Sort
View
75 of 75 resources
Article
When we first demoed Claude Code internally, it got two reactions on Slack.

Learn how Claude Code evolved a year after GA: why Boris Cherny favors auto mode over plan mode, how routines catch bugs early, and why phone-first coding fits his workflow—straight from Anthropic’s product lens.

Boris Cherny (Anthropic) and @_catwu reflect on internal Slack reactions to an early Claude Code demo and what changed since general availability. The piece is a product-direction interview, not a tutorial—thin on steps, rich on habits and roadmap themes.

  • Internal Claude Code demos split the team on Slack—early tooling polarizes before workflows settle, which is normal for agentic coding products.
  • Cherny reportedly prefers auto mode over plan mode for day-to-day work, suggesting execution-first agents beat heavy upfront planning for his use cases.
  • Routines are framed as proactive: they can fix bugs before the developer notices, pushing coding assistants toward background maintenance not just chat.
  • Phone has become a primary coding surface for Cherny, implying Claude Code and remote agent UX matter as much as desktop IDE integration.
  • A year post-GA, the conversation centers on where Claude Code goes next—expect more automation, mobility, and less manual bug triage in the narrative.
Article
> Speedrunning an identity crisis

Use Huntley’s framing to treat an identity crisis like a speedrun: set checkpoints, run intentional experiments, and decide what you’re optimizing for before drift picks for you.

Geoffrey Huntley’s note at Neue Studio (shared via X) is titled Speedrunning an identity crisis. Only the title was available in the source excerpt, so this summary stays at the thematic level—a likely first-person piece on compressing career, craft, or self-definition questions in builder and creative-studio life.

  • Speedrunning identity treats self-discovery as repeated timed passes with explicit goals, not a single slow unraveling.
  • Skilled work stacks identity layers—role, audience, values, craft—until you need named checkpoints to see what shifted.
  • Compression can reveal what you’re actually optimizing: autonomy, status, meaning, belonging, or output as public self.
  • Finishing the run cleanly matters less than logging each attempt; aborted runs still teach better routing.
  • When your work is your face, studio and tech contexts amplify identity pressure faster than private career moves.
Article
it seems layering ralph (/goal on /goal) has the timeline on choke again

Stacking Ralph goals (/goal on /goal) can stall or choke the agent timeline again—watch nested directives before you blame the model.

Geoff flags a regression in Ralph-style workflows where layered goal commands seem to jam progress on the execution timeline. The note is a field report, not a full write-up, so treat it as a signal to test your own /goal nesting.

  • Nesting Ralph /goal inside /goal is a pattern people are trying again—and it may reintroduce timeline choke.
  • When the agent stops making forward progress, check goal layering before swapping models or prompts.
  • Ralph timelines appear sensitive to how goals are stacked; shallow or single-level goals may be safer while this behavior persists.
  • This matches recurring community chatter that hierarchical goals can deadlock loops or blow context without obvious errors.
  • Reproduce with a minimal two-level /goal stack if you rely on Ralph for coding automation—document whether choke is consistent.
Article
WTF Is a Loop? Peter Steinberger vs. Boris Cherny

A viral X thread boiled AI coding down to a six-word mantra about “the loop”—and most reposts couldn’t explain what loop means. Steinberger and Cherny frame different answers for builders using agents and IDEs.

Matt Van Horn’s piece unpacks a timeline-viral tweet (he used /last30days to trace it) that pits Peter Steinberger against Boris Cherny on what “loop” actually means in modern AI-assisted development.

  • The debate is less slang and more architecture: whether “loop” means agent observe–act cycles, human approval gates, or iterative fix-until-green runs.
  • Steinberger-leaning takes often stress tight tool feedback and autonomous iteration; Cherny-leaning takes stress controlled steps inside products like Claude Code—same word, different safety and UX assumptions.
  • If your team can’t define the loop, you can’t measure it: latency per turn, failure recovery, and when a human must break the cycle.
  • Viral AI-coding phrases spread faster than definitions—treat them as signals to align on workflow, not as shared vocabulary.
  • For directory readers: pick tools by how they close the loop (tests, diffs, terminals, checkpoints), not by whether marketing says “agentic.”
Video
I Built Two Apps That Make $120K/Month

Two products, one founder, recurring revenue that makes people stop scrolling—what actually connects the dots between idea, pricing, and distribution?

  • How do you choose a second app without killing momentum on the first?
  • Which growth levers show up again and again before MRR compounds?
  • When does building faster with AI help—and when does it mask a weak offer?
Article
Remotion Was My First Agentic Video Love. Then HyperFrames Stole Me. /last30days for both

You'll see why Remotion hooked one builder on terminal-driven launch videos in React—and what made HyperFrames feel like a step change for the same agentic video workflow.

Matt Van Horn compares two agentic video stacks after a spring of shipping launch videos from Remotion compositions, then switching when HyperFrames showed up.

  • Remotion proved you could treat launch videos as code: React compositions edited and rendered from a terminal, not only in a traditional NLE.
  • A terminal-first agentic loop matters for repeatability—same repo, same components, same render pipeline across many spring launch clips.
  • HyperFrames entered as a competing agentic video path after Remotion was already the default; the post is about workflow fit, not a feature scorecard.
  • Switching tools after heavy Remotion use usually signals faster iteration or less boilerplate for the kinds of promos he was shipping.
  • /last30days framing implies both tools were actively discussed in recent AI-coding circles—worth checking current docs before picking a stack.
Video
Cloudflare bought Vite to destroy Vercel

When an edge giant doubles down on the build tool most teams already run, the fight stops looking like framework vs framework and starts looking like who owns the whole ship loop.

  • Why would a Workers-and-CDN company make Vite central to its story instead of pushing another framework?
  • If hosting moats are built on build-plus-deploy bundles, what does a Vite-aligned stack threaten that Next-first paths don't?
  • When headlines say a platform 'bought' an open tool, what should you verify before assuming your repo's defaults won't quietly nudge toward one host?
Video
Hermes Agent Desktop: Full Setup + Real Use Cases

What if your AI didn't live in a browser tab—but sat on your desktop with permissions to actually run your workflows?

  • Can you finish install and first real task in one sitting without guessing at API keys and paths?
  • Where does a local desktop agent beat chat for file work, research, and light automation—and where does it still fall short?
  • Which setup steps separate a reliable Hermes workflow from a one-off gimmick you never open again?
Video
I miss when programmers were lazy.

What if the sharpest engineers were the ones who refused heroic work—and what does that mean when AI can generate complexity faster than ever?

  • Why do boring defaults often beat custom architecture in real user outcomes?
  • Is skipping frameworks craft—or something else entirely?
  • When AI writes code at scale, what does 'lazy' discipline actually look like?
Video
OpenAI Codex: Build Apps That Work For You 24/7

What if your side projects could ship code, run jobs, and recover from failures while you sleep—and OpenAI Codex is only one piece of that puzzle?

  • What does '24/7' really mean beyond a clever prompt—agents, cron, or something else?
  • How do you keep Codex-built automation from drifting or breaking silently overnight?
  • What's the minimum you need to own before a scaffold turns into a product people can rely on?
Video
More Prompts = Worse Code?

What if every extra instruction you add is quietly fighting the ones you gave earlier?

  • Why might the model chase your latest tweak instead of the architecture you cared about on message one?
  • What shows up in your diffs when context gets crowded with half-applied fixes and dropped edge cases?
  • When does resetting the whole task beat another round of “just fix this one thing”?
Article
A harness for every task: dynamic workflows in Claude Code

Claude Code can now spin up task-specific harnesses at runtime instead of only using the default coding setup—useful when a one-size harness doesn’t fit the job.

Thariq announces dynamic workflows in Claude Code: the agent can author a custom harness on demand for whatever you’re doing, beyond the stock coding-oriented harness.

  • Dynamic workflows let Claude Code generate a harness tailored to the current task rather than forcing everything through the default coding harness.
  • The default Claude Code harness is optimized for software work; dynamic harnesses are meant for other kinds of tasks that need different tooling or structure.
  • A “harness” here is the scaffolding around the agent—how it’s steered, what tools and steps it uses—not just a single prompt.
  • Framing is “one harness per task,” built on the fly, which pushes toward more flexible agent setups inside the same product.
  • Details on how to enable workflows, APIs, and limits aren’t in this announcement snippet—treat the post as a capability headline, not a full how-to.
Video
The Next $100B Market: Selling to AI Agents

Greg Isenberg argues the next giant market won’t look like another consumer app—and the customer on the other side of the checkout might not be human at all.

  • What does it mean when AI agents become the ones with budgets and procurement authority?
  • If your buyer is a machine, what has to change about pricing, trust, and how products get discovered?
  • Where could the first $100B in 'agent economy' value actually accrue—apps, or the rails underneath them?
Article
Every Agentic Engineering Hack I Know (June 2026)

Matt Van Horn’s June 2026 agentic-engineering roundup builds on his viral Claude Code thread: favor voice, plan.md, and agent-first workflows over a traditional IDE. Use it as a checklist mindset—externalize plans, let agents execute, and revisit hacks often as tools change.

Matt Van Horn published an X article titled Every Agentic Engineering Hack I Know (June 2026), positioned as a broader follow-up to his widely viewed Claude Code hacks post. The excerpt frames agentic coding as plan-driven and voice-assisted rather than IDE-centric, but the full hack list was not available in the source text.

  • Van Horn’s earlier viral advice distilled to: skip the IDE for many tasks—use plan.md files plus voice to steer agents instead of typing in an editor.
  • The June 2026 piece rebrands the same idea from “Claude Code hacks” to “agentic engineering,” implying practices that transfer across agents and tools, not one vendor.
  • Public, dated snapshots (e.g., June 2026) matter because agentic workflows and model behavior change quickly; treat hack lists as living notes, not permanent setup guides.
  • Framing matters for adoption: “agentic engineering” emphasizes orchestration, planning, and verification loops rather than memorizing IDE shortcuts.
  • When you only have the teaser, the actionable move is still clear—write explicit plans agents can read, run work in tight feedback loops, and measure outcomes instead of defaulting to a heavy local dev environment.
Video
All 17 TanStack Projects In ONE App!

What happens when routing, server state, tables, forms, and the rest of the TanStack family have to share one codebase without stepping on each other?

  • How do you slot seventeen TanStack libraries into a single app without turning it into dependency soup?
  • Where does server-state management end and client routing or grid UI begin in one unified stack?
  • Can you really adopt these pieces one at a time—or does the demo only work when everything is wired together?
Video
This might be a Hot Take

When a blunt TypeScript-and-DX channel flags a take as deliberately provocative, what stack or AI-coding belief is about to get stress-tested?

  • Does modern web tooling deserve the hype—or the backlash Theo is hinting at?
  • What would you have to benchmark in your own repo to prove or kill his strongest claims?
  • If assistants and agents come up, are they framed as accelerators or as traps for production teams?
Video
I Built A $30K/Month App: Here's My Exact Process [Idea, Build, Marketing]

What does it actually take to go from a vague app idea to roughly $30K a month when the founder says the path is idea, build, marketing—not a single lucky launch?

  • How do you pressure-test an idea so people might pay before you build a feature-complete product?
  • What belongs in a first version if the goal is proving demand, not impressing reviewers?
  • How did distribution and messaging get treated from day one instead of after launch?
Video
SWE-Bench is getting replaced???

The benchmark everyone cites when they say an agent can fix real GitHub issues might not be the scoreboard for much longer—and the industry is already lining up what comes next.

  • What actually breaks a benchmark when models start training on the test set?
  • If SWE-Bench fades, what would a harder yardstick for repo work even measure?
  • Are the tools you trust today ranked on metrics that still match how teams ship?
Video
Anthropic fights back

Anthropic just made a move—what does it actually change for Claude, your API bill, and the assistants you ship with every day?

  • What is Anthropic pushing back against, and why should builders care right now?
  • Could your stack—Claude vs Copilot vs Cursor—look different after this?
  • Where does vendor chess end and something you can adopt this week begin?
Article
Excited to share our most powerful new Claude Code feature: dynamic workflows!

In Claude Code, say “workflow” in your prompt to get a strict multi-step orchestration plan Claude follows end-to-end—useful when many agents or stages must run in order without you micromanaging each step.

Anthropic’s cat announced a Claude Code capability where the word “workflow” triggers dynamic planning and enforced sequencing. The pitch is reliable ordering across large, multi-agent runs—not a one-off checklist you hope the model remembers.

  • Trigger dynamic workflows by including “workflow” in your Claude Code prompt so the tool builds an orchestration plan instead of improvising step order.
  • The orchestration plan is meant to be strictly followed, which targets the common failure mode of models skipping, reordering, or forgetting stages mid-run.
  • The feature is positioned for scale: maintaining correct stage order even when coordination spans on the order of hundreds of agents.
  • Treat it as orchestration infrastructure—explicit stages and dependencies—rather than a single monolithic coding answer.
  • Practical pattern: name stages, inputs, and success criteria in the prompt after invoking workflow so the generated plan has clear hooks to enforce.
Article
Super excited to finally share Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code!!

Anthropic’s Sid teases Dynamic Workflows for Claude Code—a pattern their team uses daily. Expect workflow definitions that adapt at runtime, not static scripts. Read the linked ClaudeDevs thread for setup and usage tips.

Sid (Anthropic) announces Dynamic Workflows inside Claude Code, a capability the internal team has relied on for months. The post is a short hook to a longer tips thread on X from @ClaudeDevs rather than a full tutorial in one tweet.

  • Dynamic Workflows are positioned as a first-class Claude Code feature, not a one-off prompt hack—worth treating as infrastructure for repeated dev tasks.
  • Anthropic engineers reportedly use it as a daily driver, which suggests multi-step, reusable automation over single-shot codegen.
  • The author promises a dedicated tips thread for maximizing value—implementation detail likely lives in the linked ClaudeDevs post, not this opener.
  • If you only have this tweet, treat it as a signal to evaluate workflow-style orchestration in Claude Code against your current agent or slash-command setup.
Article
New in Claude Code (research preview): dynamic workflows.

Learn how Claude Code’s research-preview “dynamic workflows” let you tackle complex work by prompting with “workflow”—Claude generates an orchestration script and runs many coordinated subagents in parallel instead of one linear session.

Anthropic’s ClaudeDevs announced a research-preview capability in Claude Code called dynamic workflows. You kick it off by including “workflow” in your prompt; the agent then fabricates orchestration logic and delegates to parallel subagents for heavy, multi-part coding tasks.

  • Dynamic workflows are opt-in via the keyword “workflow” in your prompt—there is no separate UI gate described in the announcement.
  • Claude Code generates an orchestration script at runtime rather than relying on a fixed, prebuilt multi-agent template.
  • Execution model is a coordinated fleet of subagents working in parallel, aimed at complexity that strains a single agent loop.
  • The feature ships as research preview, so behavior, limits, and stability may change before general availability.
  • Position it for orchestration-heavy jobs (many files, steps, or branches), not as a drop-in replacement for every small edit.
Video
I Built A Micro-Version Of A $1B SaaS. Now I Make $50K/Month

A builder aimed at one painful gap in a category dominated by a billion-dollar incumbent—and walked away with a monthly revenue figure that sounds impossible for a “micro” product.

  • What single job did they scope to instead of copying the whole platform?
  • How did they prove people would pay before the product grew?
  • Why can a narrow wedge beat feature parity against a giant SaaS?
Video
Can Cursor's HARDCORE Review Skill Stop The Slop?

Cursor offers a review skill pitched as “hardcore”—the open question is whether it can reliably flag sloppy agent-written code before it reaches your branch.

  • What does hardcore review actually scrutinize when AI-generated diffs look plausible on a skim?
  • How strict is it compared to a normal “review this” prompt inside the same Cursor workflow?
  • For TypeScript and React day-to-day work, would you trust it as a pre-merge gate—or still need your own checklist?
Video
Holy sh*t I think Anthropic is profitable now

A frontier lab behind Claude may have crossed a line peers still treat as years away—and that changes how you'd pick an AI coding stack.

  • What early signals suggest Anthropic could be profitable while other frontier labs are still burning cash?
  • If it's true, how might Claude's roadmap, pricing, and rate limits shift for developers betting on agents and APIs?
  • Why does a solvent frontier vendor matter more for your long-term stack than the next model benchmark?
Video
How I code with AI changed a lot

A senior TypeScript builder’s stack for coding with AI didn’t stay the same—what shifted when autocomplete stopped being the whole story?

  • Which stage of AI assistance actually changed his day-to-day the most—and what did he stop trusting models to own?
  • If agent-style multi-file edits are in play, what scoping and review habits keep quality from sliding?
  • Does picking the right editor integration and repo context beat swapping models for repeatable output?
Video
Is TanStack Starts Deferred Hydration Revolutionary?

What if the first paint stayed fast because React didn’t have to hydrate the whole page at once?

  • What exactly can TanStack Start defer hydrating without breaking forms and navigation?
  • Does deferred hydration actually move Time to Interactive—or mostly shift work to later?
  • Which UI boundaries are safe to hydrate late, and which ones can’t wait?
Video
9 Things People Get Wrong With My /grill-* skills

Matt Pocock’s /grill-* slash skills look like one-click fixes from the menu—until nine routine misreads of scope, inputs, and workflow turn structured reviews into wasted runs.

  • Why do people treat /grill-* like a generic ‘fix my code’ button when the skills assume specific file context and goals?
  • How do you know which grill variant matches review versus refactor versus explain—and what goes wrong when they look interchangeable?
  • What breaks when you skip the skill’s steps or throw huge unscoped diffs at a playbook that was designed for narrow scope?
Video
I Built A $30K/Month in 35 Days

What had to be true on day one for revenue to hit thirty thousand a month by day thirty-five?

  • Was it an audience, a product, or a channel that moved first?
  • Does the thirty thousand mean the same thing they’d claim in the fine print?
  • Which single loop did they refuse to split before scaling spend?
Video
I Make $1.7M/Year In The Most Boring Niche Imaginable

Seven figures in a niche nobody posts about—what makes the economics work when there’s zero hype to lean on?

  • Which deliberately dull market category can still clear $1.7M a year—and why is competition often thinner there?
  • What offer, pricing, and retention shape looks repeatable at that revenue—not a one-off launch?
  • When the product feels unsexy next to AI buzz, what actually wins: customer clarity, distribution, or operations?
Video
/handoff is my new favourite skill

Matt Pocock keeps returning to one slash command—and the moment it belongs in your workflow is the opposite of when most people reach for a new skill.

  • What should a /handoff actually contain before you close the tab or swap agents?
  • Why does naming it a first-class command change whether you use it every time?
  • What goes wrong in the next session when the handoff contract is too thin?
Video
9 biggest startup ideas right now (AI, B2C, mobile etc)

Greg Isenberg claims nine opportunity buckets are bigger than everything else founders are chasing right now—and AI is only one lane on the board.

  • Which of his nine bets still has room for a solo builder without a massive fund?
  • Where do B2C and mobile actually overlap with AI in his framing—and where do they diverge?
  • How do you turn a macro trend shortlist into a wedge you can validate before writing code?
Video
AI Memory: Stop Building Stateless Agents

If your coding assistant wakes up blank every turn, you're not missing a feature—you're fighting how real work actually unfolds.

  • Why do stateless agents keep re-learning the same repo quirks—and who pays for that in tokens and mistakes?
  • When should an agent remember a decision versus look it up in the codebase—and can RAG alone bridge that gap?
  • If memory can contradict your current branch, is forgetting the feature you need most?
Video
I stopped using /grill-me for coding. Here’s what I use instead:

Matt Pocock quietly retired /grill-me from his coding stack—and whatever he swapped in could reshape how you pick AI defaults for shipping code.

  • What made interrogation-style prompts the wrong fit for day-to-day implementation?
  • Which pattern does he reach for when the goal is code on disk, not a grilling session?
  • Is your favorite slash command adding friction you never measured?
Video
Stop Getting Roasted in PR Review (CodeRabbit, Locally)

What if the harshest PR comments never had to happen because you already caught what the bot would flag—on your laptop?

  • Why run CodeRabbit locally before you push instead of only on the hosted PR?
  • What kinds of issues can a pre-submit AI pass actually remove from review threads?
  • Where does machine review stop and human judgment still have to own the call?
Video
Anthropic's "dedicated monthly credit" is actually a huge cut

Anthropic’s new “dedicated monthly credit” sounds like a bonus—until you map it against what you could actually run last month.

  • What changed in the buckets behind Claude Code versus API usage?
  • Why might the same invoice line mean fewer Opus-class sessions than before?
  • Which surfaces quietly drain the pool you thought was separate?
Video
The $1M+ Solo AI Agent Business (Full Course)

What if one person could run an AI agent business past seven figures—without hiring a team first?

  • What’s the narrow wedge most solo operators pick before they expand offerings?
  • How do $1M+ solo agent shops actually mix pricing—retainers, builds, and usage?
  • What has to be in the contract before an agent is allowed to act on a client’s behalf?
Video
New Skills! /handoff, /prototype, /review and /writing-* | Skills Changelog

Your AI editor just shipped a batch of slash commands—do you actually know what each one is supposed to do?

  • What should you hand off to the agent so context doesn’t die between sessions?
  • When is /prototype the right move instead of jumping straight into production code?
  • What kinds of writing work are the /writing-* skills meant to cover—and how is /review different from a normal critique?
Video
Prompt to Dashboard in One AI Tool Call

One instruction and one agent action might replace the usual marathon of chat tweaks—if you know what to bundle into that call.

  • What do you specify up front so metrics, chart types, filters, and empty states come back as one dashboard—not scattered cards?
  • Why can delegating “build dashboard” to a single named tool call beat a long chain of refinement messages?
  • What has to happen after the first scaffold lands before APIs, auth, and performance are production-ready?
Article
Using Claude Code: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of HTML

Skip Markdown-only previews in Claude Code: have the agent emit self-contained HTML so tables, CSS, and light JS work in the terminal or a local server. You get inspectable, clickable artifacts—not flat text or huge screenshots—without a separate app stack.

Thariq (Claude Code team) argues that HTML, not Markdown, is the format that makes agent output actually usable in the terminal and browser. The piece covers a quick HTML-first workflow (template, local server, optional Vercel deploy) and why PDF, Word, and MD sit in different roles.

  • Terminal rendering of Markdown is weak; agents often compensate with screenshots instead of structured, selectable output you can act on.
  • Self-contained HTML gives agents semantics (tables, headings), presentation (CSS), and interactivity (links, scripts) in one artifact humans already know how to open.
  • Markdown stays the right default for files people edit and version; HTML is the better target when the deliverable is something you browse, click, or demo—not a doc you maintain by hand.
  • A practical loop: pip install claude-tmux, serve the project folder over HTTP, start from a single-file HTML template, then ask the agent to consolidate to index.html and package for static hosting.
  • The leverage is familiarity: HTML’s 30-year ecosystem means agents can ship small web apps (dashboards, walkthroughs, linked onboarding docs) faster than spinning up a separate product UI for each idea.
Video
Burn through the backlog from hell with /triage

When hundreds of tickets feel immovable, what if one slash command could turn the pile into a queue you actually drain?

  • What does `/triage` actually run inside your editor—and why does it beat scrolling the board ticket by ticket?
  • Which rubric sorts signal from noise so AI coding gets scoped tasks instead of one giant dump?
  • How do you batch similar backlog work so throughput spikes without living in context-switch hell?
Video
WebMCP Is A Free AI In Your App

What if your web app could run its own agent on your UI and data—without signing up for another chat API subscription?

  • How do you wire MCP-style tools into a browser app so the assistant isn't just a paid sidebar?
  • Can an embedded agent actually change application state, or only talk about it?
  • When they say "free," is that local runtime, open source, or something else you have to verify in the walkthrough?
Video
I Open-Sourced My Own AFK Software Factory

What if your codebase kept shipping while you were literally away from the keyboard—and you could steal the whole playbook from an open repo?

  • What does an ‘AFK software factory’ actually wire together so agents don’t need you live?
  • Which gates and checks does Matt treat like CI before agent output ever touches main?
  • What’s in the open-sourced layout that turns one-off AI chats into a repeatable factory?
Video
How To De-Slop A Codebase Ruined By AI (with one skill)

What if one repeatable skill could dig a real repo out of months of low-quality AI output without a full rewrite?

  • How do you tell duplicated logic and comment-noise from “normal” tech debt when an LLM filled the codebase?
  • What does a focused de-slop workflow actually run before merge so slop doesn’t creep back in?
  • Can agents plus human gates shrink the cleanup into small PRs instead of one scary refactor?
Video
Partial Page Caching Using React Server Components

Server Components let you cache some of a page at the edge while other slices stay per-request—where you draw that line decides whether visitors get speed or the wrong data.

  • Which parts of a React Server Component tree can you cache for every visitor without leaking personalized UI?
  • How do cache boundaries and revalidation work when only some segments are static on the same route?
  • Can you keep client interactivity on islands without forcing the entire RSC output out of the CDN?
Video
5 Ways To SSR/RSC on TanStack Start

TanStack Start offers more than one path to server rendering—how do you pick among them without drowning in docs?

  • Which of the five SSR/RSC patterns fits a stale-while-revalidate API versus a fully dynamic storefront?
  • Where do React Server Component boundaries actually land in a Start route tree?
  • What changes on the server versus the client when you swap from classic SSR to an RSC-first setup?
Video
Never Trust An LLM

Your AI pair programmer can ship answers in seconds—so what still has to happen before any of it belongs in production?

  • Why does a confident, fluent reply still deserve the same skepticism as an anonymous Stack Overflow paste?
  • What should every generated diff pass through before it earns a merge?
  • Which kinds of decisions are unsafe to outsource no matter how good the model sounds?
Video
Claude Code tried to improve /init... Is it any better?

Claude Code’s /init just got a refresh—does it finally seed your repo cleanly, or do you still end up fighting the agent on paths, scripts, and conventions?

  • What actually changed in the new /init flow compared to what you already run in your projects?
  • On the same real repo, does before-and-after show fewer wrong guesses—or more back-and-forth after bootstrap?
  • When should you trust /init versus writing your own rules and checked-in agent instructions?
Video
Building a REAL feature with Claude Code: every step explained

From vague idea to shipped code—what does agent-assisted development actually look like when the feature is real?

  • Which decisions stay with you when Claude Code is pair-programming on a scoped feature?
  • What order of steps turns agent chat into something you can run and verify in your repo?
  • When does treating the agent like open-ended “fix everything” fail—and what workflow replaces it?
Article
Lessons from Building Claude Code: How We Use Skills

Learn how the Claude Code team structures Skills—reusable agent capabilities—and applies them in real product development so your own skills stay focused, composable, and maintainable.

Thariq shares practical lessons from building Claude Code, Anthropic’s agentic coding tool, with emphasis on how the team defines and uses Skills in day-to-day work.

  • Skills are treated as first-class extensions: packaged instructions and workflows the agent can invoke instead of repeating one-off prompts.
  • Internal dogfooding of Claude Code surfaces which skills earn reuse versus which belong inline in a single task.
  • Good skills narrow scope—one job, clear triggers, and explicit inputs/outputs—so the agent picks the right tool without prompt sprawl.
  • Composition matters: smaller skills stack into larger flows rather than one mega-skill that tries to do everything.
  • Building the product with the same skill model users get keeps parity between what ships and what you should copy in your own repo.
Video
5 Claude Code skills I use every single day

Matt Pocock won’t open Claude Code until five specific habits are in place—most developers treat them as optional.

  • Which daily setup keeps stack rules and hard nos attached to every session without re-pasting?
  • How do you scope agent work so “done” means tests or typecheck—not just a convincing reply?
  • When does guessing about APIs become unacceptable—and what do you plug in instead?
Video
The 7 phases of AI-driven development

Most teams treat the model like a black-box coder—Matt Pocock’s title promises a seven-step order where human gates and LLM bulk work actually belong.

  • What has to be locked before you let the model generate piles of code?
  • Which phases are for judgment and constraints versus implementation—and how tight should the generate–read–correct loop be?
  • Why is verification a mandatory gate instead of optional polish after the model says it’s done?
Video
Your codebase is NOT ready for AI (here's how to fix it)

Matt Pocock opens a messy real repo and asks why your assistant keeps proposing changes that don’t compile—and what you’d change before trusting an agent near production.

  • Why does a layout that humans tolerate leave models guessing at APIs and types?
  • What guardrails turn autonomous edits from scary experiments into something you’d merge?
  • Which small context choices matter more than dumping the entire repository into chat?
Video
How to actually force Claude Code to use the right CLI (don't use CLAUDE.md)

Your project notes tell Claude Code which CLI to use — so why does it still reach for the wrong binary when the pressure is on?

  • Why does another paragraph in CLAUDE.md fail when you need pnpm instead of npm every single time?
  • What is the difference between documenting a stack rule for humans and actually wiring execution so the agent’s default path is the one you want?
  • When the model or plugins update overnight, what do you re-check so CLI choice does not silently drift again?
Video
Never Run claude /init

That first Claude Code ritual on a fresh repo might be doing more harm than a careful blank slate.

  • What is Claude’s `/init` really optimizing for when the repository is still empty?
  • Why can one bulk scaffold pass burn context before you’ve even validated the problem?
  • When does skipping auto-initialization keep your first AI diff small enough to actually review?
Video
Red Green Refactor is OP With Claude Code

Classic TDD might be the sharpest leash for a coding agent that loves to guess your APIs.

  • What if the failing test—not a giant prompt—is what tells Claude Code what to build?
  • Can red–green–refactor catch wrong assumptions before you merge agent-written code?
  • Who owns success criteria when the agent goes green and you still need a clean refactor?
Video
I'm using claude --worktree for everything now

One Git checkout for you—and a separate sandbox for every Claude task—might be the cleanest way to run parallel agent work without stepping on each other.

  • What happens when two Claude sessions edit the same repo in one folder—and how does a worktree sidestep that?
  • How do you test and merge agent changes while your main branch stays untouched?
  • Is “one task, one worktree” actually practical for daily Claude coding, or overkill?
Video
I was an AI skeptic. Then I tried plan mode

A senior TypeScript educator who dismissed coding assistants describes the one workflow that finally made AI feel reviewable instead of reckless.

  • What was he afraid would happen the moment an agent touched his repo?
  • Which step comes before any file changes—and who gets to veto it?
  • Can you stay skeptical of autopilot and still get real value from AI-assisted coding?

This week for builders

Five minutes, every Monday — the tools, releases and tactics for shipping solo.

unsubscribe anytime.