Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
agricidaniel avatar

Seo Competitor Pages

  • 27 installs
  • 548 repo stars
  • Updated July 20, 2026
  • agricidaniel/codex-seo

This is a copy of seo-competitor-pages by agricidaniel - installs and ranking accrue to the original listing.

seo-competitor-pages is a Claude Code skill that generates SEO-optimized competitor comparison, versus, and alternatives pages targeting competitive-intent keywords.

About

seo-competitor-pages generates SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. It covers X vs Y layouts, alternatives-to-X pages, best-tools roundups, and comparison tables, each targeting a competitive-intent keyword with a verifiable feature matrix and schema markup. A developer uses it to build conversion-focused comparison pages that rank for competitor and versus queries.

  • Generates X vs Y, alternatives, roundup, and comparison-table pages
  • Targets competitive-intent keywords with verifiable feature matrices
  • Includes Product and SoftwareApplication schema recommendations

Seo Competitor Pages by the numbers

  • 27 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +3 installs in the week ending Jul 12, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

seo-competitor-pages capabilities & compatibility

Free; generates pages from public data with no required API keys.

Capabilities
seo content · seo cluster · seo ecommerce
Use cases
seo · marketing · copywriting
Pricing
Free
From the docs

What seo-competitor-pages says it does

Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages.
SKILL.md
Create high-converting comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content.
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/codex-seo --skill seo-competitor-pages

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs27
repo stars548
Last updatedJuly 20, 2026
Repositoryagricidaniel/codex-seo

What it does

Generate comparison, versus, and alternatives pages that target competitive-intent keywords with feature matrices and schema.

Who is it for?

Building X-vs-Y, alternatives, and roundup pages that rank for competitor queries.

Skip if: Site-wide audits or backlink analysis.

When should I use this skill?

You want to create a comparison, versus, or alternatives-to page.

What you get

Structured comparison and alternatives pages with feature matrices and schema markup.

  • X vs Y comparison pages
  • Alternatives and roundup pages
  • Feature matrix with schema markup

By the numbers

  • 4 comparison page types
  • Product and SoftwareApplication schema templates

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Competitor Comparison & Alternatives Pages

Shared Data Cache

Step 0 -- Check shared data cache:

Before gathering, check .seo-cache/ for reusable context from related SEO skills. Reference: ../seo/references/shared-data-cache.md for schemas and dependency map.

Check these cache files when present:

  • .seo-cache/site-meta.json for domain, business type, industry, and crawl context
  • .seo-cache/audit-scores.json for prior full-audit priorities
  • .seo-cache/pages/{url-slug}/page-analysis.json for page-level context when a URL is provided
  • If found: parse and use clearly valid fields (note "Using cached [X] from [date]")
  • If missing, corrupt, or irrelevant: continue with fresh evidence
  • If the user says "refresh" or "re-run": ignore cache reads and overwrite on write

Create high-converting comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content.

Page Types

1. "X vs Y" Comparison Pages

  • Direct head-to-head comparison between two products/services
  • Balanced feature-by-feature analysis
  • Clear verdict or recommendation with justification
  • Target keyword: [Product A] vs [Product B]

2. "Alternatives to X" Pages

  • List of alternatives to a specific product/service
  • Each alternative with brief summary, pros/cons, best-for use case
  • Target keyword: [Product] alternatives, best alternatives to [Product]

3. "Best [Category] Tools" Roundup Pages

  • Curated list of top tools/services in a category
  • Ranking criteria clearly stated
  • Target keyword: best [category] tools [year], top [category] software

4. Comparison Table Pages

  • Feature matrix with multiple products in columns
  • Sortable/filterable if interactive
  • Target keyword: [category] comparison, [category] comparison chart

Comparison Table Generation

Feature Matrix Layout

| Feature          | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|------------------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|
| Feature 1        | ✅           | ✅           | ❌           |
| Feature 2        | ✅           | ⚠️ Partial   | ✅           |
| Feature 3        | ✅           | ❌           | ❌           |
| Pricing (from)   | $X/mo        | $Y/mo        | $Z/mo        |
| Free Tier        | ✅           | ❌           | ✅           |

Data Accuracy Requirements

  • All feature claims must be verifiable from public sources
  • Pricing must be current (include "as of [date]" note)
  • Update frequency: review quarterly or when competitors ship major changes
  • Link to source for each competitor data point where possible

Schema Markup Recommendations

Product Schema with AggregateRating

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Product",
  "name": "[Product Name]",
  "description": "[Product Description]",
  "brand": {
    "@type": "Brand",
    "name": "[Brand Name]"
  },
  "aggregateRating": {
    "@type": "AggregateRating",
    "ratingValue": "[Rating]",
    "reviewCount": "[Count]",
    "bestRating": "5",
    "worstRating": "1"
  }
}

SoftwareApplication (for software comparisons)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "name": "[Software Name]",
  "applicationCategory": "[Category]",
  "operatingSystem": "[OS]",
  "offers": {
    "@type": "Offer",
    "price": "[Price]",
    "priceCurrency": "USD"
  }
}

ItemList (for roundup pages)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "ItemList",
  "name": "Best [Category] Tools [Year]",
  "itemListOrder": "https://schema.org/ItemListOrderDescending",
  "numberOfItems": "[Count]",
  "itemListElement": [
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 1,
      "name": "[Product Name]",
      "url": "[Product URL]"
    }
  ]
}

Keyword Targeting

Comparison Intent Patterns

PatternExampleSearch Volume Signal
[A] vs [B]"Slack vs Teams"High
[A] alternative"Figma alternatives"High
[A] alternatives [year]"Notion alternatives 2026"High
best [category] tools"best project management tools"High
[A] vs [B] for [use case]"AWS vs Azure for startups"Medium
[A] review [year]"Monday.com review 2026"Medium
[A] vs [B] pricing"HubSpot vs Salesforce pricing"Medium
is [A] better than [B]"is Notion better than Confluence"Medium

Title Tag Formulas

  • X vs Y: [A] vs [B]: [Key Differentiator] ([Year])
  • Alternatives: [N] Best [A] Alternatives in [Year] (Free & Paid)
  • Roundup: [N] Best [Category] Tools in [Year], Compared & Ranked

H1 Patterns

  • Match title tag intent
  • Include primary keyword naturally
  • Keep under 70 characters

Conversion-Optimized Layouts

CTA Placement

  • Above fold: Brief comparison summary with primary CTA
  • After comparison table: "Try [Your Product] free" CTA
  • Bottom of page: Final recommendation with CTA
  • Avoid aggressive CTAs in competitor description sections (reduces trust)

Social Proof Sections

  • Customer testimonials relevant to comparison criteria
  • G2/Capterra/TrustPilot ratings (with source links)
  • Case studies showing migration from competitor
  • "Switched from [Competitor]" stories

Pricing Highlights

  • Clear pricing comparison table
  • Highlight value advantages (not just lowest price)
  • Include hidden costs (setup fees, per-user pricing, overage charges)
  • Link to full pricing page

Trust Signals

  • "Last updated [date]" timestamp
  • Author with relevant expertise
  • Methodology disclosure (how comparisons were conducted)
  • Disclosure of own product affiliation

Fairness Guidelines

  • Accuracy: All competitor information must be verifiable from public sources
  • No defamation: Never make false or misleading claims about competitors
  • Cite sources: Link to competitor websites, review sites, or documentation
  • Timely updates: Review and update when competitors release major changes
  • Disclose affiliation: Clearly state which product is yours
  • Balanced presentation: Acknowledge competitor strengths honestly
  • Pricing accuracy: Include "as of [date]" disclaimers on all pricing data
  • Feature verification: Test competitor features where possible, cite documentation otherwise

Internal Linking

  • Link to your own product/service pages from comparison sections
  • Cross-link between related comparison pages (e.g., "A vs B" links to "A vs C")
  • Link to feature-specific pages when discussing individual features
  • Breadcrumb: Home > Comparisons > [This Page]
  • Related comparisons section at bottom of page
  • Link to case studies and testimonials mentioned in the comparison

Output

Comparison Page Template

  • COMPARISON-PAGE.md: Ready-to-implement page structure with sections
  • Feature matrix table
  • Content outline with word count targets (minimum 1,500 words)

Schema Markup

  • comparison-schema.json: Product/SoftwareApplication/ItemList JSON-LD

Keyword Strategy

  • Primary and secondary keywords
  • Related long-tail opportunities
  • Content gaps vs existing competitor pages

Recommendations

  • Content improvements for existing comparison pages
  • New comparison page opportunities
  • Schema markup additions
  • Conversion optimization suggestions

Error Handling

ScenarioAction
Competitor URL unreachableReport which competitor URLs failed. Proceed with available data and note gaps in the comparison.
Insufficient competitor data (pricing, features unavailable)Flag missing data points clearly. Use "Not publicly available" in comparison tables rather than guessing.
No product/service overlap foundReport that the products serve different markets. Suggest alternative competitors that share feature overlap, or pivot to a category roundup format.

Write to shared data cache

After completing all work, write a concise JSON summary to .seo-cache/ when the workflow produced durable findings. Use the schemas and naming rules in ../seo/references/shared-data-cache.md; include at least cache_type, analyzed_at, source URL/domain, key findings, issues, recommendations, and tool limitations. Add .seo-cache/ to .gitignore if it is missing.

Related skills

FAQ

What page types does it produce?

X vs Y comparisons, alternatives-to pages, best-category roundups, and comparison-table pages.

What schema does it recommend?

Product schema with AggregateRating and SoftwareApplication schema for software comparisons.

How does it keep data accurate?

All feature and pricing claims must be verifiable from public sources with an as-of date.

Marketing & SEOseocontent

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.