
Seo Competitor Pages
- 27 installs
- 548 repo stars
- Updated July 20, 2026
- agricidaniel/codex-seo
This is a copy of seo-competitor-pages by agricidaniel - installs and ranking accrue to the original listing.
seo-competitor-pages is a Claude Code skill that generates SEO-optimized competitor comparison, versus, and alternatives pages targeting competitive-intent keywords.
About
seo-competitor-pages generates SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. It covers X vs Y layouts, alternatives-to-X pages, best-tools roundups, and comparison tables, each targeting a competitive-intent keyword with a verifiable feature matrix and schema markup. A developer uses it to build conversion-focused comparison pages that rank for competitor and versus queries.
- Generates X vs Y, alternatives, roundup, and comparison-table pages
- Targets competitive-intent keywords with verifiable feature matrices
- Includes Product and SoftwareApplication schema recommendations
Seo Competitor Pages by the numbers
- 27 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +3 installs in the week ending Jul 12, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
seo-competitor-pages capabilities & compatibility
Free; generates pages from public data with no required API keys.
- Capabilities
- seo content · seo cluster · seo ecommerce
- Use cases
- seo · marketing · copywriting
- Pricing
- Free
What seo-competitor-pages says it does
Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages.
Create high-converting comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content.
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/codex-seo --skill seo-competitor-pagesAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 27 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 548 |
| Last updated | July 20, 2026 |
| Repository | agricidaniel/codex-seo ↗ |
What it does
Generate comparison, versus, and alternatives pages that target competitive-intent keywords with feature matrices and schema.
Who is it for?
Building X-vs-Y, alternatives, and roundup pages that rank for competitor queries.
Skip if: Site-wide audits or backlink analysis.
When should I use this skill?
You want to create a comparison, versus, or alternatives-to page.
What you get
Structured comparison and alternatives pages with feature matrices and schema markup.
- X vs Y comparison pages
- Alternatives and roundup pages
- Feature matrix with schema markup
By the numbers
- 4 comparison page types
- Product and SoftwareApplication schema templates
Files
Competitor Comparison & Alternatives Pages
Shared Data Cache
Step 0 -- Check shared data cache:
Before gathering, check .seo-cache/ for reusable context from related SEO skills. Reference: ../seo/references/shared-data-cache.md for schemas and dependency map.
Check these cache files when present:
.seo-cache/site-meta.jsonfor domain, business type, industry, and crawl context.seo-cache/audit-scores.jsonfor prior full-audit priorities.seo-cache/pages/{url-slug}/page-analysis.jsonfor page-level context when a URL is provided
- If found: parse and use clearly valid fields (note "Using cached [X] from [date]")
- If missing, corrupt, or irrelevant: continue with fresh evidence
- If the user says "refresh" or "re-run": ignore cache reads and overwrite on write
Create high-converting comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content.
Page Types
1. "X vs Y" Comparison Pages
- Direct head-to-head comparison between two products/services
- Balanced feature-by-feature analysis
- Clear verdict or recommendation with justification
- Target keyword:
[Product A] vs [Product B]
2. "Alternatives to X" Pages
- List of alternatives to a specific product/service
- Each alternative with brief summary, pros/cons, best-for use case
- Target keyword:
[Product] alternatives,best alternatives to [Product]
3. "Best [Category] Tools" Roundup Pages
- Curated list of top tools/services in a category
- Ranking criteria clearly stated
- Target keyword:
best [category] tools [year],top [category] software
4. Comparison Table Pages
- Feature matrix with multiple products in columns
- Sortable/filterable if interactive
- Target keyword:
[category] comparison,[category] comparison chart
Comparison Table Generation
Feature Matrix Layout
| Feature | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|------------------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|
| Feature 1 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Feature 2 | ✅ | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ |
| Feature 3 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Pricing (from) | $X/mo | $Y/mo | $Z/mo |
| Free Tier | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |Data Accuracy Requirements
- All feature claims must be verifiable from public sources
- Pricing must be current (include "as of [date]" note)
- Update frequency: review quarterly or when competitors ship major changes
- Link to source for each competitor data point where possible
Schema Markup Recommendations
Product Schema with AggregateRating
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Product",
"name": "[Product Name]",
"description": "[Product Description]",
"brand": {
"@type": "Brand",
"name": "[Brand Name]"
},
"aggregateRating": {
"@type": "AggregateRating",
"ratingValue": "[Rating]",
"reviewCount": "[Count]",
"bestRating": "5",
"worstRating": "1"
}
}SoftwareApplication (for software comparisons)
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "SoftwareApplication",
"name": "[Software Name]",
"applicationCategory": "[Category]",
"operatingSystem": "[OS]",
"offers": {
"@type": "Offer",
"price": "[Price]",
"priceCurrency": "USD"
}
}ItemList (for roundup pages)
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "ItemList",
"name": "Best [Category] Tools [Year]",
"itemListOrder": "https://schema.org/ItemListOrderDescending",
"numberOfItems": "[Count]",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "[Product Name]",
"url": "[Product URL]"
}
]
}Keyword Targeting
Comparison Intent Patterns
| Pattern | Example | Search Volume Signal |
|---|---|---|
[A] vs [B] | "Slack vs Teams" | High |
[A] alternative | "Figma alternatives" | High |
[A] alternatives [year] | "Notion alternatives 2026" | High |
best [category] tools | "best project management tools" | High |
[A] vs [B] for [use case] | "AWS vs Azure for startups" | Medium |
[A] review [year] | "Monday.com review 2026" | Medium |
[A] vs [B] pricing | "HubSpot vs Salesforce pricing" | Medium |
is [A] better than [B] | "is Notion better than Confluence" | Medium |
Title Tag Formulas
- X vs Y:
[A] vs [B]: [Key Differentiator] ([Year]) - Alternatives:
[N] Best [A] Alternatives in [Year] (Free & Paid) - Roundup:
[N] Best [Category] Tools in [Year], Compared & Ranked
H1 Patterns
- Match title tag intent
- Include primary keyword naturally
- Keep under 70 characters
Conversion-Optimized Layouts
CTA Placement
- Above fold: Brief comparison summary with primary CTA
- After comparison table: "Try [Your Product] free" CTA
- Bottom of page: Final recommendation with CTA
- Avoid aggressive CTAs in competitor description sections (reduces trust)
Social Proof Sections
- Customer testimonials relevant to comparison criteria
- G2/Capterra/TrustPilot ratings (with source links)
- Case studies showing migration from competitor
- "Switched from [Competitor]" stories
Pricing Highlights
- Clear pricing comparison table
- Highlight value advantages (not just lowest price)
- Include hidden costs (setup fees, per-user pricing, overage charges)
- Link to full pricing page
Trust Signals
- "Last updated [date]" timestamp
- Author with relevant expertise
- Methodology disclosure (how comparisons were conducted)
- Disclosure of own product affiliation
Fairness Guidelines
- Accuracy: All competitor information must be verifiable from public sources
- No defamation: Never make false or misleading claims about competitors
- Cite sources: Link to competitor websites, review sites, or documentation
- Timely updates: Review and update when competitors release major changes
- Disclose affiliation: Clearly state which product is yours
- Balanced presentation: Acknowledge competitor strengths honestly
- Pricing accuracy: Include "as of [date]" disclaimers on all pricing data
- Feature verification: Test competitor features where possible, cite documentation otherwise
Internal Linking
- Link to your own product/service pages from comparison sections
- Cross-link between related comparison pages (e.g., "A vs B" links to "A vs C")
- Link to feature-specific pages when discussing individual features
- Breadcrumb: Home > Comparisons > [This Page]
- Related comparisons section at bottom of page
- Link to case studies and testimonials mentioned in the comparison
Output
Comparison Page Template
COMPARISON-PAGE.md: Ready-to-implement page structure with sections- Feature matrix table
- Content outline with word count targets (minimum 1,500 words)
Schema Markup
comparison-schema.json: Product/SoftwareApplication/ItemList JSON-LD
Keyword Strategy
- Primary and secondary keywords
- Related long-tail opportunities
- Content gaps vs existing competitor pages
Recommendations
- Content improvements for existing comparison pages
- New comparison page opportunities
- Schema markup additions
- Conversion optimization suggestions
Error Handling
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Competitor URL unreachable | Report which competitor URLs failed. Proceed with available data and note gaps in the comparison. |
| Insufficient competitor data (pricing, features unavailable) | Flag missing data points clearly. Use "Not publicly available" in comparison tables rather than guessing. |
| No product/service overlap found | Report that the products serve different markets. Suggest alternative competitors that share feature overlap, or pivot to a category roundup format. |
Write to shared data cache
After completing all work, write a concise JSON summary to .seo-cache/ when the workflow produced durable findings. Use the schemas and naming rules in ../seo/references/shared-data-cache.md; include at least cache_type, analyzed_at, source URL/domain, key findings, issues, recommendations, and tool limitations. Add .seo-cache/ to .gitignore if it is missing.
MIT License - see repository root LICENSE file for complete terms.
Copyright (c) 2026 AgriciDaniel
https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/codex-seo
Related skills
FAQ
What page types does it produce?
X vs Y comparisons, alternatives-to pages, best-category roundups, and comparison-table pages.
What schema does it recommend?
Product schema with AggregateRating and SoftwareApplication schema for software comparisons.
How does it keep data accurate?
All feature and pricing claims must be verifiable from public sources with an as-of date.