
Cpg Analysis
- 3 installs
- 706 repo stars
- Updated July 14, 2026
- alinaqi/maggy
cpg-analysis is a Claude Code skill that runs deep code-property-graph analysis with Joern and CodeQL for control flow, data flow, taint analysis, and security auditing.
About
This skill performs deep code analysis beyond the AST using Joern Code Property Graphs and CodeQL. Joern provides control flow, data flow, and program-dependency traversal for refactoring and dead-code analysis, while CodeQL adds interprocedural taint analysis and vulnerability detection. A developer uses it for control-flow tracing, data-flow tracking, and security audits before a release.
- Builds full Code Property Graphs with Joern for control and data flow
- Runs CodeQL interprocedural taint analysis and vulnerability detection
- Tiered guidance for symbol lookup, flow analysis, and security audit
Cpg Analysis by the numbers
- 3 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,752 of 2,203 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
cpg-analysis capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- security audit · code review · debugging
- Use cases
- security audit · code review · debugging
- Runs
- Runs locally
- Pricing
- Free
What cpg-analysis says it does
Use Joern for full Code Property Graph (control flow, data flow, program dependencies) and CodeQL for interprocedural taint analysis and vulnerability detection.
These are opt-in tools.
npx skills add https://github.com/alinaqi/maggy --skill cpg-analysisAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 3 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 706 |
| Last updated | July 14, 2026 |
| Repository | alinaqi/maggy ↗ |
What it does
Run taint analysis and control/data-flow tracing with Joern and CodeQL to audit code for vulnerabilities before release.
Who is it for?
Deep control-flow, data-flow, and security-vulnerability analysis when lightweight navigation is not enough.
Skip if: Everyday symbol lookup or dependency tracing, which the docs route to the always-on Tier 1 tool instead.
When should I use this skill?
When deep code analysis is needed for control flow, data flow, taint tracking, or security auditing.
What you get
Control and data flow are traced and taint-based vulnerabilities are detected across the codebase.
By the numbers
- Joern supports 40+ query tools
- 3 analysis tiers
Files
CPG Analysis Skill
Purpose: Deep code analysis beyond AST. Use Joern for full Code Property Graph (control flow, data flow, program dependencies) and CodeQL for interprocedural taint analysis and vulnerability detection.
These are opt-in tools. They require Docker/JVM (Joern) or CodeQL CLI. Use codebase-memory-mcp (Tier 1, always-on) for everyday navigation. Use these for deep analysis when Tier 1 is not enough.
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CODE PROPERTY GRAPH = AST + CFG + CDG + DDG + PDG │
│ ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────│
│ AST = Abstract Syntax Tree (structure) │
│ CFG = Control Flow Graph (execution paths) │
│ CDG = Control Dependency Graph (conditional dependencies) │
│ DDG = Data Dependency Graph (data flow between statements) │
│ PDG = Program Dependency Graph (CDG + DDG combined) │
│ │
│ Tier 2 (Joern): Full CPG with 40+ query tools │
│ Tier 3 (CodeQL): Interprocedural taint + security queries │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘---
Tier Selection Guide
Simple symbol lookup, dependency trace, blast radius?
→ Tier 1: codebase-memory-mcp (always on, sub-ms)
Control flow paths, data flow, dead code, complex refactoring?
→ Tier 2: Joern CPG (on-demand, seconds)
Security audit, taint analysis, vulnerability detection?
→ Tier 3: CodeQL (on-demand, seconds to minutes)
Full security review before release?
→ All three tiers in sequence---
Tier 2: Joern CPG (CodeBadger MCP)
When to Use Joern
| Scenario | Why Joern | Tier 1 Can't Do This |
|---|---|---|
| Trace data flow through functions | Full DDG traversal | Tier 1 has no data flow |
| Understanding control flow paths | CFG analysis with branch conditions | Tier 1 has no CFG |
| Finding dead/unreachable code | PDG reachability analysis | Tier 1 only detects unused exports |
| Complex refactoring impact | Cross-function dependency chains | Tier 1 limited to call graph |
| Auditing third-party library usage | Deep call chain traversal | Tier 1 stops at import boundary |
| Understanding exception flow | CFG includes throw/catch paths | Tier 1 ignores exceptions |
Key MCP Tools (Joern/CodeBadger)
| Tool | Purpose | Example Query |
|---|---|---|
generate_cpg | Build CPG for project | First-time setup or after major changes |
get_cpg_status | Check CPG build status | Verify CPG is ready before querying |
run_cpgql_query | Run arbitrary CPGQL queries | cpg.method("login").callOut.code.l |
get_cpgql_syntax_help | Query language reference | When unsure about query syntax |
get_cfg | Control flow graph for a method | Understand execution paths in a function |
list_methods | List all methods in project | Overview of available functions |
get_method_source | Get source code of a method | Read specific function source |
list_calls | List calls from/to a method | Caller/callee analysis |
get_call_graph | Full call graph visualization | Understand call chains |
get_type_definition | Type/class definitions | Understand type hierarchy |
Supported Languages (Joern)
Java, Scala, C/C++, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, PHP, Ruby, Go, Kotlin, Swift, Lua
Not supported: Rust (use CodeQL for Rust)
MCP Configuration (Joern)
{
"mcpServers": {
"codebadger": {
"url": "http://localhost:4242/mcp",
"type": "http"
}
}
}Prerequisites
- Docker (for Joern backend)
- Python 3.10+ (for MCP server)
- Install:
~/.claude/install-graph-tools.sh --joern
Common CPGQL Queries
// Find all methods that handle user input
cpg.method.where(_.parameter.name(".*input.*|.*request.*")).name.l
// Trace data flow from parameter to return
cpg.method("processPayment").parameter.reachableBy(cpg.method("processPayment").methodReturn).l
// Find methods with high cyclomatic complexity
cpg.method.where(_.controlStructure.size > 10).name.l
// Dead code: methods with no callers
cpg.method.where(_.callIn.size == 0).filter(_.name != "main").name.l
// Exception flow: methods that can throw but callers don't catch
cpg.method.where(_.ast.isThrow.size > 0).callIn.method.filter(_.ast.isTry.size == 0).name.l---
Tier 3: CodeQL
When to Use CodeQL
| Scenario | Why CodeQL | Other Tiers Can't Do This |
|---|---|---|
| Security audit before release | Interprocedural taint analysis | Joern has basic taint, CodeQL is deeper |
| Reviewing auth/payment code | Data flow from source to sink | Cross-function, cross-file taint |
| PR security review | Targeted vulnerability scan | Pre-built OWASP query packs |
| Compliance checking | CWE/OWASP pattern matching | Curated security query suites |
| Rust security analysis | Full Rust support | Joern doesn't support Rust |
Key MCP Tools (CodeQL)
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
run_query | Execute a CodeQL query against the database |
find_definitions | Locate symbol definitions |
find_references | Find all references to a symbol |
get_results | Parse BQRS (Binary Query Result Sets) |
Supported Languages (CodeQL)
C/C++, C#, Go, Java, Kotlin, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Ruby, Swift, Rust
MCP Configuration (CodeQL)
{
"mcpServers": {
"codeql": {
"command": "codeql-mcp",
"args": ["--database", ".code-graph/codeql-db"]
}
}
}Prerequisites
- CodeQL CLI (
brew install codeqlon macOS) - Install:
~/.claude/install-graph-tools.sh --codeql
Common CodeQL Patterns
// SQL injection: user input flows to SQL query
import python
from DataFlow::PathNode source, DataFlow::PathNode sink
where TaintTracking::hasFlowPath(source, sink)
and source instanceof RemoteFlowSource
and sink instanceof SqlExecution
select sink, source, sink, "SQL injection from $@.", source, "user input"
// Unvalidated redirect
from DataFlow::PathNode source, DataFlow::PathNode sink
where source instanceof RemoteFlowSource
and sink instanceof RedirectSink
select sink, "Unvalidated redirect from user input"---
Combined Workflow: Deep Analysis
When performing security review or complex refactoring, use all tiers:
1. SCOPE → Tier 1: detect_changes / get_architecture
Identify files and modules in scope
2. STRUCTURE → Tier 1: search_graph / trace_call_path
Map the call graph and dependencies
3. FLOW → Tier 2: get_cfg / run_cpgql_query
Analyze control flow and data flow paths
4. SECURITY → Tier 3: run_query with taint analysis
Check for vulnerabilities in data paths
5. REPORT → Combine findings from all tiers
Prioritize: Critical > High > Medium > Low---
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Do This Instead |
|---|---|
| Using Joern/CodeQL for simple symbol lookup | Use Tier 1 search_graph (sub-ms vs seconds) |
| Running full CPG build on every commit | Build CPG on-demand; use Tier 1 for continuous monitoring |
Querying Joern without checking get_cpg_status | Always verify CPG is built and current before querying |
| Running CodeQL without a specific security question | Have a hypothesis first; CodeQL queries are expensive |
| Ignoring Tier 1 blast radius before deep analysis | Always scope with Tier 1 first, then go deep on flagged areas |
| Using CodeQL for non-security structural queries | Use Joern CPGQL for structural/flow queries; CodeQL for security |
Related skills
FAQ
What is a Code Property Graph?
It combines AST, control flow graph, control-dependency graph, data-dependency graph, and program-dependency graph for deep analysis.
When should I use CodeQL instead of Joern?
For security audits, interprocedural taint analysis, and Rust support, which Joern does not cover.