
Scenario War Room
Facilitate Shell-style 2x2 scenario planning and lightweight Monte Carlo thinking before committing to runway, raise, or growth bets.
Overview
scenario-war-room is an agent skill most often used in Validate (also Idea research, Operate iterate) that applies Shell-style 2x2 scenario planning and mental Monte Carlo for startup strategic choices.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill scenario-war-roomWhat is this skill?
- Shell-adapted scenario principles: MECE scenarios, 2x2 on critical uncertainties, named quadrants
- Startup 2x2 template: raise success vs bridge crossed with fast vs slow market growth
- Predetermined elements and early indicators per scenario for monitoring
- Mental Monte Carlo: 3–5 key variables with ranges instead of requiring simulation software
- War-room sessions anchored to the quadrant most relevant right now
- 2x2 matrix built from 2 critical uncertainties yielding 4 scenarios
- Mental Monte Carlo focuses on 3–5 key variables maximum
Adoption & trust: 523 installs on skills.sh; 17.5k GitHub stars; 2/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits).
What problem does it solve?
You are betting the company on one assumed future while raise timing and market growth stay genuinely uncertain.
Who is it for?
Pre-seed and seed solo founders preparing war-room or board-style conversations about runway, fundraising, and market pace.
Skip if: Teams that already have a signed financial model and fixed plan with no need to explore alternate futures.
When should I use this skill?
You need Shell-style scenario workshops, named quadrants, or mental Monte Carlo for raise/runway decisions.
What do I get? / Deliverables
You leave with named scenarios, monitoring indicators, and quadrant-specific strategic focus instead of a single fragile forecast.
- Named 2x2 scenarios with predetermined elements and early indicators
- Session focus aligned to the most relevant quadrant
Recommended Skills
Journey fit
Spans multiple journey phases - primary shelf plus alternate fits below.
Validate/scope is the canonical shelf because the skill frames mutually exclusive futures and strategic choices before full build—not as a one-off brainstorm. Scope subphase matches narrowing what to build and how to survive under raise vs bridge and market growth uncertainties.
Where it fits
Map critical uncertainties about category growth before you commit to a niche product thesis.
Pick Blue Ocean vs Survival Mode responses before locking MVP scope and burn for the next six months.
Revisit early indicators when fundraising stalls to shift from growth experiments to efficiency focus.
How it compares
Use for exploratory strategic scenarios—not as a replacement for detailed financial forecasting spreadsheets.
Common Questions / FAQ
Who is scenario-war-room for?
Indie SaaS builders and tiny founding teams who need decision-ready scenario language without hiring strategy consultants.
When should I use scenario-war-room?
In Validate when scoping runway and raise strategy, in Idea when researching market uncertainty, in Grow when distribution assumptions shift, or in Operate when iterating survival vs growth posture.
Is scenario-war-room safe to install?
It is reference and planning content with no inherent code execution; still review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing any skill from the catalog.
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Scenario War Room
# Scenario Planning Reference ## Shell's Scenario Planning Methodology Shell invented modern scenario planning in the 1970s after the oil crisis. Core insight: **scenarios are not forecasts — they're tools for thinking.** ### Shell's Principles (adapted for startups) 1. **Scenarios are mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive** — they cover the space of possibilities without overlapping 2. **2x2 matrix** — pick 2 critical uncertainties (not risks — uncertainties); cross them to get 4 scenarios 3. **Name the scenarios** — named scenarios are remembered; numbered ones aren't 4. **Identify predetermined elements** — things that will happen regardless of scenario (regulatory changes, tech trends) 5. **Early indicators** — each scenario has signals you can monitor today ### Shell's 2x2 for Startups Critical uncertainties for early-stage SaaS: | | Market grows fast | Market grows slow | |---|---|---| | **We raise successfully** | "Blue Ocean" — execute hard | "Ramp Carefully" — efficiency focus | | **We bridge/delay raise** | "Scrappy Growth" — ramen profitability | "Survival Mode" — cut to core | Build your war room sessions around whichever quadrant is most relevant right now. --- ## Monte Carlo Thinking for Startups Monte Carlo = running thousands of simulations with random variables to understand probability distributions. You don't need software. Apply the mental model: ### The Mental Monte Carlo Process 1. **Identify the key variables** (3-5 max) 2. **Assign ranges** — not point estimates - CAC: $6K–$12K (uniform distribution) - Close rate: 20%–40% (normal, mean 30%) - Churn: 5%–20% (right-skewed — bad tail is worse) 3. **Run mental scenarios** — pick low/mid/high for each 4. **Identify the combinations that kill you** — which variable combinations make runway hit zero? 5. **Focus hedging on** the 20% of combinations that account for 80% of kill scenarios ### Practical Monte Carlo Heuristic For revenue forecasting, always state: - **P90** (90% confidence you'll exceed this) - **P50** (median case) - **P10** (only 10% chance you'll exceed this — your "stretch") Boards respect ranges. Point estimates are usually wrong and make you look naive. --- ## Pre-Mortem Technique A pre-mortem asks: *"It's 12 months from now. We failed. Why?"* It's the opposite of planning (which asks why you'll succeed). It surfaces hidden risks that optimism suppresses. ### Running a Pre-Mortem **Setup:** - Time: 90 minutes - Participants: leadership team - Facilitator: neutral (COO, or external) - Assumption: "It's [date 12 months out]. The company failed / missed its major goal. This is real." **Phase 1 — Silence (10 minutes):** Each person writes their top 3 reasons the failure happened. No discussion. **Phase 2 — Round Robin (30 minutes):** Each person shares one reason per turn. Facilitator captures on whiteboard. No debate yet. **Phase 3 — Cluster (20 minutes):** Group similar causes. Identify the top 5 clusters. **Phase 4 — Probability & Impact (20 minutes):** For each cluster: P(likely) × impact = risk score. Rank. **Phase 5 — Mitigation (10 minutes):** Top 3 risks: what one action would most reduce each? ### Pre-Mortem Prompt Variants - "It's March 2027. We ran out of money. Why?" - "It's Q4. We lost 3 enterprise customers in 60 days. What happened?" - "It's next year. Our top competitor took 40% of the market. How?" - "It's 18 months from now. Half the engineering team left. What triggered it?" --- ## Cascade Effect Mapping Cascades are where most startups get surprised. The first hit is expected — the second and third aren't. ### Cascade Mapping Format Draw as a chain: ``` INITIAL EVENT ↓ [immediate effect: domain, severity, timeline] SECONDARY EFFECT ↓ [cascade mechanism: how A causes B] TERTIARY EFFECT ↓ [cascade mechanism] END STATE [runway impact, ARR impact, team impact] ``` ### Common Cascade Patterns **Revenue → Cash → People:** ``` Customer churns ($400K ARR) ↓ CFO: runway drop