Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
aperivue avatar

Search Lit

  • 46 installs
  • 236 repo stars
  • Updated August 3, 2026
  • aperivue/medsci-skills

search-lit is a Claude Code skill for medical literature search and citation management that queries PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and bioRxiv/medRxiv, verifies each reference against a live database, and generates BibTeX.

About

This skill runs literature searches and manages citations for medical research. It queries PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and preprint servers, deduplicates and verifies each reference against a live API, and generates BibTeX entries. A researcher uses it to build a verified reference library for a manuscript section without fabricated citations.

  • Searches PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and bioRxiv/medRxiv and deduplicates results across databases
  • Verifies every reference against a live database before inclusion; never generates citations from memory
  • Generates BibTeX entries and falls back from MCP tools to NCBI E-utilities scripts when MCP is unavailable

Search Lit by the numbers

  • 46 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #1,109 of 2,715 Automation & Workflows skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

search-lit capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
research · web search · citation management
Works with
github
Use cases
research · web search
From the docs

What search-lit says it does

Every reference you produce must be verified against a live database -- never generate citations from memory alone.
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/aperivue/medsci-skills --skill search-lit

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs46
repo stars236
Last updatedAugust 3, 2026
Repositoryaperivue/medsci-skills

What it does

Search PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and preprints and produce API-verified BibTeX citations.

Who is it for?

Researchers building a verified reference library or background section for a medical manuscript.

Skip if: Bibliography management or reference auditing (use /lit-sync and /verify-refs).

When should I use this skill?

You need references for a manuscript section and want every citation verified against a live database.

What you get

A deduplicated, API-verified set of references with BibTeX entries ready for the manuscript.

  • Verified reference table
  • BibTeX entries
  • Deduplicated search results

By the numbers

  • searches 3 databases: PubMed, Semantic Scholar, bioRxiv/medRxiv
  • E-utilities rate limit 3 requests/second without API key

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Literature Search Skill

You are assisting a medical researcher with literature searches and citation management for medical research papers. Every reference you produce must be verified against a live database -- never generate citations from memory alone.

Communication Rules

  • Communicate with the user in their preferred language.
  • All citation content (titles, abstracts, BibTeX) in English.
  • Medical terminology is always in English.

Key Directories

  • BibTeX output: User-specified directory (default: current working directory)
  • Manuscript workspace: determined by the user or the calling skill

Search Tools: MCP (Primary) + E-utilities (Fallback)

Primary: MCP Tools (Claude.ai Remote)

DatabaseMCP ToolPurpose
PubMedmcp__claude_ai_PubMed__search_articlesSearch by query, MeSH terms
PubMedmcp__claude_ai_PubMed__get_article_metadataFull metadata for a PMID
PubMedmcp__claude_ai_PubMed__find_related_articlesRelated articles for a PMID
PubMedmcp__claude_ai_PubMed__lookup_article_by_citationVerify a citation
PubMedmcp__claude_ai_PubMed__convert_article_idsConvert between PMID/DOI/PMCID
Semantic Scholarmcp__claude_ai_Scholar_Gateway__semanticSearchSemantic search across all fields
bioRxiv/medRxivmcp__claude_ai_bioRxiv__search_preprintsSearch preprint servers
bioRxiv/medRxivmcp__claude_ai_bioRxiv__get_preprintFull preprint metadata
CrossRefWebFetch with https://api.crossref.org/works/{DOI}DOI verification

Fallback: NCBI E-utilities (Direct API via Bash)

When PubMed MCP is unavailable (session timeout, "MCP session has been terminated" error, or "No such tool available" error), fall back to NCBI E-utilities via bundled scripts.

Detection: If any mcp__claude_ai_PubMed__* call returns an error containing "terminated", "not found", "not available", or "not connected", switch ALL subsequent PubMed calls in this session to E-utilities. Do not retry MCP after a disconnect — it will not recover within the same conversation.

Scripts (in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/):

  • pubmed_eutils.sh — Bash wrapper for NCBI E-utilities API
  • parse_pubmed.py — Python parser for E-utilities responses

Usage patterns:

EUTILS="${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/pubmed_eutils.sh"
PARSER="${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/parse_pubmed.py"

# Search PubMed (returns PMIDs)
bash "$EUTILS" search "diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis radiology" 20 \
  | python3 "$PARSER" esearch

# Get article summaries as markdown table
bash "$EUTILS" fetch_json "16168343,16085191,31462531" \
  | python3 "$PARSER" esummary

# Get detailed metadata
bash "$EUTILS" fetch "16168343" \
  | python3 "$PARSER" efetch

# Generate BibTeX entries
bash "$EUTILS" fetch "16168343,16085191" \
  | python3 "$PARSER" bibtex

# Verify a citation by exact title
bash "$EUTILS" cite_lookup "Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity" \
  | python3 "$PARSER" esearch

# Find related articles for a PMID
bash "$EUTILS" related "16168343" 10 \
  | python3 "$PARSER" esummary

Rate limiting: 3 requests/second without API key, 10/sec with NCBI_API_KEY. The script auto-sleeps 350ms between calls. For batch operations, keep calls sequential.

E-utilities → MCP equivalence:

MCP ToolE-utilities CommandParser Mode
search_articlessearch <query> [retmax]esearch
get_article_metadatafetch <pmids>efetch or bibtex
find_related_articlesrelated <pmid> [retmax]esummary
lookup_article_by_citationcite_lookup <title>esearchfetch
convert_article_idsNot available (use CrossRef DOI lookup)

---

Workflow

Phase 1: Search Strategy

1. Understand the need: Get the research topic, specific question, or manuscript section that needs references. 2. Generate search terms:

  • Identify key concepts (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, Outcome).
  • Generate MeSH terms for PubMed queries.
  • Build Boolean queries: (concept1 OR synonym1) AND (concept2 OR synonym2).

3. Define scope:

  • Date range (default: last 10 years unless user specifies).
  • Article types (original research, review, meta-analysis, etc.).
  • Language filter (default: English).

4. Present the search plan to the user before executing. Include the Boolean query, databases to search, and filters.

Gate: Wait for user approval before running searches.

Phase 2: Execute Search

1. Search PubMed using search_articles with the Boolean query. 2. Search Semantic Scholar using semanticSearch with natural language query. 3. Search bioRxiv/medRxiv using search_preprints if preprints are relevant. 4. Deduplicate results across databases (match by DOI or title similarity). 5. Present results in a structured table:

| # | Title | Authors (first + last) | Year | Journal | PMID/DOI | Relevance |
|---|-------|----------------------|------|---------|----------|-----------|
| 1 | ...   | Kim J, ... Lee S     | 2024 | Radiology | 12345678 | High      |

6. Ask the user to select which papers to include.

Phase 2.5: Citation Searching (Snowballing)

Optional but recommended for systematic reviews and thorough background work (PRISMA item 7, "records identified through citation searching"). Expands a seed set along the citation graph instead of relying on Boolean recall alone.

Use the deterministic helper references/snowball.py (Semantic Scholar Graph API; nothing generated from memory):

# Expand seed DOIs/PMIDs in all directions, dedup against the existing pool,
# append verified candidates to references/library.bib
python3 references/snowball.py \
  --seed DOI:10.1148/radiol.2024123,PMID:38000001 \
  --direction all \
  --pool references/library.bib \
  --out references/library.bib
  • Directions: backward (references the seeds cite), forward (papers

citing the seeds), similar (S2 recommendations), or all (default).

  • Dedup: against the current references/library.bib by DOI and

normalized title, and within the harvested set.

  • Trust flag: snowball candidates are written verified=false +

verified_by=semantic_scholar. They are candidates, not confirmed citations — run /verify-refs (or Phase 4 verification) to confirm each against PubMed/CrossRef before citing.

  • Output contract: appends to references/library.bib only. NEVER writes

manuscript/_src/refs.bib (the script hard-refuses that path).

  • PRISMA line: the script prints, e.g., `Records identified through

citation searching (snowballing): N raw (backward=…, forward=…, similar=…); after dedup against existing pool: M new candidates.` — record M in the PRISMA flow's citation-searching box.

A deterministic, network-free challenge card (recorded fixtures + expected output + verify.sh) lives in references/snowball_challenge/.

Phase 3: Deep Read

For each selected paper:

1. Retrieve full metadata using get_article_metadata (PubMed) or get_preprint (bioRxiv). 2. Extract key information:

  • Study design
  • Sample size / dataset
  • Key methods
  • Primary findings (with specific numbers)
  • Limitations noted by authors

3. Build a literature matrix if multiple papers selected:

| Paper | Design | N | Key Finding | Limitation | Relevance to Our Study |
|-------|--------|---|-------------|------------|----------------------|

4. Present the matrix to the user for review.

Phase 4: Citation Management

Anti-Hallucination Protocol

This is the most critical part of the skill. Follow these rules without exception:

1. NEVER generate a reference from memory alone. Every reference must come from an API search result. 2. NEVER fabricate DOIs or PMIDs. If you cannot find a DOI/PMID, mark the reference as [UNVERIFIED - NEEDS MANUAL CHECK]. 3. Cross-check every reference against the API result:

  • Author names (at least first author and last author)
  • Publication year
  • Journal name
  • Article title (exact match, not paraphrased)
  • Volume and pages (if available)

4. If any field does not match, flag the specific mismatch. 5. For DOI verification, use WebFetch with https://api.crossref.org/works/{DOI} to confirm the DOI resolves correctly.

BibTeX Generation

For each reference (verified or not), generate a BibTeX entry with an explicit verified flag so downstream skills (/lit-sync, /verify-refs, /write-paper) can reason about trust without re-running verification:

@article{FirstAuthorLastName_Year_ShortKey,
  author    = {Last1, First1 and Last2, First2 and Last3, First3},
  title     = {Full Title As Retrieved From Database},
  journal   = {Journal Name},
  year      = {2024},
  volume    = {310},
  number    = {2},
  pages     = {e234567},
  doi       = {10.1001/jama.2024.12345},
  pmid      = {12345678},
  verified  = {true},
  verified_by = {pubmed+crossref},
  verified_on = {2026-04-24},
}

`verified` flag values (required on every entry):

ValueMeaningDownstream behavior
trueDOI or PMID confirmed via PubMed/CrossRef; title, authors, year all matchSafe to cite; /write-paper citekey-only gate passes
falseParsed from text but API lookup failed or returned mismatch/verify-refs flags as UNVERIFIED; manuscript MUST show [UNVERIFIED - NEEDS MANUAL CHECK]
manualUser explicitly added despite lookup failureTreated as verified=false by /verify-refs but suppresses repeat warnings

verified_by lists the data sources that confirmed the entry (e.g., pubmed, crossref, semantic_scholar, or a combination). verified_on is the ISO date of the most recent successful verification.

BibTeX key convention: FirstAuthorLastName_Year_OneWord (e.g., Kim_2024_Validation).

Output

1. Save BibTeX entries to the specified .bib file (append, do not overwrite). Target: references/library.bib (candidate pool for /lit-sync to import into Zotero). NEVER write to manuscript/_src/refs.bib — that is /lit-sync's sole-writer path per docs/artifact_contract.md. 2. Print a summary of all references with verification status:

Verified:    12 references (verified=true)
Unverified:   1 reference  (verified=false) [NEEDS MANUAL CHECK]
Total:       13 references

Phase 4b: Zotero Library Integration

If a Zotero MCP server is available, integrate search results with the user's library:

1. Add papers to Zotero: Use zotero_add_by_doi for DOI-based import (auto-downloads OA PDFs). 2. Organize into collections: Use zotero_manage_collections to file into the relevant project collection. 3. Check for duplicates: Use zotero_search_items to avoid adding papers already in the library. 4. Leverage annotations: Use zotero_get_annotations to reference the user's prior reading notes. 5. Write sync audit: Record collection key, added/skipped/failed counts, and unsynced entries in references/zotero_collection.json so Zotero status is auditable rather than a hidden optional side effect.

Requires Zotero Desktop running with MCP server. Skip this phase if unavailable.
If skipped, still write references/zotero_collection.json with
status: "skipped" and the reason.

Phase 5: Full-Text Retrieval

After identifying relevant papers, retrieve full-text PDFs for detailed review. This is especially important for meta-analyses where data extraction requires full text.

Phase 5a: Open Access Auto-Retrieval

Try sources in order of reliability:

1. Unpaywall API (highest quality OA links):

   import os, requests
   email = os.environ.get("UNPAYWALL_EMAIL", "user@example.com")
   url = f"https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/{doi}?email={email}"
   r = requests.get(url).json()
   if r.get("best_oa_location", {}).get("url_for_pdf"):
       pdf_url = r["best_oa_location"]["url_for_pdf"]

2. PubMed Central (PMC):

  • Convert PMID to PMCID via NCBI ID Converter
  • Download from PMC OA service: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC{id}/pdf/

3. OpenAlex API (additional OA discovery):

   url = f"https://api.openalex.org/works/https://doi.org/{doi}"
   # Requires polite pool: add email in User-Agent header or mailto= param
   r = requests.get(url, headers={"User-Agent": f"MyApp/1.0 (mailto:{email})"}).json()
   oa_url = r.get("open_access", {}).get("oa_url")

4. CrossRef landing page: Follow https://api.crossref.org/works/{doi} → publisher link → scrape <meta name="citation_pdf_url"> tag

Phase 5b: Alternative Sources

Some researchers use alternative access methods for paywalled content. Users are responsible for ensuring compliance with their institutional access policies.

If an environment variable (e.g., SCIHUB_BASE) is set, the skill may use it as an alternative PDF source. No specific URLs are provided here — users configure this themselves.

Other options:

  • Institutional proxy/VPN: Access publisher sites through institutional EZproxy or VPN
  • Interlibrary loan (ILL): Request through library services for papers not otherwise available
  • Author contact: Email corresponding authors for preprints
PDF Validation

Always validate downloaded files before use:

def is_valid_pdf(filepath):
    """Check that a downloaded file is actually a PDF, not an HTML redirect."""
    import os
    if os.path.getsize(filepath) < 10240:  # < 10KB is likely a stub/redirect
        return False
    with open(filepath, 'rb') as f:
        header = f.read(5)
    return header == b'%PDF-'

Additional checks:

  • Verify HTTP Content-Type: application/pdf header before saving
  • Files under 10KB are almost always HTML login/redirect pages, not real PDFs
  • Some publishers return CAPTCHA pages — these fail the %PDF- check
Rate Limiting
  • Unpaywall: Polite pool (no hard limit with email parameter)
  • OpenAlex: Include email in User-Agent for polite pool access
  • NCBI/PMC: 3 requests/sec without API key, 10/sec with NCBI_API_KEY
  • General: 2-second minimum interval between requests to any single host

Phase 6: Gap Analysis

When called during manuscript writing (especially by /write-paper Phase 7):

1. Read the manuscript to extract all inline citations. 2. Compare cited references against the search results. 3. Identify gaps:

  • Key papers in the field that are not cited.
  • Outdated references when newer versions exist.
  • Missing methodological references (e.g., statistical methods, reporting guidelines).

4. Report findings to the user with specific suggestions.

---

Specialized Search Modes

Mode: Manuscript Paper Reference Pool

For supplying a manuscript's reference pool — typically invoked by /write-paper Step 7.3c (or /self-review Phase 2.5c-2) when the reference adequacy gate finds the draft under target or a named method uncited, but usable directly when building out an original-research bibliography.

This mode is deliberately broad: for an original-research article, return 25–40 verified candidates, not the ~10 a quick search settles on. Do not stop early unless the field is genuinely sparse — and if it is, say so explicitly rather than returning a thin list silently. Respect a narrower journal reference cap or user scope when one is given.

Structure the pool across six candidate categories so the gaps the adequacy gate cares about are all covered:

1. Background / disease burden / clinical context — establishes why the question matters. 2. Gap-defining prior studies — the work the manuscript extends or contradicts. 3. Comparator / comparable-design cohorts — studies the Results will be measured against. 4. Methods / statistical canonical sources — the originating reference for every named method, model, score, equation, or diagnostic criterion (e.g. competing-risk model, multiple imputation, E-value, eGFR equation, concordance statistic). This is the category that clears Methods named-method gaps. 5. Reporting-guideline sources — STROBE, TRIPOD(+AI), CONSORT, PRISMA(-DTA), STARD, etc. 6. Interpretation / mechanism / limitation support — grounds Discussion claims.

For each candidate, report: PMID/DOI, verification status, candidate category, the target manuscript section it belongs in, and a one-line why it is needed.

Boundary (unchanged): every entry is API-verified before inclusion, and BibTeX is appended only to references/library.bib — the candidate pool for /lit-sync to import into Zotero. Never write to manuscript/_src/refs.bib; that SSOT belongs to /lit-sync. This mode produces candidates; it does not decide inclusion (the user does) and it does not insert references into the manuscript bib.

Mode: Systematic Search

For systematic reviews or comprehensive literature sections:

1. Document the full search strategy (PRISMA-compliant). 2. Record: database, date of search, query string, number of results. 3. Track inclusion/exclusion at each screening step. 4. Output a PRISMA flow diagram data summary.

Mode: Quick Cite

For quickly finding a single reference the user describes:

1. User says something like "that 2023 paper by Smith about AI in chest X-ray." 2. Search PubMed and Semantic Scholar with the described details. 3. Present top 3 candidates. 4. User confirms which one. 5. Generate BibTeX entry.

Mode: Related Papers

For expanding from a known paper:

1. User provides a PMID or DOI. 2. Use find_related_articles to get related papers. 3. Use Semantic Scholar for citation-based recommendations. 4. Present results ranked by relevance.

For a structured, dedup-aware, PRISMA-countable expansion (backward + forward + similar) prefer Phase 2.5: Citation Searching with references/snowball.py, which appends verified candidates to references/library.bib and reports a citation-searching count.

Mode: Embase Browser Automation

Embase has no public API. Use Chrome browser automation (MCP) to search and export:

1. Navigate to embase.com — institutional SSO authenticates automatically. If cookie error (login?error#), clear Elsevier/Embase cookies and retry. 2. Go to Advanced Search tab. 3. Enter Embase-syntax query (Emtree /exp + :ab,ti field tags). Uncheck "Map to preferred term in Emtree" when using explicit /exp terms. 4. After results appear, use "Select number of items" dropdown → select total count. 5. Click Export (in Results section) → choose CSV format → check fields: Title, Author names, Source, Publication year, Publication type, DOI, Abstract, Language of article, Medline PMID. 6. Click Export → Download tab opens → click Download. 7. CSV is in row format (records separated by blank rows) — parse with:

   # Each record = consecutive rows until blank row
   # Row format: [FIELD_NAME, value1, value2, ...]
   # AUTHOR NAMES row has multiple values (one per author)

PubMed → Embase query translation:

  • MeSH [Mesh] → Emtree /exp
  • [tiab]:ab,ti
  • [Title/Abstract]:ab,ti
  • Boolean operators stay the same (AND, OR)
  • Phrase search: use single quotes in Embase ('artificial ascites')

---

Error Handling

  • If a search returns 0 results, broaden the query (remove one concept or use broader MeSH terms) and retry.
  • CrossRef HTTP errors (token-saving rules):
  • 403 (rate-limited): Do NOT retry. Skip CrossRef silently → verify via PubMed title search instead.
  • 303 (redirect): Follow the redirect if possible. If not, skip CrossRef → PubMed fallback.
  • Any repeated failure: After the first CrossRef 403/303 in a session, assume CrossRef is

rate-limiting and skip CrossRef for ALL remaining references. Go directly to PubMed title verification. This avoids N×retry token waste.

  • Never print raw error messages like "Request failed with status code 403." Collect

failures silently and report a single summary line at the end: CrossRef unavailable for {N} references (rate-limited). Verified via PubMed instead.

  • If a DOI does not resolve via CrossRef (after applying the rules above), try searching PubMed by title to confirm the reference exists.
  • If the user provides a reference that cannot be verified by any method, clearly state: "This reference could not be verified. Please check manually before submission."
  • Never silently include an unverified reference.

What This Skill Does NOT Do

  • Does not download from paywalled journals without user-provided credentials or institutional access.
  • Does not assess the quality of evidence (use /analyze-stats or /check-reporting for that).
  • Does not write the literature review text (use /write-paper for that).
  • Does not fabricate any part of a citation.

Related skills

FAQ

Which databases does it search?

PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and bioRxiv/medRxiv, with CrossRef used for DOI verification, deduplicated across databases by DOI or title.

What if the PubMed MCP is down?

It falls back to NCBI E-utilities via bundled pubmed_eutils.sh and parse_pubmed.py scripts, rate-limited to 3 requests/second.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.