
Codex Autoresearch Loop
- 1.2k installs
- 66 repo stars
- Updated July 9, 2026
- aradotso/trending-skills
Codex Autoresearch is a Codex skill that runs an autonomous modify→verify→keep/revert loop on your codebase until a measurable goal is reached.
About
Codex Autoresearch is an agent skill that runs an autonomous modify→verify→keep/revert loop on codebases until a measurable goal is reached. Developers describe a single-sentence target; Codex infers scope, metrics, and verification commands, then iterates unattended with automatic git commits and reverts. Seven modes span loop optimization, planning, debugging, security audits, and release gating. Cross-run learning stores lessons; pivot protocol escalates via refinement and web search when stalled.
- Seven inference modes (loop, plan, fix, debug, security, ship, exec) activate from natural language
- Dual-gate verification: separate verify (metric improvement) and guard (regression detection) commands
- Automatic escalation: 3+ discards → REFINE, 5+ → PIVOT, 2 PIVOTs → web search without user prompts
- Autonomous code improvement loops for TypeScript types, test coverage, bundle size, and lint warnings
- Autonomous code improvement loops for TypeScript types, test coverage, bundle size, and lint warnings
Codex Autoresearch Loop by the numbers
- 1,176 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +8 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #910 of 16,659 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: CRITICAL risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
codex-autoresearch-loop capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- autonomous iteration · metric optimization · hypothesis testing · git automation · escalation protocol · cross session learning
- Use cases
- code review · testing · debugging · refactoring
- Runs
- Runs locally
- Pricing
- Free
What codex-autoresearch-loop says it does
Self-directed iterative research skill for Codex that continuously cycles through modify, verify, retain or discard, and repeat until a measurable goal is reached.
Codex maps your sentence to one of seven modes automatically — you never pick a mode explicitly.
You are never asked for permission during escalation. The loop continues.
npx skills add https://github.com/aradotso/trending-skills --skill codex-autoresearch-loopAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1.2k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 66 |
| Security audit | 0 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | July 9, 2026 |
| Repository | aradotso/trending-skills ↗ |
What it does
Autonomous code improvement loops for TypeScript types, test coverage, bundle size, and lint warnings
Who is it for?
Unattended metric optimization (coverage, bundle size, type errors, lint warnings) and evidence-driven debugging across long sessions.
Skip if: Manual code review, interactive pair programming, one-shot ad-hoc queries without measurable targets.
When should I use this skill?
You have a quantifiable code goal (e.g. 'eliminate all any types', 'reach 85% coverage'), enough context to write a verify command, and permission for unattended git commits.
What you get
A measurable improvement (lower type errors, higher coverage, smaller bundle) stacked in git history with automatic rollbacks on failure.
- Retained code patches
- Verification logs
- Goal completion report
By the numbers
- Seven inference modes: loop, plan, fix, debug, security, ship, exec
- Up to five confirmation rounds before loop auto-proceeds
- Parallel mode supports concurrent hypothesis testing (e.g. Parallel: 4)
Files
Codex Autoresearch
Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
Codex Autoresearch is a Codex skill that runs an autonomous modify→verify→keep/revert loop on your codebase. You describe a measurable goal in one sentence; Codex confirms the plan, then iterates unattended — every improvement stacks in git, every failure reverts automatically — until interrupted or a cap is reached. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch concept, generalized beyond ML training to any software metric.
---
Installation
Option A — manual copy into your project:
git clone https://github.com/leo-lilinxiao/codex-autoresearch.git
cp -r codex-autoresearch your-project/.agents/skills/codex-autoresearchOption B — Codex skill installer:
$skill-installer install https://github.com/leo-lilinxiao/codex-autoresearchThe skill lives at .agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/ inside your project. No config file is required before first use.
---
How to Activate
Open Codex in your project directory and prefix your goal with $codex-autoresearch:
$codex-autoresearch
I want to get rid of all `any` types in my TypeScript codeCodex will: 1. Scan the repo and infer scope, metric, verify command, and guard command. 2. Present a confirmation summary — reply go (or correct anything). 3. Run the loop unattended until you interrupt it or the goal is met.
You never write config. Codex infers everything.
---
Confirmation Flow
Before the loop starts Codex always shows what it found and asks you to confirm. Example exchange:
Codex: I found 47 `any` occurrences across src/**/*.ts.
Confirmed:
- Target: eliminate `any` types in src/**/*.ts
- Metric: `any` count (current: 47), direction: lower
- Verify: grep + tsc --noEmit as guard
Need to confirm:
- Run until all gone, or cap at N iterations?
Reply "go" to start, or tell me what to change.
You: Go, run overnight.
Codex: Starting — baseline: 47. Iterating until interrupted.Up to five confirmation rounds are possible. After that, Codex proceeds.
---
The Loop (internals)
PHASE 0: Probe environment (CPU/GPU/RAM/toolchains), check for session resume
PHASE 1: Read context + lessons file from prior run (if any)
LOOP (forever or N times):
1. Review current state, git history, results log, lessons
2. Pick ONE hypothesis (apply perspectives, filter by environment)
-- or N hypotheses if parallel mode is active
3. Make ONE atomic change
4. git commit (before verification)
5. Run verify command → did the target metric improve?
Run guard command → did anything else break?
6. Improved → keep (extract lesson)
Worse → approved rollback strategy (git revert)
Crashed → fix or skip
7. Log the result to results log
8. Health check (disk, git, verify health)
9. If 3+ discards → REFINE; 5+ → PIVOT; 2 PIVOTs → web search
10. Repeat. Never stop. Never ask.The loop runs unbounded unless you say Iterations: N during confirmation.
---
Dual-Gate Verification
Two commands serve distinct purposes:
| Gate | Purpose | Fails means |
|---|---|---|
| Verify | Did the target metric improve? | Change discarded, reverted |
| Guard | Did anything else break? | Change reworked (up to 2 attempts), then reverted |
Guard files are never modified by the loop.
Example verify + guard pair for a Python coverage run:
Verify: pytest --cov=src --cov-report=term 2>&1 | grep TOTAL | awk '{print $NF}'
Guard: python -m mypy src --ignore-missing-importsExample for TypeScript type cleanup:
Verify: grep -r "any" src --include="*.ts" | wc -l
Guard: npx tsc --noEmit---
Modes
Codex maps your sentence to one of seven modes automatically — you never pick a mode explicitly.
loop — iterate toward a measurable target (default)
$codex-autoresearch
Improve test coverage in src/ to at least 80%$codex-autoresearch
Reduce bundle size — it's currently 2.3 MB, get it under 1 MBplan — turn a vague goal into a validated loop config
$codex-autoresearch
I want to make our API faster but I don't know where to startCodex will interview you (p95 latency vs throughput? which endpoint?) and produce a ready-to-run loop config.
fix — repair errors until count reaches zero
$codex-autoresearch
pytest is failing, 12 tests broken after the refactor — fix them alldebug — evidence-driven root-cause hunting
$codex-autoresearch
Our API returns 503 randomly under load, no idea whyEach iteration tests one falsifiable hypothesis. Codex presents evidence, not guesses.
security — read-only STRIDE + OWASP audit
$codex-autoresearch
Is this code secure?ship — readiness verification and release gating
$codex-autoresearch
Ship itexec — one-shot execution with no loop
$codex-autoresearch
Run the benchmark suite and summarize results---
Inline Configuration (optional)
You can override defaults inline during the confirmation step — no file edits needed:
| Phrase | Effect |
|---|---|
Iterations: 20 | Cap the loop at 20 iterations |
Parallel: 3 | Test 3 hypotheses concurrently per round |
Guard: npm test | Override the inferred guard command |
Verify: <command> | Override the inferred verify command |
Scope: src/api/ | Restrict changes to a subdirectory |
Example during confirmation:
You: Go. Iterations: 30, Guard: npm test, Scope: src/api/---
Cross-Run Learning
At the end of each iteration Codex writes a structured lesson to .agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/lessons.md:
Iteration 7 — KEPT
Hypothesis: replace explicit `any` with inferred generic in src/utils/mapper.ts
Change: added <T extends Record<string, unknown>> to mapKeys()
Result: any count 31 → 29
Lesson: Generic constraints on utility functions eliminate clusters of `any` downstream.On session resume Codex reads this file first. Each new run benefits from prior runs.
To resume an interrupted run:
$codex-autoresearch
ResumeCodex re-reads the lessons file, checks git state, re-establishes the baseline, and continues.
---
Parallel Experiments
Request parallel mode during confirmation or at any time:
You: Go, parallel 4Codex runs four hypotheses concurrently, keeps the best result, discards the rest. Useful when hypothesis space is large.
---
Pivot Protocol
If the loop stalls, escalation happens automatically:
| Consecutive discards | Action |
|---|---|
| 3 | REFINE — narrow hypothesis, try smaller atomic changes |
| 5 | PIVOT — change strategy entirely |
| 2 PIVOTs | Web search — Codex fetches external references to unstick itself |
You are never asked for permission during escalation. The loop continues.
---
Real Code Examples
Example 1 — TypeScript any elimination (Python verify script)
If you want a custom verify script instead of a one-liner:
# scripts/count_any.py
import subprocess, sys
result = subprocess.run(
["grep", "-r", "--include=*.ts", r"\bany\b", "src/"],
capture_output=True, text=True
)
count = len(result.stdout.strip().splitlines())
print(count)
sys.exit(0) # always exit 0; the number is what mattersTell Codex during confirmation:
Verify: python scripts/count_any.py
Guard: npx tsc --noEmitExample 2 — pytest coverage loop (Python)
# scripts/coverage_pct.py
import subprocess, re, sys
out = subprocess.check_output(
["pytest", "--cov=src", "--cov-report=term", "-q"],
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, text=True
)
match = re.search(r"TOTAL\s+\d+\s+\d+\s+(\d+)%", out)
if match:
print(int(match.group(1)))
sys.exit(0)
print(0)
sys.exit(0)$codex-autoresearch
Improve test coverage — target 85%
Verify: python scripts/coverage_pct.py
Guard: python -m mypy src
Direction: higher
Target: 85
Iterations: 50Example 3 — bundle size loop (Node.js project)
# scripts/bundle_size.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
npm run build --silent 2>/dev/null
du -k dist/bundle.js | awk '{print $1}'$codex-autoresearch
Reduce our JS bundle size, currently ~2300 KB, target under 900 KB
Verify: bash scripts/bundle_size.sh
Guard: npm test
Direction: lower
Target: 900Example 4 — lint warning count (any language)
# scripts/lint_count.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
npx eslint src/ --format json 2>/dev/null \
| python3 -c "import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(sum(len(f['messages']) for f in d))"$codex-autoresearch
Get our ESLint warning count to zero
Verify: bash scripts/lint_count.sh
Direction: lower
Target: 0---
Unattended Runs
For overnight or long runs, ensure Codex CLI approval settings do not interrupt git commit or git revert commands. The simplest option is to run in a disposable or sandboxed repo clone:
git clone . /tmp/autoresearch-sandbox
cd /tmp/autoresearch-sandbox
# launch Codex here with full permissionsResults accumulate in git history. Pull the winning commits back to your main repo when done:
# in your main repo
git fetch /tmp/autoresearch-sandbox main
git cherry-pick <winning-commit-sha>---
Session Artifacts
| File | Contents |
|---|---|
.agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/lessons.md | Structured lessons from every iteration |
.agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/results.log | Full per-iteration log (metric value, kept/reverted, elapsed) |
.agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/session.json | Current session state for resume |
These files persist across Codex sessions. Delete them to start fresh.
---
Troubleshooting
Loop reverts every change:
- Verify command may be returning a non-numeric value. Test it manually:
bash -c "<your verify command>"should print a single number. - Metric direction may be wrong. Confirm
Direction: lowerorDirection: higherduring setup.
Guard fires on unrelated files:
- Narrow scope:
Scope: src/specific-module/ - Or tell Codex explicitly:
Do not touch tests/during confirmation.
Session resume picks up wrong baseline:
- Delete
session.jsonto force a fresh baseline:rm .agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/session.json
Parallel mode produces merge conflicts:
- Codex handles this internally via the pivot protocol, but if it gets stuck, reduce parallelism:
Parallel: 2
Codex asks questions mid-loop:
- This means a guard crash produced ambiguous output. Pre-empt it by specifying
Guard: <command> || trueif guard failures should be non-fatal, or by giving Codex fuller sandbox permissions so it can run git commands freely.
Loop hits PIVOT but makes no progress:
- Supply a seed hypothesis during confirmation:
Hint: try tree-shaking unused imports first - Or run
planmode first to produce a richer hypothesis list before switching toloop.
---
Quick Reference
# Start a loop
$codex-autoresearch
<your goal in one sentence>
# Resume interrupted run
$codex-autoresearch
Resume
# Bounded run
$codex-autoresearch
<goal> — Iterations: 25
# Parallel hypotheses
$codex-autoresearch
<goal> — Parallel: 4
# Force a mode
$codex-autoresearch fix
pytest has 8 failures, repair them
# Read-only audit
$codex-autoresearch security
Audit src/api/ for injection vulnerabilitiesRelated skills
How it compares
Pick codex-autoresearch-loop over single-shot codegen skills when Codex must autonomously iterate toward a verifiable metric without constant supervision.
FAQ
What happens if Codex makes a bad change?
The verify command fails; Codex automatically reverts via git revert. Guard command runs after each change; if it fails, Codex reworks the change up to 2 times before reverting. Failed attempts do not block the loop.
How does Codex know what to verify and guard?
Codex scans your repo, interviews you during a confirmation flow (up to 5 rounds), and infers the verify command (measure target metric) and guard command (detect regressions). You can override both inline: 'Verify: <cmd>', 'Guard: <cmd>'.
Can I resume an interrupted run?
Yes. Run '$codex-autoresearch Resume' and Codex re-reads lessons.md, checks git state, re-establishes the baseline, and continues. Session artifacts (lessons.md, results.log, session.json) persist across Codex sessions.
Is Codex Autoresearch Loop safe to install?
skills.sh reports 0 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.