
Iso27001 Compliance
- 92 installs
- 44 repo stars
- Updated May 22, 2026
- bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills
iso27001-compliance is a Claude Code skill for implementing an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System with risk assessment, controls, and certification audit preparation.
About
A Claude skill for implementing an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System. A developer or security lead uses it to define ISMS scope, run asset-based risk assessments, build a risk treatment plan and Statement of Applicability, and prepare for certification audits. It documents the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle and Annex A control mapping.
- Implements an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System
- Provides PDCA cycle, ISMS scope, and asset-based risk assessment methodology
- Includes a risk register, risk matrix, and Statement of Applicability guidance
Iso27001 Compliance by the numbers
- 92 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,040 of 2,203 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
iso27001-compliance capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- security audit
- Works with
- aws · github · jira
- Use cases
- security audit
- Pricing
- Free
What iso27001-compliance says it does
Implement ISO 27001 Information Security Management System. Configure ISMS controls and risk management.
Implement an Information Security Management System (ISMS) aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill iso27001-complianceAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 92 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 44 |
| Last updated | May 22, 2026 |
| Repository | bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills ↗ |
What it does
Establish an ISO 27001 ISMS with risk assessment, controls, and audit preparation.
Who is it for?
Organizations establishing an ISMS or preparing for ISO 27001 certification.
Skip if: Healthcare-specific PHI rules (use hipaa-compliance instead).
When should I use this skill?
Establishing an ISMS, running a risk assessment, or preparing for an ISO 27001 audit.
What you get
An ISO 27001-aligned ISMS with a risk register, Statement of Applicability, and audit readiness.
- Defined ISMS scope
- Asset-based risk assessment and risk register
- Statement of Applicability and risk treatment plan
By the numbers
- Uses a 1-25 risk matrix (likelihood x impact, each 1-5)
- Follows the 4-phase Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle
Files
ISO 27001 Compliance
Implement an Information Security Management System (ISMS) aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
When to Use
- Establishing an ISMS for the first time in an organization
- Preparing for ISO 27001 certification audit
- Conducting risk assessments and developing risk treatment plans
- Creating the Statement of Applicability (SoA)
- Transitioning from ISO 27001:2013 to the 2022 revision
- Meeting customer or regulatory requirements for ISO 27001 certification
ISMS Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle
pdca_cycle:
plan:
- Define ISMS scope and boundaries
- Establish information security policy
- Conduct risk assessment
- Develop risk treatment plan
- Produce Statement of Applicability
- Obtain management approval and commitment
- Define security objectives and metrics
do:
- Implement selected Annex A controls
- Deploy technical security controls
- Conduct security awareness training
- Document all procedures and processes
- Implement incident management process
- Establish supplier security management
check:
- Conduct internal audits (at least annual)
- Perform management review meetings
- Monitor and measure control effectiveness
- Review incident trends and near misses
- Assess compliance with legal requirements
- Evaluate security metrics against objectives
act:
- Address nonconformities with corrective actions
- Implement continual improvement initiatives
- Update risk assessment based on changes
- Refine controls based on audit findings
- Communicate improvements to stakeholdersISMS Scope Definition
isms_scope:
template:
organization: "Company Name, Ltd."
scope_statement: |
The ISMS covers the design, development, operation, and support of
the Company's cloud-based SaaS platform, including all supporting
infrastructure, personnel, and processes at the following locations.
included:
locations:
- "Primary office: 123 Main Street, City, Country"
- "AWS us-east-1 and eu-west-1 regions"
- "Remote workers accessing corporate systems"
business_processes:
- "Software development and deployment"
- "Cloud infrastructure management"
- "Customer data processing and storage"
- "Customer support operations"
- "Corporate IT and internal systems"
information_assets:
- "Customer data (PII, business data)"
- "Source code and intellectual property"
- "Employee personal data"
- "Financial records"
- "Security configurations and credentials"
technology:
- "AWS cloud infrastructure"
- "SaaS application stack"
- "Corporate IT systems (Google Workspace, Okta, Jira)"
- "Development tools (GitHub, CI/CD pipelines)"
excluded:
- "Physical data center operations (inherited from AWS)"
- "Third-party SaaS platforms beyond integration points"
exclusion_justification: "Physical data center controls are inherited from AWS, which maintains its own ISO 27001 certification."
interfaces:
- "Customer API endpoints"
- "Third-party integrations (payment processor, email provider)"
- "AWS management plane"Risk Assessment Process
risk_assessment:
methodology:
approach: "Asset-based risk assessment"
risk_formula: "Risk = Likelihood x Impact"
scale: "1-5 for both likelihood and impact (total 1-25)"
likelihood_scale:
1: "Rare - less than once per 5 years"
2: "Unlikely - once per 2-5 years"
3: "Possible - once per 1-2 years"
4: "Likely - multiple times per year"
5: "Almost Certain - monthly or more frequent"
impact_scale:
1: "Negligible - minimal operational impact, no data loss"
2: "Minor - limited impact, small data exposure, <$10K cost"
3: "Moderate - significant impact, data breach <1K records, <$100K cost"
4: "Major - severe impact, large data breach, <$1M cost, regulatory action"
5: "Critical - catastrophic, massive breach, >$1M cost, business viability at risk"
risk_matrix:
# Impact: 1 2 3 4 5
likelihood_5: [5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
likelihood_4: [4, 8, 12, 16, 20]
likelihood_3: [3, 6, 9, 12, 15]
likelihood_2: [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
likelihood_1: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
risk_appetite:
accept: "Score 1-4 (low risk, accept with monitoring)"
mitigate: "Score 5-14 (medium risk, implement controls to reduce)"
escalate: "Score 15-25 (high/critical risk, immediate action required)"
treatment_options:
mitigate: "Implement controls to reduce likelihood or impact"
transfer: "Insurance or contractual transfer to third party"
avoid: "Eliminate the risk by removing the activity or asset"
accept: "Accept with documented management approval"
example_risk_register:
- id: "RISK-001"
asset: "Customer database"
threat: "SQL injection attack"
vulnerability: "Insufficient input validation"
likelihood: 3
impact: 4
inherent_risk: 12
treatment: "mitigate"
controls: ["A.8.28 Secure coding", "A.8.8 Vulnerability management"]
residual_likelihood: 1
residual_impact: 4
residual_risk: 4
risk_owner: "CTO"
- id: "RISK-002"
asset: "Source code repository"
threat: "Insider theft of intellectual property"
vulnerability: "Excessive access permissions"
likelihood: 2
impact: 5
inherent_risk: 10
treatment: "mitigate"
controls: ["A.5.15 Access control", "A.8.3 Information access restriction"]
residual_likelihood: 1
residual_impact: 5
residual_risk: 5
risk_owner: "VP Engineering"
- id: "RISK-003"
asset: "Cloud infrastructure"
threat: "Cloud provider outage"
vulnerability: "Single-region deployment"
likelihood: 3
impact: 3
inherent_risk: 9
treatment: "mitigate"
controls: ["A.5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity", "A.8.14 Redundancy"]
residual_likelihood: 3
residual_impact: 2
residual_risk: 6
risk_owner: "Head of Infrastructure"Statement of Applicability (SoA)
# ISO 27001:2022 Annex A Controls - Statement of Applicability
soa_template:
organizational_controls_5:
"A.5.1":
control: "Policies for information security"
applicable: true
justification: "Required to establish security governance"
implementation: "Information security policy approved by CEO, reviewed annually"
"A.5.2":
control: "Information security roles and responsibilities"
applicable: true
justification: "Required for accountability"
implementation: "RACI matrix for security responsibilities, CISO appointed"
"A.5.7":
control: "Threat intelligence"
applicable: true
justification: "Required for proactive threat management"
implementation: "Subscribe to threat feeds, CVE monitoring, vendor advisories"
"A.5.15":
control: "Access control"
applicable: true
justification: "Required for data protection"
implementation: "RBAC via Okta, least-privilege IAM policies, quarterly access reviews"
"A.5.23":
control: "Information security for use of cloud services"
applicable: true
justification: "Primary infrastructure is cloud-based"
implementation: "AWS security baseline, CSP shared responsibility documented"
"A.5.29":
control: "Information security during disruption"
applicable: true
justification: "Business continuity requirement"
implementation: "BCP/DR plans tested annually, multi-AZ deployment"
"A.5.30":
control: "ICT readiness for business continuity"
applicable: true
justification: "Ensure technology supports continuity"
implementation: "DR runbooks, RTO/RPO defined, failover tested quarterly"
people_controls_6:
"A.6.1":
control: "Screening"
applicable: true
implementation: "Background checks for all employees before hiring"
"A.6.3":
control: "Information security awareness, education and training"
applicable: true
implementation: "Annual security training, phishing simulations quarterly"
"A.6.5":
control: "Responsibilities after termination or change of employment"
applicable: true
implementation: "Offboarding checklist, access revoked within 24 hours"
physical_controls_7:
"A.7.1":
control: "Physical security perimeters"
applicable: false
exclusion_justification: "No company-operated data centers, inherited from AWS"
technology_controls_8:
"A.8.1":
control: "User endpoint devices"
applicable: true
implementation: "MDM enrollment, disk encryption, screen lock policy"
"A.8.5":
control: "Secure authentication"
applicable: true
implementation: "MFA required for all systems, SSO via Okta"
"A.8.8":
control: "Management of technical vulnerabilities"
applicable: true
implementation: "Weekly vulnerability scans, 30-day patch SLA for critical"
"A.8.9":
control: "Configuration management"
applicable: true
implementation: "Infrastructure as code, AWS Config rules, baseline hardening"
"A.8.15":
control: "Logging"
applicable: true
implementation: "Centralized logging via CloudWatch + SIEM, 12-month retention"
"A.8.16":
control: "Monitoring activities"
applicable: true
implementation: "SIEM alerting, 24/7 on-call rotation, anomaly detection"
"A.8.24":
control: "Use of cryptography"
applicable: true
implementation: "TLS 1.2+, AES-256 at rest, KMS key management"
"A.8.25":
control: "Secure development lifecycle"
applicable: true
implementation: "SAST/DAST in CI, code review required, dependency scanning"
"A.8.28":
control: "Secure coding"
applicable: true
implementation: "OWASP guidelines, security code review, automated linting"Internal Audit Program
internal_audit:
schedule:
frequency: "Annual full cycle, quarterly focused audits"
cycle: "All ISMS clauses and applicable Annex A controls audited over 12 months"
audit_plan_template:
audit_id: "IA-2025-Q1"
scope: "Clauses 4-10, Annex A controls A.5.1-A.5.15"
auditor: "Internal auditor (independent of audited area)"
audit_dates: "2025-03-10 to 2025-03-14"
areas:
- area: "Access Control (A.5.15)"
auditee: "IT Security Team"
evidence_requested:
- "Access review records from last quarter"
- "Joiner/mover/leaver process records"
- "Privileged access management logs"
- area: "Risk Management (Clause 6.1)"
auditee: "Risk Management Team"
evidence_requested:
- "Current risk register"
- "Risk assessment methodology document"
- "Management risk review meeting minutes"
finding_categories:
major_nonconformity: "Requirement not met, significant risk to ISMS effectiveness"
minor_nonconformity: "Requirement partially met, limited risk"
observation: "Area for improvement, no requirement breach"
positive_finding: "Notably effective implementation"
corrective_action:
major: "Root cause analysis within 10 days, corrective action within 30 days"
minor: "Corrective action within 60 days"
observation: "Address in next ISMS review cycle"
verification: "Auditor verifies corrective action effectiveness"Management Review Meeting
management_review:
frequency: "At least annually, recommended quarterly"
attendees:
required:
- "CEO or Managing Director"
- "CISO or Information Security Manager"
- "Department heads"
optional:
- "Internal auditor"
- "Risk manager"
- "External consultant"
mandatory_inputs:
- "Status of actions from previous management reviews"
- "Changes in external and internal issues relevant to the ISMS"
- "Information security performance (metrics and KPIs)"
- "Audit results (internal and external)"
- "Incident trends and nonconformities"
- "Risk assessment results and risk treatment plan status"
- "Interested party feedback"
- "Opportunities for continual improvement"
mandatory_outputs:
- "Decisions on continual improvement opportunities"
- "Decisions on changes needed to the ISMS"
- "Resource allocation decisions"
- "Updated risk acceptance decisions"
kpis_to_report:
- "Number and severity of security incidents"
- "Vulnerability remediation SLA compliance"
- "Security awareness training completion rate"
- "Access review completion rate"
- "Audit finding closure rate"
- "Risk treatment plan progress"
- "Patch compliance percentage"ISO 27001 Certification Checklist
certification_checklist:
stage_1_audit_preparation:
- [ ] ISMS scope documented and approved
- [ ] Information security policy published
- [ ] Risk assessment methodology defined
- [ ] Risk assessment completed with risk register
- [ ] Risk treatment plan developed
- [ ] Statement of Applicability completed
- [ ] ISMS objectives defined with measurable targets
- [ ] Internal audit program established
- [ ] At least one full internal audit completed
- [ ] Management review conducted with minutes documented
- [ ] Document control process in place
stage_2_audit_preparation:
- [ ] All Annex A controls implemented per SoA
- [ ] Evidence of control operation for 3+ months
- [ ] Corrective actions from internal audit tracked and closed
- [ ] Security awareness training delivered and recorded
- [ ] Incident management process operational with records
- [ ] Supplier security assessments performed
- [ ] Business continuity plan tested
- [ ] All mandatory documented information available
- [ ] Employees aware of security policy and their responsibilities
surveillance_audit_readiness:
- [ ] All corrective actions from certification audit closed
- [ ] Continuous internal audit schedule maintained
- [ ] Management reviews conducted per schedule
- [ ] Risk register updated with new threats and changes
- [ ] Metrics demonstrate ISMS effectiveness
- [ ] Changes to ISMS scope documentedBest Practices
- Secure visible management commitment with a signed information security policy
- Define ISMS scope carefully; too broad makes certification expensive, too narrow reduces value
- Use an asset-based risk assessment approach to ensure comprehensive coverage
- Maintain the Statement of Applicability as a living document aligned with the risk register
- Conduct internal audits with auditors independent of the area being audited
- Hold management review meetings quarterly rather than only annually
- Integrate ISO 27001 controls into daily operations rather than treating them as a separate compliance exercise
- Use metrics and KPIs to demonstrate ISMS effectiveness to auditors and management
- Plan for the 3-year certification cycle: certification audit, then two surveillance audits
- Start collecting evidence of control operation at least 3 months before the Stage 2 audit
Related skills
FAQ
Which ISO 27001 revision does it target?
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, including transition guidance from the 2013 revision.
What risk methodology does it use?
An asset-based risk assessment with Risk = Likelihood x Impact on a 1-25 scale.