
Rag Observability Evals
- 77 installs
- 44 repo stars
- Updated May 22, 2026
- bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills
RAG Observability and Evaluations is a Claude Code skill that measures RAG quality with retrieval metrics, groundedness checks, hallucination detection, and regression testing.
About
This skill monitors and evaluates RAG systems as measurable production services. A developer uses it to run RAGAS metrics, score answer groundedness, detect hallucinations, and compute retrieval metrics like Recall@k and MRR. It supports continuous regression testing and quality gates for RAG pipeline changes.
- RAGAS metrics: faithfulness, answer relevancy, context precision/recall
- Groundedness scoring and hallucination detection with an LLM judge
- Retrieval metrics (Recall@k, MRR) and regression testing for quality gates
Rag Observability Evals by the numbers
- 77 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #5,358 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
rag-observability-evals capabilities & compatibility
Groundedness scoring calls the OpenAI API (gpt-4o), so an OpenAI key is required.
- Capabilities
- testing · research · data analysis
- Works with
- openai · grafana
- Use cases
- testing · data analysis · research
- Pricing
- Bring your own API key
What rag-observability-evals says it does
Run retrieval-augmented generation like a measurable production system, not a black box.
Debugging hallucination or relevance regressions
Establishing quality gates for RAG pipeline changes
npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill rag-observability-evalsAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 77 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 44 |
| Last updated | May 22, 2026 |
| Repository | bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills ↗ |
What it does
Measure and monitor a production RAG system with retrieval quality, groundedness, and hallucination metrics.
Who is it for?
Teams running a RAG system in production who need quality monitoring and eval gates.
Skip if: Building the initial RAG ingestion and retrieval infrastructure.
When should I use this skill?
You need to measure retrieval quality, groundedness, or hallucination rate of a RAG system.
What you get
RAG quality is continuously measured with retrieval and groundedness metrics and regression gates.
- RAGAS evaluation script
- Groundedness scorer
- Retrieval-metrics module
By the numbers
- 6 RAGAS metrics in the sample evaluation suite
- measures p50/p95 latency split by retrieval vs generation
Files
RAG Observability and Evaluations
Run retrieval-augmented generation like a measurable production system, not a black box.
When to Use This Skill
- Deploying a RAG system to production and need quality monitoring
- Setting up automated evaluation pipelines for retrieval and generation
- Debugging hallucination or relevance regressions
- Building dashboards for RAG-specific golden signals
- Establishing quality gates for RAG pipeline changes
Prerequisites
- RAG pipeline with instrumented retrieval and generation stages
- Python 3.10+ with evaluation libraries (ragas, langchain, openai)
- Prometheus endpoint for custom metrics export
- Benchmark dataset with gold-standard question/answer/source triples
- OpenTelemetry SDK integrated into the RAG service
What to Measure
Retrieval Quality
- Recall@k and MRR for top-k chunks
- Citation coverage and source freshness
- Embedding drift and index staleness
Generation Quality
- Groundedness score (answer supported by retrieved context)
- Hallucination rate by route/use case
- Instruction adherence and format validity
Reliability and Cost
- p50/p95 latency split by retrieval vs generation
- Token usage per stage
- Cache hit rate and cost per successful answer
RAGAS Evaluation Script
# rag_eval.py
"""Evaluate RAG pipeline quality using RAGAS metrics."""
from ragas import evaluate
from ragas.metrics import (
faithfulness,
answer_relevancy,
context_precision,
context_recall,
context_entity_recall,
answer_similarity,
)
from datasets import Dataset
import json
import sys
def load_eval_dataset(path: str) -> Dataset:
"""Load evaluation dataset with required columns."""
with open(path) as f:
data = json.load(f)
return Dataset.from_dict({
"question": [d["question"] for d in data],
"answer": [d["generated_answer"] for d in data],
"contexts": [d["retrieved_contexts"] for d in data],
"ground_truth": [d["reference_answer"] for d in data],
})
def run_evaluation(dataset_path: str, output_path: str):
"""Run full RAGAS evaluation suite."""
dataset = load_eval_dataset(dataset_path)
metrics = [
faithfulness,
answer_relevancy,
context_precision,
context_recall,
context_entity_recall,
answer_similarity,
]
results = evaluate(dataset, metrics=metrics)
# Print summary
print("=== RAG Evaluation Results ===")
for metric_name, score in results.items():
print(f" {metric_name}: {score:.4f}")
# Save detailed results
with open(output_path, "w") as f:
json.dump({
"summary": {k: float(v) for k, v in results.items()},
"dataset_size": len(dataset),
}, f, indent=2)
return results
if __name__ == "__main__":
run_evaluation(sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2])Groundedness Scoring
# groundedness.py
"""Score whether generated answers are grounded in retrieved context."""
from openai import OpenAI
import json
from typing import List
client = OpenAI()
GROUNDEDNESS_PROMPT = """You are evaluating whether an AI answer is fully grounded
in the provided context documents. Score each claim in the answer.
Context documents:
{contexts}
Answer to evaluate:
{answer}
For each distinct claim in the answer, determine:
1. SUPPORTED - the claim is directly supported by the context
2. PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED - the claim is partially supported
3. NOT_SUPPORTED - the claim has no support in the context
Return JSON:
{{
"claims": [
{{"claim": "...", "verdict": "SUPPORTED|PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED|NOT_SUPPORTED", "evidence": "..."}}
],
"groundedness_score": <float 0-1>,
"unsupported_claims": ["..."]
}}
"""
def score_groundedness(answer: str, contexts: List[str]) -> dict:
"""Score groundedness of a single answer against its contexts."""
context_text = "\n---\n".join(
f"[Document {i+1}]: {c}" for i, c in enumerate(contexts)
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": GROUNDEDNESS_PROMPT.format(
contexts=context_text, answer=answer
),
}],
response_format={"type": "json_object"},
temperature=0,
)
return json.loads(response.choices[0].message.content)
def batch_groundedness(eval_data: list) -> dict:
"""Score groundedness for a batch of QA pairs."""
scores = []
unsupported_count = 0
total_claims = 0
for item in eval_data:
result = score_groundedness(
item["generated_answer"],
item["retrieved_contexts"],
)
scores.append(result["groundedness_score"])
unsupported_count += len(result["unsupported_claims"])
total_claims += len(result["claims"])
avg_score = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0
return {
"average_groundedness": avg_score,
"total_claims": total_claims,
"unsupported_claims": unsupported_count,
"unsupported_rate": unsupported_count / total_claims if total_claims else 0,
"sample_count": len(eval_data),
}Retrieval Quality Metrics
# retrieval_metrics.py
"""Compute retrieval quality metrics for RAG evaluation."""
from typing import List, Set
import numpy as np
def recall_at_k(
retrieved_ids: List[str],
relevant_ids: Set[str],
k: int
) -> float:
"""Compute Recall@K for a single query."""
top_k = set(retrieved_ids[:k])
if not relevant_ids:
return 0.0
return len(top_k & relevant_ids) / len(relevant_ids)
def mrr(
retrieved_ids: List[str],
relevant_ids: Set[str]
) -> float:
"""Compute Mean Reciprocal Rank for a single query."""
for i, doc_id in enumerate(retrieved_ids):
if doc_id in relevant_ids:
return 1.0 / (i + 1)
return 0.0
def ndcg_at_k(
retrieved_ids: List[str],
relevant_ids: Set[str],
k: int
) -> float:
"""Compute NDCG@K for a single query."""
dcg = 0.0
for i, doc_id in enumerate(retrieved_ids[:k]):
if doc_id in relevant_ids:
dcg += 1.0 / np.log2(i + 2)
ideal_dcg = sum(1.0 / np.log2(i + 2) for i in range(min(len(relevant_ids), k)))
return dcg / ideal_dcg if ideal_dcg > 0 else 0.0
def compute_retrieval_metrics(
queries: list,
k_values: list = [1, 3, 5, 10]
) -> dict:
"""Compute aggregate retrieval metrics across all queries."""
results = {}
for k in k_values:
recalls = [
recall_at_k(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"]), k)
for q in queries
]
mrrs = [mrr(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"])) for q in queries]
ndcgs = [
ndcg_at_k(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"]), k)
for q in queries
]
results[f"recall@{k}"] = np.mean(recalls)
results[f"ndcg@{k}"] = np.mean(ndcgs)
results["mrr"] = np.mean(mrrs)
return resultsPrometheus Metrics Export
# rag_metrics_exporter.py
"""Export RAG quality metrics to Prometheus."""
from prometheus_client import Histogram, Counter, Gauge, start_http_server
import time
# Latency histograms by stage
RETRIEVAL_LATENCY = Histogram(
"rag_retrieval_duration_seconds",
"Time spent in retrieval stage",
["index_name", "retriever_type"],
buckets=[0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0],
)
GENERATION_LATENCY = Histogram(
"rag_generation_duration_seconds",
"Time spent in generation stage",
["model", "route"],
buckets=[0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, 30.0],
)
RERANKING_LATENCY = Histogram(
"rag_reranking_duration_seconds",
"Time spent in reranking stage",
["reranker_model"],
buckets=[0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0],
)
# Quality gauges (updated from offline evals)
GROUNDEDNESS_SCORE = Gauge(
"rag_groundedness_score",
"Latest groundedness evaluation score",
["route", "model"],
)
FAITHFULNESS_SCORE = Gauge(
"rag_faithfulness_score",
"Latest faithfulness evaluation score",
["route", "model"],
)
CONTEXT_PRECISION = Gauge(
"rag_context_precision_score",
"Latest context precision score",
["route", "index_name"],
)
RECALL_AT_K = Gauge(
"rag_recall_at_k",
"Recall@K for retrieval",
["k", "index_name"],
)
# Operational counters
REQUESTS_TOTAL = Counter(
"rag_requests_total",
"Total RAG requests",
["route", "status"],
)
HALLUCINATION_DETECTED = Counter(
"rag_hallucination_detected_total",
"Detected hallucinations",
["route", "severity"],
)
FALLBACK_TRIGGERED = Counter(
"rag_fallback_triggered_total",
"Times RAG fell back to abstain/default",
["route", "reason"],
)
TOKENS_USED = Counter(
"rag_tokens_used_total",
"Tokens consumed by stage",
["stage", "model"],
)
CACHE_HITS = Counter(
"rag_cache_hits_total",
"Semantic cache hits",
["cache_type"],
)
# Index health
INDEX_STALENESS_SECONDS = Gauge(
"rag_index_staleness_seconds",
"Seconds since last index update",
["index_name"],
)
INDEX_DOCUMENT_COUNT = Gauge(
"rag_index_document_count",
"Number of documents in index",
["index_name"],
)
def start_metrics_server(port: int = 9090):
"""Start Prometheus metrics HTTP server."""
start_http_server(port)
print(f"RAG metrics server running on :{port}/metrics")Evaluation Pipeline
1. Curate a benchmark set with gold answers and source docs. 2. Run nightly offline evals for every retriever/model configuration. 3. Execute online shadow evals on sampled production traffic. 4. Gate releases on minimum quality + safety + latency thresholds.
# eval-pipeline-cron.yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: CronJob
metadata:
name: rag-nightly-eval
namespace: ai-evals
spec:
schedule: "0 2 * * *"
jobTemplate:
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: eval-runner
image: registry.internal/rag-eval:latest
command:
- python
- -m
- rag_eval
- --dataset=/data/benchmark_v3.json
- --output=/results/nightly-$(date +%Y%m%d).json
- --push-metrics
- --fail-on-regression
env:
- name: PROMETHEUS_PUSHGATEWAY
value: "http://pushgateway:9091"
- name: MLFLOW_TRACKING_URI
value: "http://mlflow:5000"
volumeMounts:
- name: eval-data
mountPath: /data
- name: results
mountPath: /results
volumes:
- name: eval-data
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: eval-benchmark-data
- name: results
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: eval-results
restartPolicy: OnFailureAlerting Strategy
# rag-alerts.yaml
groups:
- name: rag-quality-alerts
rules:
- alert: GroundednessDropped
expr: rag_groundedness_score < 0.75
for: 10m
labels:
severity: sev2
annotations:
summary: "Groundedness score dropped below 0.75 for {{ $labels.route }}"
- alert: HallucinationSpike
expr: |
rate(rag_hallucination_detected_total[15m])
/ rate(rag_requests_total[15m]) > 0.10
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev1
- alert: IndexStale
expr: rag_index_staleness_seconds > 86400
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev3
annotations:
summary: "Index {{ $labels.index_name }} not updated in 24h"
- alert: HighFallbackRate
expr: |
rate(rag_fallback_triggered_total[10m])
/ rate(rag_requests_total[10m]) > 0.20
for: 10m
labels:
severity: sev2
- alert: RetrievalLatencyHigh
expr: |
histogram_quantile(0.95,
rate(rag_retrieval_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])
) > 2.0
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev2Practical Guardrails
- Force citations for high-risk domains.
- Return abstain/fallback when confidence is below threshold.
- Re-rank retrieved chunks before final generation.
- Use query rewriting only with strict regression tests.
Incident Triage Checklist
| Symptom | Check First | Check Second |
|---|---|---|
| Groundedness dropped | Embedding model change? | Chunking/indexing logic change? |
| Retrieval returning irrelevant docs | Index freshness and document count | Embedding model version mismatch |
| Latency spike in retrieval | Vector DB connection pool and load | Index size growth beyond threshold |
| Cost per answer increasing | Token usage per stage breakdown | Cache hit rate decline |
| Hallucination spike | Model version or temperature change | Context window overflow (truncated docs) |
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Diagnosis | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| RAGAS eval returns 0 for all metrics | Check dataset format matches expected schema | Ensure contexts are lists, not strings |
| Groundedness score unreliable | LLM judge inconsistency | Increase judge sample size, set temperature=0 |
| Index staleness alert firing | Ingestion pipeline failure | Check data source connectivity and ingestion logs |
| Retrieval recall dropping | Embedding drift after model update | Re-index corpus with current embedding model |
| High latency in generation | Context too large for model | Reduce top-k or add summarization step |
Related Skills
- rag-infrastructure - Deploy robust RAG backends
- agent-observability - Instrument requests, traces, and costs
- agent-evals - Build repeatable eval suites
- ai-sre-incident-response - Incident response for quality regressions
- opentelemetry - Distributed tracing for RAG pipelines
Related skills
FAQ
Which RAGAS metrics does it run?
Faithfulness, answer relevancy, context precision, context recall, context entity recall, and answer similarity.
How does it detect hallucinations?
It uses an LLM-judge groundedness prompt that classifies each claim as supported, partially supported, or not supported.