Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
bitwarden avatar

Analyzing Git Sessions

  • 74 installs
  • 129 repo stars
  • Updated August 4, 2026
  • bitwarden/ai-plugins

Analyzing Git Sessions is a Claude skill that summarizes git commits, file changes, and statistics within a timeframe or commit range for review, retrospectives, or documentation.

About

This skill analyzes git commits and changes within a timeframe or commit range and produces a structured summary. It extracts commit history, generates insertion/deletion statistics, categorizes new and deleted files, and optionally shows selective diffs at Concise, Detailed, or Code Review depth. A developer uses it for code review prep, retrospectives, work logs, or session documentation.

  • Summarizes commits, file changes, and stats for a timeframe or commit range
  • Three output depths: Concise, Detailed, and Code Review format
  • Context-budget protection limits diffs on large sessions

Analyzing Git Sessions by the numbers

  • 74 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #260 of 733 Git & Pull Requests skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

analyzing-git-sessions capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
git analysis · code review
Works with
github
Use cases
code review · documentation
From the docs

What analyzing-git-sessions says it does

Generate structured analysis of git activity for specified timeframe or commit range, including commit history, file changes, statistics, and optional diffs.
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill analyzing-git-sessions

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs74
repo stars129
Last updatedAugust 4, 2026
Repositorybitwarden/ai-plugins

What it does

Generate a structured summary of git commits and diffs over a timeframe or commit range.

Who is it for?

Developers who want a structured summary of what changed across a set of commits for review or a work log.

Skip if: Deep line-by-line security review or per-comment PR feedback.

When should I use this skill?

You want a structured summary of git activity over a timeframe or commit range for review or retrospective.

What you get

A structured summary of commits, stats, key files, and optional selective diffs is produced at the chosen depth.

  • Structured git session summary
  • Commit list with statistics and selective diffs

By the numbers

  • 3 output depths (Concise, Detailed, Code Review)
  • Limits to top 10 files by default

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Analyzing Git Sessions

Core Responsibility

Generate structured analysis of git activity for specified timeframe or commit range, including commit history, file changes, statistics, and optional diffs.

Inputs

Accept from user:

  • Time range: "last 2 hours", "since 10am", "today", "since 2025-10-23 14:00"
  • Commit range: "abc123..def456", "HEAD~5..HEAD", "feature-branch..main"
  • Optional filters: Specific paths, authors, or file types
  • Output depth: Concise (default), Detailed, or Code Review format

Working Process

Step 1: Parse and Validate Input

1. Determine range type:

  • Time-based: Parse relative or absolute time
  • Commit-based: Validate commit references exist
  • Branch-based: Resolve branch names to commits

2. Validate git repository:

   git rev-parse --git-dir

3. Check range has commits:

   git log <range> --oneline | head -1

If empty, inform user and exit.

Step 2: Extract Commit History

# Get all commits in range
git log <range> --oneline --no-decorate

# Get detailed commit info
git log <range> --format="%h|%an|%ar|%s" --no-decorate

# Count commits
git log <range> --oneline | wc -l

Store commit data for summary.

Step 3: Generate Statistics

Overall change statistics:

# Summary stats (insertions/deletions by file)
git diff <start>..<end> --stat

# Numeric stats for parsing
git diff <start>..<end> --numstat

# Count total changes
git diff <start>..<end> --shortstat

Author breakdown (if multiple authors):

git shortlog <start>..<end> -sn

File categorization:

  • Identify new files (show in status "A")
  • Identify deleted files (show in status "D")
  • Identify renamed files (show in status "R")
  • Modified files with change magnitude

Step 4: Identify Key Files for Detailed Analysis

Prioritization rules:

1. Large changes (>100 lines modified): Always include 2. New files: Include (especially if >50 lines) 3. Deleted files: Note but don't diff 4. Architecture files: build.gradle.kts, AndroidManifest.xml, module configs 5. Test files: Flag separately for test coverage assessment

Extract key file list:

# Files changed with line counts
git diff <start>..<end> --numstat | sort -rn -k1 -k2

Limit to top 10 files by default to avoid context overflow.

Step 5: Generate Selective Diffs (Based on Depth)

Concise mode: No diffs, stats only

Detailed mode: Diffs for top 3-5 key files

git diff <start>..<end> -- path/to/key/file.kt

Code Review mode: Diffs for all modified files, grouped by module

# Group by directory
git diff <start>..<end> --name-only | cut -d'/' -f1-2 | sort -u

# Generate diffs per module
for module in modules; do
  git diff <start>..<end> -- $module/
done

Context overflow protection:

  • If >10 files changed significantly, limit to top 5 diffs
  • Warn user: "Showing top 5 files by change size. Request specific files for full diffs."

Step 6: Present Structured Summary

Format based on depth:

Concise Summary
## Git Session Summary

**Range**: <start-commit> to <end-commit> (<timeframe>)
**Commits**: X commits by Y author(s)
**Files Changed**: A modified, B added, C deleted
**Net Changes**: +X -Y lines

### Commits

- abc123 Commit message 1
- def456 Commit message 2
  ...

### Top Files Changed

1. path/to/file1.kt (+50 -20)
2. path/to/file2.kt (+30 -15)
   ...
Detailed Summary

Includes:

  • Full commit list with authors and timestamps
  • Complete file list with change stats
  • Author breakdown
  • Top 3-5 diffs for review
Code Review Format
## Code Review Summary

### Overview

- **PR Title**: [Suggested from commit messages]
- **Changes**: X files across Y modules
- **Scope**: [Inferred from changed files]

### Commits

[Formatted commit list suitable for PR description]

### Changes by Module

**Module: app**

- file1.kt: Description of changes
- file2.kt: Description of changes

**Module: core**
...

### Key Changes

[Diffs for significant modifications]

### Test Coverage

- Test files modified: X
- New tests added: ~Y

Output Guidelines

Commit Messages

  • Show short hash (7 chars)
  • Show first line of commit message only
  • Truncate long messages to 80 chars
  • Group by author if multiple contributors

File Paths

  • Use relative paths from repo root
  • Format as code: path/to/file.kt
  • Include line change magnitude: (+X -Y)
  • Highlight file type (source, test, config)

Statistics

Present in clear tables:

| Metric        | Count |
| ------------- | ----- |
| Commits       | 15    |
| Files Changed | 23    |
| Insertions    | +450  |
| Deletions     | -180  |

Diffs

  • Include file path as header: ### path/to/file.kt
  • Use code blocks with syntax highlighting
  • Show context lines (git default: 3 lines before/after)
  • Truncate very large diffs (>200 lines) with summary

Context Budget Management

Monitor diff sizes:

  • Small session (<10 files, <500 lines): Safe for detailed mode
  • Medium session (10-30 files, 500-2000 lines): Use selective diffs
  • Large session (>30 files, >2000 lines): Concise mode with warnings

Progressive disclosure:

1. Always start with concise summary 2. Ask user: "Would you like detailed diffs for specific files?" 3. Generate diffs on demand rather than upfront

Fallback for large sessions: "This session modified 45 files with 5000+ line changes. Showing concise summary. Request specific files or modules for detailed diffs."

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Don't:

  • Generate diffs for all files in large sessions (context overflow)
  • Include full diffs without asking (waste context on unneeded details)
  • Ignore file types (treat test changes same as source changes)
  • Lose context on what user wants to know
  • Use generic summaries ("modified 10 files") without specifics

Do:

  • Ask user what level of detail they need
  • Prioritize key files by change magnitude
  • Categorize files (source, test, config, docs)
  • Provide actionable summaries
  • Offer to drill down on specific files

Success Criteria

A good git session analysis should:

1. Inform: User understands scope of changes at a glance 2. Focus: Highlights most significant changes first 3. Actionable: Provides paths and diffs for deeper review 4. Efficient: Doesn't waste context on unnecessary details 5. Adaptable: Adjusts depth based on session size and user needs

Example Outputs

See contexts/example-outputs.md for detailed examples of concise summaries and code review formats.

Related skills

FAQ

What ranges can it analyze?

Time ranges like 'last 2 hours', commit ranges like HEAD~5..HEAD, or branch comparisons.

How does it avoid context overflow on large sessions?

It limits to the top files by change size and switches to concise mode with warnings for large sessions.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.