
Senior Cloud Architect
- 88 installs
- 451 repo stars
- Updated July 21, 2026
- borghei/claude-skills
Senior Cloud Architect is a Claude skill for designing and auditing production cloud architecture across AWS, GCP and Azure, covering Terraform topologies, cost optimization, disaster recovery and security posture.
About
Senior Cloud Architect designs and reviews cloud infrastructure across AWS, GCP and Azure. It produces production-grade Terraform topologies (VPC, multi-AZ ECS/EKS, RDS, layered security), maps equivalent services across clouds, and drives cost optimization, disaster-recovery planning against RTO/RPO targets, and CIS-benchmark security audits. Developers and architects use it when designing a new cloud architecture or migration, reducing cloud spend, planning failover, or auditing security posture. It also runs Well-Architected reviews across the six pillars.
- Designs production AWS/GCP/Azure topologies with Terraform (VPC, ECS/EKS, RDS, security layers)
- Covers cost optimization, disaster recovery against RTO/RPO, and CIS security-posture audits
- Maps equivalent compute, serverless, storage and database services across the three clouds
Senior Cloud Architect by the numbers
- 88 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #594 of 1,039 Cloud & Infrastructure skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
senior-cloud-architect capabilities & compatibility
Free; provides architecture and Terraform guidance, you supply your own cloud accounts.
- Capabilities
- runbook generator
- Works with
- aws · gcp · azure · terraform
- Use cases
- devops · security audit
- Pricing
- Free
What senior-cloud-architect says it does
Expert cloud architecture and infrastructure design across AWS, GCP, and Azure — production-grade VPC/compute/database topologies, cost optimization, disaster recovery, and security posture auditing.
Disaster recovery** — Backup/Pilot Light/Warm Standby/Multi-Site strategy selection against RTO/RPO, cross-region replication, Route 53 failover.
Security posture** — CIS benchmark audits, network segmentation, least-privilege IAM with conditions, encryption at rest and in transit.
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill senior-cloud-architectAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 88 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 451 |
| Last updated | July 21, 2026 |
| Repository | borghei/claude-skills ↗ |
What it does
Design and audit production AWS/GCP/Azure architecture with Terraform, cost, DR and CIS security posture.
Who is it for?
Designing a new production cloud architecture or migration, cutting cloud spend, planning DR, or auditing security against CIS benchmarks.
Skip if: App-level code architecture, Kubernetes cluster internals, CI/CD pipeline design, or compliance frameworks beyond CIS.
When should I use this skill?
You are designing a cloud architecture or migration, planning DR/failover, optimizing cost, or auditing cloud security posture.
What you get
Terraform-backed architecture with service comparisons, DR strategy against RTO/RPO, cost right-sizing and CIS-benchmark security remediation.
- Terraform VPC/compute/database topology
- Multi-cloud service comparison
- DR strategy
By the numbers
- 3 clouds covered (AWS, GCP, Azure)
- 4 DR strategies (Backup, Pilot Light, Warm Standby, Multi-Site)
- Well-Architected review across 6 pillars
Files
Senior Cloud Architect
Expert cloud architecture and infrastructure design across AWS, GCP, and Azure — production-grade VPC/compute/database topologies, cost optimization, disaster recovery, and security posture auditing.
Keywords
cloud, aws, gcp, azure, terraform, infrastructure, vpc, eks, ecs, lambda, cost-optimization, disaster-recovery, multi-region, iam, security, migration
Core Capabilities
- Production architecture design — Terraform VPC, multi-AZ ECS/EKS behind ALB, RDS Multi-AZ, ElastiCache, layered WAF/NACL/SG security.
- Multi-cloud comparison — map equivalent compute, serverless, storage, database, ML, and CDN services across AWS, GCP, and Azure.
- Cost optimization — right-sizing, Reserved Instances/Savings Plans/Spot selection, cost-allocation tagging, budget alerting.
- Disaster recovery — Backup/Pilot Light/Warm Standby/Multi-Site strategy selection against RTO/RPO, cross-region replication, Route 53 failover.
- Security posture — CIS benchmark audits, network segmentation, least-privilege IAM with conditions, encryption at rest and in transit.
- Well-Architected reviews — checklist across all six pillars (operational excellence, security, reliability, performance, cost, sustainability).
When to Use
- Designing a new production cloud architecture or migration.
- Reducing cloud spend or planning reserved capacity.
- Planning or testing disaster recovery and failover.
- Auditing security posture against CIS benchmarks.
- Comparing AWS / GCP / Azure for a workload.
Clarify First
Before designing the architecture, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
- [ ] Target cloud(s) — AWS / GCP / Azure or multi-cloud (every topology, service mapping, and Terraform differs)
- [ ] Workload profile & scale — traffic, statefulness, and compute type (drives the VPC / compute / database topology and sizing)
- [ ] RTO/RPO targets — recovery objectives (selects Backup / Pilot Light / Warm Standby / Multi-Site DR)
- [ ] Budget / cost constraint — the spend ceiling (drives right-sizing and Reserved vs Savings Plan vs Spot)
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
References
Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:
- [references/cloud-architecture-playbooks.md](references/cloud-architecture-playbooks.md) — quick-start commands, the cloud platform comparison matrix, the four end-to-end workflows (AWS architecture, cost optimization, DR planning, security audit) with Terraform/IAM/cost code, and the AWS Well-Architected checklist. Read when designing, optimizing, or auditing an architecture.
- [references/cloud-operations.md](references/cloud-operations.md) — troubleshooting table (latency, state locks, failover, IAM, cost spikes, peering, replication) and the architecture success criteria. Read when diagnosing an issue or defining the quality bar.
Scope & Limitations
This skill covers:
- Multi-cloud architecture design and comparison across AWS, GCP, and Azure
- Infrastructure-as-Code with Terraform including VPC, compute, database, and networking
- Disaster recovery planning, cross-region replication, and failover strategies
- Cloud cost optimization, right-sizing, and reserved capacity planning
This skill does NOT cover:
- Application-level code architecture or microservice design patterns (see
senior-architect) - Kubernetes cluster internals, pod scheduling, or service mesh configuration (see
senior-devops) - Security compliance frameworks beyond CIS benchmarks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, or GDPR (see
ra-qm-team/compliance skills) - CI/CD pipeline design, build automation, or deployment workflows (see
senior-devops)
Integration Points
| Skill | Integration | Data Flow |
|---|---|---|
senior-devops | Infrastructure provisioning feeds into CI/CD deployment pipelines | Terraform outputs (endpoints, ARNs) → deployment configs |
senior-secops | Security audit findings inform cloud hardening decisions | CIS benchmark results → security remediation tasks |
senior-architect | Application architecture requirements drive cloud resource selection | Capacity requirements → compute/storage/network sizing |
aws-solution-architect | AWS-specific deep dives complement multi-cloud strategy | Cloud platform comparison → AWS implementation details |
ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance | Compliance requirements shape infrastructure security controls | Compliance matrices → IAM policies, encryption configs, audit logging |
senior-fullstack | Fullstack application stacks deploy onto cloud infrastructure | Application stack definitions → ECS/EKS task definitions, RDS configs |
Cloud Architecture Playbooks
Read this when designing a cloud architecture, optimizing cost, planning disaster recovery, or auditing security posture — the quick-start commands, platform comparison, the four end-to-end workflows, and the Well-Architected checklist.
Quick Start
# Analyze infrastructure costs
python scripts/cost_analyzer.py --account production --period monthly
# Run DR validation
python scripts/dr_test.py --region us-west-2 --type failover
# Audit security posture
python scripts/security_audit.py --framework cis --output report.html
# Generate resource inventory
python scripts/inventory.py --accounts all --format csvTools
| Script | Purpose |
|---|---|
scripts/cost_analyzer.py | Analyze cloud spend by service, environment, and tag |
scripts/dr_test.py | Validate disaster recovery failover procedures |
scripts/security_audit.py | Audit against CIS benchmarks and compliance frameworks |
scripts/inventory.py | Inventory all resources across accounts and regions |
Cloud Platform Comparison
| Service | AWS | GCP | Azure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compute | EC2, ECS, EKS | GCE, GKE | VMs, AKS |
| Serverless | Lambda | Cloud Functions | Azure Functions |
| Storage | S3 | Cloud Storage | Blob Storage |
| Database | RDS, DynamoDB | Cloud SQL, Spanner | SQL DB, CosmosDB |
| ML | SageMaker | Vertex AI | Azure ML |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloud CDN | Azure CDN |
Workflow 1: Design a Production AWS Architecture
1. Define requirements -- Identify compute, storage, database, and networking needs. Determine RTO/RPO targets. 2. Provision VPC with Terraform:
module "vpc" {
source = "terraform-aws-modules/vpc/aws"
version = "~> 5.0"
name = "${var.project}-${var.environment}"
cidr = var.vpc_cidr
azs = ["${var.region}a", "${var.region}b", "${var.region}c"]
private_subnets = var.private_subnets
public_subnets = var.public_subnets
enable_nat_gateway = true
single_nat_gateway = var.environment != "production"
enable_dns_hostnames = true
tags = local.common_tags
}3. Deploy compute -- ECS/EKS in private subnets behind an ALB in public subnets. Use at least 2 AZs for redundancy. 4. Configure database -- RDS Multi-AZ for production, single-AZ for staging. Set backup retention to 30 days (production) or 7 days (non-production). 5. Add caching layer -- ElastiCache (Redis) between application and database. 6. Layer security -- WAF on CloudFront, NACLs on subnets, security groups on instances. Apply least-privilege IAM. 7. Validate -- Run python scripts/security_audit.py --framework cis and resolve all high-severity findings.
Reference Architecture
Route 53 (DNS) -> CloudFront + WAF -> ALB
-> ECS/EKS Cluster (AZ-a) + ECS/EKS Cluster (AZ-b)
-> ElastiCache (Redis)
-> RDS Multi-AZ (Primary + Standby)Workflow 2: Optimize Cloud Costs
1. Audit current spend -- python scripts/cost_analyzer.py --account production --period monthly 2. Right-size instances -- Identify instances with avg CPU <10% and max CPU <30% as downsize candidates:
# Pseudocode for right-sizing logic
if avg_cpu < 10 and max_cpu < 30:
recommendation = 'downsize'
elif avg_cpu > 80:
recommendation = 'upsize'
else:
recommendation = 'optimal'3. Convert steady-state workloads to Reserved Instances or Savings Plans:
| Type | Discount | Commitment | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-Demand | 0% | None | Variable workloads |
| Reserved | 30-72% | 1-3 years | Steady-state |
| Savings Plans | 30-72% | 1-3 years | Flexible compute |
| Spot | 60-90% | None | Fault-tolerant batch |
4. Enforce cost allocation tags -- Require Environment, Project, Owner, CostCenter on all resources. Alert on untagged resources after 24 hours. 5. Validate -- Re-run cost analyzer and confirm savings target achieved.
Workflow 3: Plan Disaster Recovery
1. Select DR strategy based on RTO/RPO requirements:
| Strategy | RTO | RPO | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backup & Restore | Hours | Hours | $ |
| Pilot Light | Minutes | Minutes | $$ |
| Warm Standby | Minutes | Seconds | $$$ |
| Multi-Site Active | Seconds | Near-zero | $$$$ |
2. Configure cross-region replication -- Database replication to secondary region. S3 cross-region replication for object storage. 3. Set up Route 53 failover routing -- Health checks on primary. Automatic DNS failover to secondary. 4. Define backup policy:
- Database: continuous replication, 35-day retention, cross-region, encrypted
- Application data: daily, 90-day retention, lifecycle to IA at 30d, Glacier at 90d
- Configuration: on-change via git + S3, unlimited retention
5. Test -- python scripts/dr_test.py --region us-west-2 --type failover and confirm RTO/RPO targets met.
Workflow 4: Audit Security Posture
1. Run audit -- python scripts/security_audit.py --framework cis --output report.html 2. Review network segmentation -- Public subnets contain only NAT GW, ALB, bastion. Private subnets contain application tier. Data subnets contain RDS, Redis, Elasticsearch. 3. Enforce least-privilege IAM -- Every policy scoped to specific resources and conditions:
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": ["s3:GetObject", "s3:PutObject"],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/uploads/*",
"Condition": {
"StringEquals": { "aws:PrincipalTag/Team": "engineering" },
"IpAddress": { "aws:SourceIp": ["10.0.0.0/8"] }
}
}4. Verify encryption -- Data encrypted at rest (KMS) and in transit (TLS 1.2+). 5. Validate -- Re-run audit and confirm all critical and high findings resolved.
AWS Well-Architected Pillars (Decision Checklist)
- Operational Excellence: IaC everywhere? Monitoring and alerting? Runbooks for incidents?
- Security: Least-privilege IAM? Encryption at rest and in transit? VPC segmentation?
- Reliability: Multi-AZ? Auto-scaling? DR tested?
- Performance: Right-sized instances? Caching layer? CDN for static assets?
- Cost Optimization: Reserved capacity for steady-state? Spot for batch? Unused resources cleaned?
- Sustainability: Efficient regions? Right-sized compute? Data lifecycle policies?
Cloud Operations — Troubleshooting & Success Criteria
Read this when a cloud deployment is misbehaving (latency, state locks, failover, IAM, cost spikes, peering, replication) or when defining the success bar for an architecture.
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-region latency exceeds 200ms | No regional caching or CDN configured | Deploy CloudFront/Cloud CDN with edge locations closest to user base; enable regional API Gateway caches |
| Terraform state lock conflicts across teams | Shared state backend without proper locking | Use DynamoDB (AWS) or GCS (GCP) state locking with per-team state file partitioning via workspaces |
| Multi-cloud DNS failover not triggering | Health check thresholds too lenient or misconfigured endpoints | Set health check interval to 10s, failure threshold to 3, and verify endpoint returns 200 on the exact path monitored |
| IAM permission errors after cross-account migration | Trust policies not updated for new account IDs | Update AssumeRole trust policies with correct account principals and external IDs; validate with aws sts assume-role |
| Cloud costs spike unexpectedly after scaling event | Auto-scaling max limits set too high or no budget alerts | Set hard max instance counts per ASG, configure billing alerts at 80%/100%/120% thresholds, and review Spot fallback behavior |
| VPC peering routes not propagating between clouds | Route tables missing entries for peered CIDR ranges | Add explicit route entries in both VPCs pointing peered CIDRs to the peering connection; verify no overlapping CIDRs |
| DR failover test fails with data inconsistency | Replication lag between primary and secondary regions | Switch to synchronous replication for critical databases or implement application-level consistency checks pre-failover |
Success Criteria
- 99.99% availability SLA met across all production workloads with documented uptime reports
- Cost optimization savings above 25% compared to on-demand baseline through Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, and right-sizing
- RTO < 15 minutes and RPO < 1 minute validated through quarterly DR failover tests
- Zero critical CIS benchmark findings in production accounts after security audit remediation
- Infrastructure drift < 2% measured by Terraform plan diffs on scheduled compliance scans
- Cross-region failover completes within 60 seconds with automated Route 53 health check validation
- 100% resource tagging compliance enforced via automated policy checks with no untagged resources older than 24 hours
Related skills
FAQ
Which clouds does it cover?
AWS, GCP and Azure, including mapping equivalent compute, serverless, storage, database, ML and CDN services across them.
What DR strategies does it select?
Backup, Pilot Light, Warm Standby or Multi-Site, chosen against RTO/RPO targets with cross-region replication and Route 53 failover.