
Brainstorm
- 543 installs
- 52 repo stars
- Updated July 6, 2026
- buiducnhat/agent-skills
brainstorm is a Claude skill (MIT license) that turns fuzzy product ideas into a validated design brief with clarified requirements and trade-offs before planning or writing code.
About
brainstorm is a Claude skill from buiducnhat/agent-skills (MIT license) for collaborative discovery and design framing on ambiguous or high-risk work. The skill runs a structured dialogue to clarify requirements and constraints, explore alternatives with trade-offs, and produce a concrete validated design brief or handoff to planning. Developers reach for brainstorm when requirements are unclear, multiple approaches are possible, or an idea needs validation before implementation. The workflow moves from gathering context through alternative exploration to a reviewable design output.
- Structured workflow: gather project context, clarify requirements, explore alternatives, produce a design brief
- Reads docs/SUMMARY.md first and loads only task-relevant detail and code-standard docs
- Sequential targeted questions on objective, scope, constraints, and success criteria
- Explores multiple approaches with explicit trade-offs before committing
- Outputs artifacts or a handoff ready for planning—not ad-hoc chat conclusions
Brainstorm by the numbers
- 543 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #725 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/buiducnhat/agent-skills --skill brainstormAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 543 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 52 |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | July 6, 2026 |
| Repository | buiducnhat/agent-skills ↗ |
How do you validate requirements before writing code?
Turn fuzzy product ideas into a validated design brief with clarified requirements and trade-offs before you plan or write code.
Who is it for?
Developers facing ambiguous requirements, multiple architectural approaches, or high-risk features that need design validation before implementation.
Skip if: Well-specified tasks with clear requirements where jumping directly to planning or coding is appropriate.
When should I use this skill?
Requirements are unclear, multiple approaches exist, or user needs to turn a rough idea into a validated design brief before planning or coding.
What you get
Validated design brief with clarified requirements, explored alternatives, documented trade-offs, and planning handoff artifacts.
- validated design brief
- trade-off analysis
- planning handoff
By the numbers
- MIT-licensed skill with a three-step workflow: gather, explore alternatives, produce design brief
Files
Brainstorm
Overview
Use this skill to convert rough ideas into clear, reviewable design outputs through structured dialogue.
The goal is to:
1. Clarify requirements and constraints 2. Explore alternatives with trade-offs 3. Produce a concrete, validated design brief in artifacts or a handoff to planning
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Project Context
Load only the project context relevant to the current idea:
- If
docs/SUMMARY.mdexists, read it first. - Load only task-relevant detail docs.
- Prioritize
Code Standarddocs for implementation conventions. - If docs conflict with code or user intent, use the available input/question tool before broad changes.
Also check key implementation files relevant to the idea and note constraints from existing architecture, dependencies, and conventions.
Keep this pass focused. Only gather what is needed for the current idea.
Step 2: Clarify Requirements
Ask targeted questions sequentially to remove ambiguity with input/question tool:
- Focus on:
- Objective and user value
- Scope boundaries
- Constraints (technical, UX, performance, timeline)
- Success criteria
- Non-goals
Do not jump to implementation details too early.
Step 3: Explore Approaches
Propose 2-5 viable approaches.
For each approach, include:
- Short summary
- Pros
- Cons / risks
- Complexity estimate
- Recommended use conditions
Lead with your recommended option and explain why it best fits the project context and constraints.
After presenting all approaches, use input/question tool to let the user pick their preferred approach. List the summary options. Example:
1. Approach A, short summary 2. Approach B, short summary 3. Approach C, short summary 4. Other (please specify)
with the tag added for the recommended approach to guide the user.
Step 4: Present the Design Incrementally
Once requirements are clear, present the design incrementally in logical phases (about 200-300 words per phase) to avoid overwhelming the user.
- Phase 1: Foundation - Problem framing, goals, and proposed architecture/flow.
- Phase 2: Technical Details - Data model, interfaces, error handling, and edge cases.
- Phase 3: Delivery - Testing/verification strategy and rollout considerations (if applicable).
After presenting each phase, use input/question tool immediately to ask whether to:
1. Proceed to the next phase 2. Adjust the current phase 3. Revisit a previous phase
Step 5: Close the Loop
After you and the user have worked through requirements and the design is validated, determine the next actions.
1. Use input/question tool to present the user with three high-level next actions:
- "Write plan immediately (in current context)" - skip the artifact step and move straight to a
write-planhandoff. - "Write artifacts" - continue by authoring the brainstorm documents described in Step 6.
- "Implement immediately (skip design artifacts and planning)" - if the design is very clear and low-risk, the user may choose to skip both artifacts and planning and move straight to implementation.
- "End session (already provided enough information for user)" - stop; the conversation has produced enough insight for now.
2. If the user picks Write artifacts, proceed to Step 6. Once the draft artifacts exist, use input/question tool again to validate them with options:
- "Write plan with current artifacts, context"
- "End session - artifacts are sufficient for now"
- "Need changes" (free-form text) - collect the feedback, revise the artifacts, and re-ask.
3. If the user picked Write plan immediately, initiate a handoff to use skill write-plan using the current brainstorming context; no additional artifact validation is required.
4. If the user picked End session, simply stop. The information collected so far is considered sufficient.
Step 6 (optional): Write Brainstorm Artifacts
Only perform this step after the user has explicitly chosen "Write artifacts" during Step 5.
Persist results to the standardized location:
- Directory:
docs/.brainstorms/YYMMDD-HHmm-<topic-slug>/ - Main file (required):
docs/.brainstorms/YYMMDD-HHmm-<topic-slug>/SUMMARY.md - Optional supporting files:
docs/.brainstorms/YYMMDD-HHmm-<topic-slug>/section-01-<slug>.mddocs/.brainstorms/YYMMDD-HHmm-<topic-slug>/section-02-<slug>.md- etc.
SUMMARY.md format: strictly follow the template inside references/summary-template.md.
Rules
- Do not write production code or make implementation changes in this skill in the brainstorm session.
- Keep interaction lightweight and iterative; every step should be run in the same session.
- Prefer clarity over completeness when uncertain; ask a follow-up question.
- Align all recommendations with project documentation and standards.
- Keep assumptions explicit; do not guess silently.
- Think before coding: Surface assumptions explicitly. If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently. If a simpler approach exists, say so and push back when warranted.
Brainstorm: <Title>
Created: YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss
Context
- Background and motivation for the brainstorm.
Goals
- What success looks like.
Non-Goals
- What is explicitly excluded.
Chosen Approach
- Selected approach and rationale.
Alternatives Considered
- Alternative 1 — pros, cons, why not chosen
- Alternative 2 — pros, cons, why not chosen
Risks & Mitigations
- Risk → mitigation
Open Questions
- Items requiring further investigation or user confirmation.
Next Step Recommendation
- Recommended follow-up action (e.g., proceed to
write-plan, prototype, research further).
Related skills
FAQ
What does brainstorm produce?
brainstorm converts rough ideas into a validated design brief through structured dialogue—clarifying requirements, exploring alternatives with trade-offs, and handing off concrete artifacts to planning or implementation.
When should developers invoke brainstorm?
brainstorm fits when requirements are unclear, multiple approaches are possible, or high-risk work needs a validated design brief before planning or writing code.
Is Brainstorm safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.