Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
cfircoo avatar

Generate Prd

  • 33 installs
  • 17 repo stars
  • Updated March 28, 2026
  • cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit

Analyze and validate technical documentation and project architecture

About

generate-prd helps analyze technical designs, PRDs, and architecture. Use it during build to review technical specifications, validate design decisions, and ensure project alignment.

  • Design analysis
  • Technical review
  • Validation

Generate Prd by the numbers

  • 33 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #653 of 1,352 Code Review & Quality skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit --skill generate-prd

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs33
repo stars17
Last updatedMarch 28, 2026
Repositorycfircoo/claude-code-toolkit

What it does

Analyze and validate technical documentation and project architecture

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

<objective> Generate detailed, actionable Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for new features. Guide users through clarifying questions, then produce specifications suitable for implementation by developers or AI agents.

Important: This skill creates PRDs only—it does NOT begin implementation. </objective>

<quick_start> 1. Ask 3-5 clarifying questions with lettered options (A, B, C, D) 2. Generate structured PRD based on answers 3. Save to tasks/prd-[feature-name].md </quick_start>

<process>

<step name="1_clarifying_questions"> Ask 3-5 essential questions using AskUserQuestion tool. Cover:

  • Problem/Goal: What problem does this solve? Who benefits?
  • Core Functionality: What are the must-have features?
  • Scope/Boundaries: What is explicitly NOT included?
  • Success Criteria: How will we know this worked?

Each question should have 3-4 concrete options (A, B, C, D format) plus "Other" for custom input. </step>

<step name="2_generate_prd"> Create the PRD document with these sections:

1. Introduction/Overview – Brief feature description and problem statement 2. Goals – Specific, measurable objectives 3. User Stories – Each with title, description, and verifiable acceptance criteria 4. Functional Requirements – Numbered explicitly (FR-1, FR-2, etc.) 5. Non-Goals – Clear scope boundaries 6. Design Considerations – UI/UX requirements (if applicable) 7. Technical Considerations – Constraints and dependencies (if applicable) 8. Success Metrics – Measurable outcomes 9. Open Questions – Remaining clarifications needed </step>

<step name="3_save_document"> Save the PRD to: tasks/prd-[feature-name].md

Use kebab-case for feature name (e.g., prd-user-authentication.md). </step>

</process>

<principles>

<principle name="explicitness"> Avoid jargon or explain it. Provide concrete examples. A junior developer should understand every requirement without additional context. </principle>

<principle name="verifiability"> Acceptance criteria must be testable and specific.

Good: "Login button redirects to /dashboard on success" Bad: "Login works correctly" </principle>

<principle name="ui_stories"> Every UI-focused user story MUST include this acceptance criterion: "Verify in browser using dev-browser skill" </principle>

<principle name="atomic_stories"> Each user story should be small enough to implement in one session. If a story feels too large, break it into smaller stories. </principle>

</principles>

<prd_template>

# PRD: {{Feature Name}}

## 1. Introduction

{{Brief description of the feature and the problem it solves}}

## 2. Goals

- {{Goal 1: Specific, measurable objective}}
- {{Goal 2: Specific, measurable objective}}

## 3. User Stories

### US-1: {{Story Title}}
**As a** {{user type}}, **I want** {{feature}} **so that** {{benefit}}.

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- {{Specific, testable criterion}}
- {{Specific, testable criterion}}
- Verify in browser using dev-browser skill (for UI stories)

### US-2: {{Story Title}}
...

## 4. Functional Requirements

- **FR-1**: {{Explicit requirement}}
- **FR-2**: {{Explicit requirement}}
- **FR-3**: {{Explicit requirement}}

## 5. Non-Goals

- {{What this feature explicitly does NOT do}}
- {{Scope boundary}}

## 6. Design Considerations

{{UI/UX requirements, wireframe references, design patterns}}

## 7. Technical Considerations

{{Constraints, dependencies, integration points, performance requirements}}

## 8. Success Metrics

- {{Measurable outcome 1}}
- {{Measurable outcome 2}}

## 9. Open Questions

- [ ] {{Unresolved question needing clarification}}

</prd_template>

<examples>

<example name="good_acceptance_criteria"> Good:

  • "Search results display within 2 seconds"
  • "Error message shows 'Invalid email format' for malformed input"
  • "Clicking 'Save' disables button and shows spinner until complete"

Bad:

  • "Search is fast"
  • "Shows appropriate error messages"
  • "Good UX on save"

</example>

<example name="good_functional_requirements">

  • FR-1: System shall validate email format using RFC 5322 pattern
  • FR-2: Password must be minimum 8 characters with at least one number
  • FR-3: Session expires after 30 minutes of inactivity

</example>

</examples>

<success_criteria> PRD is complete when:

  • [ ] 3-5 clarifying questions were asked and answered
  • [ ] All 9 PRD sections are filled with concrete content
  • [ ] User stories have verifiable acceptance criteria
  • [ ] UI stories include browser verification criterion
  • [ ] Functional requirements are numbered (FR-1, FR-2, etc.)
  • [ ] Non-goals clearly define scope boundaries
  • [ ] Document saved to tasks/prd-[feature-name].md
  • [ ] No implementation has begun (PRD only)

</success_criteria>

Related skills

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.