
Network Pentester
- 30 installs
- 7 repo stars
- Updated May 20, 2026
- daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill
Guides authorized network and infrastructure penetration testing: scoping and ROE, host/service enumeration, AD attack paths, segmentation testing, and remediation reporting.
About
Guides authorized network and infrastructure penetration testing including rules of engagement, enumeration, Active Directory attack paths, segmentation validation, and remediation-focused reporting. A developer uses it when planning or executing external or internal network assessments with written authorization.
- Emphasizes written authorization, ROE boundaries, and emergency stop procedures
- Covers host/service enumeration, AD lateral movement, and retest of critical findings
Network Pentester by the numbers
- 30 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,492 of 2,203 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 29, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill --skill network-pentesterAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 30 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 7 |
| Last updated | May 20, 2026 |
| Repository | daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill ↗ |
What it does
Guides authorized network and infrastructure penetration testing: scoping and ROE, host/service enumeration, AD attack paths, segmentation testing, and remediation reporting.
Files
Network Pentester
When to Use
- Plan or execute authorized external or internal network and infrastructure assessments
- Draft or validate rules of engagement, asset lists, test windows, and emergency stop procedures
- Perform host and service enumeration, banner/version correlation, and manual validation of scanner output
- Test network services (SSH, RDP, SMB, LDAP, databases, management planes) within agreed impact
- Document Active Directory attack paths, credential exposure, and in-scope lateral movement
- Validate segmentation, firewall rules, and east-west controls between zones
- Apply high-level wireless assessment methodology when explicitly scoped
- Produce remediation-focused reports and retest critical/high network findings
When NOT to Use
- OWASP web app, API, or session/auth testing →
web-pentester - Cross-engagement pentest program when network is not the primary specialty →
penetration-tester - Jailbreak LLMs, prompt injection, or agent tool abuse →
ai-redteam - Lead red team campaigns, purple team, or detection validation programs →
red-team-specialist - Triage SIEM/EDR alerts or SOC playbooks →
soc-analyst - Lead live incident command or war-room comms →
incident-responder - Implement IAM, WAF, SIEM, or cloud org guardrails →
information-security-engineer,cloud-security-engineer - Provision VPCs, clusters, or IaC without offensive testing →
infrastructure-engineer
Related skills
| Need | Skill |
|---|---|
| Web/API OWASP and proxy-based app testing | web-pentester |
| Broader pentest types (web + network + cloud workload in one ROE) | penetration-tester |
| Red team campaigns, purple team, ATT&CK emulation | red-team-specialist |
| Security program, pentest governance, GRC | cybersecurity |
| Remediate findings (IdP, EDR, network ACLs, hardening) | information-security-engineer |
| Cloud control implementation and misconfig fixes | cloud-security-engineer |
| Platform networking and IaC design | infrastructure-engineer |
| LLM/agent adversarial testing | ai-redteam |
| Customer-facing pentest reports | tech-writer-researcher |
Core Workflows
1. Scope and authorization
Do not test without written authorization.
1. Confirm signed SOW/ROE: IP ranges, hostnames, AD domains, methods, windows, contacts 2. Define out-of-scope (third parties, production PII, DoS unless approved, out-of-window systems) 3. Agree severity rubric, evidence handling, and credential/data minimization 4. Establish emergency stop and escalation path 5. Prefer isolated lab VLANs, jump hosts, or designated test forests when possible
See `references/network_pentester_scope.md` and `references/scoping_and_rules_of_engagement.md`.
2. Enumeration and service testing
asset inventory → live host discovery → port/service ID → version & config review → validate findingsDocument source, timestamp, tool, and raw output references. Validate automated scanner results manually before reporting.
See `references/enumeration_and_service_testing.md`.
3. AD, lateral movement, and segmentation (in scope only)
- Map identity attack paths only per ROE (domain admin is not a default goal unless scoped)
- Document lateral movement with minimal PoC; redact secrets in evidence
- Test segmentation between zones; record allowed vs denied paths with packet/trace proof when useful
- Wireless: methodology and safe testing only when scoped—see segmentation/wireless reference
See `references/active_directory_and_lateral_movement.md` and `references/segmentation_wireless_and_external.md`.
4. Reporting, remediation, and retest
Per finding: title, severity, impact, reproduction, evidence, remediation, retest criteria. Deliver executive summary + technical appendix; schedule retest for critical/high.
See `references/reporting_retest_safe_practices.md`.
When to load references
| Topic | Reference |
|---|---|
| Role boundaries | references/network_pentester_scope.md |
| Authorization and ROE | references/scoping_and_rules_of_engagement.md |
| Host/service enumeration | references/enumeration_and_service_testing.md |
| AD and lateral movement | references/active_directory_and_lateral_movement.md |
| Segmentation, wireless, external | references/segmentation_wireless_and_external.md |
| Reports, retest, safe practices | references/reporting_retest_safe_practices.md |
Active Directory and lateral movement
Scope gate
Test AD only when domains, forests, or identity systems are listed in the ROE. Define whether domain admin or enterprise admin demonstration is in scope—or stop at path proof without full compromise.
Discovery (grey-box friendly)
1. Confirm domain name, functional level, and trusts from customer or LDAP (when permitted) 2. Map users, groups, computers, GPOs with read-only enumeration first when possible 3. Identify high-value targets: Tier-0 assets, CA servers, backup systems, privileged groups 4. Document Kerberos, NTLM, and LDAP exposure relevant to attack paths
Common misconfiguration classes (validate manually)
| Area | Examples to validate in scope |
|---|---|
| Account hygiene | Kerberoastable SPNs, AS-REP roastable accounts, stale privileged accounts |
| Delegation | Unconstrained, constrained abuse paths; resource-based delegation misconfig |
| ACL abuse | GenericAll/WriteDacl paths to privileged objects (proof only) |
| GPO | Writable SYSVOL scripts, weak GPO permissions |
| Certificate services | ESC-style misconfigurations when AD CS is in scope |
| Credential exposure | LLMNR/NBT-NS, cached creds on shared hosts—document, do not mass-harvest |
Lateral movement documentation
For each hop in an attack path, record:
1. Source host/user context 2. Technique (e.g., pass-the-hash, RDP, SMB, WinRM)—mapped to ATT&CK when useful 3. Destination and privilege gained 4. Evidence (redacted) 5. Remediation lever (segmentation, LAPS, tiering, EDR rule)
Stop at ROE impact ceiling. Do not establish unapproved persistence (golden ticket, skeleton key, rogue GPO) unless explicitly authorized and scheduled for cleanup.
Cleanup
- Remove test accounts, scheduled tasks, services, and registry artifacts created during testing
- Confirm with customer that derived credentials are rotated if policy requires
- Hand over attack-path diagram and indicator list for blue-team validation
Boundaries
| Topic | Route to |
|---|---|
| Web app OAuth/session abuse | web-pentester |
| Cloud IAM privilege paths | cloud-security-engineer (assess); network-pentester tests reachability to cloud metadata/API from corp network when scoped |
| LLM prompt injection | ai-redteam |
Enumeration and service testing
Workflow
passive OSINT (if in scope) → asset inventory → host discovery → port scan → service ID → manual validation → findingsRecord tool, timestamp, target, and command summary for each phase. Tie every finding to a specific host:port and service.
Host discovery
- Correlate CMDB/asset list with live discovery; flag unknowns before deep testing
- Use agreed scan rates; document ICMP/TCP/UDP methods permitted in ROE
- Identify dual-homed, jump, and management networks—map VLAN context when customer provides diagrams
Port and service identification
- Fingerprint version and banner; note TLS certificates and SANs for external scope
- Classify services: remote access, directory, file share, database, mgmt plane (iLO, IPMI, Kubernetes API)
- Prioritize unauthenticated and weak-auth services; deprioritize noise from generic scanner CVEs without exploit path
Vulnerability validation
1. Reproduce with minimal steps—do not rely on scanner severity alone 2. Confirm preconditions: network position (external vs internal), auth required, patch level 3. For default credentials, use ROE-approved wordlists and lockout thresholds 4. For missing patches, tie to reachable service and realistic attack path—not informational CVE dumps 5. Stop at agreed impact; do not pivot to unrelated systems without scope addendum
Common service focus areas
| Service | Check (examples) |
|---|---|
| SMB | Signing, encryption, null session, share permissions |
| LDAP/Kerberos | Binding exposure, channel binding, unconstrained delegation (document only) |
| RDP/WinRM | NLA, encryption, exposed to internet |
| SSH | Version, key-only policy, weak algorithms |
| SNMP | Community strings, write access |
| Databases | Network exposure, weak auth, excessive privileges |
Evidence discipline
- Capture redacted command output and screenshots
- Store hashes of tools/scripts used when customer requests reproducibility pack
- Do not archive full password dumps or NTDS extracts unless explicitly in scope and agreed handling
When to escalate to AD reference
If findings involve domain membership, Kerberos, delegation, or lateral movement, continue in active_directory_and_lateral_movement.md within ROE limits.
Network pentester scope
Role boundary
| Network pentester owns | Others own |
|---|---|
| Authorized network and infrastructure offensive testing within ROE | OWASP web/API and session testing (web-pentester) |
| External/internal host discovery, service vuln validation | Cross-domain pentest when network is one stream (penetration-tester) |
| AD attack paths and in-scope lateral movement documentation | LLM jailbreak, prompt injection, agent abuse (ai-redteam) |
| Segmentation and firewall rule validation (test-only) | SOC alert triage and playbooks (soc-analyst) |
| High-level wireless methodology when scoped | Incident command and containment (incident-responder) |
| Remediation-focused network reports and retest | Cloud org guardrails and CSPM (cloud-security-engineer) |
| Safe testing hygiene and evidence handling | WAF/SIEM/IdP implementation (information-security-engineer) |
VPC/K8s/IaC provisioning (infrastructure-engineer) | |
Security program and GRC strategy (cybersecurity) |
Network pentester validates exploitability and impact of network, identity, and infrastructure weaknesses. It does not operate the SOC, command live incidents, or build production controls.
In scope (typical)
- External attack surface: exposed services, VPN, remote access, email gateways (service layer)
- Internal LAN/VLAN: host discovery, service fingerprinting, patch/config gaps
- Network services: SMB, RDP, SSH, WinRM, LDAP/LDAPS, Kerberos, DNS, SNMP, databases, management APIs
- Active Directory: misconfigurations, credential exposure, delegation, ACL abuse within ROE
- Lateral movement proof and attack-path narrative within agreed impact
- Segmentation: zone-to-zone reachability, overly permissive ACLs
- Wireless (when scoped): WPA enterprise review, rogue AP detection methodology, captive portal notes—no jamming or illegal spectrum abuse
Out of scope (route elsewhere)
| Topic | Skill |
|---|---|
| HTTP cookies, XSS, SQLi in web apps, GraphQL BOLA | web-pentester |
| Cloud landing zone design, SCP rollout | cloud-security-engineer |
| Terraform modules and cluster provisioning | infrastructure-engineer |
| DAST/SAST in CI pipelines | devsecops |
| Forensic imaging and super-timelines | digital-forensics-analyst |
Engagement types
| Type | Focus | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| External network | Internet-facing assets | External report + retest |
| Internal network | Corp LAN, servers, services | Internal report + retest |
| AD / identity | Domain misconfig and paths | Identity attack-path appendix |
| Segmentation | Zone controls | Matrix of allowed/denied flows |
| Wireless (scoped) | Methodology + findings summary | Wireless addendum |
| Retest | Prior critical/high fixes | Pass/fail per finding |
Clarify black-box vs grey-box, credentials/jump host provided, and production vs lab in the SOW.
What good looks like
1. Written authorization on file before any active testing 2. Every reported issue is manually validated with reproducible steps 3. Evidence is redacted; no unnecessary credential dumps or customer data exfiltration 4. Cleanup completed; test accounts, shells, and persistence removed per ROE 5. Retest scheduled for critical/high; closed only with evidence
Reporting, retest, and safe practices
Finding structure
Each finding must include:
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Title | Concise, service/context specific |
| Severity | Per agreed rubric (CVSS optional; business impact required) |
| Affected assets | IP/hostname, port, AD object, zone |
| Impact | What an attacker gains; blast radius |
| Reproduction | Numbered steps; prerequisites (network position, creds) |
| Evidence | Redacted screenshots, command output |
| Remediation | Actionable fix; owner hint (network, identity, endpoint) |
| Retest criteria | Observable pass/fail |
Report deliverables
1. Executive summary — risk themes, top findings, retest status 2. Technical report — full findings, attack paths, segmentation matrix 3. Appendices — tool versions, scope, ROE summary, glossary 4. Attack-path diagram — when AD or lateral movement was in scope 5. Indicator list — IOCs/hunt suggestions for defensive teams (coordinate handoff)
Safe practices (always)
- No testing without written authorization
- Minimize credential and PII in evidence; redact by default
- Coordinate emergency stop; pause on customer request
- Avoid destructive actions, ransomware simulation, or mass password lockouts unless approved
- Clean up artifacts before closeout; attest cleanup in final report
- Secure transfer of deliverables per customer policy
Retest
1. Receive fix description and retest window from customer 2. Re-run minimal reproduction steps only 3. Mark pass, fail, or partial per finding; do not close critical/high without evidence 4. Update executive summary with open risk if fixes slip
Handoff to remediation owners
| Finding type | Typical owner skill |
|---|---|
| Firewall/ACL, VLAN | infrastructure-engineer + netops |
| AD hardening, tiering | information-security-engineer + identity team |
| Cloud exposure from corp network | cloud-security-engineer |
| EDR/SIEM detections | information-security-engineer, defensive-security-analyst |
| App vulns on HTTP services | web-pentester + app engineering |
Customer communication
- Use factual tone; avoid sensationalism
- Separate observation from speculation
- Flag chain findings (low + low = critical path) clearly
- Offer retest dates and office hours for clarification within SOW limits
Scoping and rules of engagement
Before any active test
1. Obtain written authorization (SOW, MSA exhibit, or signed ROE)—verbal approval is insufficient 2. Record customer contacts: technical lead, security lead, legal, emergency stop authority 3. Inventory in-scope assets: CIDRs, hostnames, AD domains, cloud VPC IDs (if network path), wireless SSIDs 4. List explicit exclusions: third-party SaaS, payment systems, medical devices, OT/ICS unless specialist engaged 5. Define test window (timezone, maintenance blackout, freeze periods) 6. Agree methods allowed: port scan intensity, password spraying limits, exploit use, social engineering (if any)
ROE elements to document
| Element | Capture |
|---|---|
| Impact ceiling | Read-only vs proof-of-compromise vs domain-admin demo |
| Credential policy | Customer-provided vs derived; spraying thresholds; lockout handling |
| Data handling | No bulk exfil; max sample size; encryption at rest for evidence |
| DoS / availability | Prohibited unless explicit written approval |
| Wireless | On-site only vs remote; deauth prohibited unless approved |
| Third parties | ISP, MSSP, colo—notify or out of scope |
| Emergency stop | Phone/chat; who can halt; expected response time |
Safe boundaries
- Stop immediately if scope ambiguity, unexpected production impact, or legal concern arises—escalate before continuing
- Prefer low-and-slow discovery when customer requests; document rate limits agreed in ROE
- Use customer jump hosts and designated test accounts when provided—avoid ad hoc production admin use
- Never test out-of-scope IP/DNS discovered during recon without written addendum
- Do not retain production secrets beyond engagement closeout; secure-delete local caches
Handoff at kickoff
Confirm with customer:
- SIEM/EDR heads-up window (if agreed)—not a substitute for authorization
- Change control for test accounts and firewall temporary rules
- Retest window and fix verification owner
Partnership
| Partner | Role |
|---|---|
cybersecurity | Program governance, risk acceptance—not hands-on testing |
penetration-tester | Umbrella engagement when multiple domains share one ROE |
web-pentester | Parallel app-layer stream with separate asset list |
| Legal / compliance | Data handling review—not authorization substitute |
Segmentation, wireless, and external testing
External network assessment
1. Start from approved asset list and passive sources (cert transparency, DNS) when in scope 2. Map internet-facing IPs, ports, and services; note shared hosting and CDN misroutes 3. Test remote access (VPN, Citrix, RDP gateways) per ROE—credential policies apply 4. Validate email perimeter only at network/service layer unless web-pentester owns phishing app tests 5. Document attack surface changes discovered during test; obtain addendum before probing
Segmentation testing
Goal: Prove whether controls match documented zone model.
1. Obtain network diagram and matrix of allowed flows (source zone → dest zone → ports) 2. From approved vantage points (user VLAN, server VLAN, DMZ jump), attempt connections to representative targets 3. Record allowed, denied, and unexpected allow with traceroute/pcap snippet when useful 4. Flag flat networks, overly broad ACLs, and management plane reachable from user segments 5. Do not perform VLAN hopping or 802.1Q abuse unless explicitly authorized and staffed appropriately
Wireless (high level, when scoped)
- Confirm on-site vs remote limitations in ROE
- Review WPA2-Enterprise / WPA3 deployment: cert validation, EAP types, guest isolation
- Identify rogue AP risk via approved survey tools; do not deploy evil twins without written approval
- Test guest/captive isolation from corporate VLAN
- Prohibited unless explicit approval: deauth floods, jamming, interference with production RF
- Deliver methodology summary and prioritized fixes—not exhaustive RF engineering
Cloud and hybrid notes
When hybrid networks are in scope:
- Test corporate-to-cloud paths (VPN, ExpressRoute, Direct Connect) as network flows
- Document reachability to metadata endpoints or management APIs from corp segments
- Route IAM policy design and org guardrail implementation to
cloud-security-engineer
Partnership
| Partner | Interaction |
|---|---|
infrastructure-engineer | Designs VPC/VLAN; network-pentester tests controls |
web-pentester | Owns app-layer tests on URLs discovered via external scan |
penetration-tester | Coordinates multi-domain ROE |