Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
daymade avatar

Prompt Optimizer

  • 1.5k installs
  • 1.3k repo stars
  • Updated August 4, 2026
  • daymade/claude-code-skills

prompt-optimizer is an agent skill that transforms vague prompts into EARS-structured testable requirements with domain grounding.

About

The prompt-optimizer skill converts vague prompts into precise specifications using EARS Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax from Rolls-Royce methodology. Its four-layer process applies EARS syntax transformation, domain theory grounding with frameworks like GTD or BJ Fogg, example extraction with real data, and structured Role Skills Workflows Examples Formats output. A six-step workflow analyzes weaknesses such as broad scope, missing triggers, ambiguous actions, and absent constraints, then rewrites requirements into testable when-then patterns. It triggers on optimize my prompt, improve this requirement, or loose feature descriptions lacking measurable outcomes. Use when developers need requirement refinement before AI-generated code, products, or documents.

  • Four-layer EARS enhancement with domain theory and example extraction.
  • Six-step workflow from weakness analysis to structured prompt output.
  • Converts broad requests into testable when-then requirement patterns.
  • Triggers on vague feature requests and explicit prompt optimization asks.
  • Outputs Role Skills Workflows Examples Formats structured specifications.

Prompt Optimizer by the numbers

  • 1,487 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +44 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #397 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

prompt-optimizer capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
ears syntax transformation · domain theory grounding · example extraction with real data · six step optimization workflow · structured role skills workflows output
Use cases
planning · documentation · orchestration
From the docs

What prompt-optimizer says it does

Transform vague prompts into precise, well-structured specifications using EARS
SKILL.md
Convert descriptive language to normative specifications
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/daymade/claude-code-skills --skill prompt-optimizer

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs1.5k
repo stars1.3k
Security audit3 / 3 scanners passed
Last updatedAugust 4, 2026
Repositorydaymade/claude-code-skills

How do I turn a vague feature request into precise testable requirements for AI or engineering work?

Transform vague requirements into EARS-structured, testable specifications with domain theory grounding.

Who is it for?

Developers refining loose requirements before codegen or product specification work.

Skip if: Skip when requirements are already precise and testable without transformation.

When should I use this skill?

User asks to optimize a prompt, improve requirements, or make a feature description more specific.

What you get

EARS-formatted specification with domain theory, examples, and structured prompt sections.

  • EARS-format requirement statements
  • Role-aware agent prompts

By the numbers

  • Security scan passed with gitleaks on 2025-11-16

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Prompt Optimizer

Overview

Optimize vague prompts into precise, actionable specifications using EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) - a Rolls-Royce methodology for transforming natural language into structured, testable requirements.

Methodology inspired by: This skill's approach to combining EARS with domain theory grounding was inspired by 阿星AI工作室 (A-Xing AI Studio), which demonstrated practical EARS application for prompt enhancement.

Four-layer enhancement process:

1. EARS syntax transformation - Convert descriptive language to normative specifications 2. Domain theory grounding - Apply relevant industry frameworks (GTD, BJ Fogg, Gestalt, etc.) 3. Example extraction - Surface concrete use cases with real data 4. Structured prompt generation - Format using Role/Skills/Workflows/Examples/Formats framework

When to Use

Apply when:

  • User provides vague feature requests ("build a dashboard", "create a reminder app")
  • Requirements lack specific conditions, triggers, or measurable outcomes
  • Natural language descriptions need conversion to testable specifications
  • User explicitly requests prompt optimization or requirement refinement

Six-Step Optimization Workflow

Step 1: Analyze Original Requirement

Identify weaknesses:

  • Overly broad - "Add user authentication" → Missing password requirements, session management
  • Missing triggers - "Send notifications" → Missing when/why notifications trigger
  • Ambiguous actions - "Make it user-friendly" → No measurable usability criteria
  • No constraints - "Process payments" → Missing security, compliance requirements

Step 2: Apply EARS Transformation

Convert requirements to EARS patterns. See references/ears_syntax.md for complete syntax rules.

Five core patterns: 1. Ubiquitous: The system shall <action> 2. Event-driven: When <trigger>, the system shall <action> 3. State-driven: While <state>, the system shall <action> 4. Conditional: If <condition>, the system shall <action> 5. Unwanted behavior: If <condition>, the system shall prevent <unwanted action>

Quick example:

Before: "Create a reminder app with task management"

After (EARS):
1. When user creates a task, the system shall guide decomposition into executable sub-tasks
2. When task deadline is within 30 minutes AND user has not started, the system shall send notification with sound alert
3. When user completes a sub-task, the system shall update progress and provide positive feedback

Transformation checklist:

  • [ ] Identify implicit conditions and make explicit
  • [ ] Specify triggering events or states
  • [ ] Use precise action verbs (shall, must, should)
  • [ ] Add measurable criteria ("within 30 minutes", "at least 8 characters")
  • [ ] Break compound requirements into atomic statements
  • [ ] Remove ambiguous language ("user-friendly", "fast")

Step 3: Identify Domain Theories

Match requirements to established frameworks. See references/domain_theories.md for full catalog.

Common domain mappings:

  • Productivity → GTD, Pomodoro, Eisenhower Matrix
  • Behavior Change → BJ Fogg Model (B=MAT), Atomic Habits
  • UX Design → Hick's Law, Fitts's Law, Gestalt Principles
  • Security → Zero Trust, Defense in Depth, Privacy by Design

Selection process: 1. Identify primary domain from requirement keywords 2. Match to 2-4 complementary theories 3. Apply theory principles to specific features 4. Cite theories in enhanced prompt for credibility

Step 4: Extract Concrete Examples

Generate specific examples with real data:

  • User scenarios: "When user logs in on mobile device..."
  • Data examples: "Product: 'Laptop', Price: $999, Stock: 15"
  • Workflow examples: "Task: Write report → Sub-tasks: Research (2h), Draft (3h), Edit (1h)"

Examples must be realistic, specific, varied (success/error/edge cases), and testable.

Step 5: Generate Enhanced Prompt

Structure using the standard framework:

# Role
[Specific expert role with domain expertise]

## Skills
- [Core capability 1]
- [Core capability 2]
[List 5-8 skills aligned with domain theories]

## Workflows
1. [Phase 1] - [Key activities]
2. [Phase 2] - [Key activities]
[Complete step-by-step process]

## Examples
[Concrete examples with real data, not placeholders]

## Formats
[Precise output specifications:
- File types, structure requirements
- Design/styling expectations
- Technical constraints
- Deliverable checklist]

Quality criteria:

  • Role specificity: "Product designer specializing in time management apps" > "Designer"
  • Theory grounding: Reference frameworks explicitly
  • Actionable workflows: Clear inputs/outputs and decision points
  • Concrete examples: Real data, not "Example 1", "Example 2"
  • Measurable formats: Specific requirements, not "good design"

Step 6: Present Optimization Results

Output in structured format:

## Original Requirement
[User's vague requirement]

**Identified Issues:**
- [Issue 1: e.g., "Lacks specific trigger conditions"]
- [Issue 2: e.g., "No measurable success criteria"]

## EARS Transformation
[Numbered list of EARS-formatted requirements]

## Domain & Theories
**Primary Domain:** [e.g., Authentication Security]

**Applicable Theories:**
- **[Theory 1]** - [Brief relevance]
- **[Theory 2]** - [Brief relevance]

## Enhanced Prompt
[Complete Role/Skills/Workflows/Examples/Formats prompt]

---

**How to use:**
[Brief guidance on applying the prompt]

Advanced Techniques

For complex scenarios, see references/advanced_techniques.md:

  • Multi-stakeholder requirements - EARS statements for each user type
  • Non-functional requirements - Performance, security, scalability with quantified thresholds
  • Complex conditional logic - Nested conditions with boolean operators

Quick Reference

Do's: ✅ Break down compound requirements (one EARS statement per requirement) ✅ Specify measurable criteria (numbers, timeframes, percentages) ✅ Include error/edge cases ✅ Ground in established theories ✅ Use concrete examples with real data

Don'ts: ❌ Avoid vague language ("fast", "user-friendly") ❌ Don't assume implicit knowledge ❌ Don't mix multiple actions in one statement ❌ Don't use placeholders in examples

Resources

Load these reference files as needed:

  • `references/ears_syntax.md` - Complete EARS syntax rules, all 5 patterns, transformation guidelines, benefits
  • `references/domain_theories.md` - 40+ theories mapped to 10 domains (productivity, UX, gamification, learning, e-commerce, security, etc.)
  • `references/examples.md` - Four complete transformation examples (procrastination app, e-commerce product page, learning dashboard, password reset security) with before/after comparisons and reusable template
  • `references/advanced_techniques.md` - Multi-stakeholder requirements, non-functional specs, complex conditional logic patterns

When to load references:

  • EARS syntax clarification needed → ears_syntax.md
  • Domain theory selection requires extensive options → domain_theories.md
  • User requests multiple optimization examples → examples.md
  • Complex requirements with multiple stakeholders or non-functional specs → advanced_techniques.md

Related skills

How it compares

Pick this over basic prompt templates when requirements have multiple stakeholders and conditional EARS logic rather than a single coding task.

FAQ

What methodology does prompt-optimizer use?

EARS Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax plus domain theory grounding and structured prompt generation.

When should I use prompt-optimizer?

When vague feature requests need conversion to testable specifications with triggers and constraints.

Is prompt-optimizer safe to install?

Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.