
Kw:Work
- 18 installs
- 382 repo stars
- Updated March 24, 2026
- everyinc/compound-knowledge-plugin
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
kw:work is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.
- kw:work
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Kw:Work by the numbers
- 18 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #10,736 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-knowledge-plugin --skill kwworkAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 18 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 382 |
| Last updated | March 24, 2026 |
| Repository | everyinc/compound-knowledge-plugin ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
<work_target> #$ARGUMENTS </work_target>
Work
You have a plan. Now execute it. Break it into tasks, do them, track what happened.
When to Use
- After
/kw:planor/kw:review— the plan is ready, time to execute
- "Start working on this", "Execute the plan", "Let's do this"
- When you have a clear plan and need to produce deliverables
Process
Step 1: Load the plan
Read the plan file. If no plan is specified:
1. Check for the most recently modified file in plans/ 2. Ask: "Which plan should I execute? Point me to a file."
Step 2: Break into tasks
Extract concrete deliverables from the plan. For each deliverable, create a task:
## Tasks
- [ ] [Task 1] — [what needs to be produced]
- [ ] [Task 2] — [what needs to be produced]
- [ ] [Task 3] — [what needs to be produced]Present the task list to the user:
"I see \[N] deliverables in this plan. Here's how I'd break them down. Want to adjust before I start?"
Task types in knowledge work:
| Deliverable | How to execute |
|---|---|
| Strategy doc / brief | Write it using the plan as structure |
| Email draft | Write it, check tone, present for review |
| Social copy | Write variations, check against style guides |
| Data analysis | Pull data, analyze, summarize findings |
| Presentation | Structure slides, write content |
| Research synthesis | Gather sources, extract insights, summarize |
| Meeting agenda | Structure topics, time-box, add context |
| Notion page / doc | Create and populate |
| Campaign assets | Create copy, briefs, timelines |
Step 3: Group tasks by dependency
Before executing, sort tasks into batches:
## Execution Plan
### Batch 1 (parallel) — no dependencies
- [ ] [Task A] — independent
- [ ] [Task B] — independent
### Batch 2 (parallel) — depends on Batch 1
- [ ] [Task C] — needs output from Task A
- [ ] [Task D] — independent of C, but needs Batch 1 context
### Batch 3 (sequential) — needs user direction
- [ ] [Task E] — depends on user feedback from earlier batchesGrouping rules:
- Tasks with no dependencies on each other go in the same batch
- Tasks that need another task's output go in a later batch
- Tasks that need user feedback before starting go in their own batch
Present the execution plan to the user:
"I've grouped these into \[N] batches. Batch 1 has \[N] independent tasks I can run in parallel. Want to adjust before I start?"
Step 4: Execute batch by batch
For each batch:
1. Announce the batch — "Starting Batch 1: \[task names]" 2. Launch independent tasks in parallel — Use Task agents for tasks that don't depend on each other. For single tasks or tasks requiring heavy interaction, execute inline. 3. Show all outputs — Present results from the batch together 4. Get feedback — "Good? Or adjust before I move to Batch 2?" 5. Mark complete — Move to next batch
When to parallelize within a batch:
| Situation | Approach |
|---|---|
| 2+ independent deliverables (e.g., 3 social posts, a brief + a data pull) | Launch as parallel Task agents |
| Single deliverable | Execute inline |
| Deliverable needs back-and-forth (e.g., iterating on tone) | Execute inline, don't delegate |
Execution principles:
- Use what's available. If there are MCP tools, APIs, or skills that can help, use them. Don't recreate what exists.
- Follow project conventions. Check CLAUDE.md for style guides, data sources, tool preferences.
- Show, don't describe. Produce the actual deliverable, not a description of what it would look like.
- Approve between batches, not between every task. Independent tasks don't need individual sign-off. Check in after each batch completes.
- Fall back to sequential if unsure. When in doubt about whether tasks are independent, run them one at a time. Wrong parallelism is worse than no parallelism.
Step 5: Handle blockers
If you can't complete a task:
- Missing information — Ask the user. Be specific about what you need.
- Missing access — Note it and move to the next task. Come back when unblocked.
- Scope creep — If a task is bigger than expected, flag it: "This is turning into its own project. Should I keep going or add it as a separate plan?"
- Quality concern — If the output doesn't feel right, say so. "I produced this but I'm not confident about \[X]. Want to review before I continue?"
Step 6: Track what happened
As you work, maintain a running log. After each batch completes, append the log to the plan file under a ## Execution Log section:
## Execution Log
### [timestamp] Batch 1: [batch name]
- [Task 1] ✅ — Produced: [what], Location: [path]
- [Task 2] ✅ — Produced: [what], Location: [path]
- Notes: [anything notable]
### [timestamp] Batch 2: [batch name]
- [Task 3] ✅ — Produced: [what], Location: [path]
- [Task 4] ⏳ Blocked — [blocker], Next step: [what needs to happen]<critical_requirement> Write the execution log to the plan file after each batch. Do not keep it only in conversation. This log feeds /kw:compound with concrete material to extract learnings from. </critical_requirement>
Step 7: Wrap up
When all tasks are complete (or blocked), summarize:
## Execution Summary
**Plan:** [plan name]
**Tasks completed:** [N] of [total]
**Deliverables produced:**
- [deliverable 1] — [location]
- [deliverable 2] — [location]
**Still open:**
- [blocked task] — [blocker]
**Discoveries:**
- [anything learned during execution worth noting]Step 8: Offer next steps
Use AskUserQuestion:
Question: "Execution complete. \[N] deliverables produced. What next?"
Options:
1. Run `/kw:review` — Quality check the outputs 2. Run `/kw:compound` — Save learnings from this session 3. Push to Proof — Share execution summary for review 4. Continue working — Pick up blocked tasks or add new ones 5. Ship it — Done, move on
Important Rules
- Produce, don't plan. This is execution mode. If you find yourself writing another plan, you're in the wrong workflow. Use
/kw:planfor that.
- Show your work. After each task, show the actual output. Don't say "I would create a doc that..." — create the doc.
- Respect scope. The plan defines what to do. If something isn't in the plan, ask before adding it. Scope creep is the enemy of finishing.
- Track everything. The work log is how you know what happened. It also feeds
/kw:compoundwith concrete results to learn from.
- Ask for feedback between batches. Knowledge work is subjective. Check in after each batch rather than producing everything and hoping it's right. Independent tasks within a batch don't need individual sign-off.
Pipeline Mode
When invoked with disable-model-invocation context (e.g., from an orchestrator or automation):
- Skip all AskUserQuestion prompts
- Use sensible defaults for all choices
- Write output files without waiting for confirmation
- Proceed to the next suggested skill automatically
- Output structured results that the calling context can parse