
Salesforce Component Standards
- 780 installs
- 37.1k repo stars
- Updated July 28, 2026
- github/awesome-copilot
salesforce-component-standards enforces LWC, Aura, and Visualforce quality across security, SLDS 2, accessibility, data access, and Jest testing.
About
Salesforce Component Quality Standards is a checker-oriented reference for Lightning Web Components, Aura components, and Visualforce pages across data access, security, styling, accessibility, communication, performance, and testing. Section 1 maps LWC patterns from @wire and lightning-record-form through LMS and GraphQL, plus XSS rules, SLDS 2 token usage, WCAG 2.1 AA checklists, and Jest minimum expectations with @salesforce/sfdx-lwc-jest mocks. Section 2 covers Aura versus LWC selection, with sharing and CRUD/FLS enforcement, and event scope rules including LMS for hybrid stacks. Section 3 documents Visualforce XSS prevention, CSRF via apex:form, SOQL bind variables, view state limits, and manual FLS checks in custom controllers. A quick anti-pattern table ties common mistakes to technology-specific fixes for faster review passes.
- LWC data access matrix: wire, record forms, imperative Apex, LMS, GraphQL.
- Security rules: no innerHTML user data, CRUD/FLS in AuraEnabled, no hardcoded IDs.
- SLDS 2 compliance: semantic tokens, lightning base components, dark mode testing.
- WCAG 2.1 AA checklist for labels, keyboard access, focus, and error association.
- Visualforce XSS, CSRF, SOQL injection, and view state management standards.
Salesforce Component Standards by the numbers
- 780 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +24 installs in the week ending Jul 22, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #442 of 2,277 Frontend Development skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
salesforce-component-standards capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- lwc data access pattern selection matrix · xss and fls security enforcement rules · slds 2 and dark mode styling standards · wcag 2.1 aa accessibility checklist · jest test minimum coverage expectations
- Use cases
- code review · frontend · security audit
What salesforce-component-standards says it does
Apply these checks to every LWC, Aura component, and Visualforce page you write or review.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill salesforce-component-standardsAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 780 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 37.1k |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | July 28, 2026 |
| Repository | github/awesome-copilot ↗ |
How do I build or review Salesforce UI components without XSS, FLS gaps, SLDS violations, or missing accessibility?
Enforce Salesforce LWC, Aura, and Visualforce security, accessibility, SLDS 2 styling, data access patterns, and Jest coverage when building or reviewing UI components.
Who is it for?
Salesforce developers writing or reviewing LWC, Aura, or Visualforce during feature work or code review.
Skip if: Skip for Apex-only backend work, Flow-only automation, or non-Salesforce React apps.
When should I use this skill?
User builds or reviews any Salesforce UI component and needs platform security and quality enforcement.
What you get
Platform-specific checklists and anti-pattern fixes for secure, accessible, testable Salesforce components.
- Standards-compliant Salesforce UI components
- Jest test coverage for LWC
By the numbers
- Covers 3 Salesforce UI types: LWC, Aura, and Visualforce
- Targets WCAG 2.1 AA and SLDS 2 compliance standards
Files
Salesforce Component Quality Standards
Apply these checks to every LWC, Aura component, and Visualforce page you write or review.
Section 1 — LWC Quality Standards
1.1 Data Access Pattern Selection
Choose the right data access pattern before writing JavaScript controller code:
| Use case | Pattern | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Read a single record reactively (follows navigation) | @wire(getRecord, { recordId, fields }) | Lightning Data Service — cached, reactive |
| Standard CRUD form for a single object | <lightning-record-form> or <lightning-record-edit-form> | Built-in FLS, CRUD, and accessibility |
| Complex server query or filtered list | @wire(apexMethodName, { param }) on a cacheable=true method | Allows caching; wire re-fires on param change |
| User-triggered action, DML, or non-cacheable server call | Imperative apexMethodName(params).then(...).catch(...) | Required for DML — wired methods cannot be @AuraEnabled without cacheable=true |
| Cross-component communication (no shared parent) | Lightning Message Service (LMS) | Decoupled, works across DOM boundaries |
| Multi-object graph relationships | GraphQL @wire(gql, { query, variables }) | Single round-trip for complex related data |
1.2 Security Rules
| Rule | Enforcement |
|---|---|
No raw user data in innerHTML | Use {expression} binding in the template — the framework auto-escapes. Never use this.template.querySelector('.el').innerHTML = userValue |
Apex @AuraEnabled methods enforce CRUD/FLS | Use WITH USER_MODE in SOQL or explicit Schema.sObjectType checks |
| No hardcoded org-specific IDs in component JavaScript | Query or pass as a prop — never embed record IDs in source |
@api properties from parent: validate before use | A parent can pass anything — validate type and range before using as a query parameter |
1.3 SLDS 2 and Styling Standards
- Never hardcode colours:
color: #FF3366→ usecolor: var(--slds-c-button-brand-color-background)or a semantic SLDS token. - Never override SLDS classes with
!important— compose with custom CSS properties. - Use
<lightning-*>base components wherever they exist:lightning-button,lightning-input,lightning-datatable,lightning-card, etc. - Base components include built-in SLDS 2, dark mode, and accessibility — avoid reimplementing their behaviour.
- If using custom CSS, test in both light mode and dark mode before declaring done.
1.4 Accessibility Requirements (WCAG 2.1 AA)
Every LWC component must pass all of these before it is considered done:
- [ ] All form inputs have
<label>oraria-label— never use placeholder as the only label - [ ] All icon-only buttons have
alternative-textoraria-labeldescribing the action - [ ] All interactive elements are reachable and operable by keyboard (Tab, Enter, Space, Escape)
- [ ] Colour is not the only means of conveying status — pair with text, icon, or
aria-*attributes - [ ] Error messages are associated with their input via
aria-describedby - [ ] Focus management is correct in modals — focus moves into the modal on open and back on close
1.5 Component Communication Rules
| Direction | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Parent → Child | @api property or calling a @api method |
| Child → Parent | CustomEvent — this.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('eventname', { detail: data })) |
| Sibling / unrelated components | Lightning Message Service (LMS) |
| Never use | document.querySelector, window.*, or Pub/Sub libraries |
For Flow screen components:
- Events that need to reach the Flow runtime must set
bubbles: trueandcomposed: true. - Expose
@api valuefor two-way binding with the Flow variable.
1.6 JavaScript Performance Rules
- No side effects in `connectedCallback`: it runs on every DOM attach — avoid DML, heavy computation, or rendering state mutations here.
- Guard `renderedCallback`: always use a boolean guard to prevent infinite render loops.
- Avoid reactive property traps: setting a reactive property inside
renderedCallbackcauses a re-render — use it only when necessary and guarded. - Do not store large datasets in component state — paginate or stream large results instead.
1.7 Jest Test Requirements
Every component that handles user interaction or retrieves Apex data must have a Jest test:
// Minimum test coverage expectations
it('renders the component with correct title', async () => { ... });
it('calls apex method and displays results', async () => { ... }); // Wire mock
it('dispatches event when button is clicked', async () => { ... });
it('shows error state when apex call fails', async () => { ... }); // Error pathUse @salesforce/sfdx-lwc-jest mocking utilities:
wireadapter mocking:setImmediate+emit({ data, error })- Apex method mocking:
jest.mock('@salesforce/apex/MyClass.myMethod', ...)
---
Section 2 — Aura Component Standards
2.1 When to Use Aura vs LWC
- New components: always LWC unless the target context is Aura-only (e.g. extending
force:appPage, using Aura-specific events in a legacy managed package). - Migrating Aura to LWC: prefer LWC, migrate component-by-component; LWC can be embedded inside Aura components.
2.2 Aura Security Rules
@AuraEnabledcontroller methods must declarewith sharingand enforce CRUD/FLS — Aura does not enforce them automatically.- Never use
{!v.something}with unescaped user data in<div>unbound helpers — use<ui:outputText value="{!v.text}" />or<c:something>to escape. - Validate all inputs from component attributes before using them in SOQL / Apex logic.
2.3 Aura Event Design
- Component events for parent-child communication — lowest scope.
- Application events only when component events cannot reach the target — they broadcast to the entire app and can be a performance and maintenance problem.
- For hybrid LWC + Aura stacks: use Lightning Message Service to decouple communication — do not rely on Aura application events reaching LWC components.
---
Section 3 — Visualforce Security Standards
3.1 XSS Prevention
<!-- ❌ NEVER — renders raw user input as HTML -->
<apex:outputText value="{!userInput}" escape="false" />
<!-- ✅ ALWAYS — auto-escaping on -->
<apex:outputText value="{!userInput}" />
<!-- Default escape="true" — platform HTML-encodes the output -->Rule: escape="false" is never acceptable for user-controlled data. If rich text must be rendered, sanitise server-side with a whitelist before output.
3.2 CSRF Protection
Use <apex:form> for all postback actions — the platform injects a CSRF token automatically into the form. Do not use raw <form method="POST"> HTML elements, which bypass CSRF protection.
3.3 SOQL Injection Prevention in Controllers
// ❌ NEVER
String soql = 'SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name = \'' + ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('name') + '\'';
List<Account> results = Database.query(soql);
// ✅ ALWAYS — bind variable
String nameParam = ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('name');
List<Account> results = [SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name = :nameParam];3.4 View State Management Checklist
- [ ] View state is under 135 KB (check in browser developer tools or the Salesforce View State tab)
- [ ] Fields used only for server-side calculations are declared
transient - [ ] Large collections are not persisted across postbacks unnecessarily
- [ ]
readonly="true"is set on<apex:page>for read-only pages to skip view-state serialisation
3.5 FLS / CRUD in Visualforce Controllers
// Before reading a field
if (!Schema.sObjectType.Account.fields.Revenue__c.isAccessible()) {
ApexPages.addMessage(new ApexPages.Message(ApexPages.Severity.ERROR, 'You do not have access to this field.'));
return null;
}
// Before performing DML
if (!Schema.sObjectType.Account.isDeletable()) {
throw new System.NoAccessException();
}Standard controllers enforce FLS for bound fields automatically. Custom controllers do not — FLS must be enforced manually.
---
Quick Reference — Component Anti-Patterns Summary
| Anti-pattern | Technology | Risk | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
innerHTML with user data | LWC | XSS | Use template bindings {expression} |
| Hardcoded hex colours | LWC/Aura | Dark-mode / SLDS 2 break | Use SLDS CSS custom properties |
Missing aria-label on icon buttons | LWC/Aura/VF | Accessibility failure | Add alternative-text or aria-label |
No guard in renderedCallback | LWC | Infinite rerender loop | Add hasRendered boolean guard |
| Application event for parent-child | Aura | Unnecessary broadcast scope | Use component event instead |
escape="false" on user data | Visualforce | XSS | Remove — use default escaping |
Raw <form> postback | Visualforce | CSRF vulnerability | Use <apex:form> |
No with sharing on custom controller | VF / Apex | Data exposure | Add with sharing declaration |
| FLS not checked in custom controller | VF / Apex | Privilege escalation | Add Schema.sObjectType checks |
| SOQL concatenated with URL param | VF / Apex | SOQL injection | Use bind variables |
Related skills
FAQ
New Aura or LWC?
New components should always be LWC unless the target context is Aura-only such as legacy managed packages.
How prevent LWC XSS?
Use template bindings for auto-escaping; never assign user data to innerHTML via querySelector.
Are Jest tests required?
Yes for components handling user interaction or Apex data, with wire mocks and error path coverage.
Is Salesforce Component Standards safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.