
Inngest Brownfield Audit
- 164 installs
- 27 repo stars
- Updated July 2, 2026
- inngest/inngest-skills
Audit an existing TypeScript or JavaScript codebase for durability gaps and produce an incremental plan to add Inngest.
About
Analyzes an existing TypeScript or JavaScript codebase to decide where and how to introduce Inngest, covering repository discovery and framework/package detection. A developer uses it when adding durable execution to code with polling loops, side-effect-heavy handlers, or long-running jobs.
- Detects durability gaps in HTTP handlers, webhooks, cron jobs, queues, and long-running jobs
- Produces an incremental plan to introduce Inngest into an existing TS/JS codebase
Inngest Brownfield Audit by the numbers
- 164 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +25 installs in the week ending Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #2,310 of 4,347 Backend & APIs skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/inngest/inngest-skills --skill inngest-brownfield-auditAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 164 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 27 |
| Last updated | July 2, 2026 |
| Repository | inngest/inngest-skills ↗ |
What it does
Audit an existing TypeScript or JavaScript codebase for durability gaps and produce an incremental plan to add Inngest.
Files
Inngest Brownfield Audit
Use this skill when asked to inspect an existing codebase, add Inngest "where it makes sense", migrate fragile background work, or find durability gaps before making changes.
This is an agent-first workflow. Do the audit from evidence in the repo, name the specific files and call sites that drove each conclusion, and make small integration moves that preserve current behavior.
When to Trigger
Use this skill for requests like:
- "Audit this repo for Inngest opportunities"
- "Add Inngest to this codebase"
- "Make our webhooks / cron jobs / background tasks reliable"
- "Find places where work can be lost on deploy or process crash"
- "Replace fragile polling, delayed jobs, or fire-and-forget promises"
- "Make this AI workflow / agent durable"
If the user is starting from scratch instead of a brownfield repo, use inngest-setup, inngest-durable-functions, inngest-events, inngest-steps, and, for AI workflows, the agent patterns in this skill.
Audit Loop
1. Map the project shape.
- Read
package.json, workspace files, app/router structure, server entry
points, deployment config, and test scripts.
- Identify framework: Next.js App Router, Next.js Pages Router, Express,
Hono, Fastify, Remix, SvelteKit, Astro, NestJS, worker-only service, or other.
- Detect package manager and TypeScript conventions before adding files.
2. Find existing Inngest usage.
- Search for
inngest,createFunction,serve(,/api/inngest,
INNGEST_, step.run, step.sleep, step.waitForEvent, step.sendEvent, step.invoke, step.ai, inngest.send, and @inngest/realtime.
- If Inngest exists, inspect version, client config, serve endpoint,
registered functions, event naming, env vars, and v3/v4 API shape before changing anything.
3. Find durability gaps.
- Search for fire-and-forget work:
void someAsync(), un-awaited promises,
.then( chains, setTimeout, setInterval, detached jobs after HTTP response, and background work in route handlers.
- Search for cron and schedulers:
cron,node-cron,agenda,bull,
bullmq, bee-queue, qstash, sqs, temporal, trigger.dev, deployment cron config, and scheduled API routes.
- Search for webhooks and at-least-once producers: Stripe, Clerk, GitHub,
Slack, Shopify, HubSpot, Linear, Svix, and generic webhook.
- Search for long-running work: PDF generation, exports, video/image
processing, embeddings, bulk email, imports, ETL, sync jobs, polling loops, retries, and external API calls.
- Search for AI agent shapes: tool loops, LLM calls, streaming tokens,
human approval, multi-step reasoning, vector search, eval loops, and provider calls that need rate limits or retry-safe state.
4. Classify each candidate.
- P0: user-visible loss, duplicate charge/email/action, timeout, missed
webhook, or crash-prone workflow.
- P1: fragile but recoverable background work, manual retry burden,
noisy 429s, or poor observability.
- P2: cleanup, ergonomics, or future migration opportunity.
- For each candidate, record: file, current trigger, side effects,
idempotency key, failure mode, recommended Inngest primitive, migration size, and confidence.
5. Choose the smallest safe integration.
- Prefer one vertical slice over a wide rewrite.
- Keep existing domain functions and data models where possible.
- Add an Inngest client and serve endpoint only once.
- Move side effects into
step.runone boundary at a time. - Make event IDs and database writes idempotent before adding retries.
- Add tests around existing behavior and the new event/function boundary.
Useful Discovery Commands
Run commands that fit the repo. Prefer rg; keep output focused.
rg -n "inngest|createFunction|step\\.|serve\\(|/api/inngest|INNGEST_" .
rg -n "setTimeout|setInterval|Promise\\.all|void [a-zA-Z0-9_]+\\(|\\.then\\(" .
rg -n "cron|node-cron|schedule|bull|bullmq|bee-queue|agenda|qstash|sqs" .
rg -n "webhook|stripe|svix|clerk|github|shopify|slack|hubspot|linear" .
rg -n "retry|backoff|poll|status|timeout|429|rate limit|rate-limit" .
rg -n "openai|anthropic|ai\\.|generateText|streamText|tool|agent|embedding" .When the repo is large, narrow searches to app source directories and exclude generated/vendor folders.
Brownfield Decision Matrix
| Existing shape | Inngest fit | Primary primitives |
|---|---|---|
| HTTP handler does slow side effects before responding | Emit event, return fast | inngest.send, event trigger, step.run |
| Webhook must acknowledge quickly but process reliably | Verify signature, emit idempotent event | Event ID, step.run, retries |
| Cron job loses progress midway | Cron-triggered durable function | Cron trigger, page-level step.run, flow control |
| Polling loop waits for external async work | Durable wait or durable poll | step.waitForEvent, step.sleep, step.run |
| Large fan-out exceeds request/serverless limits | Split orchestration and item work | step.sendEvent, per-item function, concurrency |
| External API hits 429s | Move limits to function config | throttle, rateLimit, concurrency |
| Human review can take days | Persist the wait in Inngest | step.waitForEvent, timeout, realtime |
| AI agent/tool loop needs retry-safe progress | One step per tool/model boundary | step.ai, step.run, step.sleep, realtime |
| Existing queue only hides fragile work | Replace queue boundary gradually | Event trigger, idempotency, function-level retries |
Integration Plan Format
Before editing, summarize findings in this compact shape:
Inngest audit:
- Existing Inngest: none / partial / healthy / risky
- Framework: <framework and evidence>
- Best first slice: <file + workflow>
- Why: <loss/timeout/retry/idempotency failure>
- Proposed primitives: <event, steps, flow control, waits, realtime>
- Idempotency key: <source of truth>
- Files likely touched: <short list>
- Tests/checks: <commands or focused cases>Then implement unless the user asked for audit-only.
Existing Inngest Checklist
If Inngest is already present, verify:
- A single shared client is exported from a stable module.
- The app
idis a stable slug and is not derived from deploy-specific data. - v4 local development uses
INNGEST_DEV=1; production uses
INNGEST_SIGNING_KEY.
- Serve endpoint path is discoverable, usually
/api/inngest. - The serve handler registers all functions that should sync.
- Side effects and non-deterministic work are inside steps.
- Step IDs are stable and descriptive.
- Event names follow
domain/noun.verb. - Events that may be replayed use deterministic IDs.
- Webhook handlers verify signatures before emitting events.
- Flow control is configured where external APIs have limits.
- Realtime uses v4 native
inngest/realtime, not the v3
@inngest/realtime package.
Durable Agent Patterns
Use Inngest when an AI or agent workflow needs durable progress across model calls, tool calls, waits, approvals, or streaming UI updates.
Good candidates:
- Multi-step agent that calls tools or external APIs.
- LLM workflow that may exceed one HTTP request lifetime.
- Human-in-the-loop review, approval, correction, or escalation.
- Agent that must pause for an external event or scheduled follow-up.
- Bulk AI work that needs provider-level rate limits and cost protection.
- User-visible agent progress that should stream from durable execution.
Recommended shape:
1. HTTP/UI request stores the user intent and emits an event with a stable id. 2. Inngest function loads state inside step.run. 3. Each model call, tool call, vector search, and external side effect lives in its own step.ai or step.run boundary. 4. Human pauses use step.waitForEvent or step.waitForSignal with a timeout. 5. Progress updates use step.realtime.publish between steps, or inngest.realtime.publish inside an existing step.run. 6. Provider rate limits use concurrency, throttle, or rateLimit, not ad hoc in-process throttlers.
Avoid:
- Keeping agent state only in memory.
- Retrying whole agent loops after a single tool failure.
- Charging for repeated successful model calls because the result was not
memoized.
- Using
setTimeoutor a cron poller for follow-ups and approvals. - Streaming progress from a process-local WebSocket server when the workflow
itself is durable elsewhere.
Implementation Guardrails
- Do not replace working queues, crons, or webhooks blindly. First preserve
behavior with a thin Inngest slice.
- Do not create duplicate clients or serve endpoints if the repo already has
them.
- Do not put database writes, API calls, random IDs, timestamps, or LLM calls
outside steps in the new function.
- Do not hide missing idempotency behind retries. Retries require idempotent
side effects.
- Do not hardcode secrets or dev-mode flags in source.
- Do not leave the app unable to sync: register new functions with the serve
endpoint and run available type/tests.
Verification
Pick checks that prove the integration path:
- Typecheck/build/lint the touched app.
- Run existing tests around the migrated handler or workflow.
- Add focused tests for "handler emits event and returns fast" and "function
calls the same domain operations in step boundaries" where the repo supports it.
- If local runtime is available, start the app and Inngest dev server, confirm
the function syncs, then send a sample event.
- If only static checks are available, explicitly state that runtime sync was
not verified.