
Multi Model Routing
Route each agent subtask to the cheapest model that still meets quality, latency, and failover needs instead of paying premium tokens on every call.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/itallstartedwithaidea/agent-skills --skill multi-model-routingWhat is this skill?
- Classifies subtasks (reasoning, function calling, long context, formatting) and maps them to primary, secondary, and ter
- Fails over when a provider is down instead of brittle single-vendor agent stacks
- Documents a production pattern (Buddy™ at googleadsagent.ai) with ~45% cost reduction vs all-Claude while holding qualit
- Balances cost constraints, latency requirements, and availability in one routing layer
- Treats cheaper models as first-class for summarization, extraction, and formatting workloads
Adoption & trust: 1 installs on skills.sh; 18 GitHub stars; 3/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits); trending (+100% hot-view momentum).
Recommended Skills
Journey fit
Multi-model routing is implemented as core agent infrastructure during product build—the layer that chooses providers per task before you ship production traffic. Fits agent-tooling because it defines dispatch rules, failover, and cost/latency policies across Claude, GPT, Gemini, and open models—not a single feature integration.
Common Questions / FAQ
Is Multi Model Routing safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Multi Model Routing
# Multi-Model Routing Part of [Agent Skills™](https://github.com/itallstartedwithaidea/agent-skills) by [googleadsagent.ai™](https://googleadsagent.ai) ## Description Multi-Model Routing is the intelligent dispatch of agent tasks to the optimal model provider based on task characteristics, cost constraints, latency requirements, and availability. Production AI systems that rely on a single model provider are fragile and expensive. Multi-Model Routing creates a resilient, cost-efficient agent architecture that leverages the strengths of Claude, GPT, Gemini, and open-source models, automatically selecting the best model for each task and failing over gracefully when a provider is unavailable. This skill documents the multi-model routing architecture powering the Buddy™ agent at [googleadsagent.ai™](https://googleadsagent.ai), which routes between Claude (primary — strongest reasoning), GPT-4o (secondary — strong function calling), and Gemini (tertiary — large context, low cost) based on task classification. The routing layer reduced costs by 45% compared to using Claude for all tasks while maintaining equivalent quality scores, because many subtasks (formatting, summarization, data extraction) perform identically on cheaper models. The routing decision incorporates four factors: model strengths (code reasoning, long context, structured output, creative writing), cost per token (varies 100x between model tiers), latency targets (real-time vs. batch), and availability (rate limits, outages, degraded performance). A circuit breaker pattern ensures that temporary provider issues don't cascade into user-facing failures. ## Use When - Monthly AI costs need reduction without sacrificing quality - You need resilience against single-provider outages or rate limits - Different subtasks have fundamentally different model requirements - Latency-sensitive and latency-tolerant tasks coexist in the same system - You want to evaluate new models without fully committing to them - Compliance requires not being locked into a single AI vendor ## How It Works ```mermaid graph TD A[Incoming Task] --> B[Task Classifier] B --> C{Task Type} C -->|Code Reasoning| D[Claude Sonnet/Opus] C -->|Structured Extraction| E[GPT-4o / Claude Haiku] C -->|Long Context| F[Gemini Pro] C -->|Simple Format| G[Claude Haiku / GPT-4o-mini] D --> H{Provider Available?} E --> H F --> H G --> H H -->|Yes| I[Execute] H -->|No| J[Fallback Chain] J --> K[Next Provider] K --> H I --> L[Result + Metrics] L --> M[Router Learning] M --> B ``` The routing pipeline classifies each incoming task by type (code reasoning, structured extraction, long context processing, simple formatting), then maps to the optimal model provider. Before dispatch, a circuit breaker checks provider availability — if a provider has failed recently, the task is immediately routed to the fallback chain. After execution, the result quality and performance metrics feed back into the router, allowing it to refine its model-task mapping over time. ## Implementation **Model Provider Registry:** ```typescript interface ModelProvider { id: string; name: string; models: ModelConfig[]; circuitBreaker: CircuitBreakerState; } interface ModelConfig { id: string; strengths: string[]; costPer1kInput: number; costPer1kOutput: number; maxContextTokens: number; avgLatencyMs: number; } const PROVIDERS: ModelProvider[] = [ { id: "anthropic", name: "Anthropic", models: [ { id: "claude-opus", strengths: ["reasoning", "code", "analysis"], costPer1kInput: 0.015, costPer1kOutput: 0.075, maxContextTokens: 200000, avgLatencyMs: 3000 }, { id: "claude-sonnet", stren